A comparison of economic performance between high-yielding temperate breeds and zebu-crossbreds on smallholder dairy farms in Southern Malawi with particular focus on reproductive performance
As in other sub-Saharan African countries, purebred dairy genetics such as Holsteins were imported to Malawi. The study investigated their economic performance by comparing them with local Zebu-crossbreds based on 131 smallholder dairy farm observations from Southern Malawi. High-yielding purebred cows and crossbred cows showed no significant differences in lactation yield and calving interval. Looking at the farms’ actual costs, by-products such as maize bran clearly dominated the cost structure for both breeds, but crossbreeds showed significantly lower concentrate costs. While there was no statistically significant difference in income for both breed types, a substantial share (23%) of farms under investigation shows negative incomes. Based on survey data, two typical farms were established representing standard costs with homogenous assumptions such as identical milk price. The comparison of typical farms covering the full dairy system clearly indicated that crossbred dairy cows outperformed purebreds. In addition, a simulation of a shorter calving interval for both typical farms revealed a substantial positive impact on income for both breed types with more than 30% increase. We conclude that focusing on crossbreds in combination with improved feeding and fertility management offers a more promising strategy for smallholder dairy farms in Southern Malawi than just acquiring high-yielding purebreds.
KeywordsSmallholder dairy production Breed type Malawi Reproductive performance Profitability
We thank the Department of Agricultural Research Services (DARS) and Lilongwe University of Agricultural and Natural Resources (LUANAR) together with their staff for conducting the survey in Malawi, especially Dr. Fanny Chigwa and Daniel Chiumia. This study was supported by Swiss Agency for Development for Cooperation (SDC), Switzerland and Royal Museum of Central Africa, Belgium in the frame of an ERA-ARD Project (“Improving rural livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa: Sustainable and climate-smart intensification of agricultural production”).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Agar, J. and T.L. Donaldson. 2012. Final Evaluation of the Malawi Dairy Development Alliance Land O’Lakes Malawi. Final Report. Google Scholar
- Banda, L., T. Gondwe, W. Gausi, C. Masangano, P. Fatch, K. Wellard, J.W. Banda and E.W. Kaunda. 2011. Challenges and opportunities of smallholder dairy production systems: A case study of selected districts in Malawi. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 23, 226.Google Scholar
- Banda, L., T. Gondwe and M.G.G. Chagunda. 2012b. Dairy cow fertility in Malawi. Included in: Chagunda et al. (2012), Smallholder Dairy Production in Malawi: Current status and future solutions. Optimising Smallholder Dairying project, funded by Scottish Government.Google Scholar
- Banda, M.C., F. Chigwa and D. Chiumia. 2016. Developing and evaluating sustainable integrated farming systems for improvement of smallholder dairy production in milk-shed areas of Malawi—baseline survey report of IFS-SMADAP Project (unpublished).Google Scholar
- Baur, I., M.C. Banda, C. Gazzarin and M. Lips. 2017. The determinants of the performance of dairy smallholders in Malawi. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics. Vol. 118 No. 1 (2017) 59–68.Google Scholar
- Chenyambuga, S.W. and K.F. Mseleko. 2009. Reproductive and lactation performances of Ayrshire and Boran crossbred cattle kept in smallholder farms in Mufindi District, Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 21100. Retrieved March 21, 2016, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/7/chen21100.htm.
- DAHLD (2010). National livestock census, Department of Animal Health and Livestock Development, Lilongwe.Google Scholar
- Duguma, B., Y. Kechero and G.P.J. Janssens. 2012. Productive and reproductive performance of Zebu x Holstein-Friesian crossbred dairy cows in Jimma Town, Oromia, Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria 8 (1): 67–72.Google Scholar
- FAO, IDF and IFCN. 2014. World mapping of animal feeding systems in the dairy sector, Food and Agriculture Organization, International Dairy Federation and the International Farm Comparison Network, Rome.Google Scholar
- Gondwe, T. 2012. Dairy cattle breeding in Malawi. Included in: Chagunda et al. (2012), Smallholder Dairy Production in Malawi: Current status and future solutions. Optimising Smallholder Dairying project, funded by Scottish Government.Google Scholar
- Haggblade, S., and P.B. Hazell. 2010. Successes in African Agriculture: Lessons for the future. Baltimore: John Hopkins University for the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).Google Scholar
- Heins, B.J., L.B. Hansen, A.J. Seykora, D.G. Johnson, J.G. Linn, J.E. Romano and A.R. Hazel. 2008. Crossbreds of Jersey × Holstein Compared with Pure Holsteins for Production, Fertility, and Body and Udder Measurements During First Lactation. Journal of Dairy Science Volume 91, Issue 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hemme, T. 2000. Concept for international analysis of the policy and technology impacts in agriculture, International Farm Comparison Network, IFCN Dairy Research Center, Kiel.Google Scholar
- Hüttner, K. 2000. Impact Assessment of a Community-based Animal Health Service Program in Northern Malawi. PhD thesis, Massey University. Retrieved March 23, 2016, from https://www.massey.ac.nz/massey/fms/Colleges/College%20of%20Sciences/Epicenter/docs/KlimHuttnerMVS.pdf?160A1EAB97B5868BA3DC4035C2054BAA.
- Kiwuwa, G.H., J.C.M. Trail, M.Y. Kurtu, G. Worku, F. Anderson, J. Durkin. 1986. Productivité de bovins laitiers métis dans la région d’Arsi en Ethiopie, ILRI (aka ILCA and ILRAD).Google Scholar
- Madalena F.E. 1993a. La utilización sostenible de hembras F1 en la producción del ganado lechero tropical. Estudio FAO No 111 Producción y Sanidad Animal, FAO, Rome. 87p.Google Scholar
- Madalena, F.E. 1993b. A simple scheme to utilize heterosis in tropical dairy cattle, World Animal Review 74/75, 17–25.Google Scholar
- Mburu, L.M., K.W. Gitu and J.W. Wakhungu. 2007. A cost-benefit analysis of smallholder dairy cattle enterprises in different agro-ecological zones in Kenya highlands. Livestock research for rural development 19 (95). Retrieved March 23, 2016, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/7/mbur19095.htm.
- Muller, C.J.C., J.P. Potgieter, S.W.P. Cloete and J.A. Botha. 2014. Reproductive performance of Holstein and Jersey heifers and cows in pasture-based system in South Africa. Proc. Assoc. Advmt. Breed. Genet. 21: 290–293Google Scholar
- Mwale, S., C. Wollny, J. Banda, M. Chagunda and E. Bruns. 1999. Evaluation of Malawi Zebu and its crosses on smallholder dairy farms in Mzuzu, Northern Malawi. Deutscher Tropentag, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Nyekanyeka, T. 2011. Analysis of profitability and efficiency of improved and local smallholder dairy production: A case of Lilongwe milk shed area. Master thesis, LUANAR, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
- Perera, O. 1999. Management of Reproduction. In: L. Falvey and C. Chantalakhana (eds), Smallholder Dairying in the Tropics (International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi), 241–264.Google Scholar
- Piccand, V., E. Cutullic, F. Schori, P. Kunz, J. Troxler, M. Wanner and P. Thomet. 2011. Comparison of Swiss breeds with New Zealand Holstein-Friesian in pasture-based, seasonal-calving systems. Grassland Science in Europe, Vol. 16.Google Scholar
- Sattar, A., R.H. Mirza, A.A.K. Niazi and M. Latif. 2005. Productive and reproductive performance of Holstein Frisian cows in Pakistan. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 25(2):75–81.Google Scholar
- Staal, S. J., Waithaka, M., Njoroge, L., Mwangi, D. M., Njubi, D. and Wokabi, A. 2003. Costs of milk production in Kenya: estimates from Kiambu, Nakuru and Nyandarua districts. Smallholder Dairy Project, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi.Google Scholar
- Tadesse, M. and T. Dessie. 2003. Milk production performance of Zebu, Holstein Friesian and their crosses in Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development (15) 3.Google Scholar
- Tebug, S. F., G.R. Njunga, M.G.G. Chagunda and S. Wiedemann. 2012. Health Constraints and Farm Management Factors Influencing Udder Health of Dairy Cows in Malawi. Journal of Agricultural Science, Vol. 4, No. 6.Google Scholar
- Toure, A., N. Moula, A. Kouriba, B. Traore, P. Leroy and N. Antoine-Moussiaux. 2015. Dairy farms typology and management of animal genetic resources in the peri-urban zone of Bamako (Mali). Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (JARTS), 116(1), 37–47.Google Scholar
- Vaccaro, L.P. de. 1990. Survival of European dairy breeds and their crosses with zebus in the tropics. Animal Breeding Abstracts, Vol. 58, No. 6, pp. 475–494.Google Scholar
- Wathes, D.C., V.J. Taylor, Z. Cheng and G.E. Mann. 2003. Follicle growth, corpus luteum function and their effects on embryo development in the post partum cow. Reproduction 61: (suppl.) 219–237.Google Scholar
- Yifat, D., B. Kelay, M. Bekana, F. Lobago, H. Gustafsson and H. Kindahl. 2009. Study on reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cattle under smallholder conditions in and around Zeway, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 21088. Retrieved March 21, 2016, http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/6/yifa21088.htm