Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 42, Issue 8, pp 1845–1853 | Cite as

Genetic and nongenetic effects for milk yield and growth traits in Saudi camels

  • Sallal E. Almutairi
  • Ismaïl Boujenane
  • Abdelgader Musaad
  • Falah Awad-Acharari
Original Research

Abstract

The study was based on a set of 256 records for milk yield at 305 days, 1,899 records of test day yield, and 466 growth records collected at Al Jouf center from 1987 to 2009. Except season of calving, milk yield at 305 days was affected by parity and calving year, whereas test day yield was influenced by parity, calving year, stage of lactation, and test milk day. Only birth year had a significant effect on all growth traits, whereas dam’s parity influenced weights at birth and 3 months, and birth season affected birth weight, weight at 6 months and average daily gain (ADG) 3–6 months. Variance components estimated using an animal model showed that heritability and repeatability estimates for milk yield at 305 days were 0.24 and 0.28, respectively. The corresponding estimates for test day yield were 0.22 and 0.66, respectively. Direct heritabilities were 0.37, 0.50, 0.60, and 0.85 for body weights at birth, 3, 6, and 12 months of age, respectively, and 0.25, 0.37, 0.49, and 0.29 for ADG 0–3, 3–6, 6–12, and 0–12 months, respectively. The annual genetic progress was 0.05 kg for milk yield at 305 days and 0.0003 kg for test day yield. Annual genetic gains during 23 years were 0.050, −0.185, 0.079, and 0.331 kg for body weights, respectively, and −9, −5, −4, and −13 g, for ADG, respectively. It was concluded that it is necessary to set up a field milk and growth recording system in order to collect a large number of records to check these estimates.

Keywords

Camels Milk yield Growth Heritability Breeding values Genetic progress 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was performed under the UTF project Camel breeding, protection and improvement center (UTF/SAU/021/SAU) (FAO/Ministry of Agriculture, Saudi Arabia).

References

  1. Almutairi, S.E., 2000. Evaluation of Saudi camel calves’ performance under an improved management system, Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux, 53, 219-222Google Scholar
  2. Al-Sobayil, K.A., Khalil, M.H., Al-Jobeile, H.S., Mohamed, K.M. and Salal, S.A., 2006. Quantitative genetic analysis and evaluation for early growth performance in Saudi camels. International Scientific Conference on Camels, 9-11 May, 2006, Qassim, Saudi Arabia (Abstract), pp. 201Google Scholar
  3. Aslam, M., Nawaz, M., Ali I., Zia-ur-Rahman, M. and Sandhu, M.A., 2002. Determination of productive and reproductive traits in mountain camel. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress of Genetics Applied to. Livestock Production, 30, 549-552 (Communication N° 07-03)Google Scholar
  4. Bekele, T. and Zeleke, M., 2001. Growth rate of the one humped camel in semi-nomadic households in Errer Valley, eastern Ethiopia, Tropical Agriculture, 78, 206-210Google Scholar
  5. Bekele, T., Zeleke, M. and Baars, R.M.T., 2002. Milk production performance of the one humped camel (Camelus dromedarius) under pastoral management in semi-arid eastern Ethiopia, Livestock Production Science, 76, 37-44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boldman, K.G., Kriese, L.A., Van Vleck, L.D., Van Tassell, C.P. and Kachman, S.D., 1995. A manual for use of MTDFREML. A set of programs to obtain estimates of variances and covariances [DRAFT], Washington, DC, USA, USDA/ARSGoogle Scholar
  7. Boujenane, I., 2002. Estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters for milk production in Moroccan Holstein-Friesian cows, Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux, 55, 63-67Google Scholar
  8. Ellouze, S. and Kamoun, M., 1989. Evolution de la composition du lait de dromadaire en function du stade de lactation, Options Méditerranéennes–Série Séminaires, 6, 307–311Google Scholar
  9. Gaili, E.S.E., Al-Eknah, M.M. and Sadek, M.H., 2000. Comparative milking performance of three types of Saudi camels (Camelus dromedarius), Journal of Camel Practice and Research, 7, 73-76Google Scholar
  10. Hermas, S.A., Abushuashi, H. and Abusaud, F., 1998. A primary investigation on heritabilities of growth measures in the Magrabi camel in Libya. Proceedings of the 3rd Animal Production Under Arid Conditions, 1, 65-70Google Scholar
  11. ICAR, 2009. International Agreement of Recording Practices. Approved by the General Assembly held in Niagara Falls, USA, on 18 June 2008Google Scholar
  12. Kadim, I.T., Mahgoub, O. and Purchas, R.W., 2008. A review of the growth, and of the carcass and meat quality characteristics of the one-humped camel (Camelus dromedaries), Meat Science, 80, 555-569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Khalil, M.H., Al-Sobayil, K.A., Al-Jobeile, H.S., Mohamed, K.M. and Salal, S.A., 2006. Quantitative genetic analysis and evaluation lactation traits in Saudi camels. Proccedings of the International Scientific Conference on Camels. 9-11 May, 2006, Qassim, Saudi Arabia (Abstract), pp. 200Google Scholar
  14. Khallouf, N., Khaled, A.D. and Alasaad, A., 2006. Genetic and non-genetic factors affecting lactation traits and growth in camels raised in Syria. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Camels. 9-11 May, 2006, Qassim, Saudi Arabia (Abstract), pp. 202Google Scholar
  15. Khanna, N.D., Rai, A.K. and Tandon, S.N., 2004. Camel breeds of India, Journal of Camel Science, 1, 8-15Google Scholar
  16. Legarra, A. and Ugarte, E., 2001. Genetic parameters of milk traits in Latxa dairy sheep, Animal Science, 73, 407- 412Google Scholar
  17. Ministry of Agriculture, 2006. Animal population numbers, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaGoogle Scholar
  18. Mohiuddin, G., 1993. Estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters of some performance traits in beef cattle, Animal Breeding Abstracts, 61, 495-522Google Scholar
  19. Musa, H.H., Shuiep, E.S., Ibtissam, El Zubier, E.M. and Chen, G.H., 2006. Some reproductive and productive traits of camel (Camelus dromedarius) in Western Sudan, Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 5, 590-592Google Scholar
  20. Richard, D. and Gérard, D., 1989. La production laitière des dromadaires Dankali (Éthiopie), Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux, 42, 97-103Google Scholar
  21. Safari, E., Fogarty, N.M. and Gilmour, A.R., 2005. A review of genetic parameter estimates for wool, growth, meat and reproduction traits in sheep, Livestock Production Science, 92, 271-289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sahani, M.S., Bissa, U.K. and Khanna, N.D., 1998. Factors influencing pre and post weaning body weights and daily weight gain in indigenous breeds of camels under farm conditions. Proceedings of the 3rd Animal Production Under Arid Conditions, 1, 59-64Google Scholar
  23. SAS, 1996. SAS/STAT, User’s Guide, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  24. Schoeman, S.J., Els, J.F. and Van Niekerk, M.M., 1997. Variance components of early growth traits in the Boer goat, Small Ruminant Research, 26, 15-20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Valencia, M., Dobler, J. and Montaldo, H.H., 2007. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for lactation traits in a flock of Saanen goats in Mexico, Small Ruminant Research, 68, 318-322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zeleke, Z.M., 2007. Non-genetic factors affecting milk yield and milk composition of traditionally managed camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Eastern Ethiopia, Livestock Research for Rural Development, 19 (6), Article # 85Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sallal E. Almutairi
    • 1
  • Ismaïl Boujenane
    • 2
  • Abdelgader Musaad
    • 1
  • Falah Awad-Acharari
    • 1
  1. 1.Camel Breeding, Protection and Improvement ProjectCamel & Range Research CenterAl JoufSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Department of Animal Production and BiotechnologyInstitut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan IIRabatMorocco

Personalised recommendations