Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 8, Issue 3–4, pp 251–273 | Cite as

Spatial variation in soil inorganic nitrogen across an arid urban ecosystem

  • Diane Hope
  • Weixing Zhu
  • Corinna Gries
  • Jacob Oleson
  • Jason Kaye
  • Nancy B. Grimm
  • Lawrence A. Baker
Papers

Abstract

We explored variations in inorganic soil nitrogen (N) concentrations across metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, and the surrounding desert using a probability-based synoptic survey. Data were examined using spatial statistics on the entire region, as well as for the desert and urban sites separately. Concentrations of both NO3-N and NH4-N were markedly higher and more heterogeneous amongst urban compared to desert soils. Regional variation in soil NO3-N concentration was best explained by latitude, land use history, population density, along with percent cover of impervious surfaces and lawn, whereas soil NH4-N concentrations were related to only latitude and population density. Within the urban area, patterns in both soil NO3-N and NH4-N were best predicted by elevation, population density and type of irrigation in the surrounding neighborhood. Spatial autocorrelation of soil NO3-N concentrations explained 49% of variation among desert sites but was absent between urban sites. We suggest that inorganic soil N concentrations are controlled by a number of ‘local’ or ‘neighborhood’ human-related drivers in the city, rather than factors related to an urban-rural gradient.

Keywords

soil NO3-N-N soil NH4-N urban ecosystem desert spatial autocorrelation integrated inventory CAP LTER 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J.S. (1970) Residential structure of Midwestern cities. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 64, 378–386.Google Scholar
  2. Alberti, M., Botsford, E. and Cohen, A. (2001) Quantifying the urban gradient: Linking urban planning and ecology. In Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World (J.M. Marzluff, R. Bowman and R. Donnelly, eds.), pp. 89–115. Kluwer, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, L.A., Hope, D., Xu, Y., Lauver, L. and Edmonds, J. (2001) Nitrogen balance for the central arizona-phoenix ecosystem. Ecosystems 4, 582–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, L.A. Brazel, A.J., Selover, N., Martin, C., McIntyre, N., Steiner, F.R., Nelson, A., and Musacchio, L. (2002) Urbanization and warming of Phoenix (Arizona, USA): Impacts, feedbacks and mitigation. Urban Ecoystems 6, 183–203.Google Scholar
  5. Bayman, J.M. (2001) The Hohokam of Southwest North America. J. World Prehistory 13, 257–311.Google Scholar
  6. Berk, K.N. (1978) Comparing subset regression procedures. Technometrics 20, 1–6.Google Scholar
  7. Carreiro, M.M., Howe, K., Parkhurst, D.F. and Pouyat, R.V. (1999) Variations in quality and decomposability of re oak leaf litter along an urban-rural gradient. Biol. Fert. Soils 30, 258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, K.C., Hoppen, S. and Gaydos, L. (1997) A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environ. 24, 247–261.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, J.P., Kinzig, A.P., Grimm, N.B., Fagan, W.B., Hope, D., Wu, J. and Borer, E.T. (2000) A new urban ecology. American Scientist 88, 416–425.Google Scholar
  10. Cook, R.D. and Weisberg, S. (1982) Residuals and Influence in Regression. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  11. Creed, I.F. and Band, L.E. (1998) Export of nitrogen from catchments within a temperate forest: Evidence for a unifying mechanism regulated by variable source area dynamics. Water Resources Research 34, 3105–3120.Google Scholar
  12. Cressie, N.A.C. (1993) Statistics for Spatial Data (Revised edition). John Wiley & Sons, Somerset, NJ.Google Scholar
  13. Faerge, J., Magid, J. and de Vries, F.W.T.P. (2001) Urban nutrient balance for Bankok. Ecol. Modelling 139, 63-74.Google Scholar
  14. Fenn, M.E., Haebuer, R., Tonnesen, G.S., Baron, J.S., Grossman-Clarke, S., Hope, D., Jaffe, D.A., Copeland, S., Geiser, L., Rueth, H.M. and Sickman, J.O. (2003) Nitrogen emissions, deposition and monitoring in the Western United States. BioScience 53, 391–403.Google Scholar
  15. Fisher, F.M., Parker, L.W., Anderson, J.P. and Whitford, W.G. (1987) Nitrogen mineralization in a desert soil: Interacting effects of soil moisture and nitrogen fertilizer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51, 1033–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gammage, G. Jr. (1999) Phoenix in Perspective: Reflections on Developing the Desert. Herberger Center for Design Excellence, College of Agriculture and Environmental Design, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
  17. Gee, G.W. and Bauder, J.W. (1986) Particle size analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd ed. (A. Klute, ed.), Agron. Monogr. 9 ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. (2ed edition), pp. 383–411.Google Scholar
  18. Gergel, S.E., Turner, M.G. and Kratz, T.K. (1999) Dissolved organic carbon as an indicator of the scale of watershed influence on lakes and rivers. Ecological Applications 9, 1377–1390.Google Scholar
  19. Goldman, M.B., Groffman, P.M., Pouyat, R.V., McDonnell, M.J. and Pickett, S.T.A. (1995) CH4 uptake and N availability in forest soils along an urban to rural gradient. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 27, 281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grimm, N.B., Grove, J.M., Pickett, S.T.A. and Redman, C.L. (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological environments. BioScience 70, 571–584.Google Scholar
  21. Grimm, N.B., Gergel, S.E., McDowell, W.H., Boyer, E.W., Dent, C.L., Groffman, P., Hart, S.C. Harvey, J., Johnston, C., Mayorga, E., McClain, M.E. and Pinay, G. (2003) Merging aquatic and terrestrial perspectives of nutrient biogeochemistry. Oecologia 137, 485–501.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gujarati, D.N. (1995) Basic Econometrics. 3rd edition. McGraw Hill, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  23. Guo, X.-D., Fu, B.-J., Ma, K.-M. and Chen, L.-D. (2001) Utility of semivariogram for spatial variation of soil nutrients and the robust analysis of semivariogram. J. Environ. Sci. (China) 13, 453–445.Google Scholar
