Effects of student-facilitated learning on instructional facilitators
- 630 Downloads
We investigated perceptions about learning strategy use and instructional roles among a sample of high needs adolescents (n = 230) who acted as near-peer instructional facilitators. The sample was drawn from science and mathematics classes in nonselective public secondary schools in New York City. Students participated in an inschool intervention that draws on social constructivism, theory and research on metacognition and learning strategies, role theory, and empirical findings from the peer-to-peer learning literature to promote advanced achievement among students who act as facilitators. Using a pre- and post-test single group design, we surveyed student instructional facilitators before and after program participation and related their perceptions about learning strategy use and perceptions about teaching roles to data about academic achievement. We found no survey gains in student perceptions about learning strategies or instructional roles between pre-survey (fall) and post-survey (spring). We found small but significant effects of individual perceptions about learning strategies and teaching roles on academic gains among instructional facilitators. The study also suggests that an in-school near-peer facilitated learning program can be an effective means to raise achievement in urban high schools. The study provides partial support for theories that hold that metacognition and role perceptions are involved in the academic gains of instructional facilitators, as gains in these dimensions were small compared to achievement gains.
KeywordsPeer learning Tutoring STEM Learning strategies Role theory
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1102729.
- Assessing Women and Men in Engineering (AWE) Project (2010). “STEM Assessment Tools: AWE Undergraduate Mentee Pre-Survey, Post-Survey, AWE Mentor Pre-Survey, Post-Survey,” AWE Survey Instruments. Available: http://www.engr.psu.edu/AWE/secured/director/diversity/mentor.aspx.
- Bonner, S. M., & Keiler, L. S. (2015). The Effect of peer-facilitated learning on teen leaders. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois, April 17, 2015.Google Scholar
- Bonner, S. M., & Thomas, A. S. (2016). Peer learning leadership and early benchmarks of college readiness: Evidence of impacts. Presented at the annual conference of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, February 19, 2016.Google Scholar
- City University of New York (2016). Admissions requirements. Retrieved from http://www2.cuny.edu/academics/testing/cuny-assessment-tests/admissions-requirements/.
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Dunn, K. E., Lo, W. J., Mulvenon, S. W., & Sutcliffe, R. (2012). Revisiting the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire: A theoretical and statistical reevaluation of the metacognitive self-regulation and effort regulation subscales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(2), 312–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gafney, L., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2007). Evaluating peer-led team learning: A study of long-term effects on former workshop peer leaders. Chemical Education Research, 84, 535–539.Google Scholar
- Greenwood, C. R., Terry, B., Utley, C. A., & Montagna, D. (1993). Achievement, placement, and services: Middle school benefits of classwide peer tutoring used at the elementary school. School Psychology Review, 22(3), 497–517.Google Scholar
- Kistner, S., Rakoczy, K., Otto, B., Dignath-van Ewijk, C., Büttner, G., & Klieme, E. (2010). Promotion of self-regulated learning in classrooms: Investigating frequency, quality, and consequences for student performance. Metacognition & Learning, 5(2), 157–171. doi: 10.1007/s11409-010-9055-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- New York City Department of Education, Graduation Requirements (2016a). Retrieved September 24, 2016, from http://schools.nyc.gov/RulesPolicies/GraduationRequirements/default.htm.
- New York City Department of Education, School Quality Reports (2016b) Retrieved September 24, 2016, from http://schools.nyc.gov/Accountability/tools/report/ProgressReport_2007-2013.
- Puchner, L. D. (2003). Children teaching for learning: What happens when children teach others in the classroom? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 534–574.Google Scholar
- Sarbin, T. R. (1976). Cross-age tutoring and social identity. In V. L. Allen (Ed.), Children as teachers (pp. 29–35). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Sarbin, T. R., & Allen, V. L. (1968). Role theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 488–567). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Slavin, R. E. (1980). Effects of student teams and peer tutoring on academic achievement and time on-task. The Journal of Educational Research, 48(4), 252–257.Google Scholar
- Thomas, A. S., Bonner, S. M., Everson, H. T., & Somers, J. A. (2016). Leveraging the power of peer-led learning: Investigating effects on STEM performance in urban high schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(7–8), 537–557. doi: 10.1080/13803611.2016.1158657.
- Topping, K. J. (2013). Peers as a source of formative and summative assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 395–412). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar