Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 51, Issue 8, pp 2473–2479 | Cite as

Criollo goats limit their grass intake in the early morning suggesting a prophylactic self-medication behaviour in a heterogeneous vegetation

  • R. A. Torres-Fajardo
  • P. G. González-Pech
  • C. A. Sandoval-Castro
  • J. Ventura-Cordero
  • J. F. J. Torres-AcostaEmail author
Regular Articles

Abstract

The present study compared the feeding behaviour of goats in the early morning (EM = 7:00–8:30 a.m.) and late morning (LM = 9:30–11:00 a.m.) in response to their natural gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infection status. Twelve female adult goats (37 ± 7.7 kg live weight (LW); 5 ± 1 years) with browsing experience in the tropical deciduous forest were divided into two groups (n = 6): INF group, with natural GIN infection, and non-infected (NI) group, dewormed with moxidectin (0.4 mg/kg LW subcutaneous). Feeding behaviour (dry matter intake (DMI)) of two resource types (grasses vs. shrubs + herbs) was estimated by direct observation for 4 weeks on two grazing moments (EM vs. LM). Environmental temperature and relative humidity at pasture level were measured twice weekly. The GIN egg counts and goats’ LW were measured on days 0, 14 and 28. Temperature (mean ± standard deviation) at EM (26.2 ± 1.5 °C) was lower than at LM (38.7 ± 1 °C; P < 0.01). Humidity was higher on the EM (85.1 ± 2.6%) compared to LM (60.4 ± 5.6%; P < 0.01). Irrespective of the infection status, goats consumed similar amounts of grass and shrubs + herbs during EM (P > 0.05). On the other hand, the experimental groups consumed more grass than shrubs + herbs during LM (P < 0.05). The latter suggested prophylactic behaviours strategies to (a) avoid GIN infective larvae, (b) balance the protein:energy ratio of the diet and (c) avoid saturation of detoxification pathways for the secondary compounds consumed from shrubs + herbs. The constant consumption of shrubs + herbs during the study may have reduced the GIN egg count of the INF group.

Keywords

Feeding behaviour Tropical forest Intake pattern Flight behaviour 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Torres-Fajardo R. A. thanks the doctoral scholarship received from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) to perform his doctoral thesis. Also, gratefully acknowledged is the valuable contribution of J. Navarro-Alberto, J. Leirana-Alcocer and L. Sarmiento-Franco, students and other workers from the FMVZ-UADY who were involved in the execution of the experiment.

Funding

This study was supported by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, CONACYT, México [grant number CB-2013.01221608].

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted. The ethical committee of the FMVZ-UADY approved the experimental protocol used in this study (Reference number CB-CCBA-D-2014-003).

References

  1. Agreil, C. and Meuret, M., 2004. An improved method for quantifying intake rate and ingestive behaviour of ruminants in diverse and variable habitats using direct observation Small Ruminant Research, 54, 99–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agreil, C., Meuret, M. and Fritz, H., 2006. Adjustment of feeding choices and intake by a ruminant foraging in varied and variable environments: new insights from continuous bite monitoring In:, V. Bels (ed), Feeding of domestic vertebrates: from structure to behavior, (CAB International: Wallingford), 302–325Google Scholar
  3. Alonso-Díaz, M.A., Torres-Acosta, J.F.J., Sandoval-Castro, C.A. and Capetillo-Leal, C.M., 2012. Amino acid profile of the protein from whole saliva of goats and sheep and its interaction with tannic acid and tannins extracted from the fodder of tropical plants Small Ruminant Research, 103, 69–74Google Scholar
  4. Aumont, G. and Gruner, L., 1989. Population evolution of the free-living stage of goat gastrointestinal nematodes on herbage under tropical conditions in guadeloupe (French West Indies) International Journal for Parasitology, 19, 539–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Balic, A., Bowles, V.M. and Meeusen, E.N.., 2000. The immunobiology of gastrointestinal nematode infections in ruminants Advances in Parasitology, 45, 181–241PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer, B.U., Pomroy, W.E., Gueydon, J., Gannac, S., Scott, I. and Pfister, K., 2010. Comparison of the FLOTAC technique with the McMaster method and the Baermann technique to determine counts of Dictyocaulus eckerti L1 and strongylid eggs in faeces of red deer (Cervus elaphus) Parasitology Research, 107, 555–560PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonnet, O.J.F., Meuret, M., Tischler, M.R., Cezimbra, I.M., Azambuja, J.C.R. and Carvalho, P.C.F., 2015. Continuous bite monitoring: A method to assess the foraging dynamics of herbivores in natural grazing conditions Animal Production Science, 55, 339–349Google Scholar
  8. Bowman, D., 1999. Georgis’ Parasitology for Veterinarians, 7th ed. (W. B. Saunders Company: Philadelphia)Google Scholar
  9. Brito, A.F., Tremblay, G.F., Bertrand, A., Castonguay, Y., Bélanger, G., Michaud, R., Lapierre, H., Benchaar, C., Petit, H.V., Ouellet, D.R. and Berthiaume, R., 2008. Alfalfa cut at sundown and harvested as baleage improves milk yield of late-lactation dairy cows Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 3968–3982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brunet, S., Montellano, C.M.-O. de, Torres-Acosta, J.F.J., Sandoval-Castro, C.A., Aguilar-Caballero, A.J., Capetillo-Leal, C. and Hoste, H., 2008. Effect of the consumption of Lysiloma latisiliquum on the larval establishment of gastrointestinal nematodes in goats Veterinary Parasitology, 157, 81–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Burns, J.C., Mayland, H.F. and Fisher, D.S., 2005. Dry matter intake and digestion of alfalfa harvested at sunset and sunrise Journal of Animal Science, 83, 262–270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cabaret, J. and Berrag, B., 2004. Faecal egg count reduction test for assessing anthelmintic efficacy: average versus individually based estimations Veterinary Parasitology, 121, 105–113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Castañeda-Ramírez, G.S., Torres-Acosta, J.F.J., Sandoval-Castro, C.A., González-Pech, P.G., Parra-Tabla, V.P. and Mathieu, C., 2017. Is there a negative association between the content of condensed tannins, total phenols, and total tannins of tropical plant extracts and in vitro anthelmintic activity against Haemonchus contortus eggs? Parasitology Research, 116, 3341–3348PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Castañeda-Ramírez, G.S., Rodríguez-Labastida, M., Ortiz-Ocampo, G.I., González-Pech, P.G., Ventura-Cordero, J., Borges-Argáez, R., Torres-Acosta, J.F.J., Sandoval-Castro, C.A. and Mathieu, C., 2018. An in vitro approach to evaluate the nutraceutical value of plant foliage against Haemonchus contortus Parasitology Research, 117, 3979–3991PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Cebra, C. and Cebra, M., 2012. Diseases of the hematologic, immunologic, and lymphatic systems (multisystem diseases) In:, Sheep and Goat Medicine (Second Edition), (Elsevier), 466–502Google Scholar
  16. Corticelli, B. and Lai, M., 1963. Studies on the technique of culture of infective larvae of gastrointestinal strongyles of cattle Acta Medica Veterinaria, 9, 347–357Google Scholar
  17. Costes-Thiré, M., Villalba, J.J., Hoste, H. and Ginane, C., 2018. Increased intake and preference for tannin-rich sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) pellets by both parasitized and non-parasitized lambs after a period of conditioning Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 203, 11–18Google Scholar
  18. Flores, J.S. and Espejel, I., 1994. Tipos de vegetación de la península de Yucatán, J. S. Flores (ed), (Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán: Mérida)Google Scholar
  19. Flores, J.S., Vermont-Ricalde, R.M. and Kantún-Balam, J.M., 2006. Leguminosae diversity in the Yucatan Peninsula and its importance for sheep and goat feeding In: C. A. Sandoval-Castro, F. D. DeB Hovell, J. F. J. Torres-Acosta, and A. Ayala-Burgos (eds), Herbivores: Assessment of intake, digestibility and the roles of secondary compounds, (Nothtihgham University Press: Nottingham), 291–299Google Scholar
  20. Fox, J., 2005. The R commander: a basic-statistics graphical User Interface to, 2005, 14Google Scholar
  21. Fox, N.J., Marion, G., Davidson, R.S., White, P.C.L. and Hutchings, M.R., 2013. Modelling parasite transmission in a grazing system: The importance of host behaviour and immunity PLoS ONE, 8, e77996PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Gárate-Gallardo, L., Torres-Acosta, J.F. de, Aguilar-Caballero, A.J., Sandoval-Castro, C.A., Cámara-Sarmiento, R. and Canul-Ku, H.L., 2015. Comparing different maize supplementation strategies to improve resilience and resistance against gastrointestinal nematode infections in browsing goats Parasite, 22, 19PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. García, J.E., Gómez, L., Mendoza-de-Gives, P., Rivera-Corona, J.L., Millán-Orozco, J.L., Ascacio, J.A., Medina, M.A. and Mellado, M., 2018. Anthelmintic efficacy of hydro-methanolic extracts of Larrea tridentata against larvae of Haemonchus contortus Tropical Animal Health and Production, 50, 1099–1105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gaudin, E., Costes-Thiré, M., Villalba, J.J., Hoste, H., Gerfault, V. and Ginane, C., 2018. Relative abilities of young sheep and goats to self-medicate with tannin-rich sainfoin when infected with gastrointestinal nematodes Animal, 1–10Google Scholar
  25. Gazda, T.L., Piazzetta, R.G., Dittrich, J.R., Monteiro, A.L.G. and Thomaz-Soccol, V., 2009. Distribution of nematode larvae of sheep in tropical pasture plants Small Ruminant Research, 82, 94–98Google Scholar
  26. González-Pech, P.G., Torres-Acosta, J.F.J. and Sandoval-Castro, C.A., 2014. Adapting a bite coding grid for small ruminants browsing a deciduous tropical forest Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 17, 63–70Google Scholar
  27. González-Pech, P.G., de Jesús Torres-Acosta, J.F., Sandoval-Castro, C.A. and Tun-Garrido, J., 2015. Feeding behavior of sheep and goats in a deciduous tropical forest during the dry season: The same menu consumed differently Small Ruminant Research, 133, 128–134Google Scholar
  28. González-Pech, P.G., Marín-tun, C.G., Valladares-gonzález, D.A., Ventura-cordero, J., Ortiz-ocampo, G.I., Cámara-sarmiento, R., Sandoval-castro, C.A. and Torres-acosta, J.F.J., 2018. A protocol of human animal interaction to habituate young sheep and goats for behavioural studies Behavioural Processes, 157, 632–637PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoste, H., Sotiraki, S., Landau, S.Y., Jackson, F. and Beveridge, I., 2010. Goat–Nematode interactions: think differently Trends in Parasitology, 26, 376–381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoste, H., Torres-Acosta, J.F.J., Quijada, J., Chan-Perez, I., Dakheel, M.M., Kommuru, D.S., Mueller-Harvey, I. and Terrill, T.H., 2016. Interactions between nutrition and infections with Haemonchus contortus and related gastrointestinal nematodes in small ruminants Advances in Parasitology, 93, 239–351PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Hutchings, M.R., Gordon, I.J., Robertson, E., Kyriazakis, I. and Jackson, F., 2000. Effects of parasitic status and level of feeding motivation on the diet selected by sheep grazing grass/clover swards Journal of Agricultural Science, 135, 65–75Google Scholar
  32. Hutchings, M.R., Judge, J., Gordon, I.J., Athanasiadou, S. and Kyriazakis, I., 2006. Use of trade-off theory to advance understanding of herbivore-parasite interactions Mammal Review, 36, 1–16Google Scholar
  33. Jackson, F., Varady, M. and Bartley, D.J., 2012. Managing anthelmintic resistance in goats—Can we learn lessons from sheep? Small Ruminant Research, 103, 3–9Google Scholar
  34. Jaimez-Rodríguez, P.R., González-Pech, P.G., Ventura-Cordero, J., Brito, D.R.B., Costa-Júnior, L.M., Sandoval-Castro, C.A., Torres-Acosta, J.F.J., 2019. 1The worm burden of tracer kids and lambs browsing heterogeneous vegetation is influenced by strata harvested and not total dry matter intake or plant life form. Tropical Animal Health and Production. (in press) DOI.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-01928-9
  35. MAFF, 1986. Manual of veterinary parasitological laboratory techniques, 3rd ed. (Her Majesty’s Stationary Office: London, UK)Google Scholar
  36. Marsh, K.J., Wallis, I.R., Andrew, R.L. and Foley, W.J., 2006. The detoxification limitation hypothesis: Where did it come from and where is it going? Journal of Chemical Ecology, 32, 1247–1266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Muir, J.P., 2011. The multi-faceted role of condensed tannins in the goat ecosystem Small Ruminant Research, 98, 115–120Google Scholar
  38. Novelo-Chi, L.K., González-Pech, P.G., Ventura-Cordero, J., Torres-Acosta, J.F.J., Sandoval-Castro, C.A. and Cámara-Sarmiento, R., 2019. Gastrointestinal nematode infection and feeding behaviour of goats in a heterogeneous vegetation: No evidence of therapeutic self-medication Behavioural Processes, 162, 7–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Connor, L.J., Walkden-Brown, S.W. and Kahn, L.P., 2006. Ecology of the free-living stages of major trichostrongylid parasites of sheep Veterinary Parasitology, 142, 1–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rees, G., 1950. Observations on the vertical migrations of the third-stage larva of Haemonchus contortus (Rud.) on experimental plots of Lolium perenne S24, in relation to meteorological and micrometeorological factors Parasitology, 40, 127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. SAS, 2017. User’s Guide version 9.4 (Cary, NC.)Google Scholar
  42. Team, R., 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing)Google Scholar
  43. Torres-Acosta, J.F.J., Jacobs, D.E., Aguilar-Caballero, A., Sandoval-Castro, C., May-Martinez, M. and Cob-Galera, L.A., 2004. The effect of supplementary feeding on the resilience and resistance of browsing Criollo kids against natural gastrointestinal nematode infections during the rainy season in tropical Mexico Veterinary Parasitology, 124, 217–238PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Torres-Acosta, J.F.J., Pérez-Cruz, M., Canul-Ku, H.L., Soto-Barrientos, N., Cámara-sarmiento, R., Aguilar-Caballero, A.J., Lozano-Argáes, I., Le-Bigot, C. and Hoste, H., 2014. Building a combined targeted selective treatment scheme against gastrointestinal nematodes in tropical goats Small Ruminant Research, 121, 27–35Google Scholar
  45. Torres-Fajardo, R.A., González-Pech, P.G., Ventura-Cordero, J., Ortíz-Ocampo, G.I., Sandoval-Castro, C.A. and Torres-Acosta, J.F.J., 2018. Feed resource selection of Criollo goats is the result of an interaction between plant resources , condensed tannins and Haemonchus contortus infection Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 208, 49–55Google Scholar
  46. van Dijk, J. and Morgan, E.R., 2011. The influence of water on the migration of infective trichostrongyloid larvae onto grass Parasitology, 138, 780–788PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ventura-Cordero, J., González-Pech, P.G., Jaimez-Rodriguez, P.R., Ortiz-Ocampo, G.I., Sandoval-Castro, C.A. and Torres-Acosta, J.F.J., 2017a. Gastrointestinal nematode infection does not affect selection of tropical foliage by goats in a cafeteria trial Tropical Animal Health and Production, 49, 97–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ventura-Cordero, J., Sandoval-Castro, C.A., Torres-Acosta, J.F.J. and Capetillo-Leal, C.M., 2017b. Do goats have a salivary constitutive response to tannins? Journal of Applied Animal Research, 45, 29–34Google Scholar
  49. Ventura-Cordero, J., González-Pech, P.G., Jaimez-Rodriguez, P.R., Ortiz-ocampo, G.I., Sandoval-Castro, C.A. and Torres-Acosta, J.F.J., 2018a. Feed resource selection of Criollo goats artificially infected with Haemonchus contortus: nutritional wisdom and prophylactic self-medication Animal, 12, 1269–1276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ventura-Cordero, J., González-Pech, P. G., Sandoval-Castro, C.A., Torres-Acosta, J.F.J. and Tun-Garrido, J., 2018b. Feed resource selection by Criollo goats browsing a tropical deciduous forest Animal Production Science, 58, 2314–2320Google Scholar
  51. Ventura-Cordero, J., González-Pech, P.G., Torres-Acosta, J.F.J., Tun-Garrido, J. and Sandoval-Castro, C.A., 2019. Sheep and goat browsing a tropical deciduous forest during the rainy season: why does similar plant species consumption result in different nutrient intake? Animal Production Science, 59, 66–72Google Scholar
  52. Villalba, J.J., Costes-Thiré, M. and Ginane, C., 2017. Phytochemicals in animal health: Diet selection and trade-offs between costs and benefits Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 76, 113–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Yari, M., Valizadeh, R., Naserian, A.A., Jonker, A., Azarfar, A. and Yu, P., 2014. Effects of including alfalfa hay cut in the afternoon or morning at three stages of maturity in high concentrate rations on dairy cows performance, diet digestibility and feeding behavior Animal Feed Science and Technology, 192, 62–72Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FMVZUniversidad Autónoma de YucatánMéridaMexico

Personalised recommendations