Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 45, Issue 8, pp 1677–1685 | Cite as

Effect of substitution of concentrate mix with Sesbania sesban on feed intake, digestibility, body weight change, and carcass parameters of Arsi-Bale sheep fed a basal diet of native grass hay

Regular Articles

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to assess the effect of substitution of concentrate mix with Sesbania sesban on feed intake, digestibility, average daily gain (ADG), and carcass parameters of Arsi-Bale sheep. The experiment employed 25 male sheep with mean (±standard error) initial body live weight (BLW) of 19.1 ± 0.09 kg. The experiment consisted of 7 days of digestibility and 90 days of feeding trials followed by carcass evaluation. The experiment employed a randomized complete block design with five treatments and five blocks. Treatments comprised of grass hay alone fed ad libitum (GHA; control), GHA + 100 % concentrate mix (CM) consisting of wheat bran and noug seed cake at a ratio of 2:1 (0 S. sesban), GHA + 67 % CM + 33 % S. sesban (33 S. sesban), GHA + 33 % CM + 67 % S. sesban (67 S. sesban), and GHA + 100 % S. sesban (100 S. sesban). Total dry matter intake (DMI) was higher (p < 0.001) for sheep in 0 S. sesban–100 S. sesban (800–821 g/day) compared to sheep in control (611 g/day). However, the effect of S. sesban inclusion (0 S. sesban–100 S. sesban) on total DMI was quadratic, and DMI declined after 67 S. sesban. Digestibility of DM, organic matter (p < 0.01), and crude protein were higher (p < 0.001) in supplemented group compared to the control. ADG, feed conversion efficiency (ADG/DMI), slaughter BLW, hot carcass weight, and total edible offals were higher (p < 0.05–0.001) for sheep in 0 S. sesban–100 S. sesban than those in control. Increased level of S. sesban inclusion, in general, reduced growth and carcass parameters in this study. However, there was no difference between 0 S. sesban and 33 S. sesban in most parameters studied. Thus, it can be concluded that S. sesban could substitute a concentrate when it accounted for up to 33 % of the mix.

Keywords

Sesbania sesban Arsi-Bale sheep Feed intake Average daily gain Carcass 

References

  1. Abebaw, N. and Solomon, M., 2009. Feed intake, digestibility and body weight change in Farta sheep fed hay supplemented with rice bran and/or noug seed (Guizotia abyssinica) meal, Tropical Animal Health & Production, 41,507-515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abebe, H., Solomon, M., Berhan, T. and Asaminew, T., 2011. Body weight and carcass characteristics of Washera sheep fed urea treated rice straw supplemented with graded levels of concentrate mix. Livestock Research for Rural Development 23 (8) 2011.Google Scholar
  3. Abebe, T. and Solomon, M., 2009. Supplementation with linseed cake wheat bran and their mixture on feed intake, digestibility, live weight change, and carcass characteristics in intact male Arsi-Bale sheep, Tropical Animal Health & Production, 41,507-515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alem, M., Tamir, B. and Kurtu, M.Y., 2011. Feed utilisation of Ethiopian Highland lambs on a basal diet of Eleucine coracana straw and supplemented with variously sourced protein mixed with wheat bran, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43 (1):115–120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. AOAC (Association Official Analytical Chemists), 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, (ANC. Arlington, Virginia).Google Scholar
  6. Biruh, W., 2008. Supplementation with dried foliages of selected indigenous browses: effects on feed intake, digestibility, body weight gain and carcass characteristics of Abergelle goats offered hay. MSc Thesis, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  7. Cheeke, P. R., 1999. Applied Animal Nutrition: Feed and Feeding, (Prince Hall Inc., New Jersey).Google Scholar
  8. Daniel, T., 2010. Assessment of use of cactus and browses in Meisso Woreda and effect of supplementation of cactus and selected browses mix on feed utilization of Somali goats. MSc Thesis, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  9. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2004. FAOSTAT data, http://www.faostat.fao.org/faostat/collections. Accessed 13 August 2008.
  10. Frutos, P., Hervás, G., Giráldez, F. J. and Mantecón, A. R., 2004. Review: tannins and ruminant nutrition, Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 2(2):191–202.Google Scholar
  11. Hirut Y, Solomon M and Mengistu U., 2011. Effect of concentrate supplementation on live weight change and carcass characteristics of Hararghe Highland sheep fed a basal diet of urea-treated maize stover, Livestock Research for Rural Development, 23 (245), Retrieved December 21, 2012, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/12/hiru23245.htm.
  12. Khalili, H. and Varvikko, T. 1992. Effect of replacement of concentrate mix by wilted Sesbania (Sesbania sesban) forage on diet digestibility, rumen fermentation and milk production in Frisian × Zebu (Boran) crossbred cows fed low quality native hay, Animal Feed Science & Technology. 36(3–4):275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Makkar, H.P.S., M. Brummel and K. Beeker. 1995. Formation of complexes between polyvinyl pyrrolidones or polyethylene glycols and tannins, and their implication in gas production and true digestibility in vivo techniques, British Journal of Nutrition. 73:897–913.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Matiwos, S., Solomon, M. and Adugna, T., 2008. The effect of different levels of cottonseed meal supplementation on feed intake, digestibility, live weight changes, and carcass parameters of Sidama goats, Livestock Science, 119, 137–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McDonald, P., Edwards, R.A., Greanhalgh, J.F.D. and Morgan, C.A., 2002. Animal Nutrition, (Ashford Color, Gosport).Google Scholar
  16. Mekasha, Y., Tegegne, A., Yami, A. and Umunna, N.N., 2002. Evaluation of non-conventional agro-industrial by-products as supplementary feeds for ruminants: in vitro and metabolism study with sheep, Small Ruminant Research, 44, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mekasha, Y., Tegegne, A., and Rodriduez-Martinez, H., 2007. Effect of supplementation with agro-industrial by-products and khat (Catha edulis) leftovers on testicular growth and sperm production in Ogaden bucks, Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A, 54: 147–155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mulu, M., Birhan, T. and Alemu, Y., 2008. Effect of feeding different levels of brewery dried grain on live weight gain and carcass characteristic of Wogera sheep fed on basal diet, East African Journal Sciences, 2,105-110.Google Scholar
  19. NRC, 1981. Nutrient requirements of domestic animals, (National Academy, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  20. SAS (Statistical Analysis System), 2002. Statistical Analysis System, Version 9, (Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).Google Scholar
  21. Solomon, M. and Simret, B., 2008. Bodyweight and carcass characteristics of Somali goats fed hay supplemented with graded levels of peanut cake and wheat bran mixture. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 40,553-560. doi: 10.1007/s11250-008-9133-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Solomon, M., K. J. Peters and Azage, T., 2004a. Feed intake, live weight gain and reproductive performance of Menz sheep ewes supplemented with Lablab purpureus, graded levels of Leucaena pallida 1403 and Sesbania sesban, Livestock Production Science, 87,131-142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Solomon, M., K.J. Peters and Azage, T., 2004b. Effects of supplementation with foliages of selected multipurpose trees, their mixtures or wheat bran on feed intake, plasma enzyme activities, live weight and scrotal circumference gains of Menz sheep, Livestock Production Science, 89, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Solomon, M., K.J. Peters, Azage, T., 2004c. Intake, digestibility and passage rate in Menz sheep fed tef (Eragrostis tef) straw supplemented with dried leaves of selected multipurpose trees, their mixtures or wheat bran, Small Ruminant Research, 56, 139–149Google Scholar
  25. Solomon, M., K.J. Peters. and Azage, T., 2004d. Supplementation of Menz ewes with dried leaves of Lablab purpureus or graded levels of Leucaena pallida 14203 and Sesbania sesban 1198: effects on feed intake, live weight gain and oestrous cycle, Animal Feed Science & Technology. 113 (1–4): 39–51.Google Scholar
  26. Van Soest, P. J. and Robertson, J. B., 1985. Analysis of forages and fibrous feeds: A Laboratory Manual for Animal Science, (Cornell University, Ithaca, New York).Google Scholar
  27. Van Soest, P. J., 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminants, (Cornel University, London).Google Scholar
  28. Wallie, M., Mekasha, Y., Urge, M., Abebe, G. and Goetsch, A.L., 2012. Effects of form of leftover khat (Catha edulis) on feed intake, digestion, and growth performance of Hararghe Highland goats. Small Ruminant Research. 102:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wondwosen Bekele
    • 1
  • Solomon Melaku
    • 2
  • Yoseph Mekasha
    • 2
  1. 1.Dilla Agricultural Technical Vocational Education and Training CollegeDillaEthiopia
  2. 2.School of Animal & Range SciencesHaramaya UniversityDire DawaEthiopia

Personalised recommendations