Advertisement

Dietary dragon fruit (Hylocereus undatus) peel powder improved in vitro rumen fermentation and gas production kinetics

  • Maharach Matra
  • Metha WanapatEmail author
  • Anusorn Cherdthong
  • Suban Foiklang
  • Chaowarit Mapato
Regular Articles
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

Plant phytophenols especially condensed tannins (CT) and saponins (SP) have been demonstrated to impact on rumen fermentation. Dragon fruit (Hylocereus undatus) peel powder (DFPP) contains both CT and SP. The current study aimed to investigate the influence of DFPP and varying levels of concentrate and roughage ratios on gas production kinetics, nutrient degradability, and methane production “using in vitro gas production technique.” The dietary treatments were arranged according to a 3 × 5 Factorial arrangement in a completely randomized design. The two experimental factors consisted of the roughage to concentrate (R:C) ratio (100:0, 70:30, and 30:70) and the levels of DFPP supplementation (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4% of the substrate) on DM basis. The results revealed that the R:C ratio at 30:70 had the highest cumulative gas production when compared to other ratios (P < 0.01). The in vitro true dry matter degradability at 12 and 24 h was affected by R:C ratio (P < 0.01). Furthermore, volatile fatty acids (VFA) and propionate (C3) were significantly increased by the levels of DFPP, while acetate (C2) and C2:C3 ratios were decreased (P < 0.05). The rumen protozoal population was significantly decreased by DFPP supplementation (P < 0.05). Rumen methane production was significantly impacted by R:C ratios and decreased when the level of DFPP increased (P < 0.01), while NH3-N and ruminal pH were not influenced by the DFPP supplement. It could be summarized that supplementation of DFPP resulted in improved rumen fermentation kinetics and could be used as a dietary source to mitigate rumen methane production, hence reducing greenhouse gas production.

Keywords

Dragon fruit peel powder Rumen fermentation Global warming 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express our sincere thanks to Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Thailand, the Thailand Research Fund (TRF) through the International Research Network (IRN) program (TRF-IRN57W0002) and TRF-IRG5980010 for their kind financial support and the use of research facilities. The Post-Doctoral Training Program from Research Affairs and Graduate School, Khon Kaen University, Thailand (grant no. 58440) is also acknowledged. Many thanks are also extended to all graduate students under TROFREC.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical guideline

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Abarghuei, M.J., Rouzbehan, Y. and Alipour, D., 2010. The influence of the grape pomace on the ruminal parameters of sheep. Livestock Science, 132, 73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Addisu, S. and Assefa, A., 2016. Role of Plant Containing Saponin on Livestock Production; A Review. Advances in Biological Research, 10(5), 309–314Google Scholar
  3. Anantasook, N. and Wanapat, M., 2012. Influence of rain tree pod meal supplementation on rice straw based diets using in vitro gas fermentation technique. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 25, 325–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anantasook, N., Wanapat, M., Gunun, P. and Cherdthong, A., 2016. Reducing methane production by supplementation of Terminalia chebula RETZ. containing tannins and saponins. Animal Science Journal, 87, 783–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Animut, G.R., Puchala, A.L., Goetsch, A.K., Patra, T., Sahlu, V.H. and Wells, J., 2008. Methane emission by goats consuming diets with different levels of condensed tannins from lespedeza. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 144, 212–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. AOAC., 1998. Official methods of analysis. 2, 16th edn. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. AOAC., 2012. Official Methods of Analysis, 19th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MDGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhatta, R., Enishi, O. and Kurihara, M., 2007. Measurement of methane production from ruminants. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 8, 1305–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boniface, A.N., Murray, R.M. and Hogan, J.P., 1986.Optimum level of ammonia in the rumen liquor of cattle fed tropical pasture hay. In Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production (Vol. 16, No. 15, p. 1)Google Scholar
  10. Crichton, N., 1999. Information point: Tukey Multiple Comparison test. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 8, 299–304.Google Scholar
  11. Elghandour, M.M.Y., Vallejo, L.H., Salem, A.Z.M., Mellado, M., Camacho, L.M., Cipriano, M., Olafadehan, O.A., Olivares, J. and Rojas, S., 2017. Moringa oleifera leaf meal as an environmental friendly protein source for ruminants: Biomethane and carbon dioxide production, and fermentation characteristics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 1229–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foiklang, S., Wanapat, M. and Norrapoke, T., 2016. In vitro rumen fermentation and digestibility of buffaloes as influenced by grape pomace powder and urea treated rice straw supplementation. Animal Science Journal, 87, 370–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Friggens, N.C., Nielsen, B.L., Kyriazakis, I., Tolkamp, B.J. and Emmans, G.C., 1998. Effects of Feed Composition and Stage of Lactation on the Short-term Feeding Behavior of Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 81, 2368–3277Google Scholar
  14. Galyean, M., 1989. Laboratory procedure in animal nutrition research, Department of animal and range science, New Mexico State University, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. Getachew, G., Pittroff, W., Putnam, D.H., Dandekar, A., Goyal, S. and DePeters, E.J., 2008. The influence of addition of gallic acid, tannic acid or quebracho tannins to alfalfa hay on in vitro rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 140, 444–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodland, R. and Anhang, J., 2009. Livestock and climate change. World Watch, 6, 10–19Google Scholar
  17. Gunun, P., Gunun, N., Cherdthong, A., Wanapat, M., Polyorach, S., Sirilaophaisan, S. and Kang, S., 2018. In vitro rumen fermentation and methane production as affected by rambutan peel powder. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46, 626–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guo, Y.Q., Liu, J.X., Lu, Y., Zhu, W.Y., Denman, S.E. and McSweeney, C.S., 2008. Effect of tea saponin on methanogenesis, microbial community structure and expression of mcrA gene, in cultures of rumen micro-organisms. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 47(5), 421–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Janssen, P.H., 2010. Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 160, 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jayanegara, A., Leiber, F. and Kreuzer, M., 2012. Meta-analysis of the relationship between dietary tannin level and methane formation in ruminants from in vivo and in vitro experiments. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 96, 365–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Junior, F.P., Cassiano, E.C.O., Martins, M.F., Romero, L.A., Zapata, D.C.V., Pinedo, L.A., Marino, C.T. and Rodrigues, P.H.M., 2017. Effect of tannins-rich extract from Acacia mearnsii or monensin as feed additives on ruminal fermentation efficiency in cattle. Livestock Science production, 203, 21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kang, S., Wanapat, M. and Viennasay, B., 2016. Supplementation of banana flower powder pellet and plant oil sources on in vitro ruminal fermentation, digestibility, and methane production. Tropical Animal Health Production, 48, 1673–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kang, S., Wanapat, M., Phesatcha, K., Norrapoke, T., Foiklang, S., Ampapon, T. and Phesatcha, B., 2017. Using krabok (Irvingia malayana) seed oil and Flemingia macrophylla leaf meal as a rumen enhancer in an in vitro gas production system. Animal Production Science, 57, 327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kholif, A.E., Gouda, G.A., Anele, U.Y. and Galyean, M.L., 2018. Extract of Moringa oleifera leaves improves feed utilization of lactating Nubian goats. Small Ruminant Research, 158, 69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Le Bellec, F., Vaillant, F. and Imbert, E., 2006. Pitahaya (Hylocereus spp.): a new fruit crop, a market with a future. Fruits, 61, 237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leng, R.A. and Nolan, J.V., 1984. Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science, 67(5), 1072–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liaotrakoon, W., 2013. Characterization of dragon fruit (Hylocereus spp.) Components with 185 valorization potential. PhD thesis, Ghent University, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  28. Lins, T.D.A., Terry, S.A., Silva, R.R., Pereira, L.G.R., Jancewicz, L.J., He, M.L., Wang, Y., McAllister, T.A. and Chaves, AV., 2018. Effects of the inclusion of Moringa oleifera seed on rumen fermentation and methane production in a beef cattle diet using the rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). Animal, 1–9Google Scholar
  29. Mahata, M.E., Mahlil, Y., Fajri, Y., Aditia, R., Zahara, A. and Rizal, Y., 2010. The effect of dragon fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) peel on broiler thigh meat quality and organ development, Society for Southeast Asian Agricultural Science (ISSAAS) in Collaboration with SAEDA, Tokyo University of Agriculture and JSTA, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  30. Makkar, H.P.S., 2003. Effects and fate of tannins in ruminant animals, adaptation to tannins, and strategies to overcome detrimental effect of feeding tannin-rich feeds. Small Ruminant Research, 49, 241–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Makkar, H.P.S., Francis, G. and Becker, K., 2007. Bioactivity of phytochemicals in some lesser-known plants and their effects and potential applications in livestock and aquaculture production systems. Journal of Animal Bioscience, 9, 1371–91Google Scholar
  32. Manihuruka, F.M., Suryatib, T. and Ariefb, I. I., 2016. Effectiveness of the Red Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) Peel Extract as the Colorant, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial on Beef Sausage. Media Peternakan, 40, 47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McSweeney, C.S., Palmer, B., McNeill, D.M. and Krause, D.O., 2001. Microbial interactions with tannins: nutritional consequences for ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 91, 83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Monteny, G.J., Bannink, A. and Chadwick, D., 2006. Greenhouse gas abatement strategies for animal husbandry. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 112, 163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moss, A.R., Jouany, J.P. and Newbold, J., 2000. Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Annales de Zootechnie, 49, 231–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Muñoz, C., Yan, T., Wills, D.A., Murray, S. and Gordon, A.W., 2012. Comparison of the sulfur hexafluoride tracer and respiration chamber techniques for estimating methane emissions and correction for rectum methane output from dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 3139–3148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F.M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T., Robock, A., Stephens, G., Takemura, T. and Zhang, H., 2013. Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  38. Norrapoke, T, Wanapat, M. and Wanapat, S., 2012. Effects of protein levels and mangosteen Peel pellets (Mago-pel) in concentrate diets on rumen fermentation and milk production in lactating dairy crossbreds. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 25, 971–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ørskov, E.R. and McDonald, I., 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, 92, 499–503Google Scholar
  40. Patra, A.K., Kamra, D.N. and Agarwal, N., 2006. Effect of plant extracts on in vitro methanogenesis, enzyme activities and fermentation of feed in rumen liquor of buffalo. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 128, 276–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pilajun, P. and Wanapat, M., 2011. Effect of coconut oil and mangosteen peel supplementation on ruminal fermentation, microbial population, and microbial protein synthesis in swamp buffaloes. Livestock Science, 141, 148–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Puchala, R., Min, B.R., Goetsch, A.L. and Sahlu, T., 2005. The effect of a condensed tannin-containing forage on methane emission by goats. Journal of Animal Science, 83, 182–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rosenzweig, C., Karoly, D., Vicarelli, M., Neofotis, P., Wu, Q., Casassa, G., Menzel, A., Root, T. L., Estrella, N., Seguin, B., Tryjanowski, P., Liu, C., Rawlins, S. and Imeson, A., 2008. Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change. Nature, 453Google Scholar
  44. Samuel, M., Sagatheman, S., Thomas, J. and Mathen, G., 1997. An HPLC method for estimation of volatile fatty acids of ruminal fluid. Journal of Animal Science, 67, 805–807Google Scholar
  45. SAS., 2013. User’s Guide: Statistic, Version 9.4th Edition. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  46. Shokryzadan, P., Rajion, M.A., Goh, Y.M., Ishak, I., Ramlee, M.F., Jahromi, M.F. and Ebrahimi, M., 2016. Mangosteen peel can reduce methane production and rumen biohydrogenation in vitro. South African Journal of Animal Science, 46(4), 419–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Steinfeld, H., Wassenaar, T. and Jutzi, S., 2006. Livestock production systems in developing countries. Revue scientifique et technique, 25, 505–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Supapong, C., Cherdthong, A., Seankamsorn, A., Khonkhaeng, B., Wanapat, M., Uriyapongson, S., Gunun, N., Gunun, P., Chanjula, P. and Polyorach, S., 2017. In vitro fermentation, digestibility, and methane production as influenced by Delonix regia seed meal containing tannins and saponins. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 26, 123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tan, Z. and Murphy, M.R., 2004. Ammonia production, ammonia absorption, and urea recycling in ruminants. A review. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 13(3), 389–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tavendale, M.H., Meagher, L.P., Pacheco, D., Walker, N., Attwood, G.T. and Sivakumaran, S., 2005. Methane production from in vitro rumen incubations with Lotus pedunculatus and Medicago sativa and effects of extractable condensed tannin fractions on methanogenesis. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 124, 403–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Van Soest, P.J., 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  52. Van Soest, P.J. and Robertson, J.B., 1985. A laboratory manual for animal science. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A., 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583–3597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wanapat, M., 2000. Rumen manipulation to increase the efficiency use of local feed resources and productivity of ruminants in tropics. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 13, 59–67Google Scholar
  55. Wanapat, M. and Pimpa, O., 1999. Effect of ruminal NH3-N levels on ruminal fermentation, purine derivatives, digestibility and rice straw intake in swamp buffaloes. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 12, 904–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang, J.K., Ye, J.A. and Liu, J.X., 2012. Effects of tea saponins on rumen microbiota, rumen fermentation, methane production and growth performance-A review. Tropical animal health and production, 44(4), 697–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wichienchot, S., Jatupornpipat, M. and Rastall, R.A., 2010. Oligosaccharides of pitaya (dragon fruit) flesh and their prebiotic properties. Food Chemistry, 120, 850–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Witzig, M., Zeder, M. and Rodehutscord, M., 2018. Effect of the ionophore monensin and tannin extracts supplemented to grass silage on populations of ruminal cellulolytics and methanogens in vitro. Anaerobe, 50, 44–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maharach Matra
    • 1
  • Metha Wanapat
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anusorn Cherdthong
    • 1
  • Suban Foiklang
    • 2
  • Chaowarit Mapato
    • 1
  1. 1.Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of AgricultureKhon Kaen UniversityKhon KaenThailand
  2. 2.Faculty of Animal Science and TechnologyMaejo UniversityChiangmaiThailand

Personalised recommendations