Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Relative importance of habitat quantity, structure, and spatial pattern to birds in urbanizing environments

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urbanization reduces the quantity of native vegetation and alters its local structure and regional spatial pattern. These changes cause local extirpations of bird species associated with native vegetation and increases in the abundance and number of bird species associated with human activity. We used 54–1 km2 landscapes in the Seattle, Washington, USA metropolitan area to determine (1) the relative importance of habitat quantity, structure, and pattern to bird diversity and abundance and (2) whether housing developments can be managed to mitigate the negative impacts of urbanization on forest bird diversity. In general, bird species richness was high and many native forest species were retained where urban landcover comprised less than 52% of the landscape, tree density (especially that of evergreens) remained at least 9.8 trees/ha in developments, and forest was at least 64% aggregated across the landscape. These results suggest that the quantity, structure, and pattern of forested habitat affected breeding bird diversity in urbanizing landscapes. However, habitat pattern appeared less influential than other habitat attributes when results from all community- and population-level analyses were considered. Conservation of native birds in reserves can be supplemented by managing the amount, composition, structural complexity, and—to a lesser extent—arrangement of vegetation in neighborhoods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberti M, Botsford E, Cohen A (2001) Quantifying the urban gradient: linking urban planning and ecology. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, pp. 89–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberti M, Marzluff JM (2004) Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosyst 7:241–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andren H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Atmar W, Patterson BD (1993) The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96:373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker WL [online] (1997) The r.le Programs. Version 2.2. http://www.baylor.edu/~grass/gdp/terrain/rle22.html (6 June 1997)

  • Beissinger SR, Osborne DR (1982) Effects of urbanization on avian community organization. Condor 84:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry BJL (1990) Urbanization. In: Turner BL, Clark WC, Kates RW, Richards JF (eds) Earth as Transformed by Human Action, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 103–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Appl 6:506–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blewett CM, Marzluff JM (2005) Effects of urban sprawl on snags and the abundance and productivity of cavity-nesting birds. Condor 107:677–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth DE (1991) Estimating prelogging old-growth in the Pacific Northwest. J Forestry 89:25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Botsford ER (2000) Development of a Modified Land Composition Classification Methodology Utilizing LANDSAT Thematic Mapping and Ancillary Data. M.S. thesis, University of Washington, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecol 58:445–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell FL (1999) What habitat is an island? In: Rochelle JA, Lehmann LA, Wisniewski J (eds) Forest Fragmentation: Wildlife and Management Implications, Brill, Boston, pp. 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model Selection and Inference: a Practical Information-theoretic Approach, 1st edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Chace JF, Walsh JJ (2006) Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landscape and Urban Planning 74:46–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper CB, Walters JR (2002) Experimental evidence of disrupted dispersal causing decline of an Australian passerine in fragmented habitat. Conserv Biol 16:471–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly R (2002) Design of Habitat Reserves and Settlements for Bird Conservation in the Seattle Metropolitan Area. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly R, Fleishman E (In review) Application of nestedness analysis to biodiversity conservation in urbanizing areas. Landscape and Urban Planning

  • Donnelly R, Marzluff JM (2004) Importance of reserve size and landscape context to urban bird conservation. Conserv Biol 18:733–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing RH (1994) Characteristics, causes, and effects of sprawl: a Literature review. Environ Urban Issues 305:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (1997) Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J Wildl Manage 61:603–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (1998) When does fragmentation of breeding habitat affect population survival. Ecological Modelling 105:273–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JF, Dyrness CT (1988) Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press,Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison GA (1949) Uses and modifications for the “Moosehorn” crown closure estimator. J Forestry 47:733–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Germaine SS, Rosenstock SS, Schweinsburg RE, Richardson WS (1998) Relationships among breeding birds, habitat, and residential development in greater Tucson, Arizona. Ecological Applications 8:680–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL [online] (2002) EcoSim: Null Models Software for Ecology. Version 7.0. http://homepages.together.net/~gentsmin/ecosim.htm (9 September 2002)

  • Haila Y (2002) A conceptual genealogy of fragmentation research: from island biogeography to landscape ecology. Ecolo Appl 12:321–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S, Bruna E (1999) Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation: what do we know for sure? Ecography 22:225–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston RF (2001) Synanthropic birds of north America. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, pp. 49–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight RL (1990) Ecological principles applicable to the management of urban ecosystems. In: Webb EA, Foster SQ (eds) Perspectives in Urban Ecology, Denver Museum of Natural History and Thorne Ecological Institute, Denver, pp. 24–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster RK, Rees WE (1979) Bird communities and the structure of urban habitats. Canadian Journal of Zool 57:2358–2368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichstein JW, Simons TR, Franzreb KE (2002) Landscape effects on breeding songbird abundance in managed forests. Ecol Appl 12:836–857

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomolino ML (1996) Investigating causality of nestedness of insular communities: selective immigrations or extinctions. J Biogeogr 23:699–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (1988) Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Major RE, Gowing G, Kendal CE (1996) Nest predation in Australian urban environments and the role of the Pied Currawong, Strepera graculinaation, in Australia. Australian J Ecol 21:399–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM (2001) Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, pp. 19–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM (2005) Island biogeography for an urbanizing world: how extinction and colonization may determine biological diversity in human-dominated landscapes. Urban Ecosyst 8:157–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (2001a) An historical perspective on urban bird research: trends terms, and approaches. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, pp. 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) (2001b) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, McGowan KJ, Donnelly R, Knight RL (2001c) Causes and consequences of expanding American crow populations. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R, (eds) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, pp. 331–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Ewing K (2001) Restoration of fragmented landscapes for the conservation of birds: a general framework and specific recommendations for urbanizing landscapes. Restoration Ecol 9:280–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E [online] (2002) Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps, FRAGSTATS 3.1. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html (5 May-2002)

  • McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization biodiversity, and conservation. Biosci 52:883–890

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2000) Conservation where people live and work. Conservation Biology 16:330–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munyenyembe F, Harris J, Hone J (1989) Determinants of bird populations in an urban area. Australian J Ecol 14:549–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuorteva P (1971) The synanthropy of birds as an expression of the ecological cycle disorder caused by urbanization. Annales Zoologici Fennici 8:547–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver CD, Larson BC (1996) Forest Stand Dynamics. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Opdam P, van Dorp D, ter Braak CJF (1984) The effect of isolation on the number of woodland birds in small woods in the Netherlands. J Biogeogr 11:473–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Penland ST (1984) Avian Responses to a Gradient of Urbanization in Seattle, Washington. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitelka RA (1942) High population of breeding birds within an artificial habitat. Condor 44:172–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Puget Sound Regional Council (1997) Urban Centers in the Central Puget Sound Region: A Baseline Summary and Comparison. Puget Sound Regional Council, Seattle

  • Pyle RM (1980) Management of nature reserves, In: Soulé ME, Wilcox BA (eds) Conservation Biology: an Evolutionary-ecological Perspective, Sinauer, Sunderland, pp. 319–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph CJ, Geupel GR, Pyle P, Martin TE, Desante DF (1993) Handbook of Field Methods for Monitoring Landbirds. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-144

  • Robinson L, Newell JP, Marzluff JM (2005) Twenty-five years of sprawl in the Seattle region: growth management responses and implications for conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning 71:51–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock S, Anderson D, Giesen K, Leukering T, Carter M (2002) Landbird counting techniques: current practices and an alternative. Auk 119:46–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer CL (1997) Terrestrial nature reserve design at the urban/rural interface. In: Schwartz MW (ed) Conservation in Highly Fragmented Landscapes, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 345–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME (1991) Land use planning and wildlife maintenance: guidelines for conserving wildlife in urban landscapes. Journal of the American Planning Association 57:313–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME, Bolger DT, Alberts AC, Wright J, Sorice M, Hill S (1988) Reconstructed dynamics of rapid extinctions of chaparral-requiring birds in urban habitat islands. Conservation Biology 2:75–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Package for Social Sciences (2001) SPSS 10.1.3. SPSS, Chicago

  • Thomas JA, Bourn NAD, Clarke RT, Stewart KE, Simcox DJ, Pearman GS, Curtis R, Goodger B (2001) The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proce Royal Soc of Lond B268:1791–1796

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1999) The State of the World Population 1999 – 6 Billion, a time for choices. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Sci 277:494–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Moskovits DK (2001) Tracking fragmentation of natural communities and changes in land cover: applications of LANDSAT data for conservation in an urban landscape. Conserv Biol 15:835–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitcomb RF, Robins CS, Lynch JF, Whitcomb BL, Klimkiewicz MK, Bystrak D (1981) Effects of forest fragmentation on avifauna of the eastern deciduous forest. In: Burgeos R, Sharpe D (eds) Forest Stand Dynamics in Man-dominated Landscapes, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 125–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove DS (1985) Nest predation in forest tracts and the decline of migratory songbirds. Ecol 66:1211–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Roarke Donnelly

    Present address: Biology Department, Oglethorpe University, 4484 Peachtree Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA, 30319, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biology Department, Oglethorpe University, 4484 Peachtree Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA, 30319, USA

    John M. Marzluff

Authors
  1. Roarke Donnelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John M. Marzluff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roarke Donnelly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Donnelly, R., Marzluff, J.M. Relative importance of habitat quantity, structure, and spatial pattern to birds in urbanizing environments. Urban Ecosyst 9, 99–117 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-006-7904-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-006-7904-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation