Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 45, Issue 5, pp 1215–1221 | Cite as

Dry chemical processing and ensiling of rice straw to improve its quality for use as ruminant feed

  • Ebrahim Ghasemi
  • Mohammad Khorvash
  • Gholam Reza Ghorbani
  • Mohammad Reza Emami
  • Keikhosro Karimi
Regular Articles

Abstract

In this study, changes in the chemical composition, pH, cell wall and degradability of ensiled rice straw were investigated when treated with alkali, acid, oxidant agents (1–11 %, w/w) and a combination of an oxidant with either an alkali (ALHP) or an acid (ACHP). The findings of the study revealed that ALHP had a lower efficiency in enhancing fibre degradability compared to alkali alone. Oxidant treatment showed no detectable changes in pH, dry matter (DM) and phenolic compound (PC) solubility, or in silica and fibre content, but led to increased esterified groups formed within the cell wall constituents (hemicellulose and lignin). Increasing acid concentration led to an exponential change in both pH and solubility of DM and hemicelluloses while it quadratically increased PC and silica solubility. Moreover, crystallinity, hydrogen bonding and esterification were enhanced under high acid concentrations (11 %), but decreased under mild acid conditions (5 %). Increased alkalinity led to the linear enhancement of DM and PC solubility. Solubility of silica and hemicellulose did not exhibit any significant changes with alkali concentration above 7 %. A gradual enhancement (29 %) was observed in ruminal DM degradability with increasing oxidant concentration, whereas exponential (91 %) and quadratic (23 %) enhancements were observed with alkaline and acid treatments, respectively. Treatment with acid showed observable reductions in the degradability of both cellulose and hemicellulose, whereas oxidant treatment reduced only that of hemicellulose. Treatment with 7 % alkali (pH ∼ 12) followed by ensiling appeared to be a promising process for improving rice straw quality.

Keywords

Cell wall Dry processing Rice straw Ruminal degradability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Iran National Science Foundation and Isfahan Jihad-e-Agriculture for their financial support of this study. Our thanks also go to Dr. Ezzatollah Roustazadeh, from ELC of IUT, and Glenn Nader from California University for having edited the final version of this manuscript.

References

  1. Agbagla-Dohnani, A., Noziere, P., Gaillard-Martinie, B., Puard, M., and Doreau, M., 2003. Effect of silica content on rice straw ruminal degradation, Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 140, 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AOAC, 2000. Official methods of analysis, 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, L.L., Klopfenstein, T.J. and Britton, R.A., 1980. Effect of sodium hydroxide treatment on rate of passage and rate of ruminal fiber digestion, Journal of Animal Science, 50, 745–749.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cameron, M.G., Fahey Jr, G.C., Clark, J.H., Merchen, N.R. and Berger, L.L., 1990. Effects of feeding alkaline hydrogen peroxide-treated wheat straw-based diets on digestion and production by dairy cows, Journal of Dairy Science, 73, 3544–3554.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cameron, M.G., Cameron, M.R., Fahey Jr, G.C., Clark, J.H., Berger, L.L. and Merchen, N.R., 1991. Effects of treating oat hulls with alkaline hydrogen peroxide on intake and digestion by midlactation dairy cows, Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elliott, C.L. and Snyder, G.H., 1991. Autoclave-induced digestion for the colorimetric determination of silicon in rice straw, Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry, 39, 1118–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eun, J.-S., Beauchemin, K.A., Hong, S.-H. and Bauer, M.W., 2006. Exogenous enzymes added to untreated or ammoniated rice straw: Effects on in vitro fermentation characteristics and degradability, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 131, 86–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hendriks, A.T.W.M. and Zeeman, G., 2009. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass, Bioresource Technology 100, 10–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jung, H.G., Varel, V.H., Weimer, P.J. and Ralph, J., 1999. Accuracy of Klason lignin and acid detergent lignin methods as assessed by bomb calorimetry, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 47, 2005–2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kobayashi, G.P., Okada, N.N., Hirakawa, A., Sato, T., Kobayashi, J., Hatano, Sh., Itaya, Y. and Mori, Sh., 2009. Characteristics of solid residues obtained from hot-compressed-water treatment of woody biomass, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 48, 373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kumar, R.G., Mago, V., Balan, Ch. and Wyman, E., 2009. Physical and chemical characterizations of corn stover and poplar solids resulting from leading pretreatment technologies, Bioresource Technology, 100, 3948–3962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lau, N.M., and Van Soest, P.J., 1981. Titratable groups and soluble phenolics compounds as indicators of digestibility of chemically treated roughages, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 6, 123–131.Google Scholar
  13. Li, M., Foster, C., Kelkar, S., Pu, Y., Holmes D., Ragauskas A., Saffron, C.M. and Hodge, D.B., 2012. Structural characterization of alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreated grasses exhibiting diverse lignin phenotypes, Biotechnology for Biofuels, 5, 38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu, J.X. and Ørskov, E.R., 2000. Cellulase treatment of untreated and steam pre-treated rice straw—effect on in vitro fermentation characteristics, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 88, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mourino, F., Akkarawongsa, R. and Weimer, P.J., 2001. Initial pH as a determinant of cellulose digestion rate by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro, Journal of Dairy Science, 84, 848–859.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oba, M., and Allen, M.S., 1999. Evaluation of the importance of the digestibility of neutral detergent fiber from forage: effects on dry matter intake and milk yield of dairy cows, Journal of Dairy Science, 82, 589–596.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pinos-Rodrıguez, J.M., Gonzalez, S.S., Mendoza, G.D., Barcena, R., Cobos, M.A., Hernandez, A. and Ortega, M.E., 2002. Effect of exogenous fibrolytic enzyme on ruminal fermentation and digestibility of alfalfa and rye-grass hay fed to lambs, Journal of Animal Science, 80, 3016–3020PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sarnklong, C., Cone, J.W., Pellikaan, W. and Hendriks, W.H., 2010. Utilization of rice straw and different treatments to improve its feed value for ruminants: A review, Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science, 23, 680 – 692.Google Scholar
  19. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 8.1 Edition. 2001. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  20. Sun, R.C., Tomkinson, J., Mao, F.C. and Sun, X.F., 2001. Physicochemical characterization of lignins from rice straw by hydrogen peroxide treatment, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 79, 719–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sung, H.G., Kobayashi, Y., Chang, J., Ha, A., Hwang, I.H. and Ha, J.K., 2007. Low ruminal pH reduces dietary fiber digestion via reduced microbial attachment, Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science, 20, 200–207.Google Scholar
  22. Taherzadeh, M.J. and Karimi, K., 2008. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve in ethanol and biogas production. A review, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 8, 1–30.Google Scholar
  23. Van Soest, P.J., 2006. Rice straw, the role of silica and treatments to improve quality, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 130, 137–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A., 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition, Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583–3592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wanapat, M., Polyrach, S., Boonnop, K., Mapato, C. and Cherdthong, A., 2009. Effect of treating rice straw with urea and calcium hydroxide upon intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and milk yield of dairy cows. Livestock Science, 125, 238–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang, Y., Spratling, B.M., ZoBell, D.R., Wiedmeier R.D. and McAllister, T.A., 2004. Effect of alkali pretreatment of wheat straw on the efficacy of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes. Journal of Animal Science, 82, 198–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ebrahim Ghasemi
    • 1
  • Mohammad Khorvash
    • 1
  • Gholam Reza Ghorbani
    • 1
  • Mohammad Reza Emami
    • 2
  • Keikhosro Karimi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Animal ScienceIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran
  2. 2.Veterinary Surgery Division, Department of Clinical SciencesFerdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran
  3. 3.Department of Chemical EngineeringIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations