Instructional Science

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 1–9 | Cite as

Participatory design of learning environments: integrating perspectives of students, teachers, and designers

  • Karen D. Könings
  • Tina Seidel
  • Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer


  1. Benton, L., & Johnson, H. (2014). Structured approaches to participatory design for children: Can targeting the needs of children with autism provide benefits for a broader child population? Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9297-y
  2. Bovill, C. (2013). An investigation of co-created curricula within higher education in the UK, Ireland and the USA. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. doi:10.1080/14703297.2013.770264
  3. Bovill, C., & Bulley, C. J. (2011). A model of active student participations in curriculum design: Exploring desirability and possibility. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning global theories and local practices: Institutional, disciplinary and cultural variations (pp. 176–188). Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Educational Development.Google Scholar
  4. Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16, 133–145. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, J., Cook-Sather, A., Lesnick, A., Alter, Z., Awkward, R., Decius, F., et al. (2013). Students as leaders and learners: Towards self-authorship and social change on a college campus. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50, 3–13. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.746511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook-Sather, A. (2003, March/April). Listening to students about learning differences. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22–26.Google Scholar
  7. Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Multiplying perspectives and improving practice: what can happen when undergraduate students collaborate with college faculty to explore teaching and learning. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9292-3
  8. Doyle, W. (1977). Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness. In L. S. Schulman (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 163–197). Itasca: F.E. Peacock.Google Scholar
  9. Druin, A. (2002). The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 21, 1–25.Google Scholar
  10. Elen, J., & Lowyck, J. (1999). Metacognitive instructional knowledge: Cognitive mediation and instructional design. Journal of Structural Learning & Intelligent Systems, 13, 145–169.Google Scholar
  11. Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment. Higher Education, 22, 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fishman, B. J., & Krajcik, J. (2003). What does it mean to create sustainable science curriculum innovations? A commentary. Science Education, 87, 564–5743. doi:10.1002/sce.10088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goeze, A., Zottmann, J., Vogel, F., Fischer, F., & Schrader, J. (2014). Getting immersed in teacher and student perspectives? Facilitating analytical competence using video cases in teacher education. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9304-3
  14. Janssen, F., Westbroek, H., & Van Driel, J. (2014). How to make guided discovery learning practical for student teachers. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9296-z
  15. Katsenou, C., Flogaitis, E., & Liarakou, G. (2013). Exploring pupil participation within a sustainable school. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43, 243–258. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2013.774320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kirschner, P. A., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist, 48, 169–183. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.804395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2005). Towards more powerful learning environments through combining the perspectives of designers, teachers and students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(4), 645–660. doi:10.1348/000709905X43616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2007). Teachers’ Perspective on Innovations: Implications for Educational Design. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 985–997. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2011a). The Match between Students’ Lesson Perceptions and Desires: Relations with Student Characteristics and the Importance of Motivation. Educational Research, 53, 439–457. doi:10.1080/00131881.2011.625155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2011b). Participatory Instructional redesign by students and teachers in secondary education: Effects on perceptions of instruction. Instructional Science, 39, 737–762. doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9152-3.Google Scholar
  21. Könings, K. D., Seidel, T., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Van Merriënboer (2014). Differences between students’ and teachers’ perceptions of education: Profiles to describe congruence and friction. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9294-1
  22. Mitra, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106, 651–688. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00354.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40, 331–337. doi:10.3102/0013189X11421826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents’ academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. The Elementary School Journal, 100, 443–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rudduck, J., & McIntyre, D. (2007). Improving learning through consulting pupils. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Smyth, J., & Fasoli, L. (2007). Climbing over the rocks in the road to student engagement and learning in a challenging high school in Australia. Educational Research, 49, 273–295. doi:10.1080/00131880701550565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vermetten, Y. J., Vermunt, J. D., & Lodewijks, H. G. (2002). Powerful learning environments? How university students differ in their response to instructional measures. Learning and Instruction, 12, 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen D. Könings
    • 1
  • Tina Seidel
    • 2
  • Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational Development and Research, School of Health Professions EducationMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.TUM School of EducationTechnische Universität MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations