Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 871–876 | Cite as

Effects of strain and different skip-a-day feed restriction periods on the growth performance of broiler chickens

  • Kow BenyiEmail author
  • Owoahene Acheampong-Boateng
  • David Norris
Original Research

Abstract

The effects of 6, 10 and 14 days of skip-a-day feed removal during the starter and grower periods on the growth performance of Ross 308 and Hubbard broiler chickens were studied in a 49-day production period. Ross 308 was superior to Hubbard in weight gain, market weight and feed utilization but consumed more feed, deposited more abdominal fat and had a higher mortality rate. Overall, feed removal improved feed efficiency, had insignificant effects on abdominal fatness and mortality rate and reduced feed intake, weight gain and market weight. On each restricted-feeding regime, the birds gained as much weight as their fully fed counterparts during the period of resumed full feeding but were unable to compensate fully for the weight loss and were lighter at the end of the trial. It is suggested that for profitable broiler production under tropical conditions, Ross 308 and skip-a-day feed removal for less than 6 days from 7 to 17 days of age be considered.

Keywords

Strain Skip-a-day feeding Growth performance 

References

  1. Aggrey, S. E., Karnuah, A. B., Sebastian, B. and Anthony, N. B., 2010. Genetic properties of feed efficiency parameters in meat-type chickens, Genetics Selection Evolution, 42:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benyi, K., Acheampong-Boateng, O., Norris, D. and Mikasi, M. S., 2008. Effects of early and late skip-a-day feeding on the growth performance of male Hybro broiler chickens, Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 3, 244–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benyi, K., Acheampong-Boateng, O, Norris, D., Mathoho, M. and Mikasi, M. S., 2009. The response of Ross 308 and Hybro broiler chickens to early and late skip-a-day feed restriction, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 41, 1701–1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benyi, K., Acheampong-Boateng, O., Norris, D. and Ligaraba, T. J., 2010. Response of Ross 308 and Hubbard broiler chickens to feed removal for different periods during the day. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42, 1421–1426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruggman, V., Onagbesan, O., Ragot, O., Metayer, S., Cassy, S., Favreau, F., Yego, Y., Trevidy, J. J., Tona, K., Williams, J., Decuypere, E. and Picard, M., 2005. Feed allowance—genotype × environment interactions in broiler breeder hens, Poultry Science, 84, 298–306.Google Scholar
  6. Chambers, J. R. (1990). Genetics of growth and meat production. In: R. D. Crawford (ed), Poultry Breeding and Genetics, (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 611–619.Google Scholar
  7. Dozier, W. A., Lien, R. J., Hess, J. B. and Biljill, S. F., 2003. Influence of early skip-a-day feed removal on live performance and carcass yield of broilers of different sexes and strain sources, Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 12, 439–448Google Scholar
  8. Garner, J. P., Falcone, C., Wakenell, P., Martin, M. and Mench, J. A., 2002. Reliability and validity of a modified gait scoring system and its use in assessing tibial dyschondroplasia in broilers, British Poultry Science, 43, 355–363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghazanfari, S., Kermanshabi,H., Nassiry, M. R., Goliann, A. and Salehi, A., 2010. Effect of feed restriction and different energy and protein levels of the diet on growth performance and growth hormone in broiler chickens, Journal of Biological Sciences, 10, 25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gous, R. M., Moran, E. T. Jr., Stillborn, H. R., Bradford, G. D. and Emmans, G. C., 1999. Evaluation of parameters needed to describe the overall growth, the chemical growth and growth of feathers and breast muscles of broilers, Poultry Science, 78, 812–821.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Khajali, F., Zamani’Mghaddam, A. and Ashadi-Khoshoe, E., 2007. Application of early skip-a day feed restriction on physiological parameters carcass traits and development of ascites in male broilers reared under regular or cold temperatures at high altitude, Animal Science Journal, 78, 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mahmood, S., Hassan, S., Ahmed, F., Ashraf, M., Alam, M. and Muzaffar, A, 2005. Influence of feed withdrawal for different durations on performance of broilers in summer, International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 7, 975–978.Google Scholar
  13. Navidshad, B., Shivazad, M., Zare, A. and Rahim, G., 2006. Effect of feed restriction and dietary fat saturation on performance and serum thyroid hormones in broiler chickens, International Journal of Poultry Science, 5, 436–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Plavnik and Balnave, 1992. Response of different strains of Australian broiler chickens to feed restriction at an early age, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 43, 707–715Google Scholar
  15. Richards, M., Poch, S., Coon, C., Rosebrough, R. Ashwell, C. and McMurty, J., 2003. Expression of selected genes related to lipid metabolism in broiler breeder chickens. Journal of Nutrition, 133, 707–715PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosa, P. S., Faria Filho, D. E., Dahlke, F., Vieira, B. S., Macari, M. and Furian, R. L., 2007. Effect of energy intake on performance and carcass composition of broiler chickens from two different genetic groups. Revista Brasileira Ciencia Avicola, 9, 117–122Google Scholar
  17. Santos, A.L., Sakomura, N. K., Freitas, E. R., Fortes, C. M. S. and Corilho, E. N. V. M., 2005. Comparison of free-range broiler chickens raise in confined or semi-confined systems, Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 7, 85–92Google Scholar
  18. SAS, 2004. SAS User’s Guide, Statistic, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, Journal of Poultry Science, 7, 85–92Google Scholar
  19. Scott, T. A., 2002. Evaluation of lighting programs, diet density and short-term use of mash as compared to crumbled starter to reduce incidence of sudden death syndrome in broiler chicks to 35 days of age, Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 82, 375–383.Google Scholar
  20. Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H., 1981. Principles and procedures of statistics, a biometrical approach. (2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill International Edition, London)Google Scholar
  21. Urdaneta-Rincon, M. and Leeson, S., 2002. Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction on growth characteristics of male broiler chickens, Poultry Science, 81, 769–788.Google Scholar
  22. Zubair, A. K. and Leeson, S., 1994. Effects of varying periods of early nutrient restriction on growth compensation and carcass characteristics, Poultry Science, 73, 129–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kow Benyi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Owoahene Acheampong-Boateng
    • 1
  • David Norris
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Animal ScienceUniversity of VendaThohoyandouSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Animal ProductionUniversity of LimpopoSovengaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations