Instructional Science

, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp 829–847 | Cite as

Computer-based 3D simulation: a study of communication practices in a trauma team performing patient examination and diagnostic work

Article

Abstract

Diagnostic work in trauma teams is critical for the patient’s condition and for the possibility of survival. It is a difficult situation to train due to the inherently unpredictable and time-critical practice when an injured patient presents in the Emergency Room (ER). Different types of simulations have been developed for specialized training of specific skills and on contribution to teamwork, but there are hardly any studies reporting on opportunities to train realistic, multidisciplinary collaboration and communicative skills in such time-critical settings. In this article we report on a collaboration-oriented simulation where a trauma team performs diagnostic work: examining a patient in an ER at a hospital. The setting studied is arranged as a design experiment and video data constitute the basis for our interaction analysis. Our main finding is that highly-specialized simulations are useful as an arena for communication training among trauma team members. Doctors and nurses manage to make the simulated representations relevant in their talk, share medical observations and examinations, and consecutively include these findings into their collaborative diagnostic trajectory.

Keywords

Virtual world 3D simulation Trauma team Teamwork Collaborative problem solving Communication Diagnostic trajectory Sociocultural theories Design experiment Interaction analysis 

References

  1. Albani, J. M., & Lee, D. I. (2007). Virtual reality-assisted robotic surgery simulation. Journal of Endourology, 21(3), 285–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berge, O., Furberg, A. L., Hagen, S., & Halvorsrud, R. (2002). EduAction: Designing the Collaborative Learning Environment “Mission Queen Maud Land” (Report (revision 2) No. 35). Oslo: Telenor R&D.Google Scholar
  3. Brattebø, B., Wisborg, T., & Høylo, T. (2001). Trauma teams in Norwegian hospitals. Journal of Norwegain Medical Association, 121, 2364–2367.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Büscher, M., O’Neill, J., & Rooksby, J. (2009). Designing for diagnosing: Introduction to the special issue on diagnostic work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 18, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cherry, R. A., & Ali, J. (2008). Current concepts in simulation-based trauma education. Journal of Trauma, 65(5), 1186–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duchesne, J. C., Kyle, A., Simmons, J., Islam, S., Schmieg, R. E. J., Oliver, J., et al. (2008). Impact of telemedicine upon rural trauma care. Journal of Trauma, 64(1), 92–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaba, D. M. (2004). The future vision of simulation in health care. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(Suppl 1), i2–i10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaba, D., Howard, S., Fish, K., Smith, B., & Sowb, Y. (2001). Simulation-based training in anesthesia crisis resource management (ACRM): A decade of experience. Simulation and Gaming, 32(2), 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodwin, C. (1997). The blackness of black: Color categories as situated practice. In L. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 111–142). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Halvorsrud, R. (2002). Trauma team training in a virtual emergency room. Telenor R&D, Final report from the MATADOR project.Google Scholar
  13. Hammond, J. (2004). Simulation in critical care and trauma education and training. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 10(5), 325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang, G., Reynolds, R., & Candler, C. (2007). Virtual patient simulation at US and Canadian medical schools. Academic Medicine, 82(5), 446–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IOM. (2000). To err is human. Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine.Google Scholar
  16. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kane, B., & Luz, S. (2009). Achieving diagnosis by consensus. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 18, 357–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knudson, M. M., Khaw, L., Bullard, M. K., Dicker, R., Cohen, M. J., Staudenmayer, K., et al. (2008). Trauma training in simulation: Translating skills from SIM time to real time. Journal of Trauma, 64(2), 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krange, I., & Ludvigsen, S. (2008). What does it mean? Students’ procedural and conceptual problem solving in a CSCL environment designed within the field of science education. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krange, I., & Ludvigsen, S. (2009). The historical and situated nature of design experiments: Implications for data analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(3), 268–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lachinger, S., Medves, J., Pulling, C., McGraw, R., Waytuch, B., Harrision, M., et al. (2008). Effectiveness of simulation on health profession students’ knowledge, skills, confidence and satisfaction. International Journal of Evidence Based Healthcare, 6, 278–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language mind and world dialogically. Charlotte: IAP-Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Lucas, S. M., Zeltser, I. S., Bensalah, K., Tuncel, A., Jenkins, A., Pearle, M. S., et al. (2008). Training on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator improves performance of an unfamiliar live laparoscopic procedure. Journal of Urology, 180(6), 2588–2591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ludvigsen, S., Rasmussen, I., Krange, I., Moen, A., & Middleton, D. (2011). Intersecting trajectories of participation; temporality and learning. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 105–121). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Manser, T., Harrison, T., Gaba, D., & Howards, S. (2009). Coordination patterns related to high clinical performance in a simulated anesthetic crisis. Anasthesia and Analgesia, 108(5), 1601–1615.Google Scholar
  26. Mercer, N. (1991). Researching common knowledge: Investigating the development of shared understanding in the classroom. In G. Walford (Ed.), Doing educational research (pp. 41–58). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Middleton, D., & Brown, S. D. (2005). The social psychology of experience: Studies of remembering and forgetting. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Norman, G., Eva, K., Brooks, L., & Hamstra, S. (2006). Expertise in medicine and surgery. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Paige, J., Kozmenko, V., Yang, T., Ramnarayan, P., Hilton, C., Cohn, I., et al. (2009). High-fidelity, simulation-based, interdisciplinary operating room team training at the point of care. Surgery, 145(2), 138–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Panait, L., Akkary, E., Bell, R. L., Roberts, K. E., Dudrick, S. L., & Duffy, A. J. (2009). The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. Journal of Surgical Research, 156(2), 312–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Poletti, I. (2009). Communication and diagnostic work in medical emergency calls in Italy. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 18, 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reddy, M. C., Dourish, P., & Pratt, W. (2006). Temporality in medical work: Time also matters. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15, 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rystedt, H., & Sjöblom, B. (2009). Reconstituting healthcare practices for learning in and through simulations. Paper presented at the 13th Biennial Conference on Learning and Instruction.Google Scholar
  34. Sakava, R. (2008). Historical review of surgical simulation: A personal perspective. World Journal of Surgery, 32, 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scott, D. J. (2006). Patient safety, competency, and the future of surgical simulation. Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Medical Simulation, 1(3), 164–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sexton, J. B., Thomas, E. J., & Helmreich, R. L. (2000). Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: Cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal, 320, 745–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Seymour, N., Gallagher, A., Roman, S., O’Brian, M., Bansal, V., Andersen, D., et al. (2002). Virtual reality training improves operating room performance. Results from a randomized, double-blinded study. Annals of Surgery, 236(4), 458–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weinberg, E. R., Auerbach, M. A., & Shah, N. B. (2009). The use of simulation for pediatric training and assessment. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 21(3), 282–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Youngblood, P., Harter, P., Srivastava, S., Moffett, S., Heinrichs, W., & Dev, P. (2008). Design, development, and evaluation of an online virtual emergency department for training trauma teams. Simulation in Healthcare, 3, 146–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.InterMediaUniversity of OsloBlindernNorway
  2. 2.InterMedia and Institute of Health and SocietyUniversity of OsloBlindernNorway

Personalised recommendations