Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 307–320 | Cite as

Analysis of production objectives and breeding practices of dairy goats in Kenya

  • R. C. Bett
  • I. S. Kosgey
  • A. K. KahiEmail author
  • K. J. Peters
Original Paper

Abstract

Production objectives and breeding practices of smallholder households participating in dairy goat breeding projects were analysed in relation to their ability to bring about sustainable genetic improvement in the dairy goat flocks in Kenya. A stratified survey involving 311 goat keepers in 4 project sites was used. This employed both qualitative and quantitative research methods to get a holistic view of dairy goats, and take into account the full array of contributions of dairy goats to the smallholder households. Milk production and sales of breeding stock were high priority functions for the objective to create a financial buffer. The breeding objective traits that farmers perceived as being of primary importance were milk yield, growth rate, body size, fertility and disease tolerance. There were logical trade-offs in the choice of these traits by farmers. Female dairy goats were mainly culled due to old age, poor fertility, small body size and poor health. Farmers did not place a large significance on unsatisfactory milk performance when culling female goats, mainly due to the very small production size and the high demand existing for breeding animals. Factors affecting milk yield and flock size presented satisfied a P < 0.1 significance level. The performance levels of dairy goats were mainly influenced by breeding strategies and the resource availability at the farm level. The optimisation of genotype x environment interactions remains the biggest challenge given the objectives set by the farmer.

Keywords

Production objectives Breeding practices Management strategies Smallholder farmers Dairy goats 

Abbreviations

DGAK

Dairy Goat Association of Kenya

HEL-EUCDGP

Higher Education Links-Egerton University Community Dairy Goats Project

HPI

Heifer Project International

Notes

Acknowledgements

The German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) is thanked for granting the first author the financial assistance to carry out this study. We also greatly acknowledge Humboldt University of Berlin and Egerton University for provision of facilities. Thanks to the Dairy Goat Association of Kenya, Heifer Project International and Higher Education Links-Egerton University Community Dairy Goats Project for their cooperation.

References

  1. Ajala, A.A., 1995. Women’s tasks in the management of goats in Southern Nigeria. Small Ruminant Research, 15, 203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayalew, W., Rischkowsky, B., King, J.M., Bruns, E., 2003. Crossbreds did not generate more net benefits than indigenous goats in Ethiopian smallholdings. Agricultural Systems, 76, 1137–1156 doi: 10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00033-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baiden, R.Y., 2007. Birth weight, birth type and pre-weaning survivability of West African Dwarf goats raised in the Dangme West District of the Greater Accra Region of Ghana. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 39, 141–147 doi: 10.1007/s11250-007-4354-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barillet, F., 2007. Genetic improvement for dairy production in sheep and goats. Small Ruminant Research, 70, 60–75 doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boonbrahm, N., Peters, K.J., Intisang, W., 2004. The influence of calf rearing methods and milking methods on performance traits of crossbred dairy cattle in Thailand. 1. Milk yield and udder health. Archives of Animal Breeding, 47, 211–224Google Scholar
  6. Boyazoglu, J., Hatziminaoglou, I., Morand-Fehr, P., 2005. The role of the goat in society: Past, present and perspectives for the future. Small Ruminant Research, 60, 13–23, doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyazoglu, J., Morand-Fehr, P., 2001. Mediterranean dairy sheep and goat products and their quality. A critical review. Small Ruminant Research, 40, 1–11 doi: 10.1016/S0921-4488(00)00203-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collier, R.J., Dahl, G.E., van Baale, M.J., 2006. Major advances associated with environmental effects on dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 1244–1253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Crepaldi, P., Corti, M., Cicogna, M., 1999. Factors affecting milk production and prolificacy of Alpine goats in Lombardy (Italy). Small Ruminant Research, 32, 83–88 doi: 10.1016/S0921-4488(98)00156-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DFID, 2003, Pakistan Participatory Poverty Assessment (Balochistan Province Report, August 2003). http://www.dfid.gov.uk/pubs/files/ppa-balochistan.pdf. (Date accessed 23 Dec. 07)
  11. Donkin, E.F., Boyazoglu, P.A., 2004. Diseases and mortality of goat kids in a South African milk goat herd. South African Journal of Animal Science, 34, 258–261Google Scholar
  12. Fröberg, S., Aspegren-Güldorff, A., Olsson, I., Marin, B., Berg, C., Hernández, C., Galina, C., Lidfors, L., Svennersten-Sjaunja, K., 2007. Effect of restricted suckling on milk yield, milk composition and udder health in cows and behaviour and weight gain in calves, in dual-purpose cattle in the tropics. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 39, 71–81 doi: 10.1007/s11250-006-4418-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gootwine, E., Pollott, G.E., 2000. Factors affecting milk production in Improved Awassi dairy ewes. Animal Science, 71, 607–615Google Scholar
  14. ILRI, 1999. Livestock Policy Analysis. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute) Training Manual 2. ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya. 264Google Scholar
  15. Jaitner, J., Sowe, J., Secka-Njie, E., Dempfle, L., 2001. Ownership pattern and management practices of small ruminants in The Gambia-implications for a breeding programme. Small Ruminant Research, 40, 101–108 doi: 10.1016/S0921-4488(00)00221-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kahi, A.K., Rewe, T.O., Kosgey, I.S., 2005. Sustainable community-based organizations for the genetic improvement of livestock in developing countries. Outlook on Agriculture, 34, 261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kosgey, I.S., Okeyo, A.M., 2007. Genetic improvement of small ruminants in low-input, smallholder production systems: Technical and infrastructural issues. Small Ruminant Research, 70, 76–88 doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kosgey, I.S., Rowlands, G.J., van Arendonk, J.A.M., Baker, R.L., 2008. Small ruminant production in smallholder and pastoral/extensive farming systems in Kenya. Small Ruminant Research, 77, 11–24Google Scholar
  19. Krause, A.-N., 2005. Breeding programmes for small ruminants in the tropics with special reference to the crossbreeding programme of the Dairy Goat Association of Kenya (DGAK), (Unpublished PhD Thesis. Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany)Google Scholar
  20. Marsland, N., Wilson, I., Abeyasekera, S., Kleih, U., 2001. Combining quantitative (formal) and qualitative (informal) survey methods. Socio-economic Methodologies for Natural Resources Research Best Practice Guidelines. Natural Resources Institute, Chatham, UK, 16 p. http://www.dfid.gov.uk/pubs/files/BPG10.pdf (Date accessed 23 Dec. 07)Google Scholar
  21. Min, B.R., Hart, S.P., Sahlu, T., Satter, L.D., 2005. The effect of diets on milk production and composition, and on lactation curves in pastured dairy goats. Journal of Dairy Science, 88, 2604–2615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morand-Fehr, P., 2005. Recent developments in goat nutrition and application: A review. Small Ruminant Research, 60, 25–43 doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mtenga, L.A., Kifaro, G.C., Berhanu, B., 1992. Studies on factors affecting reproductive performance and mortality rates of small East African goats and their crosses. In: S.H.B. Lebbie, B. Rey and E.K. Irungu (eds), Small Ruminant Research and Development in Africa, Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial Conference of the African Small Ruminant Research Network, AICC, Arusha, Tanzania, 7–11 December, 69–74Google Scholar
  24. Mwacharo, J.M., Drucker, A.G., 2005. Production objectives and management strategies of livestock keepers in South-East Kenya: Implications for a breeding programme. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 37, 635–652 doi: 10.1007/s11250-005-4253-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Olivier, J.J., Cloete, S.W.P., Schoeman, S.J., Muller, C.J.C., 2005. Performance testing and recording in meat and dairy goats. Small Ruminant Research, 60, 83–93 doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.06.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peacock, C., 2005. Goats — A pathway out of poverty. Small Ruminant Research, 60, 179–186 doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.06.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. PECAD, 2004, Production Estimates and Crop Assessment Division (PECAD), Foreign Agricultural Service, http://www.fas.usda.gov (Date accessed 23 Dec. 07)
  28. Peris, S., Caja, G., Such, X., Casals, R., Ferret, A., Torre, C., 1997. Influence of kid rearing systems on milk composition and yield of Murciano-Granadina dairy goats. Journal of Dairy Science, 80, 3249–3255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peters, K.J., Zumbach, B. 2002. Needs for research and development in livestock recording systems (LRS) in transition and developing countries. In: Development of Successful Animal Recording Systems for Transition and Developing Countries, Mäki-Hokkonen, J., Boyazoglu, J., Vares, T., Zjalic, M., (eds), Proceedings of the FAO/ICAR Seminar, Interlaken, Switzerland, 155–174Google Scholar
  30. Petheram, R.J., Basuno, E., 1986. Livestock component farming systems research in Java - The case for work with women. Agricultural Administration and Extension, 21, 119–127 doi: 10.1016/0309-586X(86)90048-8 Google Scholar
  31. Sinn, R., Ketzis, J., Chen, T., 1999. The role of woman in the sheep and goat sector. Small Ruminant Research, 34, 259–269 doi: 10.1016/S0921-4488(99)00078-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sölkner, J., Nakimbugwe, H., Zarate, A.V., 1998. Analysis of determinants for success and failure of village breeding programmes. In: Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, vol. 25, 11–16 January, 1998, Armidale, NSW, Australia, 273–280Google Scholar
  33. Thomas, D., Barton, D., 1995. Interactions between livestock production systems and the environment- Impact domain: Crop-Livestock Interactions, http://www.fao.org/ (Date accessed 23 Dec. 07)
  34. Wollny, C.B.A., 2003. The need to conserve farm animal genetic resources in Africa: should policy makers be concerned? Ecological Economics, 45, 341–351 doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00089-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. C. Bett
    • 1
  • I. S. Kosgey
    • 2
  • A. K. Kahi
    • 2
    Email author
  • K. J. Peters
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Animal Breeding in the Tropics and Sub-TropicsHumboldt University of BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Department of Animal SciencesEgerton UniversityEgertonKenya

Personalised recommendations