Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 95–99 | Cite as

PCR test for detecting Taenia solium cysticercosis in pig carcasses

  • Chennuru Sreedevi
  • Mohammad Hafeez
  • Putcha Anand Kumar
  • Vukka Chengalva Rayulu
  • Kothapalli Venkata Subramanyam
  • Krovvidi Sudhakar
Original Research

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was employed to detect Taenia solium DNA in muscle lesions for validation of the meat inspection results of slaughtered pigs. Two sets of oligonucleotide primers, one targeted against the large subunit rRNA gene (TBR primers) and the other targeted against cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene (Cox1 primers) of T. solium were used in this study. On reactivity in PCR test, the TBR primers and the Cox1 primers yielded products of 286 and 984 bp, respectively, in cysticercosis positive cases. Both the sets of primers were found to be highly specific, since they did not yield any PCR product in negative controls. A total of 225 pig carcasses were screened for cysticercosis by meat inspection, out of which 25 carcasses with visible cysts (16 viable and 9 degenerated cysts) were also confirmed to be positive for cysticercosis in PCR test. However, out of the 35 carcasses with suspected lesions on meat inspection, only two were found to be positive for cysticercosis in PCR test. The detection limits for both the primer sets were analyzed. The TBR primer set could detect up to 10 pg of cysticercus DNA, whereas the Cox1 primer set could detect only up to 1 ng. It is evident from the study that PCR test is an efficient tool for validation of meat inspection results and also to rule out ambiguity in carcass judgment of suspected cases of porcine cysticercosis.

Keywords

Cysticercus cellulosae Detection limits Oligonucleotide primers PCR Porcine cysticercosis Taenia solium 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, India, for providing the facilities to carry out the research work. Our special thanks go to Dr. Ruy de Souza Lino Junior for his technical suggestions.

References

  1. de Aluja, A.S., 1994. Manchas de leche (milk spots) por metacestodo de Taenia solium en higados de cerdo. Milk spots (milk spots) by larvae of Taenia solium in pig livers. Veterinaria Mexico, 25,155–156 (in Spanish, with English abstract).Google Scholar
  2. Aravindakshan, T.V., Nainar, A.M. and Nachimuthu, K., 1997. High salt method: a simple and rapid procedure for isolation of genomic DNA from buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) white blood cells. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 35(8), 903–905.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai, X.P., Zheng, Y.D., Luo, X.N., Jing, Z.Z., Hu, Z.M. and Lu, C.P., 2006. Immunodiagnosis of cysticercosis in China. The Journal of Applied Research, 6(1), 69–76.Google Scholar
  4. Chiesa, F., Dalmasso, A., Bellio, A., Martinetti, M., Gili, S. and Civera, T., 2010. Development of a Biomolecular Assay for Postmortem Diagnosis of Taenia saginata Cysticercosis. Food borne Pathogens and Disease, 7(10), 1171–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dalmasso, A., Fontanella, E., Piatti, P., Civera, T., Rosati, S. and Bottero, M.T., 2004. A multiplex PCR assay for the identification of animal species in feedstuffs. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 18, 81–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deplazes, P., Grimm, F., Sydler, T., Tanner, I. and Kapel, C.M.O., 2005. Experimental alveolar echinococcosis in pigs, lesion development and serological follow up. Veterinary Parasitology, 130, 213–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Geysen, D., Kanobana, K., Victor, B., Rodriguez-Hidalgo, R., De Borchgrave, J., Brandt, J. and Dorny, P., 2007. Validation of meat inspection results for Taenia saginata cysticercosis by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Journal of Food Protection, 70(1), 236–240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gomes, A.B., Soares, K.A., Bueno, F.C., Espindola, N.M., Tha, A.H., Maia, A.A.M., Peralta, R II, S. and Vaz, A.J., 2007. Comparative evaluation of different immunoassays for the detection of Taenia solium cysticercosis in swine with low parasite burden. Memrias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 102(6), 725–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gonzalez, A.E., Villalobos, N., Montero, E., Morales, J., Alamo Sanz, R., Muro, A., Harrison, L.J.H., Parkhouse, R.M.E. and Garate, T., 2006. Differential molecular identification of Taeniid spp. and Sarcocystis spp. cysts isolated from infected pigs and cattle. Veterinary Parasitology, 142, 95–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harrington, A. T., Creutzfeldt, C. J., SenGupta, D. J., Hoogestraat, D. R., Zunt, J. R. and Cookson, B. T., 2009. Diagnosis of neurocysticercosis by detection of Taenia solium DNA using a global DNA screening platform. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 48(1), 86–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jardim, E.A.G.V., Linhares, G.F.C., Torres, F.A.G., Araujo, J.L.B. and Barbosa, S.M., 2006. Diferenciacao especifica entre Taenia saginata e Taenia solium por ensaio de PCR e duplex-PCR. Specific discrimination between Taenia saginata and Taenia solium by one step PCR assay and duplex-PCR. Ciencia Rural, Santa Maria, 36(1), 166–172 (in Portuguese, with English abstract).Google Scholar
  12. Kedra, A.H., Tkach, V.V., Swiderski, Z. and Pawowski, Z., 2001. Intraspecific variability among NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 sequences of Taenia hydatigena. Parasitology International 50, 145–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lino Junior, R.S., 2004. Cysticercosis diagnostic methods in autopsies. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, 46(3), 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Prasad, K. N., Prasad, A., Gupta, R, K., Nath, K., Pradhan, S., Tripathi, M. and Pandey, C. M., 2009. Neurocysticercosis in patients with active epilepsy from a pig farming community of Lucknow district, North India. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 103(2), 144–150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ramahefarisoa, R.M., Rakotondrazaka, M., Jambou, R. and Carod, J.F., 2010.Comparison of ELISA and PCR assays for the diagnosis of porcine cysticercosis. Veterinary Parasitology, 173(3–4), 362–363.Google Scholar
  16. Sato, M.O., Cavalcante, T.V., Sako, Y., Nakao, M., Yamasaki, H., Yatsuda, A.P., Nakaya, K. and Ito, A., 2006. Evidence and potential for transmission of human and swine Taenia solium cysticercosis in the Piracuruca region, Piaui, Brazil. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 75(5), 933–935.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Shih, Y.C., Chen, C.M., Huang, Y.H., Liao, C.W., Fan, C.K. and Yang, C.H., 2010. Subcutaneous cysticercosis diagnosed by mitochondrial DNA analysis. International Journal of Dermatology, 49(6), 672–675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Willingham III, A.L., Harrison, L.J., Fevre, E.M. and Parkhouse, M.E., 2008. Inaugural meeting of the cysticercosis working group in Europe. EID Journal Home, 14(12).Google Scholar
  19. Yamasaki, H., Allan, J.C., Sato, M.O., Nakao, M., Sako, Y., Nakaya, K., Qui, D., Mamuti, W., Craig, P.S. and Ito, A., 2004. DNA differential diagnosis of taeniosis and cysticercosis by multiplex PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 42(2), 548–553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chennuru Sreedevi
    • 1
  • Mohammad Hafeez
    • 1
  • Putcha Anand Kumar
    • 2
  • Vukka Chengalva Rayulu
    • 1
  • Kothapalli Venkata Subramanyam
    • 2
  • Krovvidi Sudhakar
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary ScienceSri Venkateswara Veterinary UniversityTirupatiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Veterinary Microbiology, NTR College of Veterinary ScienceSri Venkateswara Veterinary UniversityGannavaramIndia
  3. 3.Department of Animal Genetics & Breeding, NTR College of Veterinary ScienceSri Venkateswara Veterinary UniversityGannavaramIndia

Personalised recommendations