Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 195–206 | Cite as

Prevalence of antibodies to Brucella spp. and individual risk Factors of Infection in Traditional Cattle, Goats and Sheep Reared in Livestock–Wildlife Interface Areas of Zambia

  • J. B. Muma
  • K. L. Samui
  • V. M. Siamudaala
  • J. Oloya
  • G. Matope
  • M. K. Omer
  • M. Munyeme
  • C. Mubita
  • E. Skjerve
Original Article


A cross-sectional study was performed in the livestock–wildlife interface areas of Lochinvar and Blue Lagoon National Parks and the non-interface area of Kazungula to determine the prevalence of antibodies to Brucella spp. in domestic ruminants and identify individual animal risk factors of infection. A total of 1245 cattle from 124 herds and 280 goats and sheep from 29 flocks were tested sequentially for Brucella antibodies using the Rose Bengal test (RBT) and competitive ELISA. In cattle, individual seroprevalence ranged from 14.1% to 28.1%, while herd sero–prevalence ranged from 46.2% to 74.0% in the three study areas. No goat or sheep tested positive for Brucella antibodies. Three types of cattle grazing strategies were encountered: locally grazed herds (LGH), transhumantly grazed herds (TGH) and river flood plain grazed herds (FGH). Brucella seroprevalence was seen to vary according to area and grazing strategy: Lochinvar and transhumant grazed herds recorded the highest figures, respectively. Age, sex and history of abortion were found to have independent effects on individual seroprevalence. This study establishes that brucellosis is endemic in domestic animals in the livestock–wildlife interface areas of Blue Lagoon and Lochinvar national parks and the disease is also present in Kazungula. We observed that type of grazing strategy had significant impact on cattle Brucella seroprevalence and that transhumant herds were at high risk of being infected.


Brucella Seroprevalence Livestock–wildlife interface Zambia 



contagious bovine pleuropneumonia


(competiitve) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay


flood plain grazed herds


foot and mouth disease


locally grazed herds


odds ratio


percentage inhibition


Rose Bengal test


transhumantly grazed herds


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahmadu, B., Sikazwe, M.S., Sakala, R. and Pandey, G.S., 1999. Sero-prevalence of bovine brucellosis in cattle at Lusaka abattoirs. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa, 47, 119–121Google Scholar
  2. Al-Shamahy, H.A., Whitty, C.J.M. and Wright, S.G., 2000. Risk factors for human brucellosis in Yemen: a case control study. Epidemiology and Infection, 125, 309–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alton, G.G., Jones, L.M. and Pietz, D., 1975. Laboratory Techniques in Brucellosis (World Health Organization, Geneva), 63–34Google Scholar
  4. Anon., 2000. Annual Report of the Department of Research and Specialist Services, (Government Printers, Lusaka Zambia), 1–18Google Scholar
  5. Bell, L.M., Hayles, L.B. and Chanda, A.B., 1976. Evidence of reservior hosts of Brucella melitensis. Medical Journal of Zambia, 10, 152–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, L.M., Hayles, L.B. and Chanda, A.B., 1977. Serological evidence of Brucella melitensis infection in goats and eland in Zambia. Veterinary Record, 101, 305PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dooho, I., Martin, W. and Stryhn, H., 2003. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research, (AVC Inc., Charlottetown), 35–42Google Scholar
  8. England, T., Kelly, L., Jones, R.D., MacMillan, A. and Wooldridge, M., 2004. A simulation model of brucellosis spread in British cattle under several testing regimes. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 63, 63–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghirotti, M., Semproni, G., De Meneghi, D., Mungaba, F.N., Nannini, D., Calzetta, G. and Paganico, G., 1991. Sero-prevalences of selected cattle diseases in the Kafue flats of Zambia. Veterinary Research and Communications, 15, 25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Godfroid, J., Michel, P., Uytterhaegen, L., Desmedt, C., Rasseneur, F., Boelaert, F., Saegerman, C. and Patigny, X., 1994. Brucellose enzootique a Brucella suis biotype 2 chez le sanglier (Sus Scrofa) en Belgique [Brucella-suis Biotype 2 Infection of wild boars (Sus Scrofa) in Belgium]. Annaesde Médecine Veterinaire, 138, 263–268Google Scholar
  11. Godfroid, J., Saegerman, C., Wellemans, V., Walravens, K., Letesson, J.J., Tibor, A., McMillan, A., Spencer, S., Sanna, M., Bakker, D., Pouillot, R. and Garin-Bastuji, B., 2002. How to substantiate eradication of bovine brucellosis when aspecific serological reactions occur in the course of brucellosis testing. Veterinary Microbiology, 90, 461–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiwa, S.F.H., Kazwala, R.R., Tungaraza, R., Kimera, S.I. and Kalaye, W.J., 1996. Bovine brucellosis serum agglutination test prevalence and breed disposition according to prevalent management systems in the Lake Victoria zone of Tanzania. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 26, 341–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jordan, D., 1995. Herdacc: a program for calculating herd level (aggregate) sensitivity and specificity (Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G2W1, Department of population medicine, University of Guelph)Google Scholar
  14. Kadohira, M., McDermott, J.J., Shoukri, M.M. and Kyule, M.N., 1997. Variations in the prevalence of antibody to Brucella infection in cattle by farm, area and district in Kenya. Epidemiology and Infection, 118, 35–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kamweneshe, B., Beilfuss, R. and Simukonda, C., 2002. Population and distribution of Kafue Lechwe and other large mammals on the Kafue Flats, Zambia (Lusaka, Zambia Crane Wetland Conservation Project and WWF Partners for Wetlands Project), 1–23Google Scholar
  16. Kubuafor, D.K., Awumbila, B. and Akanmori, B.D., 2000. Sero-prevalence of brucellosis in cattle and humans in Akwapim-South district of Ghana: public health implications. Acta Tropica, 76, 45–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacPherson, C.N.L., 1995. The effect of transhumance on the epidemiology of animal diseases. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 25, 213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mainar-Jaime, R.C. and Vazquez-Boland, J.A., 1999. Associations of veterinary services and farmer characteristics with the prevalences of brucellosis and border disease in small ruminants in Spain. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 40, 193–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McGiven, J.A., Tucker, J.D., Perrett, L.L., Stack, J.A., Brew, S.D. and MacMillan, A.P., 2003. Validation of FPA and cELISA for the detection of antibodies to Brucella abortus in cattle sera and comparison to SAT, CFT, and iELISA. Journal of Immunological Methods, 278, 171–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Murry, P.R., Baron, E.J., Pflaller, M.A., Tenover, F.C. and Yolken, R.H., 1999. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 7th edn, (ASM Press, Washington, DC), 625–631Google Scholar
  21. Nicoletti, P., 1980. The Epidemiology of Bovine Brucellosis. vol 24, (Academic Press, London), 69–98Google Scholar
  22. Nielsen, K.H., Kelly, L., Gall, D., Balsevicius, S., Bosse, J., Nicoletti, P. and Kelly, W., 1996. Comparison of enzyme immunoassays for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 26, 17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nielsen, K.H., Kelly, L., Gall, D., Nicoletti, P. and Kelly, W., 1995. Improved competitive enzyme-immunoassay for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunoprophylaxis, 46, 285–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nielsen, K., Smith, P., Widdison, J., Gall, D., Kelly, L., Kelly, W. and Nicoletti, P., 2004. Serological relationship between cattle exposed to Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and Escherichia coli O157:H7. Veterinary Microbiology, 100, 25–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. OIE, 2004. Manual of the diagnostic test and vaccines for terrestrial animals. Office International des Epizooties, Paris, France, 409–438Google Scholar
  26. Omer, M.K., Skjerve, E., Woldehiwet, Z. and Holstad, G., 2000a. Risk factors for Brucella spp. infection in dairy cattle farms in Asmara, State of Eritrea. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 46, 257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Omer, M.K., Skjerve, E., Holstad, G., Woldehiwet, Z. and Macmillan, A.P., 2000b. Prevalence of antibodies to Brucella spp. in cattle, sheep, goats, horses and camels in the State of Eritrea; influence of husbandry systems. Epidemiology and Infection, 125, 447–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Orino, K., Hassebe, F., Kitada, R., Miyazaki, T., Matsushita, F., Mubiana, M., Sato, T. and Naiki, M., 1994. Prevalence of bovine brucellosis in Southern Province of Zambia. UNZA Veterinarian, 5, 5–7Google Scholar
  29. Pandey, G.S., Kobayashi, K., Kobayashi, K., Nomura, Y., Nambota, A., Mwima, H.K. and Suzuki, A.K., 1999. Studies on sero-prevalence of brucellosis in Kafue lechwe (Kobus leche kafuensis in Zambia). Indian Veterinary Journal, 76, 275–278.Google Scholar
  30. Perry, B.D., Mwanaumo, B., Schels, H.F., Eicher, E. and Zaman, M.R., 1984. A study of health and productivity of traditionally managed cattle in Zambia. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2, 633–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reviriego, F.J., Moreno, M.A. and Dominguez, L., 2000. Risk factors for brucellosis sero-prevalence of sheep and goat flocks in Spain. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 44, 167–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robinson, T.P., 1998. Geographic information systems and the selection of priority areas for control of tsetse-transmitted trypanosomiasis in Africa. Parasitology Today, 14, 457–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Robinson, T.P., Harris, R.S., Hopkins, J.S. and Williams, B.G., 2002. An example of decision support for trypanosomiasis control using a geographical information system in eastern Zambia. International Journal of Geographical Information in Science, 16, 345–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rottcher, D., 1978. Final Report, Veterinary Wildlife Research Officer, 1975–1978, (Lusaka, Zambia, Zambia Wildlife and National Parks and German Agency for Technical Co-operation (GTZ)), 1–87Google Scholar
  35. Sachs, R., Staak, C. and Croocock, C.M., 1968. Serological investigation of brucellosis in game animals in Tanzania. Bulletin of Epizootic Diseases in Africa, 16, 93–100Google Scholar
  36. Saiwana, L.M., 1995. Wildlife conservation and management in Zambia. In: L.M. Saiwana, The Effect of Enlargement of Domestic Animal Pasture on the Wildlife in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia, 22 March 1995, 15Google Scholar
  37. Salman, M.D. and Meyer, M.E. The epidemiology of bovine brucellosis in Mexicali Valley, Mexico: Literature review of disease associated factors. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 45, 1557–1560Google Scholar
  38. Siamudaala, V.M., Muma, J.B., Muangándu, H.M., Mulumba, M., 2003. Disease challenges concerning the utilisation of teh Kafue Lechwe (Kobus leche kafuensis) in Zambia. In: S.A. Osofsky, S. Cleaveland, W.B. Karesh, M.D. Kock, P.J. Nyhus, L. Starr and A. Yang (eds), Conservation and Development Interventions at the Wildlife/livestock Interface: Implications for Wildlife, Livestock and Human Health, Durban, South-Africa 14th–15th September 2003, 75–80Google Scholar
  39. Suzuki, A.K., Pandey, G.S. and Nambota, A., 1996. Serological examination of brucellosis in Kafue lechew. In: A.K. Suzