Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 49, Issue 6, pp 1235–1242 | Cite as

Evaluation of the feeding value of Dichrostachys cinerea pods for fattening pigs in Cuba

  • N. Martín-Casas
  • M. Reinoso-Pérez
  • J.R. García-Díaz
  • H.H. Hansen
  • M.O. Nielsen
Regular Articles

Abstract

Dichrostachys cinerea (L.) Wight & Arn. is a tropical leguminous shrub widely regarded as an invasive species in Cuba, after having invaded a significant proportion of its arable land during the past decades. Concurrently, smallholder pig producers are highly constrained by the scarcity of protein feeds. This study aimed to assess the feeding value of D. cinerea pod meal (DCPM) as an alternative protein supplement for pigs in Cuban smallholder production systems. An on-farm feeding trial was carried out with three groups (N = 10) of growing-fattening pigs over 60 days, where DCPM replaced 0, 15, and 30% in DM of a dietary commercial concentrate. Then, in an in vivo digestibility trial with eight growing pigs, apparent digestibilities of DCPM were determined for dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM) and crude protein (CP). Finally, in vitro digestibilities for OM (fecal and ileal) and CP (ileal) were determined. In the feeding trial, pig body weight gains were not affected by increased dietary substitution levels of concentrate for DCPM. Blood parameters, with a few exceptions, did not show significant differences among groups. Values for in vivo OM and CP digestibilities were 40.81 and 50.26%, and substantially higher than in vitro values. In conclusion, our results showed that at least 30% of DM in commercial concentrate could be substituted by DCPM without affecting pig growth performances under Cuban smallholder conditions. The low digestibility of DCPM is, however, not acceptable for intensive pig production systems. In vitro enzyme digestibility methods developed for commercial pig feeds are not suitable for DCPM without further calibration.

Keywords

Dichrostachys cinerea In vivo digestibility In vitro digestibility Growth trial Pig Cuba 

Abbreviations

AD

Apparent digestibility

ALAT

Alanine amino transferase

BW

Body weight

CP

Crude protein

DM

Dry matter

NDF

Neutral detergent fiber

OM

Organic matter

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their special gratitude towards Guillermo Hernández Navarro (Finca La Gran Señora), who offered the possibility to carry out this research at his farm. Special thanks also go to Leonel Lazo Pérez and Leopoldina Rodríguez Triana (Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, UCLV, Cuba), for their very useful contributions to the experiments. This study was partially financed by development and research funds from the University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Compliance with ethical standards

Statement of animal rights

All the experimental procedures involving the use of animals (growth trial and digestibility trial) were carried out in compliance with both the animal welfare regulations of the Cuban Institute of Veterinary Medicine and with the EU Directive for animal experiments (2010/63/EU) as an essential requirement for performing animal experiments under representation of the University of Copenhagen. Field work supervision on the compliance of such procedures has been carried out by the Coordinator of the Animal Production Group of the Central University “Marta Abreu” of Las Villas (Cuba).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. A.O.A.C, 1965. Official Methods of Analysis, tenth ed., (Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington D.C.).Google Scholar
  2. Almaguel, R.E., Piloto, J.L., Cruz, E., Mederos, C.M.Y., Ly, J., 2011. Utilización del ensilaje artesanal de yuca como fuente energética en dietas para cerdos de engorde. Livestotock Research for Rural Development, 23(1).Google Scholar
  3. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker S., 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4, Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergmeyer, H.U., Hørder, M., Rej, R., 1986. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) Scientific Committee, Analytical Section: approved recommendation (1985) on IFCC methods for the measurement of catalytic concentration of enzymes. Part 3. IFCC method for alanine aminotransferase (L-alanine: 2-oxoglutarate aminotransferase, EC 2.6.1.2), Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, 24, 481–495.Google Scholar
  5. Boisen, S., Fernández, J.A., 1995. Prediction of the apparent ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids in feedstuffs and feed mixtures for pigs by in vitro analyses, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 51, 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boisen, S., Fernández, J.A., 1997. Prediction of the total tract digestibility of energy in feedstuffs and pig diets by in vitro analyses, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 68, 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabrera, L.R., Lezcano, P., Castro, M., 2012. Uso de ensilado de raíces de yuca y residuos de granos de maíz en la ceba de cerdos. Revista Computadorizada de Producción Porcina, 19(3), 196–200.Google Scholar
  8. Cordero, D., 2012. Experiencia en la Sierra del Rosario del manejo y control del Marabú (Dichrostachys cinerea). Taller Nacional sobre Especies Exóticas, Reserva de La Biosfera Sierra del Rosario, Las Tunas.Google Scholar
  9. Dierick, N.A., 1991. Recent developments in pig feed evaluation. In: Royal Flemish Society of Engineers, International Congress on Pig Farming: Final programme and proceedings, Brussels, 7–8 February 1991, 2.1–2.8.Google Scholar
  10. Drabkin, D.L., Austin, J.M., 1932. Spectrophotometric studies: I. Spectrophotometric constants for common hemoglobin derivatives in human, dog and rabbit blood. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 98, 719–733.Google Scholar
  11. Duncan, D.B., 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests, Biometrics, 11, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Espinosa-Sifontes, E., Pedraza-Olivera, R., 2013. Nutritional values indicators of tropical arborescent legume foliage for ruminants and pigs, Revista de Producción Animal, 25 (special), 15–18.Google Scholar
  13. Fan, M.Z., Sauer, W.C., 1995. Determination of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in barley and canola meal for pigs with the direct, difference, and regression methods, Journal of Animal Science, 73, 2364–2374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Figueroa, V., 1989. Experiencias cubanas en el uso de las mieles de caña para la alimentación porcina, Livestock Research for Rural Development, 1, 2. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd1/1/vilda.htm. Accessed 29.05.16.
  15. Gornall, A.G., Bardawill, C.J., David, M.M., 1949. Determination of serum proteins by means of the biuret reaction, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 177, 751–766.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Heuzé, V., Tran, G. Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium). In: Feedipedia, a programme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. 2015. http://www.feedipedia.org/node/552. Accessed 23.04.16.
  17. Heuzé, V., Tran, G., Giger-Reverdin S. Sicklebush (Dichrostachys cinerea). In: Feedipedia, a programme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. 2016. http://www.feedipedia.org/node/298. Accessed 30.05.16.
  18. ICSH, 1982. Selected methods for the determination of the packed cell volume. In: van Assendelft O.W., England, J.M. (eds), Advances in Hematological Methods: the blood count, (CRC Press, Boca Raton).Google Scholar
  19. INRA, AFZ, CIRAD, FAO, 2016. Feedipedia – Animal Feed Resources Information System. www.feedipedia.org.
  20. Instituto de Investigaciones Porcinas (IIP), 2014. Tecnologías alternativas para la producción de cerdos en Cuba, (Editorial EDIPOR, La Habana).Google Scholar
  21. Jahoor, F., Bhattiprolu S., Del Rosario M., Burrin D., Wykes L., Frazer M., 1996. Chronic protein deficiency differentially affects the kinetics of plasma proteins in young pigs, Journal of Nutrition, 126, 1489–1495.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaneko, J.J., Harvey J.W., Bruss M.L., 2008. Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals, sixth ed, (Academic press, San Diego).Google Scholar
  23. Ly, J., 1996. A short review of physiological aspects of the utilization of legumes for pigs in Cuba, Revista Computadorizada de Producción Porcina, 3(3), 2–8.Google Scholar
  24. Mlambo, V., Smith, T., Owen, E., Mould, F.L., Sikosana, J.L.N., Mueller-Harvey, I., 2004. Tanniniferous Dichrostachys cinerea fruits do not require detoxification for goat nutrition: In sacco and in vivo evaluations, Livestock Production Science, 90, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nielsen, M.O., Reinoso-Pérez, M., Sørensen, M., Hansen, H.O., Gustafsson, J., 2013. Eco-friendly alternatives for control and use of invasive plants in agroforestry systems: The case of Marabú (Dichrostachys cinerea) in Cuba. In: Memorias de la IX Convención Internacional sobre Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo, (Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología y Medio Ambiente de Cuba, La Habana, Cuba).Google Scholar
  26. NRC (National Research Council), 2012. Nutrient Requirements of Swine: Eleventh Revised Edition, (National Academies Press, Washington D.C.).Google Scholar
  27. Ortiz, A., Martí, O., Valdivié, M., Leyva, C., 2011. Utilización de la harina de frutos del árbol del pan (Artocarpus altilis) en dietas para cerdos en ceba. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola, 45(2), 145–149.Google Scholar
  28. R Core Team, 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.r-project.org/.Google Scholar
  29. Reinoso-Pérez, M., Taboada-Pérez, P., Marrero-Suárez, L. I., Noval-Artillés, E., 2005. Manual Práctico para la Formulación de Piensos Locales, (unpublished, COSUDE / CITMA Project: ¨Fortalecimiento de los Sistemas Locales de Producción de Proteína Animal", Villa Clara, Cuba. 22p.).Google Scholar
  30. Santos-Ricalde, R.H., Abreu-Sierra, J.E., 1995. Evaluación nutricia de la Leucaena leucocephala y del Brossimum alicastrum y su empleo en alimentación de cerdos, Revista Veterinaria México, 26, 51–57.Google Scholar
  31. Trómpiz, J., Ventura M., Esparza D., Higuera A., Padron S., Aguirre, J., 2001. Efecto de la sustitución parcial del alimento balanceado por harina de follaje de quinchoncho (Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp.) sobre el comportamiento productivo en cerdos en etapa de engorde, Revista Científica FCV-LUZ, 11, 391–396.Google Scholar
  32. Vásquez, P.C., Rosso, L., 1997. Evaluación de la harina de matarratón (Gliricidia sepium) sobre la ganancia de peso de cerdos en crecimiento, Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal, 5, 274.Google Scholar
  33. Xandé, X., Régnier, C., Archimède, H., Bocage, B., Noblet, J., Renaudeau, D., 2010. Nutritional values of sugarcane products in local Caribbean growing pigs, Animal, 4, 745–754.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Large Animal SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksberg CDenmark
  2. 2.Facultad de Ciencias AgropecuariasUniversidad Central “Marta Abreu” de Las VillasSanta ClaraCuba

Personalised recommendations