Urban Ecosystems

, 10:285 | Cite as

The influence of urbanization on forest stand dynamics in Northwestern Oregon

Article

Abstract

Urbanization has been shown to affect forest stand characteristics in nearby natural areas. The purpose of this study was to examine forest structure in a naturally forested area, Forest Park in Portland, OR and adjacent forested land. Tree community structure was examined at 25 sites distributed along an urban-rural land use gradient. All trees in three quadrats per site were identified to species and the diameter at breast height was measured. ANOVA was used to examine differences in species richness and diversity, and tree density and importance value among four categorical areas. Tree species richness and diversity, and the density, diameter and importance values of shade-tolerant (later successional) species of trees decreased with urbanization. Sites nearer the city of Portland had significantly fewer shade tolerant saplings and young trees and were dominated by earlier successional species of trees as compared with sites at the far end of the study area. The forest structure in the city section of the park was very similar to that in the significantly younger middle section. The lack of young shade tolerant saplings and young trees appears to be the result of urbanization, although the mechanisms for such a loss are unknown at this time. Such a lack of recruitment may interfere with normal successional processes at more urban areas of the park.

Keywords

Forest Urbanization Urban-rural gradient Forest stand structure Succession Regeneration Recruitment Oregon 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank Jack Keyes, Ken Kebisek, Barbara Van Ness, and Robert Tinnin for helpful comments and reviews that improved the document. I also wish to thank Peggy Sedlak for help in the field. This project was funded in part by Portland Parks and Recreation and Portland State University.

References

  1. Agee J (1991) Fire history of Douglas-fir forests in the Pacific Northwest. pp 25–33. In: Ruggiero LF, Aubry KB, Carey AB, Huff MH (eds) Wildlife and vegetation of unmanaged Douglas-fir forests. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report PNW-GTR-285, May 1981, p 533Google Scholar
  2. Airola T, Buchholz K (1984). Species structure and soil characteristics of five urban forest sites along the New Jersey Palisades. Urban Ecol 8:149–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey LH, Bailey EZ (1976) Hortus Third: a concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. MacMillan, New York, p 1290 (original compilers, revised and expanded by the Staff of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Herbarium.)Google Scholar
  4. Blair R (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6:506–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broshot N (1999) The effects of urbanization and human disturbance upon plant community structure and bird species richness, diversity, and abundance in a natural forested area (Forest Park) in Portland, Oregon. Doctoral dissertation. Portland State University, Portland, OR, p 244Google Scholar
  6. Brower JE, Zar JH, von Ende CN (1989) Field and laboratory methods for general ecology, 3rd edn. W.C. Brown, Dubuque, IA, p 237Google Scholar
  7. Cole DN, Landres PB (1996) Threats to wilderness ecosystems: impacts and research needs. Ecol Appl 6:168–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeVoto B (ed) (1953) The journals of Lewis and Clark. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, p 504Google Scholar
  9. Fahey TJ (1998) Recent changes in an upland forest in South-Central New York. J Torrey Bot Soc 125:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franklin J, Dyrness CT (1988) Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR, p 452Google Scholar
  11. Franklin J, Spies T (1991) Composition, function, and structure of old-growth Douglas-fir forests. In: Ruggiero LF, Aubry KB, Carey AB, Huff MH (eds) USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-285, p 71–80 MayGoogle Scholar
  12. Green G (1983) Soil survey of Multnomah County, Oregon. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service. p 225Google Scholar
  13. Greller AM (1975) Persisting natural vegetation in Northern Queens County, New York, with proposals for its conservation. Environ Conserv 2:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hitchcock CL, Conquist A (1974) Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Wa, p 730Google Scholar
  15. Houle M (1996) One city’s wilderness: Portland’s forest park. The Oregon Historical Society, Portland, OR, p 151Google Scholar
  16. Hobbs E (1988) Using ordination to analyze the composition and structure of urban forest islands. For Ecol Manag 23:139–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iakovoglou V, Thompson J, Burras L, Kepper R (2001) Factors related to tree growth across urban-rural gradients in the Midwest, USA. Urban Ecosyst 5:71–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson R, Wichern D (1982) Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ, p 594Google Scholar
  19. Komuro T, Koike F (2005) Colonization by woodly plants in fragmented habitats of a suburban landscape. Ecol Appl 15:662–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kowarik I (1990) Some responses of flora and vegetation to urbanization in Central Europe. pp 45–74. In: H. Sukopp, Hejny S (eds). Urban ecology. Plants and plant communities in urban environments. SPB Academic Publ The Hague, The Netherlands, p 282Google Scholar
  21. Leak W, Smith M (1996) Sixty years of management and disturbance in a New England forested landscape. For Ecol Manag 81:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lehvävirta S, Hannu R (2002). Natural regeneration of trees in urban woodlands. J Veg Sci 13:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matlack G (1993) Sociological edge effects: spatial distribution of human impact in suburban forest fragments. Environ Manage 17:829–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McBride J, Jacobs D (1986) Presettlement forest structure as a factor in urban forest development. Urban Ecol 9:245–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McDonnell M, Pickett STA, Pouyat R (1993) The application of the ecological gradient paradigm to the study of urban effects. Chap 15, pp 175–189. In: McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA (eds) Humans as components of ecosystems: The ecology of subtle human effects and populated areas. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Munger T (1960) History of Portland’s Forest-Park. Forest-Park Committee of Fifty, Portland, OR, Feb. 4, p 36Google Scholar
  27. Porter EE, Forschner BR, Blair RB (2001) Woody vegetation and canopy fragmentation along a forest-to-urban gradient. Urban Ecosyst 5:131–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pysèk P, Pysèk A (1990) Comparison of the vegetation and flora of the West Bohemia villages and towns. In: Sukopp H, Hejny S (ed) Urban ecology. Plants and plant communities in urban environments. SPB Academic Publ. The Hague, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  29. Quigley MF (2002) Franklin Park: 150 years of changing design, disturbance and impact on tree growth. Urban Ecosyst 6:223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rudnicky J, McDonnell M (1989) Forty-eight years of canopy change in a hardwood-hemlock forest in New York City. Bull Torrey Bot Club 116:52–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. SAS Institute, Inc. 1998. Statview 6.0Google Scholar
  32. Sharpe D, Stearns F, Leitner L, Dorney J (1986) Fate of natural vegetation during urban development of rural landscapes in southeastern Wisconsin. Urban Ecol 9:267–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, p 776Google Scholar
  34. Spies TA (1991) Plant species diversity and occurrence in young, mature, and old-growth Douglas-fir stands in western Oregon and Washington. pp 111–121. In: Ruggiero LF, Aubry KB, Carey AB, Huff MH (eds) Wildlife and vegetation of unmanaged Douglas-fir forests. USDA, Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-285. MayGoogle Scholar
  35. Spies T, Franklin JF (1991) The structure of natural young, mature, and old-growth Douglas-fir forests in Oregon and Washington. pp 91–109. In: Ruggiero LF, Aubry KB, Carey AB, Huff MH (eds) Wildlife and vegetation of unmanaged douglas-fir forests. USDA, Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-285. MayGoogle Scholar
  36. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (1996) Using multivariate statistics. Harper Collins, New York, p 880Google Scholar
  37. Tait CJ, Daniels CB, Hill RS (2005). Changes in species assemblages within the Adelaide metropolitan area, Australia, 1836–2002. Ecol Appl 15:346–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. White PS, Pickett STA (1985) Natural disturbance and patch dynamics: an introduction. In: Pickett STA, White PS (ed) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic, Orlando, FL, pp 279–338Google Scholar
  39. Zipperer WC (2002) Species composition and structure of regenerated and remnant forest patches within an urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst 6:271–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Linfield CollegePortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations