Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 333–342 | Cite as

Reproductive performances of dairy cows in smallholder production system in Selalle, Central Ethiopia

Original Article
Accepted:

Abstract

A study was conducted to assess the reproductive performance and factors that influence reproductive efficiency of cows in smallholder dairy farms in Selalle, Central Ethiopia. Three hundred dairy farms (average herd size = 8) were visited and data on reproductive, breeding and management histories were collected and analysed. The overall geometric means for calving to conception interval (n = 382) and duration after last calving (n = 422) were 187 and 201 days in pregnant and non-pregnant cows, respectively. The least-squares mean calving to conception interval was higher (p < 0.05) in mixed crop–livestock production (MCLP) than in small urban dairy production (SUDP) systems and was lower (p < 0.01) in non-suckling than in suckling cows. District significantly influenced (p < 0.01) the least-squares mean duration after last calving and, among the districts, non-pregnant cows in Wuchale-Jida had the highest values, whereas cows in Sululta and Mulo had the lowest values. The overall average number of services per conception (±SD) and the first service conception rate were 1.6 ± 1.0 (n = 382) and 56% (n = 456), respectively. The prevalences of abortion, dystocia (assisted parturition), retained fetal membrane, vulval discharge/endometritis and pre-weaning calf mortality were 1.4%, 1.3%, 5.4%, 2.8% and 17.4%, respectively. The present estimates of extended calving to conception interval and duration after last calving indicate poor reproductive performances of cows in Selalle smallholder dairy farms. The pre-weaning calf mortality rate is highly significant. Accordingly, a further detailed investigation is necessary to identify and quantify the specific reproductive disorders and associated interacting factors attributing to such poor performance and to determine the causes and predisposing factors behind such high calf mortality.

Keywords

Dairy cows Ethiopia/Selalle Reproductive performance Smallholder 

Abbreviations

BCS

body condition score

CCI

calving to conception interval

DALC

duration after last calving

MCLP

mixed crop-livestock production

RFM

retained fetal membrane

SUDP

small urban dairy production

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albero, M., 1983. Comparative performance of F1 Friesian × Zebu heifers in Ethiopia. Animal Production, 37, 247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bekele, T., Kasali, O.B. and Alemu, T., 1991. Reproductive problems in crossbred cattle in central Ethiopia. Animal Reproduction Science, 26, 41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolanos, J.M., Meneses, A. and Forsberg, M., 1996. Resumption of ovarian activity in zebu cows (Bos indicus) in the humid tropics: influence of body condition and levels of certain blood components related to nutrition. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 28, 237–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brännäng, E., Meskel, L.B., Schaar, J. and Swensson, C., 1980. Breeding activities of the Ethio-swedish integrated rural development project. Part I: planning and goals—the multiplier herd system. World Animal Review, 36, 34–36Google Scholar
  5. Esslemont, R.J. and Peeler, E.J., 1993. The scope for raising margins in dairy herds by improving fertility and health. British Veterinary Journal, 149, 537–547PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Esslemont, R.J. and Kossaibati, M.A., 1996. Incidence of production diseases and other health problems in a goup of dairy herds in England. The Veterinary Record, 139, 486–490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Haile-Mariam, M., Banjaw, K., Gebre-Meskel, T. and Ketema, H., 1993. Productivity of Boran cattle and their Friesian crosses at Abernosa ranch, Rift valley of Ethiopia. I. Reproductive performance and pre-weaning mortality. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 25, 239–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ILCA, 1994. Annual Report and Programme Highlights, (International Livestock Research Centre for Africa (ILCA), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia)Google Scholar
  9. Kassa, T., 1990. Post-partum reproductive activity of indigenous zebu and Friesian × zebu crossbred cows in the Ethiopian central highlands. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12, 45–52Google Scholar
  10. Larsson, K., Jansson, L., Berglund, B., Edqvist, L.-E. and Kindahl, H., 1984. Post-partum reproductive performance in dairy cows. I: influence of animal, breed and parity. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 25, 445–461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Masama, E., Kusina, N.T., Sibanda, S. and Majoni, C., 2003. Reproductive and lactational performance of cattle in a smallholder dairy system in Zimbabwe. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 35, 117–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Msanga, Y.N., Bryant, M.J., Rutam, I.B., Minja, F.N. and Zylstra, L., 2000. Effect of environmental factors and of the proportion of Holstein blood on the milk yield and lactation length of crossbred dairy cattle on smallholder farms in NorthEast Tanzania. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 32, 23–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mukasa-Mugerwa, E., 1989. A Review of Reproductive Performance of Female Bos Indicus (Zebu) Cattle, (ILCA Monograph No. 6, ILCA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia)Google Scholar
  14. Mukasa-Mugerwa, E., Tegegne, A., Mesfin, T. and Teklu, Y., 1991. Reproductive efficiency of Bos indicus (Zebu) cows under artificial insemination management in Ethiopia. Animal Reproduction Science, 24, 63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Negussie, E., Brännäng, E., Banjaw, K. and Rottmann, O.J., 1998. Reproductive performance of dairy cattle at Assela livestock farm, Arsi, Ethiopia. I. Indigenous cows versus their F1 crosses. Animal Breeding and Genetics, 115, 267–280Google Scholar
  16. Nicholson, M.J. and Butterworth, M.H., 1986. A Guide to Condition Scoring of Zebu Cattle, (ILCA Monograph; ILCA Addis Ababa, Ethiopia)Google Scholar
  17. Peters, A.R., 1984. Reproductive activity of the cow in the post-partum period. 1. Factors affecting the length of the post-partum acyclic period. British Veterinary Journal, 140, 74–84Google Scholar
  18. Peters, A.R. and Ball, P.J.H., 1995. Reproduction in Cattle. 2nd edn, (Blackwell, Oxford)Google Scholar
  19. Randel, R.D., 1981. Effect of once daily suckling on post-partum interval and cow calf performance of first Brahman × Hereford heifers. Journal of Animal Science, 53, 755–757Google Scholar
  20. Randel, R.D., 1990. Nutrition and post-partum breeding in cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 68, 853–862PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. SAS, 2001. Statistical Analysis System, version 8.2, (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC)Google Scholar
  22. Shiferaw, Y., Tenhagen, B.-A., Bekana, M. and Kassa, T., 2003. Reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cows in different production systems in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 35, 551–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Spicer, L.J. and Echternkamp, S.E., 1986. Ovarian follicular growth, function and turnover in cattle: a review. Journal of Animal Science, 62, 428–451PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Swensson, C., Schaar, J., Brännäng, E. and Meskel, L.B., 1981. Breeding activities of the Ethio-Swedish integrated rural development project. Part III. Repproductive performance of zebu and crossbred cattle. World Animal Review, 38, 31–36Google Scholar
  25. Trail, J.C.M. and Gregory, K.E., 1981. Characterization of the Boran and Sahiwal breeds of cattle for economic characters. Journal of Animal Science, 52, 1286–1293Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Lobago
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Bekana
    • 2
  • H. Gustafsson
    • 3
  • H. Kindahl
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Department of Clinical SciencesSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Faculty of Veterinary MedicineAddis Ababa UniversityDebre ZeitEthiopia
  3. 3.Swedish Dairy AssociationEskilstunaSweden

Personalised recommendations