Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 41, Issue 7, pp 1465–1473 | Cite as

Seroprevalence estimation and management factors associated with high herd seropositivity for Babesia bovis in commercial dairy farms of Puerto Rico

  • J. H. Urdaz-Rodríguez
  • G. T. Fosgate
  • S. D. Waghela
  • A. R. Alleman
  • D. O. Rae
  • G. A. Donovan
  • P. Melendez
Original Paper

Abstract

A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine individual cow seroprevalence of Babesia bovis in adult lactating dairy cattle of Puerto Rico (PR), to assess the associations of farm management factors on herd seroprevalence, and to document the species of ticks infesting cattle within these farms. Antibody activity against B. bovis was determined using an indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT). Serum samples were obtained from 2,414 adult lactating dairy cattle from 76 randomly selected commercial dairy farms. Herd seroprevalence ranged from 0 to 51% with an overall individual cow seroprevalence for B. bovis of 26%. Ticks were collected from animals on 7 (9%) of the 76 participating commercial dairy farms. All collected ticks (n = 87) were Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Factors associated with high herd seropositivity were dairy farms with calf but not heifer raising facilities (OR = 16, 95% CI = 3.0-86), having more than 4 neighbors with cattle (OR = 17, 95% CI = 1.6-178), same producer owning more than one farm (OR = 7.2, 95% CI = 1.6-32), and use of government services to apply amitraz on cattle (OR = 5.5, 95% CI = 1.5-20).

Keywords

Cattle Babesia bovis Management factors Boophilus Puerto Rico 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Authors want to thank the faculty and staff of the School of Agriculture at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus, the Agriculture Experiment Station, and the State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory Dr. Gabriel González-Calderín for providing the facilities, and equipment to carry out the fieldwork in Puerto Rico. This material is based on research supported by United States Department of Agriculture/ Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service Grant No. 2005-34135-18020 in Tropical/Subtropical Agriculture Research, Fondo para el Fomento de la Industria Lechera de Puerto Rico, and the Colegio de Médicos Veterinarios de Puerto Rico.

References

  1. Ahmed, J.S., 2002. The role of cytokines in immunity and immunopathogenesis of piroplasmoses, Parasitology Research, 88, S48-S50. doi: 10.1007/s00436-002-0616-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bock, R.E., Jackson, L., de Vos, A., Jorgensen, W., 2004. Babesiosis of cattle, Parasitology, 129, S247-S269. doi: 10.1017/S0031182004005190 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, W.C., Palmer, G.H., 1999. Designing blood-stage vaccines against Babesia bovis and B. bigemina, Parasitology Today, 15, 275-281. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4758(99)01471-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, W.C., Norimine, J., Knowles, D.P., Goff, W.L., 2006. Immune control of Babesia bovis infection, Veterinary Parasitology, 138, 75-87. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.01.041 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Camus, E., Montenegro-James, S., 1994. Bovine anaplasmosis and babesiosis in the Lesser Antilles: risk assessment of an unstable epidemiologic situation, Veterinary Research, 25, 313-317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrique, J.J., Morales, G.J., Edelsten, M., 2000. Endemic instability for babesiosis and anaplasmosis in cattle in the Bolivian Chaco, Veterinary Journal, 160, 162-164.Google Scholar
  7. Combs, G.P., 1989. History of tick eradication in Puerto Rico. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Animal Production and Health Paper, 75, 8-15.Google Scholar
  8. Cortes, M., Pantoja, A., Robles, W., Pantoja, J., 2005. Tick incidence in Puerto Rico, Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico, 89, 59-66.Google Scholar
  9. de Leon, D., Ruiz, T., Quinones, R., 1987. Ectrin spray in combination with Ectrin eartags and the control of Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) in dairy cattle, Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico, 71, 241-247.Google Scholar
  10. George, J.E., Pound, J.M., Davey, R.B., 2004. Chemical control of ticks on cattle and the resistance of these parasites to acaricides, Parasitology, 129, S353-S366. doi: 10.1017/S0031182003004682 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Georghiou, G.P., Taylor, C.E., 1977. Operational influences in the evolution of insecticide resistance, Journal of Economic Entomology, 70, 653-658.Google Scholar
  12. Goff, W.L., Molloy, J.B., Johnson, W.C., Suarez, C.E., Pino, I., Rhalem, A., Sahibi, H., Ceci, L., Carelli, G., Adams, D.S., McGuire, T.C., Knowles, D.P., McElwain, T.F., 2006. Validation of a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of antibodies against Babesia bovis, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, 13, 1212-1216. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00196-06 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Goff, W.L., Johnson, W.C., Molloy, J.B., Jorgensen, W.K., Waldron, S.J., Figueroa, J.V., Matthee, O., Adams, D.S., McGuire, T.C., Pino, I., Mosqueda, J., Palmer, G.H., Suarez, C.E., Knowles, D.P., McElwain, T.F., 2008. Validation of a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of Babesia bigemina antibodies in cattle, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, 15, 1316-1321. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00150-08 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnston, L.A., Leatch, G., Jones, P.N., 1978. The duration of latent infection and functional immunity in droughtmaster and hereford cattle following natural infection with Babesia argentina and Babesia bigemina, Australian Veterinary Journal, 54, 14-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1978.tb00262.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jonsson, N.N., 1997. Control of cattle ticks (Boophilus microplus) on Queensland dairy farms, Australian Veterinary Journal, 75, 802-807. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1997.tb15657.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jonsson, N.N., Bock, R.E., Jorgensen, W.K., 2008. Productivity and health effects of anaplasmosis and babesiosis on Bos indicus cattle and their crosses, and the effects of differing intensity of tick control in Australia, Veterinary Parasitology, 155, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.03.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Keirans, J.E., Litwak, T.R., 1989. Pictorial key to the adults of hard ticks, family Ixodidae (Ixodida: Ixodoidea), east of the Mississippi River, Journal of Medical Entomology, 26, 435-448.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mahoney, D.F., Wright, I.G., Mirre, G.B., 1973. Bovine babesiasis: the persistence of immunity to Babesia argentina and B. bigemina in calves (Bos taurus) after naturally acquired infection, Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 67, 197-203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahoney, D.F., Wright, I.G., Goodger, B.V., 1979. Immunity in cattle to Babesia bovis after single infections with parasites of various origin, Australian Veterinary Journal, 55, 10-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1979.tb09535.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. NRCS-USDA, 2006. Major land resource areas in the Caribbean area. Natural Resources Conservation Service-United States Department of Agriculture. Available at: http://www.mo15.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/mlra_pr.html, accessed 29 January 2009.
  21. OIE, 2004. Bovine Babesiosis. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals (mammals, birds and bees). Available at: http://www.oie.int/eng/normes/en_mmanual.htm?e1d10, accessed 29 January 2009.
  22. PRDA-ASDA, 2007. Orden Administrativa 2007-019. Puerto Rico Department of Agriculture Agricultural Services and Development AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith, R.D., Evans, D.E., Martins, J.R., Cereser, V.H., Correa, B.L., Petraccia, C., Cardozo, H., Solari, M.A., Nari, A., 2000. Babesiosis (Babesia bovis) stability in unstable environments, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 916, 510-520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Solorio-Rivera, J.L., Rodriguez-Vivas, R.I., Perez-Gutierrez, E., Wagner, G., 1999. Management factors associated with Babesia bovis seroprevalence in cattle from eastern Yucatan, Mexico, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 40, 261-269. doi: 10.1016/S0167-5877(99)00019-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Suthern, C.B., Combs, G.P., 1984. The Puerto Rico Tick Eradication Program. Proceedings, Eighty eighth Annual Meeting of the United States Animal Health Association, The Hyatt Regency Fort Worth Hotel, Fort Worth, Texas, October 21-26, 406-412Google Scholar
  26. Sutherst, R.W., Comins, H.N., 1979. The management of acaricide resistance in the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) (Acari: Ixodidae), in Australia, Bulletin of Entomological Research, 69, 519-537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sutherst, R.W., Norton, G.A., Barlow, N.D., Conway, G.R., Birley, M., Comins, H.N., 1979. An analysis of management strategies for cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) control in Australia, The Journal of Applied Ecology, 16, 359-382. doi: 10.2307/2402514 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tate, H.D., 1941. The biology of the tropical cattle tick and other species of tick in Puerto Rico, with notes on the effects on ticks of arsenical dips, Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico, 25, 1-24.Google Scholar
  29. Todorovic, R.A., Long, R.F., 1976. Comparison of indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) with complement fixation (CF) tests for diagnosis of Babesia spp infections in Colombian cattle. Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie, 27, 169-181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Torioni de Echaide, S., Echaide, I.E., Gaido, A.B., Mangold, A.J., Lugaresi, C.I., Vanzini, V.R., Guglielmone, A.A., 1995. Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit to detect Babesia bovis antibodies in cattle, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 24, 277-283. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(95)00485-F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Urdaz-Rodriguez, J.H., Fosgate, G.T., Alleman, A.R., Rae, D.O., Donovan, G.A., Binford, M.W., Melendez, P., 2009. Seroprevalence estimation and management factors associated with high herd seropositivity for Anaplasma marginale in commercial dairy farms of Puerto Rico, Tropical Animal Health and Production. doi: 10.1007/s11250-009-9332-9
  32. Wagner, G.G., Holman, P., Waghela, S., 2002. Babesiosis and heartwater: threats without boundaries. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 18, 417-430. doi: 10.1016/S0749-0720(02)00027-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. Urdaz-Rodríguez
    • 1
    • 5
  • G. T. Fosgate
    • 2
  • S. D. Waghela
    • 3
  • A. R. Alleman
    • 4
  • D. O. Rae
    • 1
  • G. A. Donovan
    • 1
  • P. Melendez
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical SciencesTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  3. 3.Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical SciencesTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  4. 4.Department of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  5. 5.111 Cecilio UrbinaGuaynaboUSA

Personalised recommendations