Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 48, Issue 6, pp 1123–1128 | Cite as

Effect of treating sugarcane bagasse with urea and calcium hydroxide on feed intake, digestibility, and rumen fermentation in beef cattle

  • Nirawan GununEmail author
  • Metha Wanapat
  • Pongsatorn Gunun
  • Anusorn Cherdthong
  • Pichad Khejornsart
  • Sungchhang Kang
Regular Articles

Abstract

Four beef cattle with initial body weight of 283 ± 14 kg were randomly allocated according to a 4 × 4 Latin square design to study on the effect of feeding sugarcane bagasse (SB) treated with urea and/or calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) on feed intake, digestibility, and rumen fermentation. The treatments were as follows: rice straw (RS), untreated SB (SB), 4 % urea-treated SB (SBU), and 2 % urea + 2 % Ca(OH)2-treated SB (SBUC), respectively. The results revealed that cattle fed with SBU and SBUC had higher feed intake and apparent digestibility. Ammonia nitrogen and blood urea nitrogen were increased in cattle fed with SB as roughage source (P < 0.05). Feeding SBU and SBUC to cattle resulted in higher propionic acid and lower acetic acid, acetic to propionic ratio, and methane production (P < 0.05). Moreover, the number of fungi was increased in SBU- and SBUC-fed groups while protozoa population was unchanged. This study concluded that the nutritive value of SB was improved by urea and/or Ca(OH)2 treatment, and feeding treated SB could increase feed intake, digestibility, and rumen fermentation. This study suggested that SB treated with 2 % urea + 2 % Ca(OH)2 could be used as an alternative roughage source for ruminant feeding.

Keywords

Sugarcane bagasse Urea Calcium hydroxide Digestibility Rumen fermentation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the Thailand Research Fund (TRF) and the research and development institute, Udon Thani Rajabhat University through the Research Grant for New Scholar (contract no. TRG5780118) for their financial support. Special thank to the Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology-Isan, Sakon Nakhon Campus for providing experimental animals and laboratory. Thank to Rerm Udom sugar factory CO., LTD. for providing sugarcane bagasse. The cooperation of Kannika Opatawong, Aleeya Promnoy, and Kriangkai Pimdawhom who participated in this study and the Increase Production Efficiency and Meat Quality of Native Beef and Buffalo Research Group, Khon Kaen University was highly appreciated.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahmed MH, Babiker SA, Fadel Elseed MA, Mohammed AM. 2013. Effect of urea-treatment on nutritive value of sugarcane bagasse. ARPN Journal of Science and Technology, 3(8), 834–838.Google Scholar
  2. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). 1997. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Balgees A, Elmnan A, Fadel Elseed AMA, Salih AM. 2007. Effect of ammonia and urea treatments on the chemical composition and rumen degradability of bagasse. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3(11), 1359–1362.Google Scholar
  4. Balgees A, Elmnan A, Hemeedan AA, Ahmed RI. 2015. Influence of different treatments on nutritive values of sugarcane bagasse. Global Journal of Animal Scientific Research, 2(3), 295.Google Scholar
  5. Beukes N, Pletschke BI. 2011. Effect of alkaline pre-treatment on enzyme synergy for efficient hemicellulose hydrolysis in sugarcane bagasse. Bioresource Technology, 102(8), 5207–5213.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bod’a K. 1990. Non conventional feedstuffs in the nutrition of farm animals.Developments in Animal and Veterinary 23. Elsevier, Amsterdam-Oxford-New York-Tokyo.Google Scholar
  7. Carvalho GGP, Garcia R, Pires AJV, Silva RR, Detmann E, EustaquioFilho A, Ribeiro LSO, Carvalho LM. 2013. Diets based on sugar cane treated with calcium oxide for lambs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2(62), 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castañón-Rodríguez JF, Welti-Chanes J, Palacios AJ, Torrestiana-Sanchez B, Ramírez de León JA, Velázquez G, Aguilar-Uscanga MG. 2015. Influence of high pressure processing and alkaline treatment on sugarcane bagasse hydrolysis. Journal of food, 13(4), 613–620.Google Scholar
  9. Chen XL, Wang JK, Wu YM, Liu JX. 2008. Effects of chemical treatments of rice straw on rumen fermentation characteristics, fibrolytic enzyme activities and populations of liquid- and solid-associated ruminal microbes in vitro. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 141(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa DA, Clebson SL, Eloísa SSO, Jailton CC. 2015. By-products of sugar cane industry in ruminant nutrition. International Journal of Advance Agricultural Research, 3, 1–9.Google Scholar
  11. Crocker CL. 1967. Rapid determination of urea nitrogen in serum or plasma without deproteinization. The American Journal of Medical Technology, 33(5), 361–365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Galyean M. 1989. Laboratory Procedure in Animal Nutrition Research. Department of Animal and Range Sciences. New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA, pp. 107–122.Google Scholar
  13. Hameed AAA, Salih MA, Seed FEL. 2012. Effect of urea treatment on the chemical composition and rumen degradability of groundnut hull. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 11(12), 1146–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khejornsart P, Wanapat M, Rowlinson P. 2011. Diversity of anaerobic fungi and rumen fermentation characteristic in swamp buffalo and beef cattle fed on different diets. Livestock Science, 139, 230–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moss AR, Jouany JP, Newbold J. 2000. Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Annales de Zootechnie, 49(3), 231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Okano K, Yuko I, Muhammad S, Bambang P, Tomoya U, Takashi W. 2006. Comparison of in vitro digestibility and chemical composition among sugarcane bagasse treated by four white-rot fungi. Animal Science Journal, 77(3), 308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ørskov ER, Meehan DE, Macleod NA, Kyle DJ. 1999. Effect of glucose supply on fasting nitrogen excretion and effect of level and type of volatile fatty acid on response to protein infusion in cattle. British Journal of Nutrition, 81(5), 389–393.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Polyorach S, Wanapat M. 2015. Improving the quality of rice straw by urea and calcium hydroxide on rumen ecology. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 99(3), 449–456.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Recktenwald EB, Van Ambrugh ME. 2006. Examining nitrogen efficiencies in lactating dairy cattle using corn silage based diet. Proceedings of 2006 Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufactures. 68th Meeting, October 24–26, 2006. InWyndham Syracuse, East Syracuse, NY, USA, pp. 205–217.Google Scholar
  20. Rezende CA, Lima MA, Maziero P, Azevedo ER, Garcia W, Polikarpov I. 2011. Chemical and morphological characterization of sugarcane bagasse submitted to a delignification process for enhanced enzymatic digestibility. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 4, 54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Samuel M, Sagathewan S, Thomas J, Mathen G. 1997. An HPLC method for estimation of volatile fatty acids of ruminal fluid. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 67(9), 805–811.Google Scholar
  22. SAS. 1998. User’s Guide: Statistic, Version 6, 12th edn. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  23. Steel RGD, Torrie JH. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw Hill Book, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  24. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10), 3583–3597.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Vinh NT, Wanapat M, Khejornsart P, Kongmun P. 2011. Study of diversity of rumen microorganisms and fermentation in swamp buffalo fed different diet. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 10(4), 406–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wanapat M, Cherdthong A. 2009. Use of real-time PCR technique in studying rumen cellulolytic bacteria population as affected by level of roughage in swamp buffaloes.Current microbiology, 58(4), 294–299.Google Scholar
  27. Wanapat M, Pimpa O. 1999. Effect of ruminal NH3-N levels on ruminal fermentation, purine derivatives, digestibility and rice straw intake in swamp buffaloes. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 12(6), 904–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wanapat M, Polyorach S, Boonnop K, Mapato C, Cherdthong A. 2009. Effects of treating rice straw with urea or urea and calcium hydroxide upon intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and milk yield of dairy cows. Livestock Science, 125(2), 238–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nirawan Gunun
    • 1
    Email author
  • Metha Wanapat
    • 2
  • Pongsatorn Gunun
    • 3
  • Anusorn Cherdthong
    • 2
  • Pichad Khejornsart
    • 4
  • Sungchhang Kang
    • 5
  1. 1.Program in Animal Production Technology, Faculty of TechnologyUdon Thani Rajabhat UniversityUdon ThaniThailand
  2. 2.Department of Animal Science, Faculty of AgricultureTropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Khon Kaen UniversityKhon KaenThailand
  3. 3.Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Natural ResourcesRajamangala University of Technology-IsanSakon NakhonThailand
  4. 4.Agro-Bioresources, Faculty of Natural Resources and AgroIndustryKasetsart UniversitySakon NakhonThailand
  5. 5.Agricultural Unit, Department of EducationNational Institute of EducationPhnom PenhCambodia

Personalised recommendations