Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 155–164 | Cite as

Characterization of local chicken production systems and their potential under different levels of management practice in Jordan

Original Article


This study aimed to characterize the local chickens and their production systems and to investigate the opportunities for improvement. The study was carried out in 18 villages in northern Jordan with the participation of 120 households. Data were collected by individual interviews and surveys supported with structured questionnaires. A scoring system was developed to study the effect of different levels of management on chicken performance. The main reasons for keep local chickens were egg production and generation of income. The main features of the production systems were improper housing and inadequate hygiene. Newcastle disease, predators, and parasites were the main causes of flock losses. Purchasing rate was controlled by the chickens’ phenotype, sex and age, and by season of year. The average flock size was 41.6 (±32.9) chickens per household, with a hen:cock ratio of 6.4:1. The average effective population size was 15.35, which indicated a high rate of inbreeding (5.52%). The main selection criterion adopted by farmers was egg production. There were positive significant correlations (p < 0.001) between management level and chickens’ performance. Hatchability, survivability, flock size, number of clutches, egg weight and egg mass were the major parameters that improved significantly with improvement in management level. Local chickens fulfil significant functions in the livelihood of rural smallholders; however, many constraints affected the efficiency of the production systems. Solutions should start with improving the management practices and establishing an effective breeding system.


Jordan Local chicken Management Performance Production systems 



infectious bronchitis


management score


Newcastle disease


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahlers, C., 1999. Erkrankungen und Produktionsverluste in der traditionellen Hünerhaltung in Nord-Malawi, (PhD thesis, Free University of Berlin, Germany).Google Scholar
  2. Aini, I., 1990. Indigenous chicken production in South-East Asia. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 46, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dessie, T. and Ogle, B., 2001, Village poultry production system in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 33, 521–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ekue, F.N., Poné, K.D., Mafeni, M.J., Nfi, A.N. and Njoya, J., 2002. Survey of the traditional poultry production system in the Bamenda area, Cameroon. In: Characteristics and Parameters of Family Poultry Production in Africa, (IAEA, Vienna), 15–25.Google Scholar
  5. Falconer, D.S., 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd edn, (Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow).Google Scholar
  6. Gondwe, T.N.P., 2004. Characterization of local chicken in low input-low output production systems: is there scope for appropriate production and breeding strategies in Malawi? (PhD thesis, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany).Google Scholar
  7. Gondwe, T. and Wollny, C.B.A., 2002. Traditional breeding systems in smallholder rural poultry in Malawi. 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, August 19–23, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
  8. Guèye, H.F., 1998. Village egg and fowl meat production in Africa. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 54, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Henson, E.L., 1992. In Situ Conservation of Livestock and Poultry, (FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 99; FAO, Rome).Google Scholar
  10. Horst, P., 1989. Native fowl as reservoir for genomes and major genes with direct and indirect effects on the adaptability and their potential for tropically oriented breeding plans, Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 53(3), 93–101.Google Scholar
  11. Hossain, S.M., 1993. Manipulation of the broody period to increase egg production of indigenous hens under rural conditions in Bangladesh. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 5(2) (
  12. Javed, K., Farooq, M., Mian, M.A., Durrani, F.R. and Mussawar, Shah, 2003. Flock size and egg production performance of backyard chicken reared by rural woman in Peshawar Pakistan. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 15(11) (
  13. Jordan Meteorological Department, 2006.
  14. Kondombo, S.R. Nianogo A.J., Kwakkel, R.P., Udo, H.M. and Slingerland, M., 2003. Comparative analysis in village chicken production in two farming systems in Burkina Faso. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 35, 563–574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Minga U.M., Katule, A.M., Maeda, T. and Musasa, J., 1989. Potential of the traditional chicken industry in Tanzania. In: Proceedings of the 7th Tanzania Veterinary Association Scientific Conference, TVA, 7, 207–215.Google Scholar
  16. Missohou, A., Dieye, P.N. and Talaki, E., 2002. Rural poultry production and productivity in southern Senegal. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 14(2) (
  17. Mlozi, M.R.S., Kakengi, A.V.M., Minga, U.M., Mtambo, A.M. and Olsen, J.E., 2003. Marketing of free-range local chickens in Morogoro and Kilosa urban markets, Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 15(2) (
  18. Mopate, L.Y. and Lony, M., 1999. Survey on family chicken farms in the rural areas of N’Djam’ena, Chad. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 11(2) (
  19. Muchadeyi, F.C., Sibanda, S., Kusina, N.T., Kusina, J. and Makuza, S., 2004. The village chicken production system in Rushinga District of Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 16(6) (
  20. Mwalusanya, N.A., Katule, A.M., Mutayoba, S.K., Mtambo, M.M.A., Olsenand, J.E. and Minga, U.M., 2002. Productivity of local chickens under village management conditions. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 34, 405–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Payne, W. and Wilson, R., 1999. An Introduction to Animal Husbandry in the Tropics, (Blackwell Science, Oxford).Google Scholar
  22. Pedersen, C.V., 2002. Production of semi-scavenging chicken in Zimbabwe, (PhD thesis, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen).Google Scholar
  23. Permin, A. and Pedersen, G., 2000. Problems related to poultry production at village level. In: G. Pederson, A. Permin and U.M. Minga (eds), Possibilities for Smallholder Poultry Projects in Eastern and Southern Africa, Network for Smallholder Poultry Project, Proceedings of the Workshop, Morogoro, Tanzania, 22–25 May 2000, (The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen).Google Scholar
  24. Poate, C.D. and Daplyn, P.F., 1993. Data for Agrarian Development, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Great Britain).Google Scholar
  25. Roberts J.A., 1999. Utilization of poultry feed resources by smallholders in the villages of developing countries. Proceedings of a Workshop on “Poultry as a Tool in Poverty Eradication and Promotion of Gender Equality”, 22–26 March 1999, (Tune Landboskole, Denmark), 311–335.Google Scholar
  26. Roberts, J., Gunaratne, S.P., Wickramaratne, S.H.G. and Chandrasiri, A.D.N., 1994. The benefits from the use of a creep feeder for scavenging chickens in villages. Proceedings of 7th AAAP Animal Science Congress, Bali, Indonesia, II, 69–70.Google Scholar
  27. SAS, 1999. SAS Users Guide, Version 8.1, (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).Google Scholar
  28. Szwaczkowski, T., Cywa-Benko, K. and Wezyk, S., 2003. A note on inbreeding effect on productive and reproductive traits in laying hens, Animal Science Papers and Reports, 21(2): 121–129 ( Scholar
  29. Tadelle, D.S., 2003. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of local chicken ecotypes in Ethiopia, (PhD thesis, Humboldt-University in Berlin, Germany).Google Scholar
  30. Tadelle, D., Million, T., Alemu, Y. and Peters, K.J., 2003a. Village chicken production systems in Ethiopia: 1. Flock characteristics and performance. Livestock Research for Rural Development 15(1) (
  31. Tadelle, D., Million, T., Alemu, Y. and Peters, K.J., 2003b. Village chicken production systems in Ethiopia: 2. Use patterns and performance valuation and chicken products and socio-economic functions of chicken. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 15(1) (

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Animal Breeding and Husbandry in the Tropics and SubtropicsGeorg August University GöttingenGöttingenGermany
  2. 2.International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)Addis AbabaEthiopia
  3. 3.Institute of Animal Breeding and GeneticsGeorg August University GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations