Evaluation of a 3% surf solution (surf field mastitis test) for the diagnosis of subclinical bovine and bubaline mastitis
To evaluate a 3% solution of household detergent viz., Surf Excel (Surf field mastitis test, SFMT) vis-à-vis California mastitis test (CMT), Whiteside test (WST), somatic cell counts (SCC; cut off limit = 5 × 105 cells per millilitre) and bacteriological cultures for the detection of subclinical mastitis in quarter foremilk samples (n = 800) of dairy cows and buffaloes.
Culture and SCC were used as gold standards. All tests were evaluated parallel and serial patterns. The sensitivities of SFMT, SCC, culture, CMT and WST in parallel testing were 72.82, 81.55, 87.38, 75.73 and 54.37%, respectively in cows, while 66.22, 79.73, 82.43, 70.27 and 50.00, respectively in buffaloes.
SFMT was significantly (p < 0.05) more sensitive than WST and comparable to CMT in both species. In serial testing, percent specificity of SFMT (87.12 in cow; 85.16 in buffaloes) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that of CMT (83.33 in cow; 80.64 in buffaloes). The negative predictive values of SFMT (93.50 in cow; 96.35 in buffaloes) differed non-significantly from that of CMT (94.02 in cow; 96.15 in buffaloes). The kappa index between the tests was moderate to perfect both in parallel (0.54 to >0.80) and serial (0.58 to >0.8) testing.
On the basis of closely similar diagnostic efficiency of SFMT to CMT in terms of sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and kappa index together with inexpensive and ready availability of SFMT reagent, it tempting to suggest that SFMT can be use as a cheaper, user-friendly alternative animal-side subclinical mastitis diagnostic test in poor countries.
KeywordsSurf field mastitis test Cow Buffalo Subclinical mastitis Test evaluation
- Allore, H.G., 1993. A review of incidence of mastitis in buffaloes and cattle, Pakistan Veterinary Journal, 13, 1–7.Google Scholar
- Buragahain, J. and Dutta, G.N., 1991. Comparative efficacy of indirect test for detection of bovine subclinical mastitis, Indian Veterinary Journal, 68:19–22.Google Scholar
- Dohoo, I.R., 1990. Evaluating mastitis tests. In: Proceeding of 29th Annual Meeting of National Mastitis Council, Inc., Feb. 12-14, 1990 (Louisville Kentucky, USA), 68–77.Google Scholar
- Fetrow, J., Stewart, S., Eicker, S., Farnworth, R. and Bey, R., 2000. Mastitis: An economical consideration. In: Proceeding of 39th Annual Meeting of National Mastitis Council, February, 13–16, 2000 (Atlanta Georgia, USA), 3–47.Google Scholar
- George, L.W. Divers, T.J., Ducharme, N. and Welcome, F.L., 2008. Rebhun’s Diseases of Dairy Cattle (Saunders Elsevier, St Louis, USA).Google Scholar
- Gulati, S.K., Garg, M.R. and Scott, T.W., 2008. Innovative processes for enhancing milk yield and quality, Pakistan Journal of Agriculture Science, 45, 242–244.Google Scholar
- Heeschen, W.H., 2005. Somatic cells as an indicator of milk hygiene: scientific basis and the EU approach. In: Proceeding of 44th Annual Meeting of National Mastitis Council. Jan, 16–19, 2005 (Orlando, Florida, USA), 52–72.Google Scholar
- Hussain, M., Malik, M.A., Fatima, Z. and Yousaf, M.R., 2005. Participatory surveillance of livestock diseases in Islamabad capital territory, International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 7, 657–570.Google Scholar
- Klaas, I.C., Enevoldsen, C., Vaarst, M. and Houe, H., 2004. Systematic clinical examination for identification of latent udder health types in Danish dairy herd, Journal of Veterinary Science, 87, 1217–1228.Google Scholar
- Muhammad, G., Athar, M., Shakoor, A., Khan, M.Z., Fazul-ur-Reham and Ahmad, M.T., 1995. Surf field mastitis test: an inexpensive new tool for evaluation of wholesomeness of fresh milk, Pakistan Veterinary Journal of Food Science, 5, 91–93Google Scholar
- National Mastitis Council, Inc., 1987. Laboratory and Field Handbook on Bovine Mastitis, National Mastitis Council, Inc., Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
- National Mastitis Council, Inc., 1990. Microbiological Procedures for the Diagnosis of Bovine Udder Infection. National Mastitis Council, Inc., Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
- National Mastitis Council Inc., 1999. Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. Revised Ed. National Mastitis Council Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
- Naureen, A., Saqib, M., Muhammad, G., Hussain, M. H. and Asi, M. N., 2007. Comparative evaluation of Rose Bengal plate agglutination test, mallein and some conventional serological tests for diagnosis of spontaneous equine glanders, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigations 19, 362–367.Google Scholar
- Owens, W.E., Ray, C.H., Boddie, R.L. and Nickerson, S.C., 1997. Efficacy of sequential intramammary antibiotic treatment against chronic Staphylococcus aureus intramammary infection, Large Animal Practitioner, 18, 10–14.Google Scholar
- Patgiri, G.P., Handique, S.C., Saikai, G.K. and Roychoudhury, R.K., 1987. Comparative efficacy of some indirect tests for the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in cow, Indian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 7, 146–147.Google Scholar
- Radostits, O.M., Gay, C.C., Blood, D.C. and Hinchcliff, K.W., 2007. Veterinary Medicine. W.B. Sanunders Co., Philadelphia. USA.Google Scholar
- Ruegg, P.L. and Reinemann, D.J., 2002. Milk quality and mastitis test, Bovine Practitioner, 36, 41–54.Google Scholar
- Schalm, O.W., Carroll, G. and Jain, J.C., 1971. Bovine Mastitis, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, USA.Google Scholar
- Schultz, L.H., Brown, R.W., Jasper, D.E., Mellan Berger, R.W., Natzke, R.P., Philpot, W.N., Smith, J.W. and Thompson, P.D., 1978. Current concept of bovine mastitis (National Mastitis Council, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA).Google Scholar
- Silva, I.D. and Silva, K.F. S.T., 1994. Total and differential cell count in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) milk, Buffalo Journal, 2, 133–137.Google Scholar
- Smith, D.R., 2006. Veterinary Clinical Epidemiology. 3rd Ed. (CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.).Google Scholar