Instructional Science

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 1–30 | Cite as

Epistemic and social scripts in computer–supported collaborative learning

  • Armin WeinbergerEmail author
  • Bernhard Ertl
  • Frank Fischer
  • Heinz Mandl


Collaborative learning in computer-supported learning environments typically means that learners work on tasks together, discussing their individual perspectives via text-based media or videoconferencing, and consequently acquire knowledge. Collaborative learning, however, is often sub-optimal with respect to how learners work on the concepts that are supposed to be learned and how learners interact with each other. One possibility to improve collaborative learning environments is to conceptualize epistemic scripts, which specify how learners work on a given task, and social scripts, which structure how learners interact with each other. In this contribution, two studies will be reported that investigated the effects of epistemic and social scripts in a text-based computer-supported learning environment and in a videoconferencing learning environment in order to foster the individual acquisition of knowledge. In each study the factors ‘epistemic script’ and ‘social script’ have been independently varied in a 2 × 2-factorial design. A total of 182 university students of educational science participated in these two studies. Results of both studies show that social scripts can be substantially beneficial with respect to the individual acquisition of knowledge, whereas epistemic scripts apparently do not always lead to the expected effects.


computer-supported collaborative learning CSCL cooperation scripts computer-mediated communication discussion boards videoconferencing 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baker, M., Lund, K. 1997Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environmentJournal of Computer Assisted Learning13175193Google Scholar
  2. Brooks, L.W., Dansereau, D.F. 1983Effects of structural schema training and text organization on expository prose processingJournal of Educational Psychology75811820Google Scholar
  3. Brown, A.L., Palincsar, A.S. 1989Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisitionResnick, L.B. eds. Knowing, Learning, and Instruction. Essays in the Honour of Robert GlaserErlbaumHillsdale, NJ393451Google Scholar
  4. Chan, C.K.K. 2001Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible informationInstructional Science29443479Google Scholar
  5. Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J., Glaser, R. 1981Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novicesCognitive Science5121152Google Scholar
  6. Chinn, C.A., Brewer, W.F. 1993The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instructionReview of Educational Research63149Google Scholar
  7. Clark, D., Weinberger, A., Jucks, I., Spitulnik, M., Wallace, R. 2003Designing effective science inquiry in text-based computer supported collaborative learning environmentsInternational Journal of Educational Policy, Research & Practice45582Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, E.G. 1994Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groupsReview of Educational Research64135Google Scholar
  9. Dansereau, D.F., Collins, K.W., McDonald, B.A., Holley, C.D., Garland, J.C., Diekhoff, G., Evans, S.H. 1979Development and evaluation of a learning strategy programJournal of Educational Psychology716473Google Scholar
  10. Dillenbourg, P. 2002Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional designKirschner, P.A. eds. Three Worlds of CSCL. Can We Support CSCLOpen Universiteit NederlandHeerlen6191Google Scholar
  11. Doise, W. 1990System and metasystem in cognitive operationsCarretero, M.Pope, M.L.Simons, P.R.J.Pozo, J.I. eds. Learning and Instruction: European Research in an International ContextPergamonElmsford, NY125139Google Scholar
  12. Dufresne, R.J., Gerace, W.J., Thibodeau Hardiman, P., Mestre, J.P. 1992Constraining novices to perform expertlike problem analyses: Effects on schema acquisitionThe Journal of the Learning Sciences2307331Google Scholar
  13. Ertl, B.M. (2003). Kooperatives Lernen in Videokonferenzen: Förderung von individuellem und gemeinsamem Lernerfolg durch external repräsentierte Strukturangebote [Cooperative learning in videoconferences: Facilitation of individual and collaborative learning outcome through externally represented structuring tools]. Doctoral dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. Available at: Google Scholar
  14. Fischer, F. (2001). Gemeinsame Wissenskonstruktion. Analyse und Förderung in computerunterstützten Kooperationsszenarien [Collaborative knowledge construction. Analysis and facilitation in computer-supported collaborative scenarios]. Professorial dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
  15. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., Mandl, H. 2002Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization toolsLearning and Instruction12213232Google Scholar
  16. Geyken, A., Mandl, H., Reiter, W. 1998Selbstgesteuertes Lernen mit Tele-Tutoring [Selfguided learning with tele-tutoring].Schwarzer, R. eds. Multimedia und TeleLearning [Multimedia and telelearning]CampusFrankfurt a. M.181196Google Scholar
  17. Guzley, R.M., Avanzino, S. & Bor, A. (2001). Simulated computer-mediated / video-interactive distance learning: A test of motivation, interaction satisfaction, delivery, learning & perceived effectiveness. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 6.Google Scholar
  18. Herrenkohl, L.R., Guerra, M.R. 1998Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth gradeCognition and Instruction16433475Google Scholar
  19. Hesse, F.W., Garsoffky, B., Hron, A. 1997Interfacedesign für computerunterstütztes kooperatives Lernen [Interface design for computer-supported cooperative learning].Issing, L.J.Klimsa, P. eds. Informationen und Lernen mit Multimedia (Information and learning with multimedia)2nd edBeltzWeinheim253267Google Scholar
  20. Hogan, K., Nastasi, B.K., Pressley, M. 2000Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussionsCognition and Instruction17379432Google Scholar
  21. Hron, A., Hesse, F.W., Reinhard, P., Picard, E. 1997Strukturierte Kooperation beim computerunterstützten kollaborativen Lernen [Structured cooperation in computer-supported collaborative learning]Unterrichtswissenschaft255669Google Scholar
  22. Hytecker, V.I., Dansereau, D.F., Rocklin, T.R. 1988An analysis of the processes influencing the structured dyadic learning environmentEducational Psychologist232337Google Scholar
  23. King, A. 1994Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explainAmerican Educational Research Journal31338368Google Scholar
  24. King, A. 1999Discourse patterns for mediating peer learningO’Donnell, A.M.King, A. eds. Cognitive Perspectives on Peer LearningErlbaumMahwah, NJ87115Google Scholar
  25. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., Hesse, F.W. 2003Cooperation scripts for computer-supported collaborative learningWasson, B.Baggetun, R.Hoppe, U.Ludvigsen, S. eds. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning–CSCL 2003, COMMUNITY EVENTS–Communication and InteractionInterMediaBergen, NO5961Google Scholar
  26. Larson, C.O., Dansereau, D.F., O’Donnell, A.M., Hytecker, V.I., Lambiotte, J.G., Rocklin, T.R. 1985Effects of metacognitive and elaborative activity on cooperative learning and transferContemporary Educational Psychology10342348Google Scholar
  27. Mandl, H., Gruber, H., Renkl, A. 1996Communities of practice toward expertise: Social foundation of university instructionBaltes, P.B.Staudinger, U. eds. Interactive Minds. Life-Span Perspectives on the Social Foundation of CognitionCambridge University PressCambridge394411Google Scholar
  28. Nastasi, B.K., Clements, D.H. 1991Research on cooperative learning: Implications for practiceSchool Psychology Review20110131Google Scholar
  29. Nussbaum, E.M., Hartley, K., Sinatra, G.M., Reynolds, R.E. & Bendixen, L.D. (2002). Enhancing the quality of online discussions. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  30. O’Donnell, A.M. 1999Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperationO’Donnell, A.M.King, A. eds. Cognitive Perspectives on Peer LearningErlbaumMahwah, NJ179196Google Scholar
  31. O’Donnell, A.M., Dansereau, D.F. 1992Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance.Hertz Lazarowitz, R.Miller, N. eds. Interactions in Cooperative Groups. The Theoretical Anatomy of Group LearningCambridge University PressCambridge, MA120141Google Scholar
  32. Palincsar, A.S., Herrenkohl, L.R. 1999Designing collaborative contexts: Lessons from three research programs.O’Donnell, A.M.King, A. eds. Cognitive perspectives on peer learningErlbaumMahwah, NJ151177Google Scholar
  33. Piaget, J. 1932/1965Moral Judgment of the ChildFree PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Reiser, B.J. 2002Why scaffolding should sometimes make tasks more difficult for learnersStahl, G. eds. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community.ErlbaumHillsdale, NJ255264Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2002, Boulder, USAGoogle Scholar
  35. Salomon, G., Globerson, T. 1989When teams do not function the way they ought toInternational Journal of Educational Research138999Google Scholar
  36. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C. 1996Computer support for knowledge-building communitiesKoschmann, T. eds. CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging ParadigmErlbaumMahwah, NJ249268Google Scholar
  37. Scarr, S., McCartney, K. 1983How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype-environment effectsChild Development54424435Google Scholar
  38. Suthers, D.D. 2003Representational guidance for collaborative inquiryAndriessen, J.E.B.Baker, M.Suthers, D.D. eds. Arguing to Learn. Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning EnvironmentsKluwerDordrecht2746Google Scholar
  39. Suthers, D.D., Hundhausen, C.D. 2001Learning by constructing collaborative representations: An empirical comparison of three alternativesDillenbourg, P.Eurelings, A.Hakkarainen, K. eds. European Perspectives on Computer-Supported Collaborative LearningUniversity of MaastrichtMaastricht, NL577592Google Scholar
  40. Teasley, S. 1997Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration?Resnick, L.B.Säljö, R.Pontecorvo, C.Burge, B. eds. Discourse, Tools and Reasoning: Essays on Situated CognitionSpringerBerlin361384Google Scholar
  41. Veerman, A.L., Treasure-Jones, T. 1999Software for problem solving through collaborative argumentationCoirier, P.Andriessen, J.E.B. eds. Foundations of Argumentative Text ProcessingAmsterdam University PressAmsterdam203230Google Scholar
  42. Webb, N.M., Farivar, S. 1999Developing productive group interaction in middle schoolO’Donnell, A.M.King, A. eds. Cognitive Perspectives on Peer LearningErlbaumMahwah, NJ117149Google Scholar
  43. Webb, N.M., Jonathan, D., Fall, T., Fall, R. 1995Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groupsJournal of Educational Psychology87406423Google Scholar
  44. Weinberger, A. (2003). Scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Effects of social and epistemic cooperation scripts on collaborative knowledge construction. Doctoral dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. Available at: Armin.pdf.Google Scholar
  45. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., Mandl, H. 2002Fostering computer supported collaborative learning with cooperation scripts and scaffoldsStahl, G. eds. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning:Foundations for a CSCL Community. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2002, Boulder, USAErlbaumHillsdale, NJ573574Google Scholar
  46. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., Mandl, H. 2003Gemeinsame Wissenskonstruktion in computervermittelter Kommunikation: Wirkungen von Kooperationsskripts auf den Erwerb anwendungsorientierten Wissens? [Collaborative knowledge construction in computer-mediated communication: Effects of cooperation scripts on acquisition of application-oriented knowledge]Zeitschrift für Psychologie2118697Google Scholar
  47. Weinberger, A. & Mandl, H. (2003). Computer-mediated knowledge communication. Special Issue: New Media in Education. Studies in Communication Sciences: 81–105.Google Scholar
  48. Weiner, B. 1985An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotionPsychological Review92548573Google Scholar
  49. Zhang, J., Norman, D.A. 1994Representations in distributed cognitive tasksCognitive Science1887122Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Armin Weinberger
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bernhard Ertl
    • 2
  • Frank Fischer
    • 1
  • Heinz Mandl
    • 2
  1. 1.Knowledge Media Research Center TübingenTübingenGermany
  2. 2.Ludwig-Maximilians-University MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations