Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Characterization of local chicken production systems and their potential under different levels of management practice in Jordan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize the local chickens and their production systems and to investigate the opportunities for improvement. The study was carried out in 18 villages in northern Jordan with the participation of 120 households. Data were collected by individual interviews and surveys supported with structured questionnaires. A scoring system was developed to study the effect of different levels of management on chicken performance. The main reasons for keep local chickens were egg production and generation of income. The main features of the production systems were improper housing and inadequate hygiene. Newcastle disease, predators, and parasites were the main causes of flock losses. Purchasing rate was controlled by the chickens’ phenotype, sex and age, and by season of year. The average flock size was 41.6 (±32.9) chickens per household, with a hen:cock ratio of 6.4:1. The average effective population size was 15.35, which indicated a high rate of inbreeding (5.52%). The main selection criterion adopted by farmers was egg production. There were positive significant correlations (p < 0.001) between management level and chickens’ performance. Hatchability, survivability, flock size, number of clutches, egg weight and egg mass were the major parameters that improved significantly with improvement in management level. Local chickens fulfil significant functions in the livelihood of rural smallholders; however, many constraints affected the efficiency of the production systems. Solutions should start with improving the management practices and establishing an effective breeding system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

IB:

infectious bronchitis

MS:

management score

ND:

Newcastle disease

References

  • Ahlers, C., 1999. Erkrankungen und Produktionsverluste in der traditionellen Hünerhaltung in Nord-Malawi, (PhD thesis, Free University of Berlin, Germany).

  • Aini, I., 1990. Indigenous chicken production in South-East Asia. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 46, 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dessie, T. and Ogle, B., 2001, Village poultry production system in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 33, 521–537.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ekue, F.N., Poné, K.D., Mafeni, M.J., Nfi, A.N. and Njoya, J., 2002. Survey of the traditional poultry production system in the Bamenda area, Cameroon. In: Characteristics and Parameters of Family Poultry Production in Africa, (IAEA, Vienna), 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D.S., 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd edn, (Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondwe, T.N.P., 2004. Characterization of local chicken in low input-low output production systems: is there scope for appropriate production and breeding strategies in Malawi? (PhD thesis, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany).

  • Gondwe, T. and Wollny, C.B.A., 2002. Traditional breeding systems in smallholder rural poultry in Malawi. 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, August 19–23, Montpellier, France.

  • Guèye, H.F., 1998. Village egg and fowl meat production in Africa. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 54, 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson, E.L., 1992. In Situ Conservation of Livestock and Poultry, (FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 99; FAO, Rome).

  • Horst, P., 1989. Native fowl as reservoir for genomes and major genes with direct and indirect effects on the adaptability and their potential for tropically oriented breeding plans, Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 53(3), 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, S.M., 1993. Manipulation of the broody period to increase egg production of indigenous hens under rural conditions in Bangladesh. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 5(2) (http://www.cipav.org.co/cipav/pubs/index.htm).

  • Javed, K., Farooq, M., Mian, M.A., Durrani, F.R. and Mussawar, Shah, 2003. Flock size and egg production performance of backyard chicken reared by rural woman in Peshawar Pakistan. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 15(11) (http://www.cipav.org.co/cipav/pubs/index.htm).

  • Jordan Meteorological Department, 2006. http://www.jmd.gov.jo/.

  • Kondombo, S.R. Nianogo A.J., Kwakkel, R.P., Udo, H.M. and Slingerland, M., 2003. Comparative analysis in village chicken production in two farming systems in Burkina Faso. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 35, 563–574.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minga U.M., Katule, A.M., Maeda, T. and Musasa, J., 1989. Potential of the traditional chicken industry in Tanzania. In: Proceedings of the 7th Tanzania Veterinary Association Scientific Conference, TVA, 7, 207–215.

  • Missohou, A., Dieye, P.N. and Talaki, E., 2002. Rural poultry production and productivity in southern Senegal. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 14(2) (http://www.cipav.org.co/cipav/pubs/index.htm).

  • Mlozi, M.R.S., Kakengi, A.V.M., Minga, U.M., Mtambo, A.M. and Olsen, J.E., 2003. Marketing of free-range local chickens in Morogoro and Kilosa urban markets, Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 15(2) (http://www.cipav.org.co/cipav/pubs/index.htm).

  • Mopate, L.Y. and Lony, M., 1999. Survey on family chicken farms in the rural areas of N’Djam’ena, Chad. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 11(2) (http://www.cipav.org.co/cipav/pubs/index.htm).

  • Muchadeyi, F.C., Sibanda, S., Kusina, N.T., Kusina, J. and Makuza, S., 2004. The village chicken production system in Rushinga District of Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 16(6) (http://www.cipav.org.co/cipav/pubs/index.htm).

  • Mwalusanya, N.A., Katule, A.M., Mutayoba, S.K., Mtambo, M.M.A., Olsenand, J.E. and Minga, U.M., 2002. Productivity of local chickens under village management conditions. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 34, 405–416.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, W. and Wilson, R., 1999. An Introduction to Animal Husbandry in the Tropics, (Blackwell Science, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, C.V., 2002. Production of semi-scavenging chicken in Zimbabwe, (PhD thesis, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen).

  • Permin, A. and Pedersen, G., 2000. Problems related to poultry production at village level. In: G. Pederson, A. Permin and U.M. Minga (eds), Possibilities for Smallholder Poultry Projects in Eastern and Southern Africa, Network for Smallholder Poultry Project, Proceedings of the Workshop, Morogoro, Tanzania, 22–25 May 2000, (The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen).

  • Poate, C.D. and Daplyn, P.F., 1993. Data for Agrarian Development, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Great Britain).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J.A., 1999. Utilization of poultry feed resources by smallholders in the villages of developing countries. Proceedings of a Workshop on “Poultry as a Tool in Poverty Eradication and Promotion of Gender Equality”, 22–26 March 1999, (Tune Landboskole, Denmark), 311–335.

  • Roberts, J., Gunaratne, S.P., Wickramaratne, S.H.G. and Chandrasiri, A.D.N., 1994. The benefits from the use of a creep feeder for scavenging chickens in villages. Proceedings of 7th AAAP Animal Science Congress, Bali, Indonesia, II, 69–70.

  • SAS, 1999. SAS Users Guide, Version 8.1, (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

  • Szwaczkowski, T., Cywa-Benko, K. and Wezyk, S., 2003. A note on inbreeding effect on productive and reproductive traits in laying hens, Animal Science Papers and Reports, 21(2): 121–129 (http://www.ighz.edu.pl/?p0=5&p1=34&o=2113).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadelle, D.S., 2003. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of local chicken ecotypes in Ethiopia, (PhD thesis, Humboldt-University in Berlin, Germany).

  • Tadelle, D., Million, T., Alemu, Y. and Peters, K.J., 2003a. Village chicken production systems in Ethiopia: 1. Flock characteristics and performance. Livestock Research for Rural Development 15(1) (http://www.cipav.org.co/cipav/pubs/index.htm).

  • Tadelle, D., Million, T., Alemu, Y. and Peters, K.J., 2003b. Village chicken production systems in Ethiopia: 2. Use patterns and performance valuation and chicken products and socio-economic functions of chicken. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 15(1) (http://www.cipav.org.co/cipav/pubs/index.htm).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Animal Breeding and Husbandry in the Tropics and Subtropics, Georg August University Göttingen, Kellnerweg 6, 37077, Göttingen, Germany

    A. Abdelqader

  2. International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    C. B. A. Wollny

  3. Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Georg August University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

    M. Gauly

Authors
  1. A. Abdelqader
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. B. A. Wollny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Gauly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Abdelqader.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdelqader, A., Wollny, C.B.A. & Gauly, M. Characterization of local chicken production systems and their potential under different levels of management practice in Jordan. Trop Anim Health Prod 39, 155–164 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-007-9000-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-007-9000-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation