Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 51, Issue 8, pp 2279–2286 | Cite as

Effects of probiotic lactic acid bacteria on growth performance, carcass characteristics, hematological indices, humoral immunity, and IGF-I gene expression in broiler chicken

  • Mandana Salehizadeh
  • Mohammad Hossein Modarressi
  • Seyed Naser Mousavi
  • Maryam Tajabadi EbrahimiEmail author
Regular Articles
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

The effects of screened lactic acid bacteria strains were evaluated on growth performance, humoral immunity, and IGF-1 gene expression in broiler chickens. The three dietary groups of negative control fed basal diet, the native LAB probiotic group (NP), and PrimaLac commercial LAB probiotic (PC) were studied. The results revealed that NP and PC diets significantly improved feed conversion ratio and increased body weight, as well as relative weight of carcass compared with group fed NC diet (P < 0.05). Lymphocyte level was significantly increased in birds fed NP and PC (P < 0.01), while serum triglycerides and total cholesterol levels were significantly decreased compared with the NC (P < 0.05). Significant increases were observed in antibody titers against Newcastle disease virus of vaccinated birds (P < 0.03), and morphological analysis of ileum revealed significant increases (P < 0.05) in the villus height and villus height/crypt depth in birds fed NP and PC compared with the NC. The dietary significantly increased Lactobacillus spp. (P < 0.05), while Escherichia coli (P < 0.04) populations were significantly decreased, and also, the expression of IGF-1 gene in liver tissue of broilers fed NP and PC was significantly increased compared with the NC (P < 0.05). These results indicated that the identified native LAB strains can be used commercially as a low-cost probiotic in poultry industry of Iran.

Keywords

LAB Microflora population Feed conversion ratio Commercial probiotic Intestinal morphology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Tak Gen Zist Company and Dr. Ayoub Farhadi (Lab. for Molecular Genetics, SANRU) for their help and patience. This research did not receive any specific funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Afsharmanesh, M., Sadaghi, B. and Silversides, F.G. 2013. Influence of supplementation of prebiotic, probiotic, and antibiotic to wet-fed wheat-based diets on growth, ileal nutrient digestibility, blood parameters, and gastrointestinal characteristics of broiler chickens. Comparative Clinical Pathology, 22, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmadivand, S., Eagderi, S. and Imanpour, M.R. 2013. The skeletal deformity in response of dietary phosphorus and calcium level in the Caspian roach (Rutilus rutilus caspicus) larvae. International Journal of Aquatic Biology, 1, 93–99.Google Scholar
  3. Angel, R., Dalloul, R.A., Doerr, J. 2005. Performance of broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with a direct-fed microbial. Poultry science, 84(8):1222–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Awad, W.A., Ghareeb, K., Abdel-Raheem, S. and Böhm, J. 2009. Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 88, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beski, S.S.M. and Al-Sardary, S.Y.T. 2015. Effects of dietary supplementation of probiotic and synbiotic on broiler chickens hematology and intestinal integrity. International Journal of Poultry Science, 14, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carvalho, N., Hansen, S. 2005. Prospects for probiotics in broilers. Feed Int 26, 9–11.Google Scholar
  7. Chang, H.S. 2007. Overview of the world broiler industry: Implications for the Philippines. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 4, 67–82.Google Scholar
  8. Chim-anage, P., Hirunvong, V., Sirirote, P., Malaphan, W., Yongsmith, B., Isariyodom, S., Tirawattanawanich, C., Chitanont, W., Talsook, P. 2008. Effect of Feed Supplementation of Lactic Acid Bacteria on Microbial Changes in Broiler Intestine. Kasetsart J, 42, 269–276.Google Scholar
  9. Corcionivoschi, N., Drinceanu, D., Stef, L., Luca, I. and Julean, C. 2010. Probiotics–identification and ways of action. Innovative Romanian Food Biotechnology, 6, 1.Google Scholar
  10. Dec M., Puchalski A., Nowaczek A., Wernicki A. 2016. Antimicrobial Activity of Lactobacillus Strains of Chicken Origin against Bacterial Pathogens, Int. Microbiol., 19, pp. 57–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. El-Sissi, A.F., Mohamed, S.H. 2011. Impact of symbiotic on the immune response of broiler chickens against NDV and IBV vaccines. Global Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2011;6:186–91.Google Scholar
  12. Ferket, P.R., Gernat, A.G. 2006. Factors that affect feed intake of meat birds: A review. Int. J. Poult. Sci, 5, 905–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. García-Hernández, Y., Pérez-Sánchez, T., Boucourt, R., Balcázar, J.L., Nicoli, J.R., Moreira-Silva, J., Rodríguez, Z., Fuertes, H., Nuñez, O., Albelo, N., Halaihel, N. 2016. Isolation, characterization and evaluation of probiotic lactic acid bacteria for potential use in animal production. Research in Veterinary Science, 108:125–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghadban, G. S. 2002. Probiotics in broiler production—a review. Arch. Geflugelk, 66, 49–58.Google Scholar
  15. Haghighi, H.R., Gong, J., Gyles, C.L., Hayes, M.A., Zhou, H., Sanei, B., Chambers, J.R. and Sharif, S. 2006. Probiotics stimulate production of natural antibodies in chickens. Clin. Vaccine Immunol., 13, 975–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heravi, R. M., Kermanshahi, H., Sankian, M., Nassiri, M. R., Moussavi, A. H., Nasiraii, L. R., Varasteh, A. R. 2011. Screening of lactobacilli bacteria isolated from gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens for their use as probiotic. African J. Microb. Res. 5(14), 1858–1868.Google Scholar
  17. Idoui, T. and Karam, N.E. 2016. Effects of autochthonous probiotic feeding on performances, carcass traits, serum composition and fecal microflora of broiler chickens. Sains Malaysiana, 45, 347–353.Google Scholar
  18. Jannah, S. N., Dinoto, A., Wiryawan, K. G., Rusmana, I. 2014. Characteristics of lactic acid bacteria isolated from gastrointestinal tract of Cemani chicken and their potential use as probiotics. Media Peternakan, 37(3), 182–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kareem, K.Y., Loh, T.C., Foo, H.L., Akit, H. and Samsudin, A.A. 2016. Effects of dietary postbiotic and inulin on growth performance, IGF1 and GHR mRNA expression, fecal microbiota and volatile fatty acids in broilers. BMC veterinary research, 12, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koh, A., De Vadder, F., Kovatcheva-Datchary, P. and Bäckhed, F. 2016. From dietary fiber to host physiology: short-chain fatty acids as key bacterial metabolites. Cell, 165, 1332–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Livak, K.J. and Schmittgen, T.D., 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods, 25, 402–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mountzouris, K.C., Tsirtsikos, P., Kalamara, E., Nitsch, S., Schatzmayr, G. and Fegeros, K. 2007. Evaluation of the efficacy of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus strains in promoting broiler performance and modulating cecal microflora composition and metabolic activities. Poultry science, 86, 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neveling, D.P., Van Emmenes, L., Ahire, J.J., Pieterse, E., Smith, C. and Dicks, L.M.T. 2017. Safety assessment of antibiotic and probiotic feed additives for Gallus gallus domesticus. Scientific reports, 7, 12,767.Google Scholar
  24. Noohi, N., Ebrahimipour, G., Rohani, M., Talebi, M. and Pourshafie, M.R. 2016. Phenotypic characteristics and probiotic potentials of Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry. Jundishapur journal of microbiology, 7(9).Google Scholar
  25. Pourakbari, M., Seidavi, A., Asadpour, L., Martínez, A. 2016. Probiotic level effects on growth performance, carcass traits, blood parameters, cecal microbiota, and immune response of broilers. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 88, 1011–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Quinto, E.J., Jiménez, P., Caro, I., Tejero, J., Mateo, J., Girbés, T. 2014. Probiotic lactic acid bacteria: A review. Food Nutr. Sci., 5, 1765–1775.Google Scholar
  27. Rahmani, H.R., Speer, W. and Modirsanei, M. 2005. The effect of intestinal pH on broiler performance and immunity. In Proceedings of the 15th European Symposium on poultry nutrition, Balatonfüred, Hungary, World’s Poultry Science Association (WPSA).Google Scholar
  28. Sas, S. A. S., & Guide, S. U. S. (2003). Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  29. Shokryazdan, P., Jahromi, M.F., Liang, J.B., Ramasamy, K., Sieo, C.C. and Ho, Y.W. 2017. Effects of a Lactobacillus salivarius mixture on performance, intestinal health and serum lipids of broiler chickens. PloS one, 12(5), p. e0175959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Soltani, M., Ahmadivand, S., Behdani, M., Hassanzadeh, R., Rahmati-Holasoo, H., Taheri-Mirghaed, A., 2016. Transcription of adaptive-immune genes upon challenge with infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) in DNA vaccinated rainbow trout. International Journal of Aquatic Biology, 4, 353–359.Google Scholar
  31. Sri-Harimurti, H.M.2013. The dynamics of indigenous lactic acid bacteria probiotics on carcass yield, abdominal fat and intestinal morphology of broilers. InProceeding of the 3rd AINI international seminar, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia (pp. 24–26).Google Scholar
  32. Taheri, H.R., Moravej, H., Tabandeh, F., Zaghari, M. and Shivazad, M. 2009. Screening of lactic acid bacteria toward their selection as a source of chicken probiotic. Poultry Science, 88, 1586–1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Talebi, A., Amirzadeh, B., Mokhtari, B. and Gahri, H. 2008. Effects of a multi-strain probiotic (PrimaLac) on performance and antibody responses to Newcastle disease virus and infectious bursal disease virus vaccination in broiler chickens. Avian Pathology, 37, 509–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vanderpool, C., Yan, F., Polk, D.B. 2008. Mechanisms of probiotic action: implications for therapeutic applications in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, 14, 1585–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wu, B.Q., Zhang, T., Guo, L.Q., Lin, J.F. 2011. Effects of Bacillus subtilis KD1 on broiler intestinal flora. Poultry Science, 90, 2493–2499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zaghari, M., Zahroojian, N., Riahi, M. and Parhizkar, S. 2015. Effect of Bacillus subtilis spore (GalliPro®) nutrients equivalency value on broiler chicken performance. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 14, 3555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang, M., Xuan, S., Bouxsein, M.L., Von Stechow, D., Akeno, N., Faugere, M.C., Malluche, H., Zhao, G., Rosen, C.J., Efstratiadis, A. and OClemens, T.L. 2002. Osteoblast-specific knockout of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptor gene reveals an essential role of IGF signaling in bone matrix mineralization. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277, 44,005–44,012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mandana Salehizadeh
    • 1
  • Mohammad Hossein Modarressi
    • 1
  • Seyed Naser Mousavi
    • 2
  • Maryam Tajabadi Ebrahimi
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Animal Science, Varamin-Pishva BranchIslamic Azad UniversityVaraminIran
  3. 3.Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Central Tehran BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations