Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 42, Issue 7, pp 1471–1479 | Cite as

Intake and digestibility in cattle fed low-quality tropical forage and supplemented with nitrogenous compounds

  • Claudia B. Sampaio
  • Edenio Detmann
  • Mario F. Paulino
  • Sebastiao C. Valadares Filho
  • Marjorrie A. de Souza
  • Isis Lazzarini
  • Pedro V. Rodrigues Paulino
  • Augusto C. de Queiroz
Original Research

Abstract

The effects of supplementation with nitrogenous compounds on intake, digestibility, and microbial protein synthesis in cattle fed low-quality tropical forage were assessed. Five rumen fistulated crossbred Holstein × Gir heifers were used, with initial average live weight of 180 ± 21 kg. Signal grass (Brachiaria decumbens) hay (48.6 g kg−1 of crude protein (CP), on a dry matter (DM) basis) was used as roughage. Five treatments were defined according to nitrogen supplementation level (0, 20, 40, 60, and 80 g of CP kg−1 above the CP level of the hay). A mixture of urea, ammonium sulfate, and albumin at the ratios of 4.5:0.5:1.0, respectively, was used as nitrogen source. The experiment consisted of five experimental periods, according to a 5 × 5 Latin square design. The average CP contents in the diets were 51.9, 71.1, 86.0, 116.7, and 130.2 g kg−1, on a DM basis. A quadratic effect was detected (P < 0.10) of the CP levels in the diets on DM and neutral detergent fiber intake (kg/day), with maximum response at the levels of 102.4 and 100.5 g CP kg−1 DM, respectively. The average daily concentration of rumen ammonia nitrogen showed increasing linear pattern (P < 0.01) as function of CP levels in the diet, with estimated value of 9.64 mg dL−1 equivalent to the maximum DM intake. Microbial nitrogen flow in the intestine was linearly and positively related (P < 0.01) with the CP levels in the diet.

Keywords

Rumen ammonia nitrogen Signal grass Supplementation Urea 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) for financial support.

References

  1. Association of Official Analytical Chemists—AOAC, 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed (AOAC International, Arlington).Google Scholar
  2. Cecava, J.M., Merchen, N.R., Gay, L.C. and Berger, L.L., 1990. Composition of ruminal bacteria harvested from steers as influenced by dietary energy level, feeding frequency, and isolation techniques. Journal of Dairy Science, 73, 2480–2488.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, X.B. and Gomes, M.J., 1992. Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle basid on urinary excretion of purine derivatives—an overview of the technical details, (Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen).Google Scholar
  4. Chizzotti, M.L., Valadares Filho, S.C., Valadares, R.F.D., Chizzotti, F.H.M., Campos, J.M.S., Marcondes, M.I. and Fonseca, M.A., 2006. Consumo, digestibilidade e excreção de uréia e derivados de purinas em novilhas de diferentes pesos. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 35, 1813–1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Costa, V.A.C., Detmann, E., Valadares Filho, S.C., Paulino, M.F., Henriques, L.T. and Mantovani, H.C., 2008. Degradação in vitro da fibra em detergente neutro de forragem tropical de baixa qualidade em função de suplementação com proteína e/ou carboidratos. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 37, 494–503.Google Scholar
  6. DelCurto, T., Cochran, R.C., Harmon, D.L., Beharka, A.A., Jacques, K.A., Towne, G. and Vanzant, E.S., 1990a. Supplementation of dormant Tallgrass-Prarie forage: I. Influence of varying supplemental protein and (or) energy levels on forage utilization characteristics of beef steers in confinement. Journal of Animal Science, 68, 515–531.Google Scholar
  7. DelCurto, T., Cochran, R.C., Corah, L.R., Beharka, A.A., Vanzant, E.S. and Johnson, D.E., 1990b. Supplementation of dormant Tallgrass-Prarie forage: II. Performance and forage utilization characteristics in grazing beef cattle receiving supplements of different protein concentrations. Journal of Animal Science, 68, 532–542.Google Scholar
  8. Detmann, E., Paulino, M.F., Zervoudakis, J.T., Cecon, P.R., Valadares Filho, S.C., Gonçalves, L.C. and Cabral, L.S., 2004. Níveis de proteína bruta em suplementos múltiplos para terminação de bovinos mestiços em pastejo durante a época seca: desempenho produtivo e características de carcaça. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 33, 169–180.Google Scholar
  9. Detmann, E., Paulino, M.F.;,Valadares Filho, S.C. and Lana, R.P., 2007. Fatores controladores de consumo em suplementos múltiplos fornecidos ad libitum para bovinos manejados a pasto. Cadernos Técnicos de Veterinária e Zootecnia, 55, 73–93.Google Scholar
  10. Detmann, E., Paulino, M.F., Mantovani, H.C., Valadares Filho, S.C., Sampaio, C.B., Souza, M.A., Lazzarini, I. and Detmann, K.S.C., 2009. Parameterization of ruminal fiber degradation in low-quality tropical forage using Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Livestock Science, 126, 136–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoover, W.H., 1986. Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion. Journal of Dairy Science, 69, 2755–2766.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lazzarini, I., Detmann, E., Sampaio, C.B., Paulino, M.F., Valadares Filho, S.C., Souza, M.A. and Oliveira, F.A., 2009a. Dinâmicas de trânsito e degradação da fibra em detergente neutro em bovinos alimentados com forragem tropical de baixa qualidade e compostos nitrogenados. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 61, 635–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lazzarini I, Detmann E, Sampaio CB, Paulino MF, Valadares Filho SC, Souza MA, Oliveira FA, (2009b). Intake and digestibility in cattle fed low-quality tropical forage and supplemented with nitrogenous compounds. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 38:2021–2030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leng, R.A., 1990. Factors affecting the utilization of “poor-quality” forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions. Nutrition Research Review, 3, 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Licitra, G., Hernandez, T.M. and Van Soest, P.J., 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 57, 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Littell, R.C., Freund, R.J. and Spector, P.C., 1991. SAS System for linear models 3ed. (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).Google Scholar
  17. Mathis, C.P., Cochran, R.C., Heldt, J.S., Woods, B.C., Abdelgadir, I.E., Olson, K.C., Titgemeyer, E.C. and Vanzant, E.S., 2000. Effects of supplemental degradable intake protein on utilization of medium- to low-quality forages. Journal of Animal Science, 78, 224–232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. McAllan, A.B. and Smith, R.H., 1983. Factors influencing the digestion of dietary carbohydrates between the mouth and abomasum of steers. British Journal of Nutrition, 50, 445–454.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mertens, D.R., 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International, 85, 1217–1240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nocek, J.E. and Russell, J.B., 1988. Protein and energy as an integrated system. Relation of ruminal protein and carbohydrates availability to microbial synthesis and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science, 71, 2070–2107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ortiz-Rubio, M.A., Ørskov, E.R., Milne, J. and Galina, H.M.A., 2007. Effect of different sources of nitrogen on in situ degradability and feed intake of Zebu cattle fed sugarcane tops (Saccharum officinarum). Animal Feed Science and Technology, 139, 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Paulino, M.F., Detmann, E., Valente, E.E.L., and Barros, L.V., 2008. Nutrição de bovinos em pastejo. In: Proceedings of 4rd Symposium on Strategic Management of Pasture (Departamento de Zootecnia-UFV, Viçosa, Brazil), 131–170.Google Scholar
  23. Sampaio, C.B., Detmann, E., Lazzarini, I., Souza, M.A., Paulino, M.F. and Valadares Filho, S.C., 2009. Rumen dynamics of neutral detergent fiber in cattle fed low-quality tropical forage and supplemented with nitrogenous compounds. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 38, 560–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Satter, L.D. and Slyter, L.L., 1974. Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro. British Journal of Nutrition, 32, 199–208.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Souza, M.A., Detmann, E., Paulino, M.F., Sampaio, C.B., Lazzarini, I. and Valadares Filho, S.C., 2010. Intake, digestibility, and rumen dynamics of neutral detergent fibre in cattle fed low-quality tropical forage and supplemented with nitrogen and/or starch. Tropical Animal Health and Production, in press. doi: 10.1007/s11250-010-9566-6
  26. Ushida, K., Lassalas, B. and Jouany, J.P., 1985. Determination of assay parameters for RNA analysis in bacterial and duodenal samples by spectrophotometry. Influence of treatment and preservation. Reproduction Nutrition Development, 25, 1037–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Soest, P.J., 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2ed. (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
  28. Vasconcelos, J.T., Greene, L.W., Cole, N.A. and McCollum, F., 2004. Effects of phase feeding of protein on performance, blood urea nitrogen, and carcass characteristics of finishing beef cattle: II. group fed steers. Beef Cattle Research in Texas, 2004, 135–139.Google Scholar
  29. Verbic, J., Chen, X.B., MacLeod, N.A. and Ørskov, E.R., 1990. Excretion of purine derivatives by ruminants. Effect of microbial nucleic acid infusion on purine derivative excretion by steers. Journal of Agricultural Science, 114, 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia B. Sampaio
    • 1
  • Edenio Detmann
    • 1
  • Mario F. Paulino
    • 1
  • Sebastiao C. Valadares Filho
    • 1
  • Marjorrie A. de Souza
    • 1
  • Isis Lazzarini
    • 1
  • Pedro V. Rodrigues Paulino
    • 1
  • Augusto C. de Queiroz
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de ZootecniaUniversidade Federal de ViçosaViçosaBrazil36571-000

Personalised recommendations