Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 61–66 | Cite as

Staphylococcus aureus intramammary infection affects milk yield and SCC of dairy cows

  • Bruno Garcia Botaro
  • Cristina Simões Cortinhas
  • Aline Gerato Dibbern
  • Luis Felipe Prada e Silva
  • Nilson Roberti Benites
  • Marcos Veiga dos Santos
Regular Articles


Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is the most prevalent infectious microorganism affecting dairy cattle worldwide, and its pathogenic characteristics facilitate its spread in dairy herds. S. aureus intramammary infections (IMI) are mainly subclinical, and associated losses can exceed average herd losses where the pathogen is not isolated. However, the extent it affects milk composition at udder and quarter levels is still unknown, and cow composite milk losses may be underestimated due to the dilution effect. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of S. aureus subclinical mastitis on mammary quarter milk yield and composition. In order to determine the effects of the pathogen on milk yield and composition at quarter level, a pairwise comparison of infected and non-infected mammary quarters (n = 28) from two dairy herds was carried out. Quarters were individually milked, and milk production and composition were assessed. S. aureus has increased somatic cell counts at quarter level; however, no effect of S. aureus IMI on milk lactose, fat, and protein contents was observed. Fat yield from infected quarters decreased, but losses due to the infection caused by S. aureus were not associated with quarter positioning in cows.


Subclinical mastitis Quarter milk sample Milk losses Mastitis pathogen 



This project was supported by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), Brazil (grant no. 2007/08577-3). Bruno Garcia Botaro received a scholarship (grant no. 2008/05077-3) from FAPESP during the development of this project. Authors acknowledge Lucinéia Mestieri and José Franchini Garcia Moreno, from the Department of Animal Production and Nutrition, and Dr. Priscilla Anne Melville, from the Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences of the University of São Paulo, Brazil, and also Dr. Fredi Alexander Díaz Quijano, from the Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health of the University of São Paulo, Brazil, for their technical assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest among the authors and other people or organizations that could inappropriately bias their work.


  1. Almeida, R.A., Matthews, K.R., Cifrian, E., Guidry, A. J., Oliver, S. P., 1996. Staphylococcus aureus invasion of bovine mammary epithelial cells. Journal of Dairy Science, 79 (6), 1021–1026.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 2003. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC. 18. ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg.Google Scholar
  3. Auldist, M. J., Coats, S., Rogers, G. L., Mcdowell, G. H., 1995. Changes in the composition of milk from healthy and mastitis dairy cows during the lactation cycle. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 35, 427–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azzara, C. D., Dimick, P., 1985. Lipoprotein lipase activity of milk from cows with prolonged subclinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science, 68 (12), 3171–3175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bansal, K. B., Hamman, J., Grabowski, N. T., Singh, K. B., 2005. Variation in the composition of selected milk fraction samples from healthy and mastitis quarters, and its significance for mastitis diagnosis. Journal of Dairy Research, 72, 144–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barkema, H. W., Schukken, Y. H., Lam, T. J. G. M., Galligan, D. T., Beiboer, M. L., Brand, A., 1997. Estimation of interdependence among quarters of the bovine udder with subclinical mastitis and implications for analysis. Journal of Dairy Science, 80 (8), 1592–1599.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barkema, H. W., Schukken, Y. H., Zadoks, R. N., 2006. Invited review: The role of cow, pathogen and treatment regimen in the therapeutic success of bovine Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science, 89 (6), 1877–1895.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boss, R., Naskova, J., Steiner, A., Graber, H. U., 2011. Mastitis diagnostics: quantitative PCR for Staphylococcus aureus genotype B in bulk tank milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 94 (1), 128–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Busato, A., Trachsel, P., Schällibaum, M., Blum, J. W., 2000. Udder health and risk factors for subclinical mastitis in organic dairy farms in Switzerland. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 44 (3–4), 205–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coulon, J. B., Gasqui, P., Barnouin, J., Ollier, A., Pradel, P., Pomies, D., 2002. Effect of mastitis and related-germ on milk yield and composition during naturally-occurring udder infections in dairy cows. Animal Research, 51 (5), 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Forsbäck, L., Lindmark-Månsson, H., Andrén, A., Åkerstedt, M., Andrée, L., Svennersten-Sjaunja, K., 2010. Day-to-day variation in milk yield and milk composition at the udder-quarter level. Journal of Dairy Science, 93 (8), 3569–3577.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harmon, R. J., 1994. Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Science, 77 (7), 2103–2112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leitner, G., Krifucks, O., Merin, U., Lavi, Y., Silanikove, N., 2006. Interactions between bacteria type, proteolysis of casein and physico-chemical properties of bovine milk. International Dairy Journal, 16 (6), 648–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lynch, J., Barbano, D., Fleming, J. R., 1998. Indirect and direct determination of the casein content of milk by Kjeldahl nitrogen analysis: Collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International, 81 (4), 763–774.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Miltenburg, J. D., Crauwels, A. P. P., Bongers, J. H., Tielen, M. J. M., Schukken, Y. H., Elbers, A. R. W., 1996. Incidence of clinical mastitis in a random sample of dairy herds in the southern Netherlands. Veterinary Record, 139 (3), 204–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Natzke, R. P., Schultz, L. H., Barr, G. R., Holtman n, W. B. 1965. Variation in mastitis screening tests and milk composition of udder quarters under normal conditions and following omission of a milking. Journal of Dairy Science, 48 (10), 1295–1299.Google Scholar
  17. Natzke, R. P., Everett, R. W., Guthrie, R. S., Keown, J. F., Meek, A. M., Merrill, W. G., Roberts, S. J., Schmidt, G. H., 1972. Mastitis Control Program: Effect on milk production. Journal of Dairy Science, 55 (9), 1256–1260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nielsen, N. I., Larsen, T., Bjerring, M., Ingvartse n, K. L. 2005. Quarter health, milking interval, and sampling time during milking affect the concentration of milk constituents. Journal of Dairy Science, 88 (9), 3186–3200.Google Scholar
  19. Oliver, S. P., Gonzalez, R. N., Hogan, J. S., Jayarao, B. M., Owens, W. N., 2004. Microbiological procedures for the diagnosis of bovine udder infection and determination of milk quality. National Mastitis Council, Verona, WI.Google Scholar
  20. Paradis, M. È., Bouchard, É., Scholl, D. T., Miglior, F., Roy, J. P., 2010. Effect of nonclinical Staphylococcus aureus or coagulase-negative staphylococci intramammary infection during the first month of lactation on somatic cell count and milk yield in heifers. Journal of Dairy Science, 93 (7), 2989–2997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pyörälä, S., 2003. Indicators of inflammation in the diagnosis of mastitis. Veterinary Research, 34, 565–578.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reksen, O., Sølverød, L.; Branscum, A. J., Østerås, O, 2006. Relationships between milk culture results and treatment for clinical mastitis or culling in Norwegian dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 89 (8), 2928–2937.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Silva, L. F. P., Etchebarne, B. E., Weber Nielsen, M. S., Liesman, J. S., Kiupel, M., Vandehaar, M. J., 2008. Intramammary infusion of leptin decreases proliferation of mammary epithelial cells in prepubertal heifers. Journal of Dairy Science, 91 (8), 3034–3044.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tesfaye, G., Regassa, F., Kelay, B., 2010. Milk yield and associated economic losses in quarters with subclinical mastitis due to Staphylococcus aureus in Ethiopian crossbred dairy cows. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42 (5), 925–931.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ward, G. E., Schultz, L. H., 1972. Relationship of somatic cells in quarter milk to type of bacteria and production. Journal of Dairy Science, 55 (10), 1428–1431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Whist, A. C., Østerås, O., Sølverød, L., 2009. Association between isolation of Staphylococcus aureus one week after calving and milk yield, somatic cell count, clinical mastitis, and culling through the remaining lactation. Journal of Dairy Research, 76 (1), 24–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Younis, A., Krifucks, O., Heller, E. D., Samra, Z., Glickman, A., Saran, A., Leitner, G., 2003. Staphylococcus aureus exosecretions and bovine mastitis. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 50 (1), 1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zadoks, R. N., Allore, H. G., Barkema, H. W., Sampimon, O. C., Wellenberg, G. J., Gröhn, Y. T., Schukken, Y. H., 2001. Cow- and quarter-level risk factors for Streptococcus uberis and Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science, 84 (12), 2649–2663.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zecconi, A., Binda, E., Borromeo, V., Piccinini, R., 2005. Relationship between some Staphylococcus aureus pathogenic factors and growth rates and somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Research, 72 (2), 203–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruno Garcia Botaro
    • 1
    • 2
  • Cristina Simões Cortinhas
    • 3
  • Aline Gerato Dibbern
    • 3
  • Luis Felipe Prada e Silva
    • 3
  • Nilson Roberti Benites
    • 1
  • Marcos Veiga dos Santos
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal SciencesUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Dairy Science and Technology Graduate ProgramUNOPARLondrinaBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Animal Production and Nutrition, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal SciencesUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations