Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 49–62 | Cite as

Practices of traditional beef farmers in their production and marketing of cattle in Zambia

  • Chisoni MumbaEmail author
  • Barbara Häsler
  • John B. Muma
  • Musso Munyeme
  • Doreen Chilolo Sitali
  • Eystein Skjerve
  • Karl M. Rich
Regular Articles

Abstract

Understanding the practices of traditional cattle farmers in developing countries is an important factor in the development of appropriate, pro-poor disease control policies, and in formulating regional-specific production incentives that can improve productivity. This paper describes the production, husbandry practices, economics, and constraints of traditional cattle farming in Zambia. A cross-sectional study design was used to obtain data from traditional cattle farmers (n = 699) using a structured questionnaire. Data analyses were carried out using SPSS and STATA statistical packages. The results revealed that the majority [65% (95% CI: 59.3–71.1)] of farmers practised a transhumant cattle herding system under communal grazing. In these transhumant herding systems, animal husbandry and management systems were found to be of poor quality, in terms of supplementary feeding, vaccination coverage, deworming, uptake of veterinary services, usage of artificial insemination, and dip tanks all being low or absent. East Coast Fever was the most common disease, affecting 60% (95% CI: 56.4–63.7) of farmers. Cattle sales were low, as farmers only sold a median of two cattle per household per year. Crop farming was found to be the main source of farm income (47%) in agro-pastoralist communities, followed by cattle farming (28%) and other sources (25%). The median cost of production in the surveyed provinces was reported at US$316, while that of revenue from cattle and cattle products sales was estimated at US$885 per herd per year. This translates to an estimated gross margin of US$569, representing 64.3% of revenue.

There is considerable diversity in disease distribution, animal husbandry practices, economics, and challenges in traditional cattle production in different locations of Zambia. Therefore, to improve the productivity of the traditional cattle sub-sector, policy makers and stakeholders in the beef value chain must develop fit-for-purpose policies and interventions that consider these variations.

Keywords

Beef value chain Cattle keeping practices Traditional cattle farmers Zambia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Capacity Building in Zoonotic Diseases Management using the Integrated Approach to Ecosystems Health at Human-Livestock-Wildlife Interface in Eastern and Southern Africa (NORHED CAPAZOMANINTECO, Grant Number UGA/13003/1).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anonymous, 2015. Government Republic of Zambia. Department of Veterinary Services Annual Report. Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock., (Lusaka)Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous, 2017. Government Republic of Zambia. Seventh National Development Plan 2017–2021. Ministry of National Development Planning, (Lusaka)Google Scholar
  3. Chilonda, P. and Van Huylenbroeck, G., 2001. Attitude towards and uptake of veterinary services by small-scale cattle farmers in Eastern province, Zambia, Outlook on Agriculture, 30, 213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Du Plessis, I. and Hoffman, L.C., 2004. Effect of chronological age of beef steers of different maturity types on their growth and carcass characteristics when finished on natural pastures in the arid sub-tropics of South Africa. South African Journal of Animal Sciences, 34, 1–12Google Scholar
  5. Fourcade, Y., Engler, J.O., Rödder, D., Secondi, J. and Brooks, T., 2014. Mapping species distributions with MAXENT using a geographically biased sample of presence data: a performance assessment of methods for correcting sampling bias. PLoS ONE, 9, e97122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gallet, C.A., 2010. Meat meets meta: a quantitative review of the price elasticity of meat. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 92, 258–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grace, D., Randolph, T., Affognon, H., Dramane, D., Diall, O. and Clausen, P.-H., 2009. Characterisation and validation of farmers’ knowledge and practice of cattle trypanosomosis management in the cotton zone of West Africa. Acta Tropica, 111, 137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamoonga, R., Stevenson, M.A., Allepuz, A., Carpenter, T.E. and Sinkala, Y., 2014. Risk factors for foot-and-mouth disease in Zambia, 1981–2012. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 114, 64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lubungu, M., Chapoto, A. and Tembo, G., 2012. Smallholder farmers participation in livestock markets: the case of Zambian farmers., Lusaka. http://fsg.afre.msu.edu/zambia/WP66.pdfGoogle Scholar
  10. Lubungu, M., Sitko, N.J. and Hichaambwa, M., 2015. Analysis of beef value chain in Zambia: challenges and opportunities of linking smallholders to markets., Lusaka. http://fsg.afre.msu.edu/zambia/wp103.pdfGoogle Scholar
  11. Makungu, C. and Mwacalimba, K.K., 2014. A quantitative risk assessment of bovine theileriosis entering Luapula Province from Central Province in Zambia via live cattle imports from traditional and commercial production sectors. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 116, 63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McNerney, R., 2015. Diagnostics for developing countries. Diagnostics, 5, 200–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moll, H.A.J., 2005. Costs and benefits of livestock systems and the role of market and nonmarket relationships. Agricultural Economics, 32, 181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moll, H.A.J., Staal, S.J. and Ibrahim, M.N.M., 2007. Smallholder dairy production and markets: a comparison of production systems in Zambia, Kenya and Sri Lanka. Agricultural Systems, 94, 593–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mubamba, C., Sitali, J. and Gummow, B., 2011. Trends of selected cattle diseases in eastern Zambia between 1988 and 2008. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 101, 163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Muma, J.B., Munyeme, M., Samui, K.L., Siamudaala, V., Oloya, J., Mwacalimba, K. and Skjerve, E., 2009. Mortality and commercial off-take rates in adult traditional cattle of Zambia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 41, 783–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Muma, J.B., Pandey, G.S., Munyeme, M., Mumba, C., Mkandawire, E. and Chimana, H.M., 2011. Brucellosis among smallholder cattle farmers in Zambia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44, 915–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Muuka, G., Songolo, N., Kabilika, S., Hang’ombe, B.M., Nalubamba, K.S. and Muma, J.B., 2012. Challenges of controlling contagious bovine pleuropneumonia in sub-Saharan Africa: a Zambian perspective. Tropical animal health and production, 45, 9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Muuka, G.M., Chikampa, W., Mundia, C., Bounavoglia, D., Pini, A. and Scacchia, M., 2014. Recent observations on site reactions in cattle to vaccination against contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP) using T1/44 vaccine in Zambia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 46, 481–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Naziri, D., Rich, K.M. and Bennett, B., 2015. Would a commodity-based trade approach improve market access for Africa? A case study of the potential of beef exports from communal areas of Namibia. Development Policy Review, 33, 195–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Perry, B. and Grace, D., 2009. The impacts of livestock diseases and their control on growth and development processes that are pro-poor. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 2643–2655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Perry, B.D. and Rich, K.M., 2007. Poverty impacts of foot-and-mouth disease and the poverty reduction implications of its control. The Veterinary record, 160, 238–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Randolph, T.F., Schelling, E., Grace, D., Nicholson, C.F., Leroy, J.L., Cole, D.C., Demment, M.W., Omore, A., Zinsstag, J. and Ruel, M., 2007. Invited review: role of livestock in human nutrition and health for poverty reduction in developing countries. Journal of animal science, 85, 2788–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Salganik, M.J., 2006. Variance estimation, design effects, and sample size calculations for respondent-driven sampling. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 98–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sinkala, Y., Simuunza, M., Pfeiffer, D.U., Munang, H.M., Mulumba, M., Kasanga, C.J., Muma, J.B. and Mweene, A.S., 2014. Challenges and economic implications in the control of foot and mouth disease in sub-Saharan Africa: lessons from the Zambian experience. Veterinary Medicine International, 2014, 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sitali, D.C., Mumba, C., Skjerve, E., Mweemba, O., Kabonesa, C., Mwinyi, M.O., Nyakarahuka, L. and Muma, J.B., 2017. Awareness and attitudes towards anthrax and meat consumption practices among affected communities in Zambia: a mixed methods approach. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 11, e0005580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SNV, 2012. Assessment of opportunities for improving dairy production, marketing, and adoption of good animal husbandry practices within traditional cattle keeping areas of Zambia., Lusaka. http://saipar.org:8080/eprc/bitstream/handle/123456789/307/SNV_Assessment of Opportunities for Improving Dairy Production%2C Marketing and Adoption of Good Animal Husbandry_Dec. 2012.pdf?sequence=1Google Scholar
  28. Steinfeld, H., Wassenaar, T. and Jutzi, S., 2006. Livestock production systems in developing countries: status, drivers, trends. Scientific and Technical Review of the Office International des Epizooties, 25, 505–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Syfert, M.M., Smith, M.J., Coomes, D.A., Meagher, T. and Roberts, D., 2013. The effects of sampling bias and model complexity on the predictive performance of MaxEnt species distribution models. PLoS ONE, 8, e55158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. World Bank, 2011. What would it take for Zambia’s beef and dairy industries to achieve their potential? Finance and private sector development Unit, Africa Region. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/2771/623770ESW0Gray000public00BOX361530B.pdf?sequence=1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Disease Control, School of Veterinary MedicineThe University of ZambiaLusakaZambia
  2. 2.Department of Food Safety and Infection BiologyNorwegian University of Life SciencesOsloNorway
  3. 3.Department of Pathobiology and Population SciencesThe Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead LaneHertfordshireUK
  4. 4.International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), East and Southeast Asia Regional OfficeHanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations