Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Teacher-education students’ views about knowledge building theory and practice

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of engaging students to collectively learn and work with knowledge in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment called Knowledge Forum on their views about knowledge building theory and practice. Participants were 24 teacher-education students who took a required course titled “Integrating Theory and Practice in Teaching.” Data mainly came from (1) student discourse recorded in a Knowledge Forum database, (2) a survey that examined students’ views about knowledge building, and (3) interviews with regard to students’ perceived barriers to implementing knowledge building theory in teaching. Findings suggest that with sustained discourse to construct their collective understanding of the relationships between theory and practice in teaching for a semester, the participants were able to attain more informed and practical views about knowledge building theory. In addition, students’ perceived barriers to implementing knowledge building in teaching were identified and strategies to help overcome these barriers discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

  2. Barab, S. A. (2003). Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Information Society, 19(3), 1–7.

  3. Bereiter, C. (1994). Implications of postmodernism for science, or, Science as progressive discourse. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 3–12.

  4. Bereiter, C. (1997). Situated cognition and how to overcome it. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 281–300). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  5. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

  6. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  7. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court.

  8. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. D. Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. v. Merrienboer (Eds.), Unravelling basic components and dimensions of powerful learning environments (pp. 55–68). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

  9. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David McKay.

  10. Burtis, J. (2002). Analytic Toolkit for Knowledge Forum (Version 4.0). Toronto, ON: Institute for Knowledge Innovation and Technology, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto.

  11. Chai, C. S., Hong, H.-Y., & Teo, T. (2009). Singaporean and Taiwanese pre-service teachers’ beliefs and their attitude towards ICT use: A comparative study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(1), 117–128.

  12. Chai, C. S., & Khine, M. S. (2006). An analysis of interaction and participation patterns in an online learning community. Journal of Education Technology and Society, 9(1), 250–261.

  13. Chai, C. S., & Merry, R. (2006). Teachers’ perceptions of teaching and learning in a Knowledge Building Community: An exploratory case study. Learning, Media & Technology, 31(2), 133–148.

  14. Chai, C. S., & Tan, S. C. (2009). Professional development of teachers for computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) through knowledge building. Teacher College Records, 111(5), 1296–1327.

  15. Cohen, D. K. (1989). Teaching practice: Plus que ca change. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 27–84). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

  16. Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning. conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

  17. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  18. Hargreaves, D. H. (1999). The knowledge-creating school. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 122–144.

  19. Hong, H.-Y., Chen, F. C., Chang, H. M., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, W. C. (2009a). Exploring the effectiveness of an idea-centered design to foster a computer-supported knowledge building environment. In C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning practices: CSCL2009 conference proceedings (pp. 142–150). Rhodes, Greece: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.

  20. Hong, H.-Y., & Lin, S. P. (2010). Teacher-education students’ epistemological belief change through collaborative knowledge building. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(1), 99–110.

  21. Hong, H.-Y., & Scardamalia, M. (2008). Using key terms to assess community knowledge. Paper presented at the annual conference of American Educational Research Association (AERA), New York.

  22. Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Messina, R., & Teo, C. L. (2008). Principle-based design to foster adaptive use of technology for building community knowledge. In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P. A. Kirschner, & F. J. Prins (Eds.), International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a learning world. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference for the Learning Sciences—ICLS 2008, Vol. 1 (pp. 374–381). Utrecht, the Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.

  23. Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., & Zhang, J. (in press). Knowledge Society Network: Toward a dynamic, sustained network for building knowledge. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology.

  24. Hong, H.-Y., & Sullivan, F. R. (2009). Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 613–627.

  25. Hong, H.-Y., Zhang, J., Teo, C. L., & Scardamalia, M. (2009b). Towards design-based knowledge-building practices in teaching. In C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning practices: CSCL2009 conference proceedings (pp. 257–261). Rhodes, Greece: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.

  26. Hyman, J. (1999). How knowledge works. The Philosophical Quarterly, 49(197), 433–451.

  27. Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13, 487–509.

  28. Oshima, J., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1995). Collaborative learning processes associated with high and low conceptual progress. Instructional Science, 24(2), 125–155.

  29. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teacher’s beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

  30. Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. New York: Anchor Books.

  31. Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. London: Oxford University Press.

  32. Reiman, A. J. (1999). The evolution of the social role taking and guided reflection framework in teacher education: Recent theory and quantitative synthesis of research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(6), 597–612.

  33. Richardson, V., Anders, P., Tidwell, D., & Lloyd, C. (1991). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and practices in reading comprehension instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 559–586.

  34. Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.

  35. Sawyer, K. (Ed.). (2006). Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  36. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.

  37. Scardamalia, M. (2003). Knowledge building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. In A. DiStefano, K. E. Rudestam, & R. Silverman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning (pp. 269–272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  38. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 37–68.

  39. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE Project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. In K. McGilley (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  40. Stahl, G. (2007). Meaning making in CSCL: Conditions and preconditions for cognitive processes by groups. Paper presented at the international conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2007), Brunswick, NJ.

  41. Stahl, G. (2009). Studying virtual math teams. New York, NY: Springer.

  42. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

  43. Sun, Y., Zhang, J., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Knowledge building and vocabulary growth over two years, Grades 3 and 4. Instructional Science, 38(2), 247–271.

  44. van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2007). Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolios. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 175–220.

  45. Wilson, S. M. (1990). The secret garden of teacher education. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 204–209.

  46. Zhang, J., Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (accepted). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences.

  47. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of nine- and ten-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2), 117–145.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The preparation of this paper was supported in part by the National Science Council, Taiwan, grants NSC96-2524-S-008-001 and NSC97-2511-S-004-001-MY2. We extend special thanks to the students and teacher for their participation and for the research opportunities enabled by them. Our special thanks also go to Florence R. Sullivan for editing the manuscript.

Author information

Correspondence to Huang-Yao Hong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hong, H., Chen, F., Chai, C.S. et al. Teacher-education students’ views about knowledge building theory and practice. Instr Sci 39, 467–482 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9143-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Knowledge building
  • Teacher education students
  • Epistemology
  • Teaching beliefs