An instructional paradigm for the teaching of computer-mediated communication
- 481 Downloads
This article outlines an instructional paradigm that guides the design of interventions that build skills in computer-mediated communication (CMC). It is applicable to learning at multiple levels of communicative proficiency and aims to heighten awareness, the understanding of the impact of media configurations, the role of cultures and social contexts in mediated communication, and forward research in the service of instructional designs for CMC. This paradigm broadens the scope of Hymes’ (Sociolinguistics, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972) theory of communicative competence, which is often applied to foreign language learning contexts, to include online interaction. The paradigm addresses the nuances of mediated communication through recognition of the situations and modes that intersect in online spaces. The paradigm is designed for learning situations that provide time and access to mediated environments where learners develop values for communication skill through practical experiences and structured reflection. This approach to creating instruction has at its core certain values, including risk-taking by participating in unfamiliar contexts, appreciating mediated-communication configurations as unique modalities, and placing CMC skills development within larger sets of pedagogical goals. This instructional paradigm does not assume that verbal fluency, grammatical competence, skill in either writing or speaking, nor membership in any age group translates directly to skill in CMC. The methods presented here have been selected because they build tolerance and appreciation for divergent viewpoints. The methods are (1) building interest by having learners select specific media situations, (2) facilitating collaboration by constructing safe spaces, (3) directly teaching CMC reading skills, (4) using examples and matched non-examples, (5) investigating CMC principles in real world examples through structured discussions, (6) showing the process of different communications’ development, and (7) using roles in discussion designs.
KeywordsInstructional design theory CMC Instruction Educational paradigm Instructional theory Communication Instructional design Digital natives
I am indebted to my colleague Alistair Van Moere PhD for his insights and collaboration during the testing and development of early instructional designs targeting the development of CMC skills, to Charles M. Reigeluth PhD who provided feedback on an early version of this paradigm, to Susan C. Herring PhD whose teaching dramatically influenced the development of the curricular areas incorporated into this paradigm, and to Andrew F. Barrett who provided key technical help at crucial moments in the development of this manuscript.
- Abdul-Mageed, M. M. (2009). Epistemic modality in computer-mediated discourse: The case of Wikipedia’s academic core. Paper presented at the third annual linguistics conference at Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
- Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
- Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 269–292). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Boling, E. (2010). The need for design cases: Disseminating design knowledge. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1), 1–8. Retrieved December, 2010 from http://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ijdl/index.
- Boling, E., Smith, K., Easterling, W., Hardré, P., Howard, C., Korkmaz, N., et al. (2010). Design judgment as a component of design character: Some focused views from the field. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
- Brush, T., & Saye, J. W. (2009). Strategies for preparing preservice social studies teachers to integrate technology effectively: Models and practices. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), no pages/online. Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/socialstudies/article1.cfm.
- Burkhalter, B. (1999). Reading race online: Discovering racial identity in usenet discussions. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 63–69). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Chadwick, S., & Ralston, E. (2010). Perspective-taking in structured and unstructured online discussions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
- Collins, A. (1999). The changing infrastructure of education research. In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 289–298). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
- Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 191–233.Google Scholar
- de Siqueira, A., & Herring, S. C. (2009). Temporal patterns in student-advisor instant messaging exchanges: Individual variation and accommodation. Proceedings of the forty-second Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42), Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.Google Scholar
- Dibbell, J. (1993). A rape in cyberspace. The Village Voice, pp. 36–42.Google Scholar
- Donner, J. (2007). The rules of beeping: Exchanging messages via intentional “missed calls” on mobile phones. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), Retrieved August 1, 2010 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue11/donner.html.
- Emigh, W., & Herring, S. C. (2005). Collaborative authoring on the Web: A genre analysis of online encyclopedias. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 38th Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos.Google Scholar
- Flavell, J. H., Botkin, P. T., Fry, C. L., Wright, J. W., & Jarvis, P. E. (1968). The development of role-taking and communication skills in children. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Fanselow, J. F. (1987). Breaking rules: Generating and exploring alternatives in language teaching. White Plains: Longman Inc.Google Scholar
- Gagnè, R. (1985). The conditions of learning and the theory of instruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. T. (2009). Discussion approach to instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. III, pp. 99–116). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Herring, S. C. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrived November 7, 2010 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring.html.
- Herring, S. C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer mediated discourse. Language @ Internet, 1, Retrieved September 6, 2007 from http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2761.