  24. Hefting, M., Clement, J.C., Dowrick D., Cosandey, A.C., Bernal, S., Cimpian, C., Tatur, A., Burt, T.P. and Pinay, G. (2004) Water table elevation controls on soil nitrogen cycling in riparian wetlands along a European climatic gradient. Biogeochem. 67, 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hope, D., Gries, C., Zhu, W., Fagan, W.F., Redman, C.L., Grimm, N.B., Nelson, A.L., Martin, C. and Kinzig, A. (2003) Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, 8788–8792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jenerette, G.D. and Wu, J.G. (2001) Analysis and simulation of land-use change in the central Arizona-Phoenix region, USA. Landscape Ecology 16, 611–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaiser J. (2001) An experiment for all seasons. Science 293, 624–627.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Knowles-Yánez, K., Moritz, C., Fry, J., Bucchin, M., Redman, C.L. and McCartney P. (1999) Historic Land Use Team: Phase I Report on Generalized Landuse. Central Arizona-Phoenix LTER: Phoenix, Arizona, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Ley, D. (1983) Social Geography of the City. DIANE Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  30. Loreau, M. (1998) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: A mechanistic model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95, 5632–5636.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Luck, M.A. and Wu, J. (2002) A gradient analysis of the landscape pattern of urbanization in the Phoenix metropolitan area of USA. Landscape Ecology 17, 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maricopa Association of Governments. (1997) Urban Atlas, Phoenix Metropolitan Area. Maricopa Association of Governments, Phoenix, AZ.Google Scholar
  33. Martin, C.A. (2001) Landscape water use in Phoenix, Arizona. Desert Plants 17, 26–31.Google Scholar
  34. McAuliffe, J.R. (1994) Landscape evolution, soil formation, and ecological patterns and processes in Sonoran desert bajadas. Ecological Monographs 64, 111–148.Google Scholar
  35. McClain, M.E., Boyer, E.W., Dent, E.W., Gergel, S.E., Grimm, N.B., Groffman, P.M., Hart, S.C., Harvey, J.W., Johnston, C.A., Mayorga, E., McDowell, W.H. and Pinay, G. (2003) Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Ecosystems 6, 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McDonnell, M.J. and Pickett, S.T.A. (1990) Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: An unexplained opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71, 1232–1237.Google Scholar
  37. McDonnell, M.J., Pickett, S.T.A. and Pouyat R.V. (1993) The application of the ecological gradient paradigm to the study of urban effects. In Humans as Components of Ecosystems: Subtle Human Effects and the Ecology of Human Populated Areas (McDonnell M.J. and Pickett S.T.A., eds.), pp. 175–189. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  38. McDonnell, M.J., Pickett, S.T.A., Groffman, P., Bohlen, P., Pouyat, R.V., Zipperer, W.C., Parmelee, R.W., Carreiro, M.M. and Medley, K. (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1, 21–36.Google Scholar
  39. Myers, R.H. (1990) Classical and Modern Regression with Applications. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, MA.Google Scholar
  40. Oleson, J., Hope, D., Gries, C. and Kaye, J. A Bayesian approach to estimating regression coefficients for soil properties in land use patches with varying degrees of spatial variation. Environmental and Ecological Statistics (in review).Google Scholar
  41. Padgett, P.E., Allen, E.B., Bytnerowicz, A. and Minich, R.A. (1999) Changes in soil inorganic nitrogen as related to atmospheric nitrogenous pollutants in southern California. Atmospheric Environment 33, 769–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Padgett, P.E. and Bytnerowicz, A. (2001) Deposition and adsorption of the air pollutant HNO3 vapor to soil surfaces. Atmospheric Environment 35, 2405–2415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parker, K.C. and Bendix, J. (1996) Landscape-scale geomorphic influence on vegetation patterns in four environments. Physical Geog. 17, 113–141.Google Scholar
  44. Peterjohn, W.T. and Schlesinger, W.H. (1991) Factors controlling denitrification in a Chihuahuan desert ecosystem. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 1694–1701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peterson, S.A., Urquhart, N.S. and Welch, E.B. (1999) Sample representativeness: A must for reliable regional lake condition estimates. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33, 1559–1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pickett, S.T.A., Burch, W.R. Jr., Dalton, S., Foresman, T., Grove, J.M. and Rowntree, R. (1997) A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosystems 1, 185–199.Google Scholar
  47. Pouyat, R.V. and McDonnell, M.J. (1991) Heavy metal accumulation in forest soils along an urban-rural gradient in southeastern New York. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 57, 797–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pouyat, R.C. and Turechek, W.W. (2001) Short- and long-term effects of site factors on net N-mineralization and nitrification rates along an urban-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 5, 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pouyat, R.V., Parmelee, R.W. and Carreiro, M.M. (1994) Environmental effects of forest soil-invertebrate and fungal densities in oak stands along an urban-rural land use gradient. Pedobiologia 38, 385–399.Google Scholar
  50. Pouyat, R.V., McDonnell, M.J. and Pickett, S.T.A. (1995) Soil characteristics of oak stands along an urban-rural land use gradient. J. Environ. Quality 24, 516–526.Google Scholar
  51. Pouyat, R.V., McDonnell, M.J. and Pickett, S.T.A. (1997) Litter decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in oak stands along an urban-rural land-use gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1, 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pouyat, R., Groffman, P., Yesilonis, I. and Hernandez, L. (2002) Soil carbon pools and fluxes in urban ecosystems. Env. Poll. 116, S107–S118.Google Scholar
  53. Ribeiro Jr., P.J. and Diggle, P.J. (2001) geoR: A package for geostatistical analysis. R-NEWS 1(2), 15–18. ISSN 1609–3631.Google Scholar
  54. Rossi, R.E., Mulla, D.J., Journel, A.G. and Franz, E.H. (1992) Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting spatial dependence. Ecol. Monogr. 62, 277–314.Google Scholar
  55. Sadras, V.O. and Baldock, J.A. (2003) Influence of size of rainfall events on water-driven processes—II. Soil nitrogen mineralization in a semi-arid environment. Aust. J. Agric. Research 54, 353–361.Google Scholar
  56. Sandor, J.A. and Eash, N.S. (1991) Significance of ancient agricultural soils for long-term agronomic studies and sustainable agriculture research. Agron. J. 83, 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. SAS Institute Inc. (2004) SAS/STAT 9.1 User's Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institue Inc.Google Scholar
  58. Schlesinger, W.H. (1997) Biogeochemistry, 2nd edition. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.Google Scholar
  59. Schlesinger, W.H., Raikes, J.A., Hartley, A.E. and Cross, A.F. (1996) On the spatial pattern of soil nutrients in desert ecosystems. Ecology 77, 364–374.Google Scholar
  60. Schabenberger, O. and Pierce, F.J. (2001) Contemporary Statistical Models for the Plant and Soil Sciences. CRC Press.Google Scholar
  61. Schlesinger, W.H. and Pilmanis, A.M. (1998) Plant-soil interactions in deserts. Biogeochemistry 42, 169–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stefanov, W.L., Ramsey, M.S. and Christensen, P.R. (2001) Monitoring urban land cover change: An expert system approach to land cover classification of semiarid to arid urban centers. Remote Sensing of Environment 77, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stevens, D.L. Jr. (1997) Variable density grid-based sampling designs for continuous spatial populations. Environmetrics 8, 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stohlgren, T.J., Binkley, D., Chong, G.W., Kalkhan, M.A., Schell, L.D., Bull, K.A., Otsuki, Y., Newman, G., Bashkin, M. and Son, Y. (1999) Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecological Monographs 69, 25–46.Google Scholar
  65. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000) Phoenix-Mesa Metropolitan Statistical Area Population Demographics., http://www.census.gov.
  66. Welter, J.R. (2004) Nitrogen Transport and Processing in the Intermittent Drainage Network: Linking Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems. Dissertation, Arizona State University. 211 pp.Google Scholar
  67. White, C.S. and McDonnell, M.J. (1988) Nitrogen cycling processes and soil characteristics in an urban versus rural forest. Biogeochemistry 5, 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Whittaker, R.H. and Niering, W.A. (1975) Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. 5. Biomass, production, and diversity along an elevation gradient. Ecology 56, 771–790.Google Scholar
  69. Wondzell, S.M., Cunningham, G.L. and Bachelet, D. (1996) Relationships between landforms, geomorphic processes, and plant communities on a watershed in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. Landscape Ecology 11, 351–362.Google Scholar
  70. Wu, F. (1998) Simulating urban encroachment on rural land with fuzzy-logic-controlled cellular automata in a geographical information system. J. Environ. Manag. 53, 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Xie, G.H., Lahav, I., Barness, G. and Steinberger, Y. (2001) Dynamics of soil nitrogen along a topoclimatic gradient in the Judean desert. Arid Land Research and Management 15, 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhu, W.X. and Carreiro, M.A. (2004) Temporal and spatial variations in nitrogen transformations in deciduous forest ecosystems along an urban-rural gradient. Soil Biol. & Biogeochem. 36, 267–278.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane Hope
    • 1
  • Weixing Zhu
    • 2
  • Corinna Gries
    • 1
  • Jacob Oleson
    • 3
  • Jason Kaye
    • 4
  • Nancy B. Grimm
    • 4
  • Lawrence A. Baker
    • 5
  1. 1.International Institute for SustainabilityArizona State UniversityTempe
  2. 2.Biological Sciences, SUNYBinghamtonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Math & StatisticsASU
  4. 4.School of Life SciencesASUTempe
  5. 5.Minnesota Water Resources CenterSt. Paul

Personalised recommendations