An ecological model of developing researcher competence: the case of software technology in doctoral research
This paper presents an ecological model of developing researcher competence, with a particular focus on doctoral students’ use of research software. The model extends on theoretical work done by Young et al. (Instructional Science 30(1): 47–63, 2002), modelling the intentional dynamics of technological learning contexts. The development of the ecological model is linked to existing ways of understanding the doctoral experience. This includes the recent emphasis on pedagogy and learning, as well as different conceptualisations of context. The experiences of three doctoral student informants are used to exemplify aspects of the ecological model. A description of an e-learning resource, designed to support Education doctoral students’ use of research software, illustrates a concrete pedagogical contribution of the model. The paper concludes with a more general discussion of contributions of the model to the field of ecological psychology and the literature on doctoral education.
KeywordsDeveloping researcher competence Ecological psychology Intentionality Software Affordances Research education
- Atlas ti (2002–2007). Atlas ti the knowledge workbench: V5.0 User’s Guide and Reference. http://www.atlasti.com/downloads/atlman.pdf. Retrieved: 17 Mar 2009.
- Blackboard (1997–2009). Website: http://www.blackboard.com. Accessed November 11, 2009.
- Borg, S. (2001). The research journal: A tool for promoting and understanding researcher development. Language Teaching Research, 5(2), 156–177.Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.Google Scholar
- Fay, R. (2008). The complexities and affordances of narrative in research texts: Developing narrative awareness with experienced teachers on postgraduate programmes. Paper presented at the narrative matters: ‘Storying our world’ conference, Toronto, Canada (May 2008).Google Scholar
- Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing: Towards an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Huddersfield (2006). Online QDA [website]. http://onlineqda.hud.ac.uk/. Accessed March 17, 2009.
- Kerlin, B. (2000). Qualitative research in the United States [27 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1(1). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/index. Retrieved Feb 21, 2007.
- MaxQDA (2007). MaxQDA [website]. http://www.maxqda.com/. Accessed March 17, 2009.
- McGrenere, J. & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. In Proceedings of the Graphcis Interface 2000 (pp. 179–186). Toronto: Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society.Google Scholar
- Norman, D. (1988). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Onat-Stelma, Z. (2005). Moving from Teaching Older Learners to Young Learners: Cases of English Language Teachers in Turkey. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
- QRS International (2007). Nvivo [website]. http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_nvivo.aspx. Accessed March 17, 2009.
- Shaw, R. E., & Turvey, M. T. (1999). Ecological foundations of cognition: II. Degrees of freedom and conserved quantities in animal-environment systems. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(11–12), 111–123.Google Scholar
- Turvey, M. T., & Shaw, R. E. (1995). Toward an ecological physics and a physical psychology. In R. L. Solso & D. W. Massaro (Eds.), The science of the mind: 2001 and beyond (pp. 144–169). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R. E., & Mace, W. (1978). Issues in the theory of action: Degrees of freedom, coordinate structures and coalitions. In J. Requin (Ed.), Attention and performance VII (pp. 557–595). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar