Advertisement

Instructional Science

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 343–365 | Cite as

Altering the Modality of Instructions to Facilitate Imagination: Interactions between the Modality and Imagination Effects

  • Sharon Tindall-Ford
  • John Sweller
Article

Abstract

Under some conditions, learning is improved by using a dual mode presentation involving for example, visual diagrams and auditory, rather than written text (modality effect). Under other conditions, learning is improved by asking learners to imagine rather than study instructional material (imagination effect). Both effects have been explained using cognitive load theory. This paper investigates interactions between the modality and imagination effects. It was hypothesized that the imagination effect would be facilitated when accompanied by audio/visual instructions compared to visual only instructions. Experiment 1 provided evidence to suggest that for the materials used, audio/visual instructions were required to obtain an imagination effect. Experiment 2 through verbal protocols aimed to investigate the cognitive mechanisms required when studying and imagining and found that learners who studied tended to engage in search while learners who imagined focused on entities and relations that needed to be learned.

Keywords

coginitive load theory imagination effect modality effect 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baddeley, A. 1992Working memoryScience255556559Google Scholar
  2. Brünken, R., Plass, J., Leutner, D. 2004Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning with dual-task methodology: Auditory load and modality effectsInstructional Science32115132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brünken, R., Steinbacher, S., Plass, J.L., Leutner, D. 2002Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning using dual-task methodologyExperimental Psychology49112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, R., Nguyen, F., Sweller, J. 2006Efficiency in learning: evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive loadPfeifferSan FransiscoGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper, G., Sweller, J. 1987Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on␣mathematical problem solving transferJournal of Educational Psychology79347362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper, G., Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., Sweller, J. 2001Learning by imaginingJournal of Experimental Psychology: Applied76882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Driskell, J.E., Copper, C., Moran, A. 1994Does mental practice enhance performance?Journal of Applied Psychology7481492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ericsson, K.A., Kintsch, W. 1995Long-term working memoryPsychological Review10211245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ericsson, K.A., Simon, H.A. 1993Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as dataMIT PressCambridge, MassRevised ednGoogle Scholar
  10. Etnier, J.L., Landers, D.M. 1996The influence of procedural variables on the efficacy of mental practiceThe Sport Psychologist104857Google Scholar
  11. Ginns, P., Chandler, P., Sweller, J. 2003When imagining information is effectiveContemporary Educational Psychology28229251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., Sweller, J. 2003The expertise reversal effectEducational Psychologist382331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Sweller, J. 1998Levels of expertise and instructional designHuman Factors40117Google Scholar
  14. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Sweller, J. 2000Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instructionJournal of Educational Psychology92126136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leahy, W., Sweller, J. 2005Interactions among the imagination, expertise reversal and element interactivity effectsJournal of Experimental Psychology: Applied11266276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Low, R., Sweller, J. 2005The modality principleMayer, R.E. eds. Cambridge handbook of multimedia learningCambridge University PressNew York147158Google Scholar
  17. Mayer, R. 2005Cognitive theory of multimedia learningMayer, R.E. eds. Cambridge handbook of multimedia learningCambridge University PressNew York3148Google Scholar
  18. Mayer, R., Moreno, R. 2003Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learningEducational Psychologist384352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller, G.A. 1956The magical number of seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing informationPsychological Review638197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E. 1998A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual-processing systems in working memoryJournal of Educational Psychology90312320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mousavi, S.Y., Low, R., Sweller, J. 1995Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modesJournal of Educational Psychology87319334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Paivio, A. 1986Mental representations: a dual coding approachOxford University PressOxford, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  23. Penney, C.G. 1989Modality effects and the structure of short term verbal memoryMemory and Cognition17398422Google Scholar
  24. Peterson, L.R., Peterson, M. 1959Short term retention of individual itemsJournal of Experimental Psychology58193198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rawlings, E.I., Rawlings, I.L. 1974Rotary pursuit tracking following mental rehearsal as a function of voluntary control of visual imageryPerceptual and MotorSkills38302309Google Scholar
  26. Romero, K., Silvestri, L. 1990The role of mental practice in the acquisition and performance of motor skillsJournal of Instructional Psychology17218221Google Scholar
  27. Shick, M. 1970Effects of mental practice on selected volleyball skills for college womenResearch Quarterly418894Google Scholar
  28. Surburg, P.R. 1968Audio, visual and audio-visual instruction with mental practice in developing the forehand tennis driveResearch Quarterly39728734Google Scholar
  29. Sweller, J. 1999Instructional design in technical areasACER PressVictoria, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  30. Sweller, J. 2003Evolution of human cognitive architectureRoss, B. eds. The psychology of learning and motivationAcademic PressSan Diego215266Google Scholar
  31. Sweller, J. 2004Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architectureInstructional Science32931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sweller, J. 2005Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learningMayer, R.E. eds. Cambridge handbook of multimedia learningCambridge University PressNew York1930Google Scholar
  33. Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P., Cooper, M. 1990Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical materialJournal of Experimental Psychology: General119176192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sweller, J., Cooper, G. 1985The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebraCognition and Instruction25889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sweller, J., Merrienboer, J., Paas, F. 1998Cognitive architecture and instructional designEducational Psychology Review10251296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tabbers, H., Martens, R., Merriënboer, J. 2004Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: Effects of modality and cueingBritish Journal of Educational Psychology747181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., Sweller, J. 1997When two sensory modes are better than oneJournal of Experimental Psychology: Applied3257287CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations