GnRH-1 mRNA, LH surges, steroid hormones, egg production, and intersequence pause days alter in birds exposed to longer wavelength of light in the later stages of production in Gallus gallus domesticus
- 264 Downloads
The objective of this was to establish the effects of red spectrum of light (650 nm, treated n = 12) and normal spectrum of light (450 nm control = 12) on GnRH-I mRNA expression, amplitude and frequency of luteinizing hormone (LH), and egg production from 72–82 weeks of age in white leghorn hens. Birds exposed to red spectrum of wavelength significantly improved (P < 0.01) steroid hormone, and egg production improved over old laying 72 to 82 weeks. Weekly interval profiles followed the same pattern. At 77th weeks of age blood, samples from both the groups were collected at every 3 h for 36 h to study the pulsatile secretion of LH surges. Plasma LH concentration was higher (P < 0.01) in treated birds with more number of frequencies and amplitude LH surges in plasma of treated birds. LH frequencies were more pronounced and advanced during 36 h of sampling at 3 h interval in treated birds. Weekly interval of plasma LH, E2β, and P4 concentrations increased (P < 0.01) in treated birds from 72 to 82 weeks of age. GnRH-I mRNA concentration was significantly (P < 0.01) higher in birds exposed to red spectrum of light compared to controls. It is hypothesized that exposure of birds to red spectrum of light-enhanced (P < 0.01) GnRH-I mRNA with more number of yellow yolky follicles was found in birds exposed to red spectrum of light during 77 days (72–82 weeks of age) of experimental period. It is concluded that higher levels of GnRH-I mRNA, LH, E2β, and P4 concentration with lower incidence of pause days enabled the birds to lay more eggs even later in the productive period by modulating the wavelengths of light under normal husbandry conditions.
KeywordsDifferent wavelengths of light GnRH-I mRNA LH surges Egg production Hen
The authors are thankful to the Director of NIANP, Bangalore for providing necessary facilities to carry out the work. We are thankful to Dr. John. A. Proudman, USDA, USA for providing chicken LH hormone and antisera as a gratis. The project is as a gratis from ICAR, New Delhi.
- Halford, Stephanie, Susana, S. Pires, Michael, Turton, Lei Zheng, Irene Gonzalez Menendez, Wayne, L. Davies, Stuart, N. Peirson, José M, García-Fernández, Mark W. Hankins, and Russell G. Foster. 2009. VA opsin-based photoreceptors in the hypothalamus of birds. Current Biology. 19: 16, Page 1396-1402.Google Scholar
- Lal, P., Sharp, P.J., Dunn, I.C., Talbot, R.T., 1990. Absence of an effect of naloxone, an opioid antagonist, on luteinizing hormone release in vivo and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone I release in vitro in intact, castrated, and food restricted cockerels. Gen. Comp. Endocrinology, 77: 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mobarkey, N, Avital, A, Heiblum, Rozenboim, I, 2010. The role of retinal and extraretinal photostimulation in reproductive activity in broiler breeder hens. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 38:235-243Google Scholar
- Sharp P.J. Dunn., I.C and Cerolini ,S., 1992. Neuroendocrine control of reduced persistence of egg laying in domestic hens: evidence for the development of photo refractoriness. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 94; 221–235Google Scholar
- Snedecor, G.W. and. Cochran, W.G., 1994. Statistical Methods 8th (edn.), Iowa State Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
- Tanabe ,Y., Ogawa, T. and Nakamura, T, (1981), The effect of short term starvation on pituitary and plasma LH, plasma LH, plasma estradiol and of progesterone, and pituitary response to LH–RH in the laying hen (Gallus domesticus). General and Comparative Endocrinology, 43 pp. 392–398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nakane, Yusuke, Ikegami, Keisuke, Ono Hiroko, Yamamoto, Naoyuki, Shosei, Yoshida, Kanjun, Hirunagi, Shizufumi, Ebihara, Kubo, Yoshihiro, and Yoshimura Takashi.2010. A mammalian neural tissue opsin (opsin 5) is a deep brain photoreceptor in birds. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences USA 107(34):15264–15268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar