Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 47, Issue 6, pp 1131–1137 | Cite as

Nutritional values of available ruminant feed resources in smallholder dairy farms in Rwanda

  • Mupenzi Mutimura
  • Cyprian Ebong
  • Idupulapati Madhusudana Rao
  • Ignatius Verla Nsahlai
Regular Articles

Abstract

Smallholder dairy farmers in Rwanda use diversity of resources to cope with endemic feed shortages. However, there is inadequate real farm data to support farmer decisions on choices of options. The main objective of this study was to evaluate nutritional quality of feed types that farmers use in different agro-ecological zones of Rwanda. Samples of feed types were collected from 90 randomly selected households in the low- and mid-high-altitude zones of Rwanda and analysed for proximate composition, contents of metabolisable energy (ME), organic matter digestibility (OMD) and neutral detergent fibre digestibility (NDFd). Rumen fermentation characteristics and efficiency of energy utilisation were examined by determining partitioning factor (PF). Results showed that only five out of 24 feed types were common in both districts. Chemical composition, OMD, ME, NDFd and PF of these feed types differed significantly (P < 0.05) in their nutritional attributes. This suggests that a common feed composition table can be used as a component of the decision support tool for rational feed resource development and utilisation in the smallholder farms in the selected agro-ecologies of Rwanda.

Keywords

Chemical composition Feed resources Metabolisable energy Organic matter digestibility Partitioning factor 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the partial financial support from the Swedish International Development Agency (Sida) under “Climate Smart Brachiaria grass to improve livestock production in East Africa” project funded through Biosciences for eastern and central Africa under the International Livestock Research Institute (BecA-ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya. The authors are also grateful to farmers in Bugesera and Nyamagabe districts for allowing us to collect feed resources from their farms.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. AOAC, 1990. Association of official Analytical chemists. Official methods of analysis. 15th edition. A.O.A.C. Arlington Virginia, USA.Google Scholar
  2. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists), 2006. Total nitrogen, Official Methods of analysis, 984.13, 18th edition. Association of official analytical chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Blümmel, M. and Becker, K., 1997. The degradability characteristics of fifty-four roughages and roughage neutral-detergent fibres as described by in vitro gas production and their relationship to voluntary feed intake. British Journal of Nutrition, 77, 757–768.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Garg, M.R., Sherasia, P.L., Bhanderi, B.M., Phondba, B.T., Shelke, S.K. and Makkar, H.P.S., 2013. Effects of feeding nutritionally balanced rations on animal productivity feed conversion efficiency, feed nitrogen use efficiency, rumen microbial protein supply, parasitic load, immunity and enteric methane emissions of milking animals under field conditions. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 179, 24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P.J., 1970. Forage fibre analyses (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications). USDA. Agricultural Research Service. Agricultural Handbook No. 379.Google Scholar
  6. Gracindo, C.V., de Castro, M.B., Louvandini, H., Riet-Correa, F. and Barbosa-Ferreira, M., 2014. Performance of sheep grazing in pastures of Brachiaria decumbens, Brachiaria brizantha, Panicum maximum, and Andropogon gayanus with different protodioscin concentrations. Tropical Animal Health Production, 46, 733–737.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kabirizi1, M., Zziwa, E., Mugerwa, S., Ndikumana, J. and Nanyennya, W., 2013. Dry season forages for improving dairy production in smallholder systems in Uganda. Tropical Grasslands – Forrajes Tropicales, 1, 212–214.Google Scholar
  8. Kambashi, B., Picron, P., Boudry, C., Théwis, A., Kiatoko, H. and Bindelle, J., 2014. Nutritive value of tropical forage plants fed to pigs in the Western provinces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 191, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kavana, P.Y. and Kakengi, V.A.M., 2014. Availability of pasture for domestic and wild herbivores in grazing land of Mpanda Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 26, Article #37. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd26/2/kava26037.htm. Retrieved January 6, 2015,
  10. Klapwijk, C.J., Bucagu, C., van Wijk, M.T., Udo, H.M.J., Vanlauwe, B., Munyanziza, E. and Giller, K.E., 2014. The ‘One cow per poor family’ programme: Current and potential fodder availability within smallholder farming systems in southwest Rwanda. Agricultural Systems, 131, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li H.Y., Xu L. and Wang, N., 2014. Assessment of the nutritive value of whole corn stover and its morphological fractions. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science, 27, 2, 194–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Menardo, S., Airoldi, G., Cacciatore, V. and Balsari, P., 2015. Potential biogas and methane yield of maize stover fractions and evaluation of some possible stover harvest chains. Biosystems engineering, 129, 352–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Menke, K.H., Raab, L., Salewski, A., Steingass, A., Fritz, D. and Scheinder, W., 1979. The estimation of digestibility and metabolisable energy contents of ruminant feedstuffs from gas production when they incubated with rumen fluid in vitro. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge), 92, 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Msangi, S., Enahoro, D., Herrero, M., Magnan, N., Havlik, P., Notenbaert, A. and Nelgen, S., 2014. Integrating livestock feeds and production systems into agricultural multi-market models: The example of IMPACT. Food Policy, 49, 365–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mutimura, M., Lussa, A.B..., Mutabazi, J., Myambi, C.B., Cyamweshi, R.A. and Ebong, C., 2013a. Status of animal feed resources in Rwanda. Tropical Grasslands—Forrajes Tropicales, 1, 1, 109–110.Google Scholar
  16. Mutimura, M., Myambi, C.B., Gahunga, P., Mgheni, D.M., Laswai, G.H., Mtenga, L.A., Gahakwa, D., Kimambo, A.E. and Ebong, C., 2013b. Rumen liquor from slaughtered Cattle as a Source of inoculum for in-Vitro gas production technique in forage evaluation. Agricultural Journal, 4, 8, 173–180.Google Scholar
  17. Oliveira, L.N., Filho, S.L.S.C., Gerasev, C., Duarate, E.R. and Abdalla, A.L., 2014. Chemical composition, degradability and methane emission potential of banana crop residues for ruminants. Tropical and Subtropical Agro-ecosystems, 17, 197–206.Google Scholar
  18. Osuji, P.O., Nsahlai, I.V. and Khalili, H., 1993. Feed Evaluation. ILCA Manual 5. ILCA (International Livestock Centre for Africa), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  19. Saleh, S., Lashkari, S., Abbasi, R.E. and Kamangar, H., 2014. Nutrient digestibility and chemical composition of potato (Solanum tuberosum) vince as alternative forage for ruminant diets. Agricultural Communications, 2, 1, 63–66.Google Scholar
  20. Santos, E.M., Pereira, O.G., Garcia, R., Ferreira, C.L.L.F., Oliveira, J.S. and Silva, T.C., 2014. Effect of regrowth interval and a microbial inoculant on the fermentation profile and dry matter recovery of guinea grass silages. Jour of Dairy Science, 97, 4423–4432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. SAS, 2010. Statistics, Version 9.3. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Shukla, A., Vats, S. and Shukla, R.K., 2014. Proximate composition, nutritive value and evaluation of antioxidant potential of stem of Dracaena reflexa Lam. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 6, 11, 360–364.Google Scholar
  23. Singh, S., Anele, U.Y., Edmunds, B. and Südekum, K. H., 2014. In vitro ruminal dry matter degradability, microbial efficiency, short chain fatty acids, carbohydrate and protein fractionation of tropical grass-multipurpose tree species diets. Livestock Science, 160, 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A., 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch carbohydrates in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583–3597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Woyessa, F., Tolera, A. and Diba, D., 2013. Feed intake, digestibility and growth performance of Horro lambs fed natural pasture hay supplemented with graded levels of Vernonia amygdalina leaves and sorghum grain. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, 2, 2, 30–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mupenzi Mutimura
    • 1
    • 2
  • Cyprian Ebong
    • 2
  • Idupulapati Madhusudana Rao
    • 3
  • Ignatius Verla Nsahlai
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Department of Animal Science and Poultry ScienceUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalScottsvilleSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Animal ProductionRwanda Agriculture Board (RAB)KigaliRwanda
  3. 3.International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)CaliColombia

Personalised recommendations