Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 119–137 | Cite as

Case study for evaluating campus sustainability: nitrogen balance for the University of Minnesota

Article

Abstract

American ecologists recently began to address the ecology of cities. Concurrently, higher education institutions have developed sustainability education programs and instituted sustainability policies and projects. This paper draws together these two disparate areas by examining the nitrogen (N) budget of the Twin Cities campus of the University of Minnesota. We addressed the question: what were the annual inputs, outputs and internal cycles of N on the University of Minnesota Twin Cities campus? We found that 508 Mg N yr-1 were brought into the campus and 494 Mg N yr-1 were emitted from the University of Minnesota campus. The largest N inputs were abiotic fixation (conversion of N2 to NOx by combustion) and food for humans and animals. The largest N output was NOx, followed by wastewater. Our results expand the understanding of the ecology of institutions within an urban area and provide an opportunity for improving urban ecology education and environmental policy at educational institutions.

Keywords

Urban ecology Campus ecology Nitrogen budget Campus sustainability 

References

  1. Baker L, Hope D, Xu Y, Edmonds J, Lauver L (2001) Nitrogen balance for the Central Arizona–Phoenix (CAP) ecosystem. Ecosystems 4:582–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borrud L, Wilkingson E, Mickle S (1996) What we eat in America: USDA surveys food consumption changes. Food Rev:14–19, Sept–DecGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd S, Millar S, Newcombe K, O’Neil B (1981) The ecology of a city and its people: the case of Hong Kong. Australia National Press, Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  4. Brezonik PL, Stadelmann TH (2002) Analysis and predictive models of stormwater runoff volumes, loads and pollutant concentrations from watersheds in the Twin Cities metropolitan area, Minnesota, USA. Water Res 6:1743–1757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campus Sustainability Assessment Project (2005) Campus sustainability assessment project database, Campus Sustainability Assessment Project. http://www.csap.envs.wmich.edu/pages/res_csa.html
  6. Clugston RM, Calder W (1999) Critical dimensions of sustainability in higher education. In: Filho W (ed) Sustainability and university life. Peter Land Scientific Publishers, New York, pp 31–46Google Scholar
  7. Collins JP, Kinzig A, Grimm NB, Fagan WF, Hope D, Wu J, Borer E (2000) A new urban ecology. Am Sci 88:416–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Creighton SH (1998) Greening the Ivory Tower: improving the environmental track record of universities, colleges and other institutions. MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunha TJ (1982) Animals as a food source for man. Feedstuffs 54:18Google Scholar
  10. Decker E, Elliott HS, Smith RA, Blake DR, Rowland FS (2000) Energy and material flow through the urban ecosystem. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25:685–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ensminger M (1992) The Stockman’s handbook. Interstate, Danville, ILGoogle Scholar
  12. Faerge J, Magid J, Penning de Vries FWT (2001) Urban nutrient balance for Bangkok. Ecol Model 139:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galloway JN, Howarth RW, Michaels AF, Nixon SW, Prospero JM, Dentener FJ (1996) Nitrogen and phosphorus budgets of the North Atlantic ocean and its watersheds. Biogeochemistry 35:3–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grimm NB, Grove JM, Pickett STA, Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50:571–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grove JM, Burch Jr WR (1997) A social ecology approach and applications of urban ecosystem and landscape analysis: a case study of Baltimore, Maryland. Urban Ecosyst 1:259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hammond AC (1991) Protein conversion ratio. In: Putnam PA (ed) Animal Science. Academic, San Diego, pp 271–277Google Scholar
  17. Keniry J (1995) Ecodemia: campus environmental stewardship at the turn of the 21st century. National Wildlife Federation, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Minnesota Agricultural Statistics Service (2003) Dairy: milk cows, production per cow and total production county estimates, http://www.NASS.usda.gov/MN
  19. Minnesota Department of Agriculture (1993) Useful nutrient management data in farm nutrient management for Minnesota: a training session. Minnesota Department of Agriculture, St. Paul, MNGoogle Scholar
  20. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (1999) Criteria air pollutant emissions in Minnesota. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency http://www.pca.state.mn.us/air/criteria-emissioninventory.html
  21. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (2001) Air quality in Minnesota report: appendix A. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency http://www.pca.state.mn.us/hot/legislature/reports/2001/at-appendix-i.pdf
  22. National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NRSP-3)/National Trends Network (2003) National program office, Illinois state water survey. 2204 Griffith Drive, Champaign, IL 61820Google Scholar
  23. National Wildlife Federation (1998) Green investment, green return: how practical conservation projects save millions on America’s campuses. National Wildlife Federation’s Campus Ecology Program, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Orr D (1994) Earth in mind: on education, environment, and the human prospect. Island, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Paulin K (1999) Greening campus: an environmental audit of the University of Minnesota. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group reportGoogle Scholar
  26. Roos JHJ, Bleijenberg AN, Dijstra WJ (1997) Energy and emission profiles of aircraft and other modes of passenger transport over European distances. Commissioned by the Directorate-General, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  27. Rumsey TS (1984) Monensin in cattle: introduction. J Anim Sci 58:1461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Savanick S (2004) Campus ecology: bridging the gap between campus sustainability efforts and urban ecology. Doctoral dissertation, University of MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  29. Savanick S (2006) Using the campus nitrogen budget to teach about the nitrogen cycle. J Geosci Educ 54:312–319Google Scholar
  30. Schlesinger WH (1992) A global budget for atmospheric NH3. Biogeochemistry 15:191–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1995) Nontampered exhaust emission rates for low altitude heavy duty diesel powered vehiclesGoogle Scholar
  32. University of Minnesota (1998) University of Minnesota recycling program facts. www1.umn.edu/recycle/fact.html
  33. University of Minnesota (2002) Sustainable efforts: a guide to sustainable efforts and initiatives on the Twin Cities campus, Regents of the University of Minnesota, http://www.csbr.edu/umn_sustainability
  34. van Weenen H (2000) Towards the vision of a sustainable university. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 1:20–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zipperer WC, Wu J, Pouyat RV, Pickett STA (2000) The application of ecological principles to urban and urbanizing landscapes. Ecol Appl 10:685–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation BiologyUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  2. 2.Water Resources CenterUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  3. 3.Science Education Resource CenterCarleton CollegeNorthfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations