Advertisement

Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 139–151 | Cite as

Assessing the effect of developed habitat on waterbird behaviour in an urban riparian system in Ottawa, Canada

  • Michael R. DonaldsonEmail author
  • Kringen M. Henein
  • Michael W. Runtz
Article

Abstract

Waterbird species were used to assess the consequences of developed habitat on wildlife behaviour in an urban riparian system along the Rideau River in Ottawa, Canada. Fourteen developed sites and 14 undeveloped sites were surveyed from October 2004 to February 2005. Each site was approached on foot and the first observed behaviour (i.e., fleeing, foraging, resting or swimming) of each individual was recorded. A total of 10,604 behavioural observations were made across 12 taxa. Overall, the fleeing behaviour was observed more often at undeveloped sites. Foraging, resting and swimming behaviours were observed more often at developed sites. We found that seven species fled more often at undeveloped sites, including hooded merganser. This species was also more abundant at undeveloped sites, suggesting that hooded merganser may be more sensitive to anthropogenic disturbance in urban environments than other species that are habituated toward humans. For sensitive species, undeveloped shoreline may serve as a refuge from human disturbance in urban ecosystems.

Keywords

Habitat development Urban ecosystems Urbanization Wildlife management Behaviour 

References

  1. Beale CM, Monaghan P (2004) Human disturbance: people as predation-free predators? J Appl Ecol 41:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belant JL, Ickes SK, Seamans TW (1998) Importance of landfills to urban-nesting herring and ring-billed gulls. Landsc Urban Plan 43:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6:506–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blumstein DT, Anthony LL, Harcourt R, Ross G (2003) Testing a key assumption of wildlife buffer zones: is flight initiation distance a species-specific trait? Biol Conserv 110:97–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burger J, Gochfeld M (1999) Role of human disturbance in response behavior of Laysan Albatrosses (Diomedea immutabilis). Bird Behav 13:23–30Google Scholar
  6. Chace JF, Walsh JJ (2006) Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 74:46–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clergeau P, Savard JPL, Mennechez G, Falardeau G (1998) Bird abundance and diversity along an urban–rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor 100:413–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conomy JT, Dubovsky JA, Collazo JA, Fleming WJ (1998) Do black ducks and wood ducks habituate to aircraft disturbance? J Wildl Manage 62:1135–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crooks KR, Suarez AV, Bolger DT (2004) Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape. Biol Conserv 115:451–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeStefano S (2003) Birds in the human landscape. Conserv Biol 17:1467–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ditchkoff SS, Saalfeld ST, Gibson CJ (2006) Animal behavior in urban ecosystems: modifications due to human-induced stress. Urban Ecosyst 9:5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donnelly R, Marzluff JM (2006) Relative importance of habitat quantity, structure and spatial pattern to birds in urbanizing environments. Urban Ecosyst 9:99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernandez-Juricic E, Telleria JL (2000) Effects of human disturbance on spatial and temporal feeding patterns of Blackbird Turdus merula in urban parks in Madrid, Spain. Bird Study 47:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forrest A, St. Clair CC (2006) Effects of dog leash laws and habitat type on avian and small mammal communities in urban parks. Urban Ecosyst 9:51–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frid A, Dill L (2002) Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv Ecol 6:11–27Google Scholar
  16. Gill JA, Sutherland WJ, Wakinson AR (1996) A method to quantify the effects of human disturbance on animal populations. J Appl Ecol 33:786–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greer DM (1982) Urban waterfowl population: ecological evaluation of management and planning. Environ Manage 6:217–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hostelter M, Holling CS (2000) Detecting the scales at which birds respond to structure in urban landscapes. Urban Ecosyst 4:25–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoysak DJ, Ankney D (1996) Correlates of behavioural dominance in mallards and American black ducks. Anim Behav 51:401–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnsgard PA (1975) Waterfowl of North America. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
  21. Jokimäki J, Huhta E (2000) Nest predation and habitat selection of birds along an urban gradient. Condor 102:838–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jozkowicz A, Gorska-Kłek L (1996) Activity patterns of the mute swans Cygnus olor wintering in rural and urban areas: a comparison. Acta Ornithol 31:45–51Google Scholar
  23. Lafferty KD (2001) Birds at a Southern California beach: seasonality, habitat use and disturbance by human activity. Biodivers Conserv 10:1949–1962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lima SL (1998) Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive and ecological perspectives. Adv Study Behav 27:215–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindsay AR, Gillum SS, Meyer MW (2002) Influence of lakeshore development on breeding bird communities in a mixed northern forest. Biol Conserv 107:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lord A, Waas JR, Innes J, Whittingham MJ (2001) Effects of human approaches to nests of northern New Zealand Dotterels. Biol Conserv 98:233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Manor R, Saltz D (2003) Impact of human nuisance disturbance on vigilance and group size of a social ungulate. Ecol Appl 13:1830–1834Google Scholar
  28. Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (2001) A historical perspective on urban bird research: trends, topics, and definitions. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, NorwellGoogle Scholar
  29. Melles S, Glenn S, Martin K (2003) Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity: species–environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient. Conserv Ecol 7:5–27Google Scholar
  30. Mills GS, Dunning JB Jr, Bates JM (1989) Effects of urbanization on breeding bird community structure in southwestern desert habitats. Condor 91:416–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller JR, Hobbs NT (2000) Recreational trails, human activity, and nest predation in lowland riparian area. Landsc Urban Plan 50:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nelson GS, Nelson SM (2001) Bird and butterfly communities associated with two types of urban riparian habitats. Urban Ecosyst 5:95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Platt A, Lill A (2006) Composition and conservation value of bird assemblages of urban ‘habitat islands’: do pedestrian traffic and landscape variables exert and influence? Urban Ecosyst 9:83–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Poulin M (2001) A multidisciplinary, community-based study of the environmental health of the Rideau River: final report. Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  35. Rottenborn SC (1999) Predicting the impacts of urbanization on riparian bird communities. Biol Conserv 88:289–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Safina C, Burger J (1983) Effects of human disturbance on reproductive success in the Black Skimmer. Condor 85:164–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sauvajot RM, Buechner M, Kamradt DA, Schonewald CM (1998) Patterns of human disturbance and response by small mammals and birds in chaparral near urban development. Urban Ecosyst 2:279–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stillman RA, Goss-Custard JD (2002) Seasonal changes in the response of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus to human disturbance. J Avian Biol 33:358–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Traut AH, Hostetler ME (2003) Urban lakes and waterbirds: effects of development on avian behavior. Waterbirds 26:290–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Traut AH, Hostetler ME (2004) Urban lakes and waterbirds: effects of shoreline development on avian distribution. Landsc Urban Plan 69:69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Webb NV, Blumstein DT (2005) Variation in human disturbance differentially affects predation risk assessment in western gulls. Condor 107:178–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael R. Donaldson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kringen M. Henein
    • 2
  • Michael W. Runtz
    • 2
  1. 1.Ottawa-Carleton Institute of BiologyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Department of BiologyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations