Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 203–219

Assessing the effects of land use and land cover patterns on thermal conditions using landscape metrics in city of Indianapolis, United States

Article

Abstract

Direct applications of remote sensing thermal infrared (TIR) data in landscape ecological research are rare due to limitations in the sensors, calibration, and difficulty in interpretation. Currently there is a general lack of methodology for examining the relationship between land surface temperatures (LST) derived from TIR data and landscape patterns extracted from optical sensors. A separation of landscapes into values directly related to their scale and signature is a key step. In this study, a Landsat ETM+ image of Indianapolis, Unites States, acquired on June 22, 2000, was spectrally unmixed (using spectral mixture analysis, SMA) into fraction endmembers of green vegetation, soil, high albedo, and low albedo. Impervious surface was then computed from the high and low albedo images. A hybrid classification procedure was developed to classify the fraction images into seven land use and land cover (LULC) classes. Using the fractional images, the landscape composition and pattern were examined. Next, pixel-based LST measurements were correlated with the landscape fractional components to investigate LULC based relationships between LST and impervious surface and green vegetation fractions. An examination of the relationship between the LULC and LST maps with landscape metrics was finally conducted to deepen understanding of their interactions. Results indicate that SMA-derived fraction images were effective for quantifying the urban morphology and for providing reliable measurements of biophysical variables. LST was found to be positively correlated with impervious surface fraction but negatively correlated with green vegetation fraction. Each temperature zone was associated with a dominant LULC category. Further research should be directed to the theoretical and applied implications of describing such relationships between LULC patterns and urban thermal conditions.

Keywords

Land surface temperature Land use and land cover Spectral mixture analysis Landscape metrics Urban ecology 

References

  1. Adams JB, Sabol DE, Kapos V, Filho RA, Roberts DA, Smith MO, Gillespie AR (1995) Classification of multispectral images based on fractions of endmembers: application to land cover change in the Brazilian Amazon. Remote Sens Environ 52:137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberti M, Marzluff J (2004) Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: linking urban patterns to ecological and human function. Urban Ecosyst 7(3):241–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Byrne GF (1979) Remotely sensed land cover temperature and soil water status - a brief review. Remote Sens Environ 8:291–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlson TN, Gillies RR, Perry EM (1994) A method to make use of thermal infrared temperature and NDVI measurements to infer surface soil water content and fractional vegetation cover. Remote Sens Rev 9:161–173Google Scholar
  5. Clapham WB Jr (2003) Continuum-based classification of remotely sensed imagery to describe urban sprawl on a watershed scale. Remote Sens Environ 86:322–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conway TG (1997) Improved remote heat sensing. Mech Eng 119(5):88–89Google Scholar
  7. Frohn RC (1998) Remote sensing for landscape ecology. Lewis, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  8. Gallo KP, Owen TW (1998) Assessment of urban heat island: a multi-sensor perspective for the Dallas-Ft. Worth, USA region. Geocarto Int 13:35–41Google Scholar
  9. Gillies RR, Carlson TN (1995) Thermal remote sensing of surface soil water content with partial vegetation cover for incorporation into climate models. J Appl Meteorol 34:745–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gillies RR, Carlson TN, Cui J, Kustas WP, Humes KS (1997) A verification of the ‘triangle’ method for obtaining surface soil water content and energy fluxes from remote measurements of the Normalized Difference Vegetation index (NDVI) and surface radiant temperature. Int J Remote Sens 18:3145–3166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goward SN (1981) Thermal behavior or urban landscapes and the urban heat island. Phys Geogr 1(2):19–33Google Scholar
  12. Goward SN, Xue Y, Czajkowski KP (2002) Evaluating land surface moisture conditions from the remotely sensed temperature/vegetation index measurements: an exploration with the simplified simple biosphere model. Remote Sens Environ 79:225–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gustafson EJ (1998) Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1:143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hunsaker CT, O’Neill RV, Jackson BL, Timmins SP, Levine DA, Norton DJ (1994) Sampling to characterize landscape pattern. Landsc Ecol 9(3):207–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jenks M, Burton E, Williams K (eds) (1996) The compact city: a sustainable urban form?, pp 13–35. E & FN Spon, and imprint of Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Lo CP, Quattrochi DA, Luvall JC (1997) Application of high-resolution thermal infrared remote sensing and GIS to assess the urban heat island effect. Int J Remote Sens 18:287–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lu D, Weng Q (2004) Spectral mixture analysis of the urban landscapes in Indianapolis with Landsat ETM+ imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 70(9):1053–1062Google Scholar
  18. Lu D, Weng Q (2006) Use of impervious surface in urban land use classification. Remote Sens Environ 102(1–2):146–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lynch K (1981) Good City form. MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  20. Machlis GE, Force JE, Burch WR Jr (1997) The human ecosystem part I: the human ecosystem as an organizing concept in ecosystem management. Soc Nat Resour 10:347–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Madhavan BB, Kubo S, Kurisaki N, Sivakumar TVLN (2001) Appraising the anatomy and spatial growth of the Bangkok Metropolitan area using a vegetation-impervious-soil model through remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens 22:789–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  23. McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program For Categorical Maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. URL: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html (Last date accessed: 10 May 2005)
  24. Nichol JE (1994) A GIS-based approach to microclimate monitoring in Singapore’s high-rise housing estates. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 60:1225–1232.Google Scholar
  25. Nichol JE (1996) High-resolution surface temperature patterns related to urban morphology in a tropical city: a satellite-based study. J Appl Meteorol 35:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oke TR (1982) The energetic basis of the urban heat island. Q J R Meteorol Soc 108:1–24Google Scholar
  27. O’Neill RV, Krummel JR, Gardner RH, Sugihara G, Jackson B, DeAngelis DL, Milne BT, Turner MG, Zygmunt B, Christensen SW, Dale VH, Graham RL (1988) Indices of landscape pattern. Landsc Ecol 1:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Owen TW, Carlson TN, Gillies RR (1998) An assessment of satellite remotely-sensed land cover parameters in quantitatively describing the climatic effect of urbanization. Int J Remote Sens 19:1663–1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Phinn S, Stanford M, Scarth P, Murray AT, Shyy PT (2002) Monitoring the composition of urban environments based on the Vegetation-Impervious Surface-Soil (VIS) model by subpixel analysis techniques. Int J Remote Sens 23:4131–4153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pickett STA, Burch WR Jr, Dalton SE, Foresman TW, Grove JM, Rowntree RA (1997) A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosyst 1:185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Quattrochi DA, Luvall JC (1999) Thermal infrared remote sensing for analysis of landscape ecological process: methods and applications. Landsc Ecol 14:577–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rashed T, Weeks JR, Gadalla MS, Hill AG (2001) Revealing the anatomy of cities through spectral mixture analysis of multisepctral satellite imagery: a case study of the Greater Cairo region, Egypt. Geocarto Int 16:5–15Google Scholar
  33. Ridd MK (1995) Exploring a V-I-S (Vegetation-Impervious Surface-Soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: comparative anatomy for cities. Int J Remote Sens 16:2165–2185Google Scholar
  34. Riitters KH, O’Neill RV, Hunsaker CT, Wickhan JD, Yankee DH, Timmins SP, Jones KB, Jackson BL (1995) A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landsc Ecol 10:23–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roberts DA, Batista GT, Pereira JLG, Waller EK, Nelson BW (1998) Change identification using multitemporal spectral mixture analysis: applications in eastern Amazônia. In: Lunetta RS, Elvidge CD (eds) Remote sensing change detection: Environmental monitoring methods and applications. Ann Arbor Press, Ann Arbor, MI, pp 137–161Google Scholar
  36. Roth M, Oke TR, Emery WJ (1989) Satellite derived urban heat islands from three coastal cities and the utilisation of such data in urban climatology. Int J Remote Sens 10:1699–1720Google Scholar
  37. Saunders D, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmid HP (1988) Spatial scales of sensible heat flux variability: representativeness of flux measurements and surface layer structure over suburban terrain. Ph.D. Thesis, The Univesity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BCGoogle Scholar
  39. Small C (2001) Estimation of urban vegetation abundance by spectral mixture analysis. Int J Remote Sens 22:1305–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith RM (1986) Comparing traditional methods for selecting class intervals on choropleth maps. Prof Geogr 38(1):62–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Soil Conservation Service (1975) Urban hydrology for small watersheds, USDA Soil Conservation Service Technical Release No. 55. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  42. Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 20:171–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Turner MG (1990) Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns. Landsc Ecol 4:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Voogt JA, Oke TR (1998) Effects of urban surface geometry on remotely-sensed surface temperature. Int J Remote Sens 19:895–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Voogt JA, Oke TR (2003) Thermal remote sensing of urban climate. Remote Sens Environ 86:370–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang YQ, Zhang X, Liu H, Harari-Kremer R (1999) Landscape characterization of metropolitan Chicago region by Landsat TM. In: Proceedings of American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, pp 238–247Google Scholar
  47. Ward D, Phinn SR, Murray AL (2000) Monitoring growth in rapidly urbanizing areas using remotely sensed data. Prof Geogr 53:371–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weng Q (2001) A remote sensing-GIS evaluation of urban expansion and its impact on surface temperature in the Zhujiang Delta, China. Int J Remote Sens 22:1999–2014Google Scholar
  49. Weng Q, Lu D, Schubring J (2004) Estimation of land surface temperature–vegetation abundance relationship for urban heat island studies. Remote Sens Environ 89(4):467–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilson JS, Clay M, Martin E, Stuckey D, Vedder-Risch K (2003) Evaluating environmental influences of zoning in urban ecosystems with remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 86:303–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu C, Murray AT (2003) Estimating impervious surface distribution by spectral mixture analysis. Remote Sens Environ 84:493–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wu J, Jelinski DE, Luck M, Tueller PT (2000) Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: scale variance and pattern metrics. Geogr Inf Sci 6(1):6–19Google Scholar
  53. Yang S, Zhang M, Zeng R (1984) The urban heat island effect of Guangzhou. Journal of South China Normal University 1984(2):35–45, (In Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography, Geology, and AnthropologyIndiana State UniversityTerre HauteUSA
  2. 2.School of Forestry and Wildlife SciencesAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations