Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 191–200 | Cite as

Milk production, intake, digestion, blood parameters, and ingestive behavior of cows supplemented with by-products from the biodiesel industry

  • Severino Gonzaga Neto
  • Ronaldo Lopes Oliveira
  • Francisco Helton Sá de Lima
  • Ariosvaldo Nunes de Medeiros
  • Leilson Rocha Bezerra
  • Júlio Viégas
  • Nilton Guedes do NascimentoJr.
  • Marcondes Dias de Freitas Neto
Regular Articles

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the intake, digestion, blood parameters, and feeding behavior of crossbred dairy cows (Holstein × Gir) managed on Panicum maximum Jacq. cv. Tanzania-1 and provided supplementation with groundnut cake, sunflower cake, or palm kernel cake (to replace soybean meal). Sixteen cows were randomly assigned in a Latin square design with four treatments and four experimental periods. The consumption of nutrients from the pasture did not vary between experimental treatments. Cows receiving the palm kernel cake supplement had a reduced crude protein, non-fibrous carbohydrate, and total digestible nutrient intake and an increase in the average consumption of ether extract. There was also a reduction in the digestibility of dry matter. The inclusion of supplements in the diet did not influence the average time spent eating, ruminating, or resting. The mean values of respiratory and heart rates showed thermal comfort during the trial period. There was a reduction in blood urea nitrogen with palm kernel cake supplementation, and the values of total protein, albumin, and glucose were also significantly different with this supplement. It is recommended that cakes of groundnut cake and sunflower cake seed be used for a total replacement of soybean meal supplements for lactating cows, but the use of palm kernel cake is not recommended.

Keywords

Alternative food Dairy cattle Protein sources Animal nutrition Supplementation 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest with regard to the work presented in this report.

References

  1. Baêta, F.C. and Souza, C.F., 1997. Ambiência em edificações rurais e conforto térmico, Viçosa: UFV, pp. 246Google Scholar
  2. Bezerra, L.R., Gonzaga Neto, S., Medeiros, A.N., Mariz, T.M. de A., Oliveira, R.L., Cândido, E.P. and Silva, A.M.A., 2013. Feed restriction followed by realimentation in prepubescent Zebu females, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 45, 1161–1169Google Scholar
  3. Buffington, D.E., Pitt, D., Canton, G.H. and Collazo-Arocho, A., 1981. Black Globe-Humidity Index (BGHI) as confort equacion for dairy cows, Transactions of the ASAE, 24, 711–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, C.E.F., Horadagoda, A., Kerrisk, K.L., Scott, V., Islam, M.R., Kaur, R. and Garcia, S.C., 2014. Grazing Soybean to Increase Voluntary Cow Traffic in a Pasture-based Automatic Milking System, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 27(3), 422–430PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cochran, R.C., Adams, D.C. and Wallace, J.D., 1986. Predicting digestibility of different diets with internal markers: evaluation of four potential markers, Journal of Animal Science, 63(5), 1476–1483Google Scholar
  6. Da Cruz, A.M., De Castro, E.V., Barbosa, F.J.M., Dos Santos, H.D., De Souza, J.F., Arrivabene, M., Cavalcante, T.V., Minharro, S., Falcão, A.J.D.S. and Dias, F.E.F., 2014. Milk Quality of Dairy Cattle Bred in Ceará, Northeast of Brazil, Journal of Animal Science Advances, 4(6), 897–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dohme-Meiera, F., Kaufmanna, L.D., Görsb, S., Junghansb, P., Metgesb, C.C., Van Dorlandc, H.A., Bruckmaierc, R.M. and Müngera, A., 2014. Comparison of energy expenditure, eating pattern and physical activity of grazing and zero-grazing dairy cows at different time points during lactation, Livestock Science, 162, 86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gonzaga Neto, S., Bezerra, L. R., Medeiros, A.N., Ferreira, M.A., Pimenta Filho, E.C. Cândido, E. P. and Oliveira, R.L., 2011. Feed Restriction and Compensatory Growth in Guzerá Females, Asian-Australian Journal Animal Science, 24, 791–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall, M.B., 2000. Calculation of non-structural carbohydrate content of feeds that contain nonprotein nitrogen. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, p.A-25, (Bulletin, 339)Google Scholar
  10. Haydock, K. P. and Shaw, N. H., 1975. The comparative yield method for estimating dry matter yield of pasture, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, 15(76), 663–670Google Scholar
  11. Moreira, M.N., Silva, A.M.A., Carneiro, H., Bezerra, L.R, Raissa Kiara Oliveira de Morais, R.K.O. and Medeiros, F.F., 2014. In vitro degradability and total gas production of biodiesel chain byproducts used as a replacement for cane sugar feed, Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 36(4), doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i4.23950.
  12. National Research Council - NRC. 2001. Nutrients requirements of dairy cattle. 7th Ed., Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, pp. 408Google Scholar
  13. Olivares-Palma, S.M., Meale, S.J., Pereira, L.G.R.; Machado, F.S. Carneiro, H. Lopes, F.C.F., Mauricio, R.M. and Chaves, A.V., 2013. In vitro Fermentation, Digestion Kinetics and Methane Production of Oilseed Press Cakes from Biodiesel Production, Asian Australian Journal of Animal Sciences, 26, 1102–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oliveira, J.S., Antoniassi, J., Freitas, S.C. and Müller, M.D., 2013. Chemical composition of glycerin produced by biodiesel plants in Brazil and potential utilization in animal feeding, Ciência Rural, 43(3), 509–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oliveira, P.A. de, Cirne, L.G.A., Oliveira, G.J.C., Jaeger, S.M.P.L., Strada, E.S.O., Bagaldo, A.R. and Oliveira, R.L., 2014. Reproductive performance of crossbred ewes race Santa Ines in Brachiaria humidicula and e ffect of sex on weight gain of lambs, Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 66, 85–92Google Scholar
  16. Polizel Neto, A., Roça, R.O., Branco, R.H., Bonilha, S.M.F., Andrade, E.N., Corvino, T.L.S. and Gomes, H.F.B., 2014. Animal performance, feeding behaviour and carcass traits of feedlot cattle diet fed with agro-industrial by-product as fat source, Journal of Agricultural Science, 6(6), 54–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Santana, M.C.A., Euclides, V.B.P., Mancio, A.B..., Medeiros, S.R., Costa, J.A.R. and Oliveira, R.L., 2013. Intake and Performance of Yearling Steers Grazing Guineagrass (Panicum maximum cv. Tanzânia) Pasture Supplemented with Different Energy Sources, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 26, 349–357PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. SAS, 2004. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  19. Silva, J.F.C. and Leão, M.I., 1979. Fundamentos de nutrição dos ruminantes. Piracicaba: Livroceres, pp. 380Google Scholar
  20. Silva, D.J. and Queiroz, A.C., 2002. Análise de alimentos: métodos químicos e biológicos. (Viçosa: Ed UFV), pp. 235Google Scholar
  21. Sniffen, C.J., Connor, J.D., Van Soest, P.J., Fox, D.G. and Russell, J.B., 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluation of cattle diets. II Carbohydrate and protein availability, Journal Animal Science, 70(3), 3562–3577Google Scholar
  22. Van Soest, P.J. and Mason, V.C., 1991. The influence of Maillard reaction upon the nutritive value of fibrous feeds, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 32(1), 45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Severino Gonzaga Neto
    • 1
  • Ronaldo Lopes Oliveira
    • 2
  • Francisco Helton Sá de Lima
    • 3
  • Ariosvaldo Nunes de Medeiros
    • 1
  • Leilson Rocha Bezerra
    • 4
  • Júlio Viégas
    • 5
  • Nilton Guedes do NascimentoJr.
    • 2
  • Marcondes Dias de Freitas Neto
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZootecniaFederal University of ParaíbaAreiaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of ZootecniaFederal University of BahiaSalvadorBrazil
  3. 3.Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of South of Minas GeraisMuzambinhoBrazil
  4. 4.Department of ZootecniaFederal University of PiauíBom JesusBrazil
  5. 5.Department of ZootecniaFederal University of Santa MariaSanta MariaBrazil

Personalised recommendations