Browsing camels have access to different plant species in relation to the kind of pasture they can reach. A study was conducted in an arid region of Southern Tunisia to determine the dietary preference and forage quality of free ranging camels. Foliage consisting of leaves from Limonium pruinosum, Retama raetam and Stipa tenacissima, was collected during the dry season to evaluate the chemical characteristics and nutritional value of these browse fodder species. The dietary preference was studied using 15 adult camels which were selected from a herd of 50 animals appropriately marked for identification. There was a significant difference in the chemical composition and nutritional value of plant species collected. Based on crude protein (CP) content and nutritional value, the three fodder species browsed can be recommended as good-quality food source for camels under pastoral management.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Acid detergent fibre
Acid detergent lignin
Acid insoluble ash
Neutral detergent fibre
Nitrogen free extract
Aganga, A.A., Mosase, K.W., 2001. Tannin content, nutritive value and dry matter digestibility of Lonchocarpus capassa, Ziziphus mucronata, Sclerocarya birrea, Kirkia acuminata and Rhus lancea seed, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 91, 107-113. doi:10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00235-8.
AOAC. 1990. Official methods for analysis (15th edn), Association of Official Analytical Chemists (Washington DC, USA).
Bakshi, M.P.S. and Wadhwa, M., 2004. Evaluation of forest tree leaves of semi-hilly arid region as livestock feed, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 17, 777–783.
Barhoumi, Z., Djebali, W., Smaoui, A., Chaïbi, W. and Abdelly, C., 2007. Contribution of NaCl excretion to salt resistance of Aeluropus littoralis (Willd) Parl, Journal of Plant Physiology, 164, 842-850 doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2006.05.008.
Breman, H. and Kessler, J.J., 1995. Woody plants in agro-ecosystems of semi-arid regions with and emphasis on the Sahelian countries, AB DLO, Wageningen.
Dereje, M. and Udén, P., 2005. The browsing dromedary camel I. Behaviour, plant preference and quality of forage selected, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 121, 297–308. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.01.017.
Derouiche, R., 1997. Contribution à l’étude par modèle numérique de l’impact des aménagements de CES sur la recharge de la nappe de Zeuss-Koutine, (Mémoire de in d’études, INAT) 68.
Diatta, S., Salifou, I., Sy, M., Kaboré-Zoungrana, C. Y., Banoin, M. and Akpo, L.E., 2008. Assessment of germinative potentialities of sahelian forage tree: Maerua crassifolia Forssk., Capparaceae, Livestock Research for Rural Development, 20 (6).
Fall-Touré, S., Michalet-Doreau, B., Traoré, E., Friot, D. and Richard, D., 1998. Occurence of digestive interactions in tree forage-based diets for sheep, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 63, 63–78. doi:10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00127-8.
Genin, D., Khorchani, T. and Hammadi, M., 2007. Improving nutritive value of a North African range grass (Stipa tenacissima): Effect of dung ash and urea treatment on digestion by goats, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 136, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.08.013.
Georing, H.K. and Van Soest, P.J., 1970. Forage fiber analysis: apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications, Agriculture Handbook No. 379, USDA.
Kassilly, F.N., 2002. Forage quality and camel feeding patterns in Central Baringo, Kenya, Livestock Production Science, 78, 175–182. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00032-5.
Laudadio, V., Tufarelli, V., Dario, M., Hammadi, M., Seddik, M.M., Lacalandra, G.M. and Dario, C., 2008. A survey of chemical and nutritional characteristics of halophytes plants used by camels in Southern Tunisia, Tropical Animal Health and Production, in press, doi:10.1007/s11250-008-9177-7.
Moore, K.J. and Jung, H.J.G., 2001. Lignin and fiber digestion, Journal of Range Management, 54, 420–430. doi:10.2307/4003113.
Osuga, I.M., Wambui, C.C., Abdulrazak, S.A., Ichinohe, T. and Fujihara, T., 2008. Evaluation of nutritive value and palatability by goats and sheep of selected browse foliages from semiarid area of Kenya, Animal Science Journal 79, 582–589. doi:10.1111/j.1740-0929.2008.00567.x.
Papachristou, T.G., 1997. Foraging behaviour of goats and sheep on Mediterranean kermes oak shrublands. Small Ruminant Research, 24, 85-93. doi:10.1016/S0921-4488(96)00942-X.
SAS. 2000. SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 8.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC
Schwarz, J., Kirchgessner, M. and Stangl, G.I., 2000. Cobalt requirement of beef cattle – feed intake and growth at different levels of cobalt supply, Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 83, 121-131. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0396.2000.00258.x.
Tiffany, M.E.; Mcdowell, L.R., O’Connor, G.A., Nguyyen, H., Martin, F.G.; Wilkinson, N.S. and Katzowitz, N.A., 2001. Effects of residual and reapplied biosolids on forage and soil concentrations over a grazing season in north Florida. II. Microminerals, Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32, 2211-2226. doi:10.1081/CSS-120000278.
Van Keulen, J. and Young, B.A., 1977. Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies, Journal of Animal Science, 44, 282–287.
Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A., 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition, Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583–3597.
The present work was supported by the Italian and Tunisian cooperation funds. Thanks are due to the technicians of departments for their help in laboratory analysis.
About this article
Cite this article
Laudadio, V., Dario, M., Hammadi, M. et al. Nutritional composition of three fodder species browsed by camels (Camelus dromedarius) on arid area of Tunisia. Trop Anim Health Prod 41, 1219–1224 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-008-9303-6
- Camelus dromedarius
- Forage characteristics
- Dietary behaviour