- Howard, C. D. (2003). Overcoming online obstacles: Macro-factors in online enhanced course design. The Journal of Kanda University of International Studies, 15(1), 293–312.Google Scholar
- Howard, C. D. (2009). Part of speech tagged asynchronous CMC: Comparing native, non-native, and newspaper English. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences: Illinois working papers, 2009, 110–126.Google Scholar
- Howard, C. D. (2010). Obstacles to the credibility of online learning. eLearn Magazine, 112(1). Retrieved September 27, 2010 from http://elearnmag.acm.org/archive.cfm?aid=1730789.
- Howard, C. D., & Myers, R. (2010). Creating video-annotated discussions: An asychronous alternative. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1), Retrieved November 1, 2010 from http://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ijdl/index.
- Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Jarvela, S., & Hakkinen, P. (2000). Level of web-based discussion: Theory of perspective-taking as a tool for analyzing interaction. Paper presented at the fourth international conference of the learning sciences, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
- Jeong, A. (2004). The combined effects of response time and message content on growth patterns of discussion threads in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 36–53.Google Scholar
- Keller, J. M., & Kopp, T. W. (1987). An application of the ARCS model of motivational design. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models (pp. 289–320). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Kelly, A., & Lesh, R. (2006). Design research in mathematics science & technology education. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Könings, K., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Participatory instructional redesign by students and teachers in secondary education: effects on perceptions of instruction. Instructional Science, 1(26), doi: 10.1007/s11251-010-9152-3.
- Korenman, J., & Wyatt, N. (1996). Group dynamics in an email forum. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 225–242). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
- Koschmann, T. (2000). Toward a diologic theory of learning: Bakhtin’s contribution to understanding learning in settings of collaboration. unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- Lewis, C., Watson, M., & Schnaps, E. (1999). Recapturing education’s full mission: Educating for social, ethical and intellectual development. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 511–535). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Liu, Y., & Ginther, D. (2001). Managing impression formation in computer-mediated communication. Educause Quarterly, 50(1), 50–54.Google Scholar
- McLuhan, M. (1967). The medium is the massage: An inventory of effects. Penguin: London.Google Scholar
- Merrill, M. D., Barclay, M., & Van Schaak, A. (2008). Prescriptive principles for instructional design. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merrieenboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Meyer, E. T. (2006). Socio-technical interaction networks: A discussion of the strengths, weaknesses and future of Kling’s STIN model. In J. Berleur, M. I. Numinen, & J. Impagliazzo (Eds.), Social informatics: An information society for all. In remembrance of Rob Kling (Vol. 223, pp. 37–48). Boston: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miller, J. (2004). Social languages and schooling: The uptake of sociocultural perspectives in school. In M. Hawkins (Ed.), Language learning and teacher education: A sociocultural approach (pp. 113–146). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Nakamura, L. (2002). Head-hunting on the Internet: Identity tourism, avatars, and racial passing in textual and graphic chat spaces. Cybertypes: Race, ethnicity, and identity on the internet (pp. 31–60). NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Perkins, D. N., & Unger, C. (1999). Teaching and learning for understanding. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 91–114). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 425–454). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Reigeluth, C. M. (2009). Instructional theory for education in the information age. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. III, pp. 387–400). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., & Macpherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by doing. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 511–535). (Vol. II, pp. 161-182). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Schwier, R. A., Campbell, K., & Kenny, R. (2004). Instructional designers’ observations about identity, communities of practice, and change agency. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(1), 69–100.Google Scholar
- Selman, R. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding: Developmental and clinical analyses. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Skovholt, K., & Svennevig, J. (2006). Email copies in workplace interaction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1), article 3.Google Scholar
- Tannen, D. (2011). How social media make cross-generational discourse like cross-cultural communication. Paper presented at the Georgetown University Roundtable on Applied Linguistics. Washington: Discourse: Language and New Media (GURT).Google Scholar
- Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Thurlow, C. (2006). From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and popular exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3). Retrived August 1, 2011 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue3/thurlow.html.
- van Moere, A., & Howard, C. D. (2002). Introducing Email exchange in a freshman curriculum. Working Papers of the Research Institute of Language Studies and Language Education, 12(1), 41–57.Google Scholar
- Wallace, P. M. (1999). The psychology of the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Zhu, E. (1996). Meaning negotiation, knowledge construction, and mentoring in a distance learning course. Paper presented at the Proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the 1996 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar