Instructional Science

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 141–185 | Cite as

Review of computer mediated communication research for education

  • Rocci LuppiciniEmail author


This research review examines recent developments in computer-mediated communication (CMC) research for educational applications. The review draws on 170 recent research articles selected from 78 journals representing a wide range of disciplines. The review focuses on peer-reviewed empirical studies, but is open to a variety of methodologies. The review is divided into two sections addressing major areas of current research: (a) general CMC research in education, and (b) factors affecting computer-mediated learning. The review covers a variety of key research areas revolving around CMC in education, including, media effect and comparison, on-line courses and networks, course and program evaluations, learning and learning processes, problem solving, writing, decision-making, argumentation, group decision-making, group dynamics, peer evaluations, gender differences, anonymity, teaching practice effects, technology integration, teacher styles and characteristics, socio-cultural factors, and professional development effects. Findings suggest partial advantages of CMC in writing, task focused discussion, collaborative decision-making, group work, and active involvement in knowledge construction during group interactions. Other research findings revealed influences of peer interaction, group composition, group cohesion, goal commitment, group norm development, and process training, mixed-sex groups, and virtual cross-functional teams. Mixed-findings are revealed for performance advantages of computer-mediated versus face-to-face learning environments on various tasks and for the presence of gender differences in computer-mediated environments.


collaborative learning computer-mediated communication instruction online learning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adrianson L. (2001). Gender and computer-mediated communication: Group processes in problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1):71–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adrianson L., Hjelmquist E. (1991). Group processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Behavior & Information Technology, 10(4):281–296Google Scholar
  3. Alavi M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 20(2):150–174Google Scholar
  4. Alavi M., Wheeler B., Valacich J. (1995). Using IT to reengineer business education: An exploratory investigation to collaborative telelearning. MIS Quarterly, 19(3):294–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Almeda, M. & Rose, K. (2000). Instructor satisfaction in university of California extension’s on-line writing curriculum. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4(3). [Online]. Available at:
  6. Anderson, T. & Kanuka, H. (1997). On-line Forums: New platforms for professional development and group collaboration. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 4(3). [Online]. Available at:
  7. Atan H., Rahman Z., Idrus R.M. (2004). Characteristics of the web-based learning environment in distance education: Students’ perceptions of their learning needs. Educational Media International, 41(2):103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baltes, B.B., Dickson M.W., Sherman, M.P., Bauer, C.C. & LaGanke, J.S. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Process 87(1): 156–179Google Scholar
  9. Baym, N. (1996). Agreements and disaggreements in a computer-mediated discussion. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29(4): 315–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Becker, D. & Dwyer, M. (1998). The impact of student verbal/visual learning style preference on implementing groupware in the classroom. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 2(2). [Online]. Available at:
  11. Belanich J., Wisher R.A., Orvis K.L. (2004). A question-collaboration approach to web-based learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(3):169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Benbasat I., Lim J. (2000). Information technology support for debiasing group judgements: An empirical investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(1):167–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Benbunan-Fich, S. & Star, R. (1999). Educational applications of CMCs: Solving case studies through asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 4(3). [Online]. Available at:
  14. Berg, G. (2000). Early patterns of faculty compensation for developing and teaching distance learning courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4(1). [Online]. Available at:
  15. Berge Z., Myers B. (2000). Evaluating computer mediated communication courses in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(4):431–450Google Scholar
  16. Bernard R., Lundgren-Cayrol K. (2001). Computer conferencing: An environment for collaborative project-based learning in distance education. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(2):241–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bikson, T. & Eveland, J. (1990). The interplay of work group structures and computer support, intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  18. Blum, K. (1999). Gender differences in asynchronous learning in higher education: learning styles, participation barriers and communication patterns. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 3(1). [Online]. Available at:
  19. Bonk C., Malikowski S., Angeli C., East J. (1998). Web-based case conferencing for preservice teacher education: Electronic discourse from the field. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19(3):269–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bordia P. (1997). Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: a synthesis of the experimental literature. Journal of Business Communication, 34 (1):99–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Briton D., Taylor J. (2001). Online workers’ education: How do we tame the technology? International Journal of Instructional Media, 28(2):117–35Google Scholar
  22. Booth S., Hultén M. (2003). Opening dimensions of variation: An empirical study of learning in a Web-based discussion. Instructional Science, 31(1):65 – 86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Burge E. (1994). Learning in computer conferenced contexts: The learners’ perspective. Journal of Distance Education, 9(1):19–43Google Scholar
  24. Burley H. (1998). Does the medium make the magic? The effects of cooperative learning and conferencing software. Computers and Composition, 15(1):83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Campos, M., Laferrière, T. & Harasim, L. (2001). The post-secondary networked classroom: renewal of teaching practices and social interaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2). [Online]. Available at:
  26. Chester , A. & Gwynne, G. (1998). Online teaching: Encouraging collaboration through anonymity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(2). [Online]. Available at: Scholar
  27. Chidambaram, L. (1996). Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quarterly. June: 143–159Google Scholar
  28. Chidambaram L., Jones B. (1993). Impact of communication medium on and computer support on group perceptions and performance: A comparison of face-to-face and dispersed meetings. MIS Quarterly, 4(4):65–487Google Scholar
  29. Cho E. (1998). Analysis of teacher & students’ attitudes on two-way video tele-educational system for Korean elementary school. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1):98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Choi I., Land S., Turgeon A. (2005). Scaffolding Peer-questioning Strategies to Facilitate Metacognition During Online Small Group Discussion. Instructional Science, 33(5):483–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chou C. (2001). Formative evaluation of synchronous CMC systems for a learner-centered online course. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(2):173–192Google Scholar
  32. Chou S., Liu C. (2005). Learning effectiveness in a web-based virtual learning environment: A learner control perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(1):65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Citera M. (1998). Distributed teamwork: the impact of communication media on influence and decision quality. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(9):792–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Cohen J. (1996). Computer mediated communication and publication productivity among faculty. Internet Research, 6(2):41–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cole, L., Beam, M., Karn, L. & Hoad-Reddick, A. (1992). Educational computer-mediated communication. A fieldstudy of recent research. Unpublished paper, Toronto, Canada: Ontario Institute for Studies in EducationGoogle Scholar
  36. Condon, S. & Cech, C. (1996). Discourse management strategies in face-to-face-and computer-mediated decision making interaction. Electronic Journal of Communication 6(3). [Online]. Available at:
  37. Condon S., Cech C. (2001). Discourse management in three modalities. In: Herring S. (eds). Computer-Mediated Conversation. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Connolly T., Jessup L.M., Valacich J.S. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36:689–703Google Scholar
  39. Creswell, J. (1994). Research design qualitative & quantitative approache. Thousand Oaks: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  40. Daft R., Langel R. (1990) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5):554–571Google Scholar
  41. Daly B. (1993). The influences of face-to-face versus computer mediated communication channels on collective induction. Accounting, Management, and Information Technologies, 3(1):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. December, J. (1996). What is computer-mediated communication? [Online] Available:
  43. Dehler C., Porras-Hernandez L. (1998). Using computer-mediated communication (CMC) to promote experiential learning in graduate studies. Educational Technology, 38(3):52–55Google Scholar
  44. De Laat M., Lally V., (2003). Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community. Instructional Science, 31(1):7–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Dennis A.R., Hilmer K.M., Taylor N.J. (1997). Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision-making: Effects of minority influence. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14:61–88Google Scholar
  46. Desantis G., Poole M. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organizational Science, 5:121–147Google Scholar
  47. De-Simone C., Schmid R., McEwen L. (2001). Supporting the learning process with collaborative concept mapping using computer-based communication tools and processes. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 7(2):263–283Google Scholar
  48. Dickey M.D. (2004). The impact of web-logs (blogs) on student perceptions of isolation and alienation in a web-based distance-learning environment. Open Learning, 19(3):279–291Google Scholar
  49. Dirr, P.J. (1990). Distance education: policy considerations for the year 2000. In M.G. Moore, (Ed.), Contemporary issues in american distance education, pp 397–406. New York: PergamonGoogle Scholar
  50. Dutton, J., Dutton, M. & Perry, J. (2002). How do online students differ from lecture students? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6(1). [Online]. Available at:
  51. Elmer-Dewitt, P. (1994). Bards of the Internet. Time July 4: 66–67Google Scholar
  52. Everett D., Ahern T. (1994). Computer mediated communication as a teaching tool: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3):336–357Google Scholar
  53. Finholt T., Olson G. (1997). From laboratories to collaboratories: a new organizational form for scientific collaboration. Psychological Science, 8:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Fishman B. (1999). Characteristics of students related to computer-mediated communications activity. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1):73–97Google Scholar
  55. Flanagin A., Tiyaamornwong V., O’Connor J., Seibold D. (2002). Computer-mediated group work: The interaction of member and sex and anonymity. Communication Research, 29(1):66–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Shea,P., Pelz, W. & Swan, K. (2000). factors influencing faculty satisfaction with asynchronous teaching and learning in the SUNY learning network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4(3). [Online]. Available at:
  57. Freedman K., Liu M. (1996). The importance of computer experience, learning processes, and communication patterns in multicultural networking. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(1):43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Galegher J., Kraut R. (1994). Computer-mediated communication for intellectual teamwork: An experiment in group writing. Information Systems Research, 5(2):110–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Gallupe, R. B., DeSanctis, G. & Dickson, G. (1988). Computer-based support for group problem-finding: An experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly 12(2): 277–298Google Scholar
  60. Gallupe R., McKeen J. (1990). Enhancing computer-mediated communication: An experimental investigation into the use of a group DSS for face-to-face versus remote meetings. Information and Management, 18:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C. & Wellman, B. (1997). Studying online social networks. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 4 (3). [Online]. Available at: Scholar
  62. Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley: Sociology PressGoogle Scholar
  63. Gnisci A, Papa F., Spedaletti S. (1999). Usability aspects, socio-relational context and learning performance in the virtual classroom: A laboratory experiment. Behaviour and Information Technology, 18(6):431–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Godlee F., Gale C., Martyn C. (1998). Effect on the quality of peer review of anonymous reviewers and asking them to sign their own reports: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(3):237–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Gold, S. (2001). A constructivist approach to online training for online teachers. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(1). [online]. Available:
  66. Greenlaw S. (1999). Using groupware to enhance teaching and learning in undergraduate economics. Journal of Economic Education, 30(1):33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Guernsey L. (1998). Distance education for the not-so-distant. Chronicle of Higher Education, 45(3):29–30Google Scholar
  68. Gunawardena C., Nolla A., Wilson P., Lopez-Islas J., Ramirez-Angel N., Megchun-Alpizar R. (2001) Cross-cultural study of group process and development in online conferences. Distance Education, 22(1):85–121Google Scholar
  69. Guzzo, R. & Shea, G. (1992). Group performance and internet relations in organizations. In M. Dunnette & L. Hough, (eds), Handbook of industrial & organizational psychology, 2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 269–313. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists PressGoogle Scholar
  70. Hacker R., Sova B. (1998). Initial teacher education: a study of the efficacy of computer mediated courseware delivery in a partnership context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4):333–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Harris L., Wambeam A. (1996). The internet-based composition classroom: A study in pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 13(3):353–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hartman, J., Dziuban, C. & Moskal, P. (2000). Faculty satisfaction in ALNs: A dependent or independent variable. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4(3). [Online]. Available at:
  73. Hawisher, G. & Pemberton, M. (1997). Writing across the curriculum encounters asynchronous learning networks or WAC meets up with ALN. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 1(1). [Online]. Available at:
  74. Hawkes M. (2000). Structuring computer-mediated communication for collaborative teacher development. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 33(4):268–277Google Scholar
  75. Haythornthwaite, C., Kazmer, M. & Robins, J. (2000). Community development among distance learners: Temporal and technological dimensions. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 6(1). [Online]. Available at:
  76. Hedlund J., Ilgen D.R., Hollenbeck J.R. (1998). Decision accuracy in computer-mediated versus face-to-face decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76:30–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Hertz-Lazarowitz R., Bar-Natan I. (2002) Writing development of Arab and Jewish students using cooperative learning (CL) and computer-mediated communication (CMC). Computers and Education, 39(1):19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Hesse B., Werner C., Alman I. (1998). Temporal aspect of computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 4(2):147–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Hewett B. (2000). Characteristics of interactive oral and computer-mediated peer group talk and its influence on revision. Computers and Composition, 17(3):265–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Hillman D. (1999) A new method for analyzing patterns of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 12(2):37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Hiltz, S.R. (1997). Impacts of college-level courses via asynchronous learning networks: some preliminary results. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 1(2). [Online]. Available at:
  82. Hollingshead A. (1996). information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: the effects of communication media. Human Communication Research, 23(2):193–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Hollingshead A., McGrath J. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology. A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research, 24(3):307–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Jarvenpaa, S. & Leider, D. (1998). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 3(4). [On-line] Available:
  85. Jessup L., Connolly T., Tansik D. (1990). Toward a theory of automated group work: The dindividuating effects of anonymity. Small Group Research, 21:333–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Jin S.H. (2005). Analyzing student-student and student-instructor interaction through multiple communication tools in web-based learning. International journal of instructional media, 32(1):59Google Scholar
  87. Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psycholog 31: 177–192Google Scholar
  88. Jonassen D., Kwon H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated vs. face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(1):35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Justice A., Cho M., Winker M., Berlin J. (1998). Does masking improve peer quality review? A randomized control. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(3):240–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Karetnick R. (2001). Constructing the self through modification of convention in computer-mediated environments. New Jersey Journal of Communication, 9(1):88–102Google Scholar
  91. Kaye A. (1991). Learning together apart. In: Kaye A.R. (eds), Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden Papers. Springer-Verlag/NATO Scientific Affairs Division, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  92. Klein H., Mulvey P. (1995). Two investigations of the relationships among group, goals, goal commitment, cohesion, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61(1):44–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Kline T., McGrath -J. (1999). A review of the groupware literature: Theories, methodologies, and a research agenda. Canadian-Psychology, 40(3):265–271Google Scholar
  94. Kollias V., Mamalougos N., Vamvakoussi X., Lakkala M., Vosniadou S. (2005). Teachers’ attitudes to and beliefs about web-based collaborative learning environments in the context of an international implementation. Computers and Education, 45(3):295–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Kollock P., Smith M.A. (1999). Communities in Cyberspace. In: Smith M.A., Kollock P. (eds), Communities in cyberspace. Routledge, New York, pp. 3–25Google Scholar
  96. Koohang A. (2004). Students perceptions toward the use of the digital library in weekly web-based distance learning assignments portion of a hybrid programme. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5):617–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Kumari (2001). Connecting graduate students to virtual guests through asynchronous discussions – analysis of an experience. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2). [Online] Available at:
  98. Lally V., Barrett E. (1999). Building a learning community on-line: Towards socio-academic interaction. Research Papers in Education: Policy and Practice, 14(2):147–163Google Scholar
  99. LaPointe D.K., Gunawardena C.N. (2004). Developing, testing and refining of a model to understand the relationship between peer interaction and learning outcomes in computer-mediated conferencing. Distance Education, 25(1):83–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Larose, R., Gregg, J. & Eastin, M. (1998). Audiographic telecourses for the Web: An experiment. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 4(2). [Online]. Available at:
  101. Latané, B. (1984). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist 36: 343–356Google Scholar
  102. Lea, M., Rogers, P., Postmes, T. & Schouten, A. (2001). SIDEVIEW: An design to develop team players and improve productivity in Internet collaborative learning groups, Proceedings of the ICSC Congress on Intelligent Systems & Applications Google Scholar
  103. Lehman S., Kauffman D, White M., Horn C., Bruning R., (2001a). Teacher interaction: Motivating at-risk students in Web-based high school courses. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 33(5):45–52Google Scholar
  104. Lehman J., Warfield J., Palm M., Wood T. (2001b). Making teaching public: Supporting teachers’ inquiry through the Internet. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 33(5):14–21Google Scholar
  105. Loomis, K. (2000). Learning styles and asynchronous learning: Comparing the LASSI model to class performance. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4(1). [Online]. Available at:
  106. Luetkehans, L. (1999). A case study of using groupware to support collaborative activities in a distance learning course. Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Papers presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology [AECT], HoustonGoogle Scholar
  107. Lundell D. (2000). Developing writers, developing professionals: Graduate students bridging theory and practice in basic writing. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 16(2):43–53Google Scholar
  108. Luppicini, R. (2003). Categories of virtual learning communities for educational design. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 2(4): 12–22Google Scholar
  109. Mann S. (2003). A personal inquiry into an experience of adult learning on-line. Instructional Science, 31(1):111 – 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Mark G., Wulf V. (1999). Changing interpersonal communication through groupware use. Behaviour and Information Technology, 18(5):385–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Marttunen M. (1998). Electronic mail as a forum for argumentative interaction in higher education studies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18(4):387–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Marttunen M., Laurinen L. (2001). Learning of argumentation skills in networked and face-to-face environments. Instructional Science, 29:127–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Mason R., Kaye A. (1989) Mindweave: Communication, Computers, and Distance education. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  114. Matheson K., Zanna M.P. (1991). The impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 4(3):221–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. McCain K. (2000). Sharing digitized research-related information on the world wide web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14):1321–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. McConnell D. (1997). Interaction patterns of mixed sex groups in educational computer conferences Part 1-empirical findings. Gender and Education, 9(3):345–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. McDonald J., Campbell C. (1998). Interpersonal dynamics and group development in computer conferencing. The American Journal of Distance Education, 12(1):7–25Google Scholar
  118. McGrath J., Arrow H., Gruenfeld D., Hollingshead A., O’Connor K. (1993). Groups, tasks, and technology: The effects of experience and change. Small Group Research, 24:406–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. McGuire T., Kiesler S., Siegal J. (1987). Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52:917–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Mclsaac, M.S., Blocher, J.M., Mahes, V. & Vrasidas, C. (1999). Student and teacher perceptions of interaction in online computer-mediated communication. Educational Media International 36(2): 121–131Google Scholar
  121. McMahen C., Dawson A. (1995). The design and implementation of environmental computer-mediated communication (CMC) projects. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27(3):318–335Google Scholar
  122. Ocker R.J., Yaverbaum G.J. (1999). Asynchronous computer-mediated-communication versus face-to-face collaboration: Results on student learning, quality and satisfaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8:427–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Ohlund B., Yu C., Jannasch A., DiGangi S. (2000). Impact of asynchronous and synchronous Internet-based communication on collaboration and performance among K-12 teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research 23(4):405–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Olarniran B.A. (1994). Group performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication media. Management Communication Quarterly, 7:256–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Orr P. (1998). HOWL: An on-line conference for an off-line poetry seminary. Computers and Composition, 15(1):97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Ory, J., Bullock, C. & Burnaska, K. (1997). Gender similarity in the use of and attitudes about ALN in a university setting. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 1(1). [Online]. Available at:
  127. Onwuegbuzie A., Teddlie C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In: Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (eds), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp. 351–383Google Scholar
  128. Pagnucci G., Mauriello N. (1999). The masquerade: Gender, identity, and writing for the web. Computers and Composition, 16(1):141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Paolillo, J. (1999). The virtual speech community: Social network and language variation on IRC. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 4(3). [Online]. Available at:
  130. Pilkington, R. & Walker, A. (2003). Facilitating debate in networked learning: Reflecting on online synchronous discussion in higher education. Instructional Science 31(1): 41–63Google Scholar
  131. Pimentel, J. (1999). Design of net-learning system based on experiential learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 3 (2). [Online]. Available at: Available at:
  132. Poole M., Holmes M. (1995). Decision development in computer-assisted group decision making. Human Communication Research, 22(1):90–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Postmes, T. & Spears, R. (2002). Contextual moderators of gender differences and stereotyping in computer-mediated groupdiscussions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28: 1073–1083Google Scholar
  134. Postmes T., Spears R., Lea M. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26(3):341–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Olson, J., Olson, G. & Meader, D. (1995). What mix of video and audio is useful for doing remote real-time design work? Proceedings from the Human Computer Interaction Conference, pp. 362–368, USAGoogle Scholar
  136. Quinn C., Mehan H., Levin J., Black S. (1983). Real education in non-real time. The use of electronic message systems for instruction. Instructional Science, 4:331–327Google Scholar
  137. Ramsoomair J. (1997). Internet in the context of cross-cultural management. Internet Research, 7(3):189–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Reid F.J.M., Ball L.J., Morley A.M., Evans J.B.T. (1997). Styles of group discussion in computer-mediated decision-making. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36:241–262Google Scholar
  139. Rice R., Love G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication Research, 14(1):85–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Rickly R. (1999). The gender gap in computers and composition research: Must boys be boys? Computers and Composition, 16(1):121–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Robey D., Khoo H., Powers C. (2000). Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams. Technical Communication. Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 47(1):51–66Google Scholar
  142. Romiszowski A.J. (1992). Computer Mediated Communications: A Selected Bibliography. Educational Technology, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  143. Romiszowski A.J., Mason R. (1996). Computer-mediated communication. In: Jonassen D. (eds), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York, pp. 438–456Google Scholar
  144. Romiszowski A., Mason R. (2004). Computer-mediated communication. In: Jonassen D. (eds), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ, pp. 397–431Google Scholar
  145. Ross J. (1996). The influence of computer communication skills on participation in a computer conferencing course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15(1):37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Rossman, M. (1999). Successful online teaching using an asynchronous learner discussion forum. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 3(2). [Online] Available at:
  147. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R. & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education 14(2). [Online]. Available at: al.htmlGoogle Scholar
  148. Rovai, A. (2001). A preliminary look at the structural differences of higher education classroom communities in traditional and aln courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6 (1). [Online]. Available at: Scholar
  149. Rovai, A. (2002). A preliminary look at the structural differences of higher education classroom communities in traditional and aln courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6 (1). [Online]. Available at: Scholar
  150. Ruberg -L. (1996). Student participation, interaction, and regulation in a computer-mediated communication environment: A qualitative study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(3):243–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Saat R.M. (2004). The acquisition of integrated science process skills in a web-based learning environment. Research in Science and Technological Education, 22(1):23–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Sackmary B., Scalia L. (1996). Groupware and computer supported cooperative work in the college classroom. Business Communication Quarterly, 59(4):98–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Sauer J., Schramme S., Ruettinger B. (2000). Knowledge acquisition in ecological product design: The effects of computer-mediated communication and elicitation method. Behaviour and Information Technology, 19(5):315–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Savicki V. (1996). Gender, group composition, and task type in small task groups using computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(4):549–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Schifter, C. (2000). Faculty participation in asynchronous learning networks: a case study of motivating and inhibiting factors. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4 (1). [Online]. Available at: Scholar
  156. Schnackenberg, H.L., Chin, K. & Luppicini, R.J. (2003). Heuristic and formative evaluation: A case study illustration of a new technique. Journal of Educational Computing Research 28(2): 35–52Google Scholar
  157. Schrire S. (2005). Interaction and cognition in asynchronous computer conferencing. Instructional Science, 32(6):475 – 502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Schrum, L. & Benson, A. (2000). Online professional education: A case study of an MBA program through its transition to an online model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4(1). [Online]. Available at: Scholar
  159. Schwier, R. (2001). Catalysts, emphases, and elements of virtual communities: Implications for research and practice. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 2(1): 5–18Google Scholar
  160. Scott C. (1999). The impact of physical and discursive anonymity on group members’ multiple identifications during computer-supported decision making. Western Journal of Communication, 63(4):456–487Google Scholar
  161. Shani A., Sena J., Stebbins M. (2000). Knowledge work teams and groupware technology: Learning from Seagate’s experience. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2):111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Shaw,G. & Pieter, W. (2000). The use of asynchronous learning networks in nutrition education: student attitude, experiences and performance. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4(1). [Online]. Available at: Scholar
  163. Sheremetov L., Arenas A. (2002). EVA: an interactive Web-based collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 39(2):161–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Sia C., Tan B., Wei K. (2002). Group polarization and computer-mediated communication: Effects of communication cues, social presence, and anonymity. Information Systems Research, 13(1):70–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Siegel J., Dubrovsky V., Kiesler S., McGuire T.W. (1986). Group processes in computermediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37:157–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Solomon G. (1993). Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  167. Sosik, J., Avolio, B. & Kahai, S. (1997). Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. Journal of Applied Psychology 82(1): 89–103Google Scholar
  168. Spooner F., Jordan L., Algozzine B., Spooner M. (1999). Student ratings of instruction in distance learning and on-campus classes. Journal of Educational Research, 92(3):132–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Stepich D., Ertmer P., Lane M. (2001). Problem solving in a case-based course: Strategies for facilitating coached expertise. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3):53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Strauss S.G. (1996). Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 27:115–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Swan K., Shea P., Fredericksen E., Pickett A., Pelz W., Maher G. (2001). Building knowledge building communities: Consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(4):359–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Taylor, J. (2001). Virtual writing forum with Don Murray and the national writing project in an asynchronous environment. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(1). [Online]. Available at: Scholar
  173. Thaiupathump, C., Bourne, J. & Campbell, O. (1999). Intelligent agents for online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 3(2). [Online]. Available at: Scholar
  174. Tolmie A., Boyle J. (2000). Factors influencing the success of computer mediated communication (CMC) environments in university teaching: A review and case study. Computers and Education, 34(2):119–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Treleaven L., Cecez-Kecmanovic D. (2001). Collaborative learning in a web-mediated environment: A study of communicative practices. Studies-in-Continuing-Education, 23(2):169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Tullar W., Kaiser P. (2000). The effect of process training on process and outcomes in virtual groups. Journal of Business Communication, 37(4):408–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. U. S. Department of Commerce, National Communications, and Information Administration (2000). Falling through the Net IV: Toward Digital Inclusion. U.S. Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  178. U.S. Department of Education: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1999). Internet access in private and public schools. U.S. Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  179. Valacich J.S., Schwenk C. (1995). Devil’s advocacy and dialectical inquiry effects on faceto-face and computer-mediated group decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63:158–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Valenta, Therriault, Dieter, & Mrtek (2001). Identifying student attitudes and learning styles in distance education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2). [Online] Available: Scholar
  181. Vandergrift, K. (2002). Anatomy of a distance education course: A case study analysis.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6 (1). [Online]. Available at: 1/6_1 vandergriff.htmGoogle Scholar
  182. Veermans M., Cesareni D. (2005). The nature of the discourse in web-based collaborative learning environments: Case studies from four different countries. Computers and Education 45(3): 316–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Vician C., Brown S. (2000). Unraveling the message quilt: A case-study examination of student interaction in computer-based communication assignments. Computers and Composition 17(2):211–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Wallace R. (2003). Online Learning in Higher Education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication & Information 3(2):241–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Walther J. (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research 23(3):342–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Walther J., Anderson J., Park D. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Communication Research 21:460–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Weedman J. (1999). Conversation and community: The potential of electronic conferences for creating intellectual proximity in distributed learning environments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50(10):907–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Weisband, S. P. (1992). Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 53: 352–380Google Scholar
  189. Wellens, A. R. (1986). Use of psychological distancing model to assess differences in telecommunication media. In L. Parker & C. Olgen, (ed.), Teleconferencing and Electronic Media: Vol. V, pp. 347–361Google Scholar
  190. Wellens, A.R. (1990). Assessing multi-person and person-machine distributed decision making using an extended psychological distancing model. AAMRL-TR-90–006. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio: Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  191. Wiebe E. (1999). Integration of electronic mail into schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research 21(1):55–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Williams S., Watkins K., Daley B., Courtenay B., Davis M., Dymock D. (2001). Facilitating cross-cultural online discussion groups: Implications for practice. Distance Education 22(1):151–167Google Scholar
  193. Yates S. (1997). Gender, identity and CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 13(4): 281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CommunicationUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations