Response of Thai indigenous crossbred chickens to various dietary protein levels at different ages

  • Prapot Maliwan
  • Wittawat Molee
  • Sutisa KhempakaEmail author
Regular Articles


The objective of this study was to evaluate the protein requirement of Korat chicken (KRC), a slow-growing cross strain between the Thai indigenous fighting cock (Leung Hang Khoa) and the modern genotype females. Four periods were considered: from hatch to 21 days (phase 1), 22 to 42 days (phase 2), 43 to 63 days (phase 3), and 64 to 84 days of age (phase 4). A total of 3120 mixed-sex KRC were randomly allocated to 5 dietary protein levels containing 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23% with 2978 kcal of ME/kg (900 birds in phase 1); 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22% with 3151 kcal of ME/kg (780 birds in phase 2); 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20% with 3200 kcal of ME/kg (720 birds in phase 3); and 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19% with 3200 kcal of ME/kg (720 birds in phase 4) with 6 replicates in a completely randomized design. The results showed that BW, BW gain, average daily gain (ADG), and protein intake (P < 0.05) were increased with increasing dietary protein (P < 0.05) in all phases. However, FI, feed cost per kg of BW gain, energy intake, and blood urea nitrogen of chickens were not found to be significantly different among treatments. On the other hand, increasing dietary protein levels depressed the protein efficiency ratio of chickens from hatch to 21 and from 64 to 84 days of age (P < 0.05), and tended to decrease it from 22 to 42 (P = 0.08) and from 43 to 63 (P = 0.07) days of age as well. According to a broken-line regression analysis, the protein requirements of chickens from hatch to 21 and from 22 to 42 days of age for maximum BW gain were 21.26 and 20.45%, respectively. While the requirements of maximum responses for BW gain and FCR in the period of 43 to 63 days of age were 18.00 and 18.04%, respectively, and in the period of 64 to 84 weeks of age were 17.94 and 18.03%, respectively.


Crossbred chicken Growth performance Protein requirement Slow-growing chicken 



We wish to express our sincere gratitude to Dr. Pascal Mermillod, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA Nozilly, France), for his comments and valuable suggestions. We wish to express thanks to Suranaree University of Technology (SUT) for their research facilities and a scholarship from the Ministry of Science and Technology for Prapot Maliwan.

Funding information

This research was financially supported by the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) No. SUT3-303-58-36-06 and the Thailand Research Fund (TRF).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Ajinomoto, 1998. True digestibility of essential amino acids for poultry-1998. Ajinomoto Co, Inc, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  2. Anino, J.S. and Giese, R.W., 1976. Clinical chemistry: principles and procedures. 4th edition, Little Brown and Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  3. AOAC, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Baéza, E., Bernadet, M.D. and Lessire, M., 2012. Protein requirements for growth, feed efficiency, and meat production in growing mule ducks, The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 21, 21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bregendahl, K., Sell, J.L. and Zimmerman, D.R., 2002. Effect of low-protein diets on growth performance and body composition of broiler chicks, Poultry Science, 81, 1156–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng, T.K., Hamre, M.L. and Coon, C.N., 1997. Responses of broilers to dietary protein levels and amino acid supplementation to low protein diets at various environmental temperatures, Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 6, 18–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chomchai, N., Sumamal, W., Namkhum, S. and Boonpukdee, W., 2003. Feed and feeding study for crossbred native chicken 3) effect of dietary protein levels on growth performances and carcass characteristics of four-crossbred native chicken, page 241–254 in Annual Report (in Thai), Animal Nutrition Division, Department of Livestock Development, Bangkok, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  8. Dyubele, N.L., Muchenje, V., Nkukwana, T.T. and Chimonyo, M., 2010. Consumer sensory characteristics of broiler and indigenous chicken meat: A South African example, Food Quality and Preference, 21, 815–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gheorghe, A., Dragotoiu, D., Ciurescu, G., Lefter, N. and Habeanu, M., 2013. Effects of dietary protein level on protein deposition in broilers: 1. productive performance and carcass characteristics, Bulletin UASVM Animal Science and Biotechnology, 70, 266–273Google Scholar
  10. Heger, J., 2003. Essential to non-essential amino acid ratios. In: Amino acid and animal nutrition (D'Mello, J.P.F. editor.), page 47–68, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. Jaturasitha, S., Srikanchai, T., Kreuzer, M. and Wicke, W., 2008. Differences in carcass and meat characteristics between chicken indigenous to Northern Thailand (Black-Boned and Thai Native) and imported extensive breeds (Bresse and Rhode Island Red), Poultry Science, 87, 160–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Laudadio, V., Passantino, L., Perillo, A., Lopresti, G., Passantino, A., Khan, R.U. and Tufarelli, V., 2012. Productive performance and histological features of intestinal mucosa of broiler chickens fed different dietary protein levels, Poultry Science, 91, 265–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leeson, S. and Summers, J.D., 2005. Commercial Poultry Nutrition. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  14. Maliwan, P., Khempaka, S., Molee, M. and Schonewille, J.T., 2018. Effect of energy density of diet on growth performance of Thai indigenous (50% crossbred) Korat chickens from hatch to 42 days of age, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 50, 1835–1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malomo, G.A., Bolu, S.A. and Olutade, S.G., 2013. Effects of dietary crude protein on performance and nitrogen economy of broilers, Sustainable Agriculture Research, 2, 52–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nguyen, T.V. and Bunchasak, C., 2005. Effects of dietary protein and energy on growth performance and carcass characteristics of Betong chicken at early growth stage, Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 27, 1171–1178Google Scholar
  17. Nguyen, T.V., Bunchasak, C. and Chantsavang, S., 2010. Effects of dietary protein and energy on growth performance and carcass characteristics of Betong chickens (Gallus domesticus) during growing period, International Journal of Poultry Science, 9, 468–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Niu, Z., Shi, J., Liu, F., Wang, X., Gao, C. and Yao, L., 2009. Effects of dietary energy and protein on growth performance and carcass quality of broilers during starter phase. International Journal of Poultry Science 8, 508–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. NRC., 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th Revised Edition, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  20. Pingmuang, R., Tangtaweewipat, S., Cheva-Isarakul, B. and Tananchai, B., 2001. Proper dietary protein and energy levels for crossbred native chickens during 6–10 weeks of age, pages 169–177 in the 39th Kasetsart University Annual Conference (in Thai), Bangkok, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  21. Robbins, K.R., Saxton, A.M. and Southern, L.L, 2006. Estimation of nutrient requirements using broken-line regression analysis, Journal of Animal Science, 84 (supplement), E155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. SAS, 1996. SAS Procedures Guide, Release 6.3 edition, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  23. Scott, M.L., Nesheim, M.C. and Young, R.J., 1982. Nutrition of the Chicken. 3rd edition, Scott, M.L. and Associates publishers, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  24. Tangtaweewipat, S., Cheva-Isarakul, B. and Pingmuang, R., 2000. Proper dietary protein and energy levels for growing crossbred native chickens, pages 100–113 in the 38th Kasetsart University Annual Conference (in Thai), Bangkok, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  25. Zaman, Q.U., Mushtaq, T., Nawaz, H., Mirza, M.A., Mahmood, S., Ahmad, T., Babar, M.E. and Mushtaq, M.M.H., 2008. Effect of varying dietary energy and protein on broiler performance in hot climate, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 146, 302–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural TechnologySuranaree University of TechnologyNakhon RatchasimaThailand

Personalised recommendations