Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 495–502 | Cite as

Brazilian foot and mouth disease status and meat exportation to the European Union

  • Luiz Felipe Ramos Carvalho
  • Cristiano Barros de Melo
  • Luiza Seixas
  • Concepta McManus
Regular Articles
  • 250 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to define the differences between the Brazilian states that export and do not export meat to the European Union (EU) and to identify the variables that are important to meet the export requirements. Infrastructure and computerization of the control of animal transit in Brazil that impact on regional health status were evaluated and linked to other variables such as status for foot and mouth disease (FMD) and qualification to export meat to EU. Variables related to transit control of bovines implemented by the state agencies of animal health and inspection in each Brazilian state were evaluated. Using a discriminant analysis, four variables were selected that explained the variation between Brazilian states that were “free” and “not free” of FMD while another four were selected to explain the variation between the zones “approved” and “not approved” to export meat to the EU, including number of official veterinarians, total transit of bovines and buffaloes, total number of animal transit certificates issued for bovine and buffaloes at the state or zone level, and total number of municipalities in the state or zone. It was possible to correctly discriminate between “free” and “not free” FMD states or zones. Variables related to animal transit are important in assessing the state for the classification of animal health situation and for EU approval for the exportation of meat.

Keywords

Animal health Animal transit certificates Disease eradication FMD 

Notes

Acknowledgments

To CNPq for productivity scholarship holders and CNPq-INCT-Pecuária, CAPES/Procad NF 2007, and CAPES Demanda Social for scholarships.

References

  1. Ayebazibwe, C., Tjørnehøj, K., Mwiine, F. N., Muwanika, V. B., Okurut, A.R.A., Siegismund, H.R., Alexandersen, S. 2010. Patterns, risk factors and characteristics of reported and perceived foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in Uganda. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2; 1547-1559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brasil, Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, 2009. Manual de Padronização sobre organização das informações sobre estrutura dos órgãos executores de defesa agropecuária, Emissão e controle da Guia de Trânsito Animal (GTA) e constituição e manutenção de cadastro de propriedades rurais, exploração pecuária e produtor rural. (http://www.agricultura.gov.br/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/MAPA/SERVICOS/TRANSITOQUARENTENADEANIMAIS/GTANOVO/MANUAL%20DE%20PADRONIZA%C7%C3O%205.0_0.PDF). Accessed 03 March 2010.
  3. Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, 2007. Instrução Normativa n.º 44, de 02 de outubro de 2007. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília.Google Scholar
  4. Braun, M. B. S., Dos Santos, F. R., Figueiredo, A. M. Cardoso, R. B. 2008. Impacto das barreiras sanitárias e fitossanitárias na competitividade das exportações brasileiras e paranaenses de carne bovina. In: Proceedings of 46th Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administração e Sociologia Rural, Rio Branco, Brazil, 1-21Google Scholar
  5. Carvalho, L. F. R., Melo, C. B., Haddad, J. P. A. 2012a. Farm registration and control of animal transit of bovines in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária. 34; 19-26.Google Scholar
  6. Carvalho, L. F. R., Melo, C. B., McManus, C., Haddad, J. P. A. 2012b. Use of satellite images for geographical localization of livestock holdings in Brazil. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 103; 74-77.Google Scholar
  7. Europa – Gateway to the European Union. EUR-Lex – Access to European Union law. 79/542/EEC: Council Decision of 21 December 1976 drawing up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorize imports of bovine animals, swine and fresh meat. 1979. http://www.eaza.net/activities/tddecisions/Council%20Decision%2079_542_EEC.pdf (Accessed October 11 2013).
  8. Europa – Gateway to the European Union. EUR-Lex – Access to European Union law. Commission Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 of 12 March 2010 laying down lists of third countries, territories or parts thereof authorised for the introduction into the European Union of certain animals and fresh meat and the veterinary certification requirements. 2010. http://www.vetbiblios.pt/LEGISLACAO_TECNICA/CONTROLOS_VETERINARIOS_TROCAS/Animais_Vivos/Regulamento_206-2010_12-03_20-03.pdf (Accessed October 11 2013).
  9. Freitas AB, 2011. Fatores condicionantes da evasão tributária: uma análise da contribuição para o financiamento da previdência social (dissertation). Brasília, BR: Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Ciência da Computação, 81 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Garcia BP, 2009. Embargos à carne bovina brasileira: estudo de casos no âmbito dos acordos internacionais (dissertation). Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Administração, 149 p.Google Scholar
  11. Ghanem, M. M., Abdel-Hamid, O.M. 2010. Clinical, haematological and biochemical alterations in heat intolerance (panting) syndrome in Egyptian cattle following natural foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42; 1167-1173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ibrahim, M., Ahmad, S., Swati, Z.A., Ullah, G. 2011. Fat-tailed sheep production systems in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43; 1395-1403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kiss, I.Z., Green, D. M., Kao, R. R. 2006. The network of sheep movements within Great Britain: network properties and their implications for infectious disease spread. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 3; 669-677.Google Scholar
  14. Lawson, A.B.., Zhou, H. 2005. Spatial statistical modeling of disease outbreaks with particular reference to the UK foot and mouth disease (FMD) epidemic of 2001. Proceedings of GISVET ‘04 — GISVET ‘04, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 71; 141–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marshall M, Roger P. 2005. Policy and science of FMD control: the stakeholders’ contribution to decision making a call for integrated animal disease management. Journal Clinical Laboratory Immunology, 53; 27-38.Google Scholar
  16. Melo EC, 2002. Foot-and-mouth disease in South America: the concept of the Pan-American Health Organization. In: Proceedings of Foot-and-mouth disease: control strategies-Symposium, Paris, France, 73-79.Google Scholar
  17. Michels IL, Mendonça CG. 1998. O trânsito de animais e a febre aftosa no Mato Grosso do Sul: um estudo dos impactos econômicos decorrentes da implantação de restrições ao trânsito ou ingresso de animais vivos e produtos de origem animal. DEA/UFMS/FAPEC.Google Scholar
  18. Moura, J.A., McManus, C., Bernal, F.E.M., Melo, C.B., 2010. An analysis of the 1978 African swine fever outbreak in Brazil and its eradication. Revue Scientifique et Technique - Office International des Epizooties 29; 549–563.Google Scholar
  19. OIE. Organizácion Mundial de Sanidad Animal. 2009. Codigo sanitario para los animales terrestres vol 1, 17a. edicíon. Paris: 343 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Ramanoon, S.Z., Robertson, I.D., Edwards, J., Hassan, L., Isa, K.M. 2012. Outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease in Peninsular Malaysia from 2001 to 2007. Tropical Animal Health and Production, July, doi:  10.1007/s11250-012-0226-x
  21. Rufael, T., Catley, A., Bogale, A., Sahle, M., Shiferaw, Y. 2008. Foot and mouth disease in the Borana pastoral system, southern Ethiopia and implications for livelihoods and international trade. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 40; 29-38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Salman, M. D., Stark, K. D. C., Zepeda, C. 2003. Quality assurance applied to animal disease surveillance systems. Revue Scientifique et Technique - Office International des Epizooties 22; 689-696.Google Scholar
  23. Tirado G., 2009. Demandas tecnológicas da cadeia produtiva da carne bovina: uma análise no Estado de São Paulo (dissertation). Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária, 170 p.Google Scholar
  24. Triches, D., Da Silva, S. Z., Malafaia, G. C. 2009. Reflexões sobre as barreiras não tarifárias às exportações na cadeia de carne bovina brasileira. In: Proceedings of 47th Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administração e Sociologia Rural, São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luiz Felipe Ramos Carvalho
    • 1
  • Cristiano Barros de Melo
    • 1
  • Luiza Seixas
    • 1
  • Concepta McManus
    • 1
  1. 1.Campus Darcy Ribeiro Asa Norte, ICC SulUniversidade de Brasília (UnB)BrasíliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations