Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 48, Issue 8, pp 1673–1678 | Cite as

Supplementation of banana flower powder pellet and plant oil sources on in vitro ruminal fermentation, digestibility, and methane production

  • Sungchhang Kang
  • Metha WanapatEmail author
  • Bounnaxay Viennasay
Regular Articles

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of banana flower power pellet (BAFLOP-pellet) and plant oil source on in vitro gas production, fermentation efficiency, and methane (CH4) production. Rumen fluid was collected from two rumen-fistulated dairy steers fed on rice straw-based diet with concentrate supplement to maintain normal rumen ecology. All supplemented feed were added to respective treatments in the 30:70 roughage to concentrate-based substrate. The treatments were arranged according to a 3 × 3 factorial arrangement in a completely randomized design. First factor was different levels of BAFLOP-pellet supplementation (0, 30, and 60 g/kg of dietary substrate) and second factor was plant oil source supplementation [non-supplemented, 20 g/kg krabok seed oil (KSO), and 20 g/kg coconut oil (CO) of dietary substrate, respectively]. Under this investigation, BAFLOP-pellet supplementation increased gas production kinetics and in vitro digestibility (P < 0.05). Ruminal pH was dropped post incubation time in the non-supplemented group but was enhanced in BAFLOP-pellet-supplemented treatments. On the other hand, supplementation of KSO and CO depressed gas production and digestibility, but did not influence ruminal pH. In addition, protozoal population and CH4 production were decreased by BAFLOP-pellet and plant oil addition (P < 0.05). Based on this study, it could be concluded that supplementation of BAFLOP-pellet and plant oil source could enhance the in vitro fermentation efficiency while reduced protozoal population and CH4 production. It is suggested that BAFLOP-pellet (60 g/kg of dietary substrate) and KSO/CO (20 g/kg of dietary substrate) could be used to manipulate rumen fermentation characteristics fed on high-concentrate diet.

Keywords

Banana flower Plant oil Rumen ecology Methane Ruminant 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The most sincere thanks are extended to the Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Centre (TROFREC), Khon Kaen University (KKU), and Thailand Research Fund (TRF) through the International Research Network (IRN) program for their kind support on research fund and facility.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical guideline

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. AOAC., 2012. Official Methods of Analysis, 19th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD.Google Scholar
  2. Calabrò, S., Guglielmelli, A., Iannaccone, F., Danieli, P.P., Tudisco, R., Ruggiero, C., Piccolo, G., Cutrignelli, M.I. and Infascelli, F., 2011. Fermentation kinetics of Sainfoin hay with and without PEG. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 96, 842–849.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Carulla, J.E., Kreuzer, M., Machmller, A. and Hess, H.D., 2005. Supplementation of Acacia mearnsii tannins decreases methanogenesis and urinary nitrogen in forage-fed sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 56, 961–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crichton, N., 1999. Information point: Tukey Multiple Comparison test. Blackwell Science Ltd, Journal of Clinic Nurse, 8, 299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dijkstra, J., Ellis, J.L., Kebreab, E., Strathe, A.B., Lopez, S., France, J. and Bannink, A., 2012. Ruminal pH regulation and nutritional consequences of low pH. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 172, 22–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dohme, F., Machmüller, A., Wasserfallen, A. and Kreuzer, M., 2001. Ruminal methanogenesis as influenced by individual fatty acids supplemented to complete ruminant diets. Letter Applied Microbiology, 32, 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frutos, P., Hervás, G., Giráldez, F.J., Mantecón, A.R. 2004. Review. Tannins and ruminant nutrition. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 2, 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galyen, M., 1989. Laboratory procedures in animal nutrition research. New Mexico State University.Google Scholar
  9. Goel, G. and Makkar, H. P. S., 2012. Methane mitigation from ruminants using tannins and saponins. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44, 729–739.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Grainger, C., Clarke, T., Auldist, M.J., Beauchemin, K.A., McGinn, S.M., Waghorn, G.C. and Eckard, R.J., 2009. Potential use of Acacia mearnsii condensed tannins to reduce methane emissions and nitrogen excretion from grazing dairy cows. Canada Journal of Animal Science, 89, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guglielmelli, A., Calabrò, S., Primi, R., Carone, F., Cutrignelli, M.I., Tudisco, R., Piccolo, G., Ronchi, B. and Danieli, P.P., 2011. In vitro fermentation patterns and methane production of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) hay with different condensed tannin contents. Grass Forage Science, 66, 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hristov, A.N., Ivan, M. and McAllister, T.A., 2004. In vitro effects of individual fatty acids on protozoal numbers and on fermentation products in ruminal fluid from cattle fed a high concentrate, barley-based diet. Journal of Animal Science, 82, 2693–2704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kang, S. and Wanapat, M., 2013. Using plant source as a buffering agent to manipulating rumen fermentation in an in vitro gas production system. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 26, 1424–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kang, S., Wanapat, M. and Cherdthong, A., 2014. Effect of banana flower powder supplementation as a rumen buffer on rumen fermentation efficiency and nutrient digestibility in dairy steers fed on high concentrate diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 196, 32–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kang, S., Wanapat, M., Cherdthong, A. and Phesatcha, K., 2015. Comparison of banana flower powder and sodium bicarbonate supplementation on rumen fermentation and milk production in dairy cows. Animal Production Science. doi: 10.1071/AN15055.Google Scholar
  16. Kang, S., Wanapat, M., Phesatcha, K., Norrapoke, T., Foiklang, S., Ampapon, T. and Phesatcha, B., 2016. Using krabok (Irvingia malayana) seed oil and Flemingia macrophylla leaf meal as a rumen enhancer in an in vitro gas production system. Animal Production Science. doi: 10.1071/AN15211.Google Scholar
  17. Kongmun, P., Wanapat, M., Pakdee, P. and Navanukraw, C., 2010. Effect of coconut oil and garlic powder on in vitro fermentation using gas production technique. Livestock Science, 127, 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lüscher, A., Mueller-Harvey, I., Soussana, J.F., Rees, R.M. and Peyraud, J.L., 2014. Potential of legume-based grassland–livestock systems in Europe: a review. Grass Forage Science, 69, 206–228.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Makkar, H.P.S., Blummel, M. and Becker, K., 1995. Formation of complexes between polyvinyl pyrrolidones or polyethylene glycols and tannins, and their implication in gas production and true digestibility in in vitro techniques. British Journal of Nutrition, 73, 897–913.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Menke, K.H., Raab, L., Salewski, A., Steingass, H., Fritz, D. and Schneider, W., 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. Journal of Agricultural Science, (Camb.) 92, 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Orskov, E.R. and McDonal, I., 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, 92, 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Panyakaew, P., Goela, G., Lourenco, M., Yuangklang, C. and Fievez, V., 2013. Medium-chain fatty acids from coconut or krabok oil inhibit in vitro rumen methanogenesis and conversion of non-conjugated dienoic biohydrogenation intermediates. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 180, 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. SAS (Statistical Analysis System), 2013. User’s Guide: Statistic, Version 9.4th Edition. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  24. Sittijunda, S., Reungsang, A. and O-thong, S., 2010. Biohydrogen production from dual digestion pretreatment of poultry slaughterhouse sludge by anaerobic self-fermentation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 35: 13427–13434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Soest, P. and Robertson, J.B., 1985. A laboratory manual for animal science. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, page. 612.Google Scholar
  26. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A., 1991. Methods for dietary fiber neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wanapat, M. and Poungchompu, O., 2001. Method for estimation of tannin by vanillin-HCl method (A modified method of Burns, 1971). Department of Animal Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 4002, Thailand.Google Scholar
  28. Wanapat, M., Kang, S. and Polyorach, S., 2013. Development of feeding systems and strategies of supplementation to enhance rumen fermentation and ruminant production in the tropics. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 4(1), 32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Yuangklang, C., Khotsakdee, J., Vasupen, K., Panyakeaw, P. and Bureenok, S., 2010. Effect of krabok oil level on feed intake, nutrient digestion and rumen fermentation in meat goats. Proceedings of the 13th AITVM Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, 23–26 August 2010, pp. 238–239.Google Scholar
  30. Zhou, Y.Y., Mao, H.L., Jiang, F., Wang, J.K., Liu, J.X. and McSweeney, C.S., 2011. Inhibition of rumen methanogenesis by tea saponins with reference to fermentation pattern and microbial communities in Hu sheep, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 166, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sungchhang Kang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Metha Wanapat
    • 2
    Email author
  • Bounnaxay Viennasay
    • 2
  1. 1.Agricultural Unit, Department of EducationNational Institute of EducationPhnom PenhCambodia
  2. 2.Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of AgricultureKhon Kaen UniversityKhon KaenThailand

Personalised recommendations