Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Performance evaluation of two serological tests for contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP) detection in an enzootic area using a Bayesian framework

  • 152 Accesses

  • 7 Citations

Abstract

A Bayesian approach, allowing for conditional dependence between two tests was used to estimate without gold standard the sensitivities of complement fixation test (CFT) and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test (cELISA) and the serological prevalence of CBPP in a cattle population of the Central Delta of the Niger River in Mali, where CBPP is enzootic and the true prevalence and animals serological state were unknown. A significant difference (P = 0.99) was observed between the sensitivities of the two tests, estimated at 73.7% (95% probability interval [PI], 63.4–82.7) for cELISA and 42.3% (95% PI, 33.3–53.7) for CFT. Individual-level serological prevalence in the study population was estimated at 14.1% (95% PI, 10.8–16.9). Our results indicate that in enzootic areas, cELISA performs better in terms of sensitivity than CFT. However, negative conditional sensitivity dependence between the two tests was detected, implying that to achieve maximum sensitivity, the two tests should be applied in parallel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Amanfu, W., Sediadie, S., Masupu, K.V., Benkirane, A., Geiger, R., Thiaucourt, F., 1998. Field validation of a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) for the detection of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia in Botswana. Revue d’Elevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire des pays Tropicaux, 51 (3), 189–193.

  2. Anonymous, 2010. Annuals outbreaks data reported from 2004 to 2010 by the National Directory of the Veterinarian Office (DNSV) – MALI.

  3. Branscum, A.J., Gardner, I.A. and Johnson, W.O., 2005. Estimation of diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity through Bayesian modelling. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 68, 145–163.

  4. Campbell, A. D. and Turner, A. W., 1953. Studies of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia of cattle: IV. An improved complement fixation test. Australian Veterinary Journal, 29, 154–163.

  5. Enøe, C., Georgiadis, M.P., Johnson, W.O., 2000. Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 45, 61–81.

  6. Gardner, I. A., Stryhn, H., Lind, P., Collins, M.T., 2000. Conditional dependence between tests affects the diagnostic and surveillance of animal diseases. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 45, 107–122.

  7. Geiger, R., 2003. Surveillance and testing strategies for the diagnostic of CBPP: Results of the FAO/IAEA Co-ordinated Research Programme on the monitoring of CBPP in Africa FAO-OIE-AU/IBAR-IAEA, Consultative Group on Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia Third meeting, Rome 12–14 November 2003.

  8. Georgiadis, M. P., Johnson, W. O., Gardner, I. A., and Singh, R., 2003. Correlation-adjusted estimation of sensitivity and specificity of two diagnostic tests. Applied Statistics, 52, 63–76.

  9. Jones, G., Johnson, W. O., Hanson, T. E., and Christensen, R., 2009. Identifiability of models for multiple diagnostic testing in the absence of a gold standard. Biometrics, 66, 855–863.

  10. Le Goff, C., Thiaucourt, F., 1998. A competitive ELISA for the specific diagnostic of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP). Veterinary Microbiology, 60, 179–191.

  11. Lesnoff, M., Laval, G., Bonnet, P., Abdicho, S., Workalemahu, A., Kifle, D., Peyraud, A., Lancelot, R., Thiaucourt, F., 2004. Within-herd spread of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia in Ethiopian highlands. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 64, 27–40.

  12. Menten, J., Boelaert, M., Lesaffre, E., 2008. Bayesian latent class models with conditionally dependent diagnostic tests: a case study. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 4469–4488.

  13. Muuka, G., Mudenda, H. B., Nalubamba, K. S., Kabilika, S., Mwambazi, L., Muma, J. B., 2011. Comparison of complement fixation test, competitive ELISA and LppQ ELISA with post-mortem findings in the diagnosis of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP). Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43, 1057–1062.

  14. Niang, M., Diallo, M., Cissé, O., Koné, M., Doucouré, M., Roth, J. A., Rodrigues, V. B., Dedieu, L., 2006. Pulmonary and serum antibody responses elicited in zebu cattle experimentally infected with Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides SC by contact exposure. Veterinary Research, 37, 733–744.

  15. Niang, M., Sery A., Doucouré, M., Koné, M., N’Diaye, M., Amanfu, W.,Thiaucourt, F., 2010. Experimental studies on the effect of long-acting oxytetracycline treatment in the development of sequestra in contagious bovine pleuropneumonia infected cattle. Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, 2 (4), 35–45.

  16. Schubert, E., Sachse, K., Jores, J.,Heller, M., 2011. Serological testing of cattle experimentally infected with Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides Small Colony using four different tests reveals a variety of seroconversion patterns. Veterinary Research (in press), doi:10.1186/1746-6148-7-72.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the ACDUQ project (ANR-05-PADD-014, France) and French Embassy Mali–SCAC. The work was carried out at the Mycoplasma unit, LCV-Bamako and with the supervision of the Animal and Integrated Risk Management (AGIRs) Unit–Montpellier. We thank Grace DELOBEL, Emmanuel CAMUS and CVL technicians for their important support.

Author information

Correspondence to Cheick Abou Kounta Sidibé.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sidibé, C.A.K., Grosbois, V., Thiaucourt, F. et al. Performance evaluation of two serological tests for contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP) detection in an enzootic area using a Bayesian framework. Trop Anim Health Prod 44, 1233–1238 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-0063-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bayesian framework
  • CBPP
  • Field cattle
  • Sensitivity
  • Specificity
  • Serological tests