Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 139–159 | Cite as

Habitat origins and microhabitat preferences of urban plant species

  • J. T. LundholmEmail author
  • A. Marlin


Urban vegetation is commonly described as dominated by weedy species that are adapted to human disturbance. In this study, we determined the original (pre-agriculture) habitats of urban plant species sampled quantitatively in the spontaneous vegetation of a university campus in Halifax, Nova Scotia (eastern Canada). We sampled 11 distinct patch types corresponding to different built forms. Differences in vegetation among patch types were related in part to environmental variables such as soil moisture and light availability. The urban vegetation was dominated by species from rocky habitats such as cliffs and talus slopes, with lesser representation from grassland and floodplain habitats. When compared to a null model of species origins based on the global area and species richness of different original habitats, species from rock outcrops and grassland habitats were overrepresented in the urban vegetation. These results contrast with the received view that cities represented highly “unnatural” ecosystems: built form appears to replicate the habitat templates required by rock outcrop species. Urban ecological theory should incorporate the replication of habitat analogs by built forms in addition to the creation of ecologically novel habitats.


Habitat template Urban vegetation Original habitats Species pool Non-native species 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alberti M, Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E, Bradley G, Ryan C, Zumbrunnen C (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. BioScience 53:1169–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson DR, Link WA, Johnson DH, Burnham KP (2001) Suggestions for presenting the results of data analyses. Journal of Wildlife Management 65:373–378Google Scholar
  3. Bennet SJ (1998) The ecogeography and collection of grain, forage, and pasture legumes in south-west Turkey. Genetic Resources & Crop Evolution 45:253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bishop GF, Davy AJ (1994) Hieracium pilosella L. Pilosella officinarum F. Schultz & Schultz-Bip., Journal of Ecology 82:195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brodo IM, Sharnoff SD, Sharnoff S (2001) Lichens of North America. Yale University Press, New Haven, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke KR, Green RH (1988) Statistical design and analysis for a ‘biological effects’ study. Marine Ecology Progress Series 46:213–226Google Scholar
  7. Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2001) PRIMER v5:User Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltd., Plymouth, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in Marine Communities: an Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. 2nd Edition. PRIMER-E Ltd. Plymouth, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornelius R, Faensen-Thiebes. (1990) The strategies of Solidago canadensis L. in relation to urban habitats II. Competitive ability. Acta Oecologica 11:145–153Google Scholar
  10. Critchley CNR (2000) Ecological assessment of plant communities by reference to species traits and habitat preferences. Biodiversity & Conservation 9:87–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crowe TM (1979) Lots of weeds: insular phytogeography of vacant urban lots. Journal of Biogeography 6:169–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Desmet P, Cowling R (2004) Using the species-area relationship to set baseline targets for conservation. Ecology and Society 9(2):11 [online] URL: Google Scholar
  13. Dow K (2000) Social dimensions of gradients in urban ecosystems. Urban Ecosystems 4:255–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Falk JH (1979) Energetics of a suburban lawn ecosystem. Ecology 57:141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freedman B, Love S, O'Neil B (1996) Tree species composition, structure, and carbon storage in stands of urban forest of varying character in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Canadian Field-Naturalist 110:675–682Google Scholar
  16. Freedman B (2004) Environmental Science: A Canadian Perspective. Pearson Education Canada Inc., Toronto, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaston KJ, Warren PH, Thompson K, Smith RM (2005) Urban domestic gardens (IV): the extent of the resource and its associated features. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:3327–3349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilbert OL (1989) The Ecology of Urban Habitats. Chapman & Hall, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  19. Gleason HA, Cronquist A (1991) Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. The New York Botanical Garden, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Grimm NB, Grove JM, Pickett ST, Redman CL (2000). Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. BioScience 50:571–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grubb PJ (1976) A theoretical background to the conservation of ecologically distinct groups of annuals and biennials in the chalk grassland ecosystem. Biological Conservation 10:53–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hartnett DC (1996) Effects of bison grazing, fire, and topography on floristic diversity in tall grass prairie. Journal of Range Management 49:413–420Google Scholar
  23. Hill MO (2002) Hemeroby, urbanity and ruderality: bioindicators of disturbance and human impact. Journal of Applied Ecology 39:708–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hope D, Gries C, Zhu W, Fagan WF, Redman CL, Grimm NB, Nelson AL, Martin C, Kinzig A (2003) Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 100:8788–8792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hough M (1984) City Form and Natural Process, Routledge, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. Ireland R (1982) Moss Flora of the Maritime Provinces. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  27. Kabucis I, Rūsicņa S, Veen P (2003) Grasslands of Latvia: Status and Conservation of Semi-Natural Grasslands, European Grasslands Report No 6, Royal Dutch Society for Nature Conservation and Latvian Fund for NatureGoogle Scholar
  28. Kier G, Mutke J, Dinerstein E, Ricketts TH, Küper, Kreft H, Barthlott W (2005) Global patterns of plant diversity and floristic knowledge. Journal of Biogeography 32:1107–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kowarik I (1990) Some responses of flora and vegetation to urbanization in central Europe. In: Sukopp H, Hejny S, Kowarik I (eds) Urban Ecology. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp. 45–74Google Scholar
  30. Kraus J, Klein A, Stefan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2004) Effects of habitat area, isolation, and landscape diversity on plant species richness of calcareous grasslands. Biodiversity & Conservation 13:1427–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kruskal JB, Wish M (1978) Multidimensional Scaling. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  32. Kunick W (1982). Comparison of the flora of some cities of the central European lowlands. In: Bornkamm R, Lee JA, Seaward MRD (eds) Urban Ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK, pp. 13–22Google Scholar
  33. Larson DW, Matthes U, Kelly PE (2000) Cliff Ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Larson DW, Matthes U, Kelly PE, Lundholm JT, Gerrath JA (2004) The Urban Cliff Revolution: New Findings on the Origins and Evolution of Human Habitats. Fitzhenry & Whiteside, Markham, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  35. Lundholm JT (2005) A habitat template approach to green building surfaces. conference proceedings: Green Roofs for Healthy Cities, Toronto, Canada. pp. 14Google Scholar
  36. Marks PL (1983) On the origin of the field plants of the northeastern United States. The American Naturalist 122:210–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marlin A (2005) Microhabitat differentiation in urban plant communities. unpublished honours thesis, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, NS, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  38. May R (2004). Editorial—On the role of the humanities in urban ecology: the case of St. Petersburg. Urban Ecosystems 7:7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA, Groffman P, Bohlen P, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Parmelee RW, Carreiro MM, Medley K (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1:21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mintenko AS (2002) Turfgrass evaluation of native grasses for the northern Great Plains region. Crop Science 42:2018–2024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mitlacher K, Poschlod P, Rosen E, Bakker JP (2002). Restoration of wooded meadows—a comparative analysis along a chronosequence on Oland (Sweden). Applied Vegetation Science 5:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mosseler A, Lynds JA, Major JE (2003) Old-growth forests of the Acadian Forest Region. Environmental Reviews 11:S47–S77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Muller S (1999) Plant communities and conservation of Botrychium-rich grasslands in the Bitcherland (Northern Vosges Biosphere Reserve, France) Biodiversity & Conservation 8:1519–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peev D (1999) Plant Biodiversity in Rila National Park: Species and Coenotic Levels, Bulgaria GEF Biodiversity ProjectGoogle Scholar
  46. Pelechaty M (1999) The phytosocological characteristics and habitat requirements of the Phragmitetum communis (Gam, 1927) Schmale, 1939 phytocoenoses in the lakes of the Wielkopolski National Park. Hydrobiologia 408:329–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pickett STA, Burch WR Jr., Dalton SE, Foresman TW, Grove JM, Rowntree R (1997) A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosystems 1:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Costanza R (2001) Urban ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32:127–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Quammen D (1998) Planet of weeds. Harper's Magazine, Oct.:57–69Google Scholar
  50. Rebele F (1994) Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 4:173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rodwell JS (1992) British Plant Communities Volume 2 Grasslands and Montane Communities. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. Rodwell JS (2000) British Plant Communities Volume 5 Maritime Communities and Vegetation of Open Habitats, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Saner MA, Clements DR, Hall MR, Doohan DJ, Crompton CW (1995) The biology of Canadian weeds. 105. Linaria vulgaris Mill. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 75:525–537Google Scholar
  54. Schischkin BK (1999). Flora of the USSR Vol. XXV. Smithsonian Institution Libraries, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  55. Schischkin BK, Borov EG (1997) Flora of the USSR Vol. XXII. Smithsonian Institution Libraries, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  56. Schischkin BK, Borov EG (2000) Flora of the USSR Vol. XXVI. Smithsonian Institution Libraries, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  57. Shafigullina SM (2004) Influence of post-flood hydrologic conditions in the Kuibyshev Reservoir on coastal communities of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Russian Journal of Ecology 35:46–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Silverside AJ (2004) The Wild Flowering Plants and Ferns of Wigtownshire. University of Paisley, UKGoogle Scholar
  59. Southwood TRE (1977) Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies? Journal of Animal Ecology 46:337–365Google Scholar
  60. Spirn SA (1984) The Granite Garden: Urban Nature and Human Design. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Stepp JR, Jones EC, Pavao-Zuckerman M, Casagrande D, Zarger RK (2003). Remarkable properties of human ecosystems. Conservation Ecology 7(3):11. [online] URL: Google Scholar
  62. Taran GS (1994) Floodplain Ephemeretum of Middle Ob-a new class for Siberia, Isoto-Nanojuncetea Br.-Bl. Et Tx. 1943 on the northern border of expansion. Siberian Journal of Ecology 1:578–582Google Scholar
  63. Taran GS (1995) A little-known vegetation class of the former USSR-flood plain Ephemeretum. Siberian Journal of Ecology 2:372–380Google Scholar
  64. Tatli A (2002) The flora of upper Ceyhan Valley (Kahramanmaras/Turkey) Turkish Journal of Botany 26:259–275Google Scholar
  65. Taylor DR, Aarssen LW, Loehle C (1990) On the relationship between r/K selection and environmental carrying capacity: a new habitat templet for plant life history strategies. Oikos 58:239–250Google Scholar
  66. Thompson K, Austin KC, Smith RM, Warren PH, Angold PG, Gaston KJ (2003) Urban domestic gardens (I): putting small-scale plant diversity in context. Journal of Vegetation Science 14:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Turner WR, Nakamura T, Dinetti M (2004) Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. BioScience 54:585–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Turner K, Lefler B, Freedman B (2005) Plant communities of selected urbanized areas of Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. Landscape and Urban Planning 71:191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA (1980) Flora Europea Vols. 1–5. Cambridge University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  70. USGS (2004) Northeast Wetland Flora Field Office Guide to Plant Species, United States Geological Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research CentreGoogle Scholar
  71. Voss E G (1985) Michigan Flora. Part II. Dicots (Saururaceae-Cornaceae). University of Michigan Herbarium, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  72. Voss EG (1996) Michigan Flora. Part III. Dicots (Pyrolaceae-Compositae). University of Michigan Herbarium, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  73. Wittig R (2004) The origin and development of the urban flora of Central Europe. Urban Ecosystems 7:323–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Woodell S (1979) The flora of walls and pavings. In: Laurie IC (ed) Nature in Cities. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 135–156Google Scholar
  75. Wu Z, Raven PH, Hong D (2001) Flora of China. Science Press, Beijing; Missouri Botanical Gardens Press, St. Louis, MissouriGoogle Scholar
  76. Zinck M (1998) Roland's Flora of Nova Scotia. Nimbus Publishing & Nova Scotia Museum, Halifax, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  77. Zobel K, Liira J (1997) A scale-independent approach to the richness vs biomass relationship in ground-layer plant communities. Oikos 80:325–332Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biology Department/Environmental Studies Program Saint Mary’s UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations