Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 185–189 | Cite as

Study of male effect on feeding and estrus behavior of Afshari ewes

  • Amir Hossein Asgari Safdar
  • Ali Asghar Sadeghi
Regular Articles

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the male effect on the manifestation of estrus and feeding behavior of Afshari ewes during their breeding season. The study consists of 48 Afshari ewes, 3 years old, 67 ± 2 kg live weight, body condition score 3, along with 10 Afshari rams. The study was for a period of 6 weeks in a complementary randomized design. Ewes were equally divided into three treatments (T1, T2, and T3) along with a control (T4) with six animals in each group. Variable factors of treatments was the distance of the ram box (from the ewes), which was determined to be the T1 (0–5 m), T2 (10–15 m), and T3 (25–30 m). Exposure of the ewes to the rams resulted in an earlier manifestation of estrus signs (p < 0.05). Moreover, the total recorded estrus signs were significantly affected by the distance from the rams (p < 0.05). The result of this study showed differences in feed intake of the ewes due to the distance from the rams (p < 0.05). In the other words, the distance of the ewes from the rams significantly affected feed intake of the Afshari ewes.

Keywords

Afshari ewe Feed intake Male effect Estrus 

References

  1. Bedos, M., Flores, JA. Fitz-Rodríguez, G., Keller M., Malpaux, B., Poindron, P. and Delgadillo, J.A., 2010. Four hours of daily contact with sexually active males is sufficient to induce fertile ovulation in anestrous goats. Horm Behav 58: 473–477.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen-tannoudij, J and Signoret, J.P., 1987. Effect of short exposure to the ram on later reactivity of anestrous ewes to the male effect. Anim Reprod Sci 13(4): 263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Delgadillo, J.A., Gelez, H., Ungerfeld, R., Hawken, PAR. and Martin, G.B., 2009. The ‘male effect’ in sheep and goats-revisiting the dogmas. Behav Brain Res 200(2): 304–314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dwyer, C., 2009. The behaviour of sheep and goats. In: P. Jensen (Ed.) the Ethology of Domestic Animals. An Introductory Text. Second ed. CAB International, Wallingford, UK; pp. 161–176.Google Scholar
  5. Feng, M., Qin, J., Wang, C., Ye, Y., Wang, S., Xie, D., Wang, P.S. and Liu, C., 2009. Estradiol up regulates the expression of oxytocin receptor in colon in rats. J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 296: 1059–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Forbes JM, 2007. Voluntary food intake and diet selection in farm animals. 2nd Ed. (CABI; Second edition (August 2007)) Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.Google Scholar
  7. Fricke, O., Lehmkuhl, G. and Pfaff, D.W., 2006. Cybernetic principles in the systematic concept of hypothalamic feeding control. Eur J Endocrinal 154: 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hafez, E.S.E., Hafez, B., 2000. Reproduction in farm animals” 7th edition, (Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Hamada, T., Nakajima, M., Takeuchi, Y. and Mori, Y., 1996. Pheromone-induced Stimulation of Hypothalamic Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Pulse Generator in Ovariectomized, Estrogen-Primed Goats. Neuroendocrinology 64(4): 313–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hawken, P.A. and Martin, G.B., 2012. Sociosexual stimuli and gonadotropin-releasing hormone/luteinizing hormone secretion in sheep and goats. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 43(2):85–94.Google Scholar
  11. Iwata, E., Kikusui, T., Takeuchi, Y. and Mori, Y., 2003. Substances derived from 4-ethyl octanoic acid account for primer pheromones activity for the “male effect” in goats. J Vet Med Sci 65(9): 1019–1021.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Longpre, KM. and Katz, SL., 2011. Estrous female goats use testosterone-dependent cues to assess mates. Horm Behav 59: 98–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Metz, J. and Wierenga, H., 1997. Behavioral Criteria for the Design of Housing Systems for Cattle. Cattle Housing Systems, Lameness and Behavior, (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Boston, MA, USA).Google Scholar
  14. Miranda-de la Lama, G.C. and Mattiello, S., 2010. The importance of social behavior for goat welfare in livestock farming. Small Rum Res 90: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mohamadi, W., Daghigh KIA, H., Hossein Khani, A. and Alijani, S., 2011. Effect of Male Goat Pheromone on Feeding Behavior of Female Markhoz Goat in Breeding Season. Pak Vet J, 2011, 31(4): 327–330.Google Scholar
  16. Okamura, H. and Mori, Y., 2005. Characterization of the primer pheromone molecules responsible for the ‘male effect’ in ruminant species. Chem Sen 30 (suppl 1): 140–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. SAS Institute Inc. 2003. SAS Users Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  18. Schmidt, G.H., Van Vleck, L.D. and Hutjens, M.F., 1988. 2nd Ed, Prentice Hall, Principles of Dairy Science, Texas, USA, pp. 466, (Prentice Hall; 2 Sub edition (March 1988)).Google Scholar
  19. Warren, G., 2004. Applied Sheep Behavior. Animal Science Department the University of Tennessee, (Agriculture Extension service, University of Tennessee), Available online: http://animalscience.ag.utk.edu.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amir Hossein Asgari Safdar
    • 1
  • Ali Asghar Sadeghi
    • 2
  1. 1.Young Researchers and Elite Club, Baft BranchIslamic Azad UniversityBaftIran
  2. 2.Department of Animal Science, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations