Testing the effectiveness of creative map mnemonic strategies in a geography class
- 51 Downloads
This study investigated the effects of creative-map instructional strategies on learning performance, learning motivation, and creativity in a junior high school geography class. A quasi-experimental approach was used to assess the treatment effects among 79 ninth graders, utilizing qualitative data including students’ feedback, and four quantitative instruments: filling-in map quizzes, geography term exams, the Learning Motivation Scale for Primary and Junior High School Students, and the Newly Revised Creative Thinking Tests. Repeated-measures ANCOVA were performed to analyze the correlation coefficients between the experimental and control groups, and indicated that the former group performed better than the latter in learning performance, motivation, and creativity after the intervention. Thus, it can be concluded that creative-map mnemonic strategies can have a positive impact on the learning and retention of place names and locations. Implications for further research and practice are also discussed.
KeywordsGeography teaching Mnemonics Place-names and locations Learning performance Creativity Motivation
This work was financially supported by the Grant MOST-108-2634-F-002-022 from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan, and the “Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences” and “Chinese Language and Technology Center” of the National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the National Taiwan Normal University and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
Informed consent was obtained from all the parents of the individual participants included in the study.
- Alexander, R. (2010). Children, their world, their education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ashoori, P., & Moghadam, M. (2015). The effect of instructing mnemonic devices on immediate versus delayed vocabulary retention. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 8(1), 87–102.Google Scholar
- Bae, C. L., Therriault, D. J., & Redifer, J. L. (2018). Investigating the testing effect: Retrieval as a characteristic of effective study strategies. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Baptista, L. (2018). Creativity and the art of memory. Retrieved November 11, 2018 from https://british-aesthetics.org/creativity-and-the-art-of-memory/.
- Bearman, N., Jones, N., André, I., Cachinho, H. A., & DeMers, M. (2016). The future role of GIS education in creating critical spatial thinkers. Journal of Geography in Higher education, 40(3), 394–408.Google Scholar
- Bednarz, S. W. (2004). Geographic information systems: A tool to support geography and environmental education? GeoJournal, 60(2), 191–199.Google Scholar
- Bellezza, F. S. (1996). Mnemonic methods to enhance storage and retrieval. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (pp. 345–380). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Bellezza, F. S., & Buck, D. K. (1988). Expert knowledge as mnemonic cues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2(2), 147–162.Google Scholar
- Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boehm, R. G., McKee, J. O., Smith, B. A., & Palmer, J. J. (1987). Middle America: Location and place. Social Education, 51, 479–484.Google Scholar
- Brown, K., Ellis, J., Ogan, D., & Wengreen, H. (2016). Nutrition and dietetic students vitamin and mineral knowledge and concurrent learning and retention strategies. International Journal for Innovation Education Research, 4(10), 274–283.Google Scholar
- Cermak, L. S. (1975). Improving your memory. Oxford: Norton.Google Scholar
- Cobb, C. (2013). The use of an animated pedagogical agent as a mnemonic device to promote learning and motivation in online education. Retrieved November 12, 2018 from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1490797726?accountid=14228.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Davis, G. A. (1997). Identifying creative students and measuring creativity. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 269–281). Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Dehn, M. J. (2008). Working memory and academic learning: Assessment and intervention. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Dunn, M., & Miller, D. (2016). Improving story writing: Integrating the story mnemonic strategy with Ipad apps for art and keyboarding. International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 3(1), 11–28.Google Scholar
- Endres, T., Carpenter, S., Martin, A., & Renkl, A. (2017). Enhancing learning by retrieval: Enriching free recall with elaborative prompting. Learning and Instruction, 49, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fontana, J. L., Scruggs, T., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2007). Mnemonic strategy instruction in inclusive secondary social studies classes. Remedial Special Education, 28(6), 345–355.Google Scholar
- Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- Gersmehl, P. (2014). Teaching geography. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
- Gilhooly, K. J., Fioratou, E., Anthony, S. H., & Wynn, V. (2007). Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology, 98(4), 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2007.tb00467.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Glover, J. A., & Bruning, R. H. (1987). Educational psychology: Principles and applications. Boston, MA: Scott Foresman & Co.Google Scholar
- Hsu, H.-J. (2012). An action research on the low achievers’ learning difficulties in geography in junior high school. Taichung: National Taichung University of Education.Google Scholar
- Joint Committee on Geographic Education. (1984). Guidelines for geographic education: Elementary and secondary schools (US). Washington, D.C.: The Council.Google Scholar
- Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Creativity 101. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lee, M.-Y., Shen, S.-M., & Lin, S.-C. (2007). The knowledge of world geography in the sixth to ninth grade students: Example of Taiwan National Geographic Championship. Journal of Geographical Research, 46, 1–17.Google Scholar
- Liao, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-L., Chen, H.-C., & Chang, Y.-L. (2018). Infusing creative pedagogy into an English as a foreign language classroom: Learning performance, creativity, and motivation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 213–223.Google Scholar
- List, A. (2018). Strategies for comprehending and integrating texts and videos. Learning and Instruction, 57, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lubin, J., & Polloway, E. A. (2016). Mnemonic instruction in science and social studies for students with learning problems: A review. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 14(2), 207–224.Google Scholar
- Malmberg, L.-E., Pakarinen, E., Vasalampi, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2015). Students’ school performance, task-focus, and situation-specific motivation. Learning and Instruction, 39, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Levin, J. R., Gaffney, J., & McLoone, B. (1985). Mnemonic vocabulary instruction for learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8(1), 57–63.Google Scholar
- Millar, G. W. (2002). Torrance kids at M-Life. Westport: Ablex.Google Scholar
- National Geographic Education Foundation. (2002). National Geographic—Roper 2002 Global Geographic Literacy Survey. Retrieved from https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=301605&d=1405465338.
- National Geographic Education Foundation. (2006). National Geographic-Roper Public Affairs 2006 Geographic Literacy Study. Retrieved November 12, 2018 from http://press.nationalgeographic.com/2006/05/02/roper-geography-study/.
- Ormrod, J. E. (2004). Human learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Raymaekers, L. H., Otgaar, H., & Smeets, T. J. M. (2014). The longevity of adaptive memory: Evidence for mnemonic advantages of survival processing 24 and 48 hours later. Memory, 22(1), 19–25.Google Scholar
- Reffel, J. (1997). Cued vs. free recall in long-term memory of the fifty United States. Current Psychology, 16(3–4), 308–315.Google Scholar
- Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1989). Mnemonic instruction of LD students: A field-based evaluation. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12(2), 119–125.Google Scholar
- Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2000). The effectiveness of mnemonic instruction for students with learning and behavior problems: An update and research synthesis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10(2–3), 163–173.Google Scholar
- Smith, B. (2017). Methodologically historicizing social studies education: Curricular filtering and historical thinking as social studies thinking. Canadian Journal of Education, 40(2), 1–26.Google Scholar
- The Council on Foreign Relations. (2016). What college-aged students know about the world—A survey on global literacy. In The U.S.A.: The Council on Foreign Relations and National Geographic.Google Scholar
- Thompson, I. (1987). Memory in language learning. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), learner strategies in language learning (pp. 43–56). Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International.Google Scholar
- Torrance, E. P. (1998). The Torrance tests of creative thinking norms—Technical manual figural (streamlined) forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service Inc.Google Scholar
- Turk, D. J., Gillespie-Smith, K., Krigolson, O. E., Havard, C., Conway, M. A., & Cunningham, S. J. (2015). Selfish learning: The impact of self-referential encoding on children’s literacy attainment. Learning and Instruction, 40, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van Kesteren, M., Renée, T., Krabbendam, L., & Meeter, M. (2018). Integrating educational knowledge: Reactivation of prior knowledge during educational learning enhances memory integration. NPJ Science of Learning, 3(1), 11.Google Scholar
- Weiss, R. P. (2000). Memory and learning. Training Development, 54(10), 46-.Google Scholar
- Wu, J. J., Chen, F. Y., Guo, J. X., Lin, W. W., Liu, S. H., & Chen, Y. H. (1998). The Chinese version of creative thinking test. Taipei: Ministry of Education (Taiwan).Google Scholar
- Young, C. (2015). Don’t forget, the science of memory is key to helping students learn. Retrieved November 14, 2018 from https://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/2015/dec/01/dont-forget-science-memory-key-students-learn.