Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Fengshui theory in urban landscape planning

  • 947 Accesses

  • 20 Citations

Abstract

The spatial configuration of urban landscapes results from cumulative interactions between human activities and the physical environment. Traditional philosophies and cultural legacies have had important influences on urban development and planning in East Asia. In Seoul, traditional land use practices based on ‘Fengshui’ have significantly contributed to human-mediated patterns of landscape changes, in addition to the role of the socio-economic background (development) and other human activities. The concept of Fengshui was originally founded upon people’s empirical cognition of natural landscape patterns. Recently, however, advanced economic development, westernization and urbanization have been rapidly altering the old traditions of the holistic landscape systems through changing urban planning practices. Since the type, scale, frequency, distribution and spreading pattern of environmental and human disturbances have been changed, a new paradigm for urban landscape planning is necessary to maintain the ecological and cultural integrity of landscapes in Korea. In this paper, we discuss recent concepts and methods of landscape ecology and urban planning from the viewpoint of Fengshui, the traditional land use patterns in Seoul, whose application has so far been restricted only to traditional land evaluation. We conclude that, to maintain the sustainability of the urban landscape, it is necessary to develop a new urban planning framework for the region that is based on the integration between landscape ecology principles with the traditional concepts of Fengshui.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Choi CJ (1991) Fengshui: Philosophy of Korea. Mineumsa, Seoul (in Korean)

  2. Choi WS (2000) Cultural geography of the Bibo in Youngnam region. Doctoral Thesis. Korea University, Seoul. 318p (in Korean)

  3. Choi YK (2004) Baekdudaegan, the central axis of the Korean peninsular—The patch toward management strategies regarding to its concepts. In: Hong SK et al (eds) Ecological issues in a changing world: Status, response and strategy. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht. pp. 355–384

  4. Forman RTT (1989) Ecologically sustainable landscapes; the role of spatial configuration. In: Zonneveld IS, Forman RTT (eds) Changing landscapes: An ecological perspective. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 261–278

  5. Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics. The ecology of landscape and region. Cambridge University Press, p 632

  6. Han JS (1998) Human and environment. Kyohakyunkusa, Seoul (in Korean)

  7. Holzner W, Werger MJA, Ikushima I (1983) Man’;s Impact on vegetation. Junk, Den Haag

  8. Hong SK (2001) Factors affecting landscape changes in central Korea: Cultural disturbance of the forested landscape systems. In: van der D Zee, Zonneveld IS (eds) Landscape ecology applied in land evaluation, development and conservation: Some worldwide selected examples. ITC, The Netherlands, pp 131– 147

  9. Hong SK, Song IJ, Choi WS (2001) Theoretical comparison of modern and traditional urban plan: From an Asia landscape ecological planning perspective. Publicationes Instituti Geographici Universitatis Tartuensis 92:209–213

  10. Küchler AW, Zonneveld IS (1988) Vegetation mapping. Handbook of vegetation science. Vol. 10. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

  11. Lepart J, Debussche M (1992) Human impact on landscape patterning: Mediterranean examples. In: Hansen AJ, di Castri F (eds) Landscape boundaries—Consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 76–106

  12. Lyle JT (1999) Design for human ecosystems: Landscape, land use, and natural resources. Island Press, pp 279

  13. McHarg IL (1969) Design with nature. Natural History Press, NY

  14. March AL (1968) An appreciation of Chinese Geomancy. J Asian Stud 27:256

  15. Nassauer JI (1995) Culture and changing landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 10:229–237

  16. Naveh Z, Lieberman A (1994) Landscape ecology: Theory and application. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 360

  17. Needham J (1986) Science and civilization in China. Cambridge University Press, pp 82

  18. Niemi G, Hanowski J, Helle P, Howe R, Mönkkönen M, Venier L, Welsh, D (1998) Ecological sustainability of birds in boreal forests. Conservation Ecology [online] 2(2):17. URL: http:/www.consecol.org/vol2/iss2/art17

  19. Porket M (1974) The theoretical foundation of Chinese medicine: Systems of correspondence. MIT Press

  20. Reid A, Teamey K, Dillon J (2002) Traditional ecological knowledge for learning with sustainability in mind. http://trumpeter.athabascau.ca/content/v18.1/reid_et_al.html

  21. Seoul Development Institute (2000) Eco-city plan for the application of urban ecological concept to urban planning. Seoul Development Institute, Seoul

  22. Seoul Development Institute (1994) Detailed plan for the 21C of Seoul. Seoul Development Institute, Seoul (in Korean)

  23. Seoul Metropolitan Government (1997) The master plan of Seoul Toward 2011. Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul (in Korean)

  24. Seoul Metropolitan Government (1995) Seoul statistical yearbook. Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul (in Korean)

  25. Tuan Y (1968) Discrepancies between environmental attitude and behavior: Examples from Europe and China. Canad Geogr 12:176–191

  26. Watanabe Y (1990) Philosophy of Fengshui and East Asia. Jinmonsyouenn, Kyoto (in Japanese)

  27. Whang KW (1991) Future image of Seoul and its open space system. Envir and Landsc 40:59–61 (in Korean)

  28. Wu J, Hobbs R (2002) Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis. Landsc Ecol 17:355–365

  29. Wu J, Loucks OL (1995) From balance-of-nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: A paradigm shift in ecology. Quatan Rev Biol 70:439–466

  30. Zonneveld IS (1989) The land unit—A fundamental concept in landscape ecology, and its applications. Landsc Ecol 3:67–86

  31. Zonneveld IS (1995) Land ecology. An introduction to landscape ecology as a base for land evaluation, land management and conservation. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam

  32. Zipperer WC, Wu J, Pouyat RV, Pickett STA (2000) The application of ecological principles to urban and urbanizing landscapes. Ecolog Appl 10:685–688

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Sun-Kee Hong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hong, S., Song, I. & Wu, J. Fengshui theory in urban landscape planning. Urban Ecosyst 10, 221–237 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-006-3263-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Asian landscape pattern
  • Fengshui theory
  • Landscape ecological planning
  • Land use policy
  • Urban ecology