Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 51, Issue 8, pp 2387–2393 | Cite as

Identifying breeding goals to develop selection index for buffalo in Egypt using preference survey

  • S. A. M Abdel-SalamEmail author
Regular Articles


The aim of the study was to identify the breeding goals, derive the relative goal values (RGV), and develop selection index (SI) for buffalo in Egypt. A structured questionnaire survey of milk-producing buffalo holders in 10 Egyptian governorates was carried out to collect data. The total number of surveyed holders was 1797. Buffalo holders were asked to identify the breeding goal groups (BGG). Breeding goal groups were ranked, according to relative importance to farmers, in descending order. The breeding goal traits (BGT) within each BGG were chosen and ranked in descending order. The survey results reflected the importance of milk production traits as the main breeding goal. Traits of milk yield and fat yield were given the greatest attention. In order to estimate the relative goal values (RGV), the subjective determination procedure was used. A principal component analysis (PCA) followed by cluster analysis (CA) of the principal components were performed. The CA led to the identification of three farmer clusters. Six selection indices were proposed from the PCA. The indices yielded different precision with a maximum of 93% of the holder’s preferences variability. The current study revealed that subjective method could be used to identify the RGV. Further studies are needed particularly those related to the production system. Also, measurements of market data and consumers requests and their influence on the selected traits are badly needed.


Breeding goals Relative goal values Selection index Buffalo 



The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Ali Nigm professor of animal breeding, Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, for the valuable revision of the manuscript.

Funding information

This research was conducted within the framework of the project no. 1010 titled “Sustainable Breeding Program of Egyptian Buffalo” and funded by the Science and Technology Development Foundation (STDF).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. Amer, P.R., 2012. Turning science on robust cattle into improved genetic selection decisions. Animal 6, 551–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bazeley, K.J., Barrett, D.C., Williams, P.D. and Reyher, K.K., 2016. Measuring the growth rate of UK dairy heifers to improve future productivity. Veterinary Journal, 212, 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Byrne, T.J., Amer, P.R., Nühs, J.K., Bryant, J.R. and Cruickshank, G.J., 2012. Using preference survey approaches to define breeding goals in the New Zealand dairy industry. International Committee for Animal Recording, May 2012, Cork, Ireland, Volume: 38.Google Scholar
  4. Byrne, T.J., Amer, P.R., Smith, K.F., Fennessy, P.F. and Hansen, P., 2016. Using preference survey approaches to define breeding goals. J. Dairy Sci. 99(10):8146–8167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dezfuli, B.T. and De Seno, L., 2016. Investigation of response to selection for milk traits in dairy Buffalo of Iran based on three sale situations. Buffalo Bulletin, 35(3):405–415.Google Scholar
  6. El-Arian, M.N., 2005. Selection indices for Friesian cows using two methods of calculating relative economic values for some important productive and reproductive traits. J Agric Sci, Mansoura Univ Egypt 30, 7285–96Google Scholar
  7. El-Arian, M.N., Mourad, K.A. and Khattab, A.S., 2001, A comparison of different selection indices for genetic improvement of some milk traits in a herd of Egyptian buffaloes. J Agric Sci, Mansoura Univ Egypt 26, 2687–95Google Scholar
  8. El-Bramony, M.M., Gebreel, I.A. and Fooda, T.A., 2010. Response to selection for milk yield traits in Egyptian buffalo. Egyptian J. Anim. Prod. 47(2):85–92.Google Scholar
  9. Falconer, D.S. and Mackay, T.F.C., 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetic. 4th ed, Longman Group UK Harlow.Google Scholar
  10. FAOSTAT, 2016. FAO Statistics Division., FAO, Rome, Italy, Accessed 20 Jan 2019.
  11. Groen, A.F., Steine, T., Colleau, J.J., Pedersen, J., Pribyl, J. and Reinsch, N., 1997. Economic values in dairy cattle breeding, with special reference to functional traits. Report of an EAAP-working group. Livestock Production Science 49, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris, D.L., Stewart, T.S. and Arboleda, C.R., 1994. Animal breeding programmes. A systematic approach to their design. USDA-ARS. AAT-NC. 8-14.Google Scholar
  13. Krupová, Z., Oravcová, M., Krupa, E. and Peškovičová, D., 2008. Methods for calculating economic weights of important traits in sheep. Slovak J. Anim. Sci., 41 (1): 24–29.Google Scholar
  14. MALR, 2015. Statistics of livestock. The Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation/Egypt.Google Scholar
  15. Nanda, A.S. and Nakao, T., 2003. Role of buffalo in the socioeconomic development of rural Asia: Current status and future prospectus. Animal Science Journal, 74, 443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ponzoni, R.W., 1986. A profit equation for the definition of the breeding objective of Australian Merino sheep. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 103, 342–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Smith, C., 1985. Scope for selecting many breeding stocks of possible economic value in the future. Anim. Prod. 41, 403–412.Google Scholar
  18. Valsalan, J., Chakravarty, A.K., Patil, C.S., Dash, S.K., Mahajan, A.C., Kumar V. and Vohra, V., 2014. Enhancing milk and fertility performances using selection index developed for Indian Murrah buffaloes. Trop Anim Health Prod., 46(6):967–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. XLSTAT, 2018. Data analysis and statistical solution for MS Excel. Version 6. Addinsoft.Google Scholar
  20. Zbigniew Gołaś, 2017. Determinants of milk production profitability of dairy farms in the EU Member States. Problems of Agricultural Economics, 3(352):19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal Production, Faculty of AgricultureCairo UniversityGizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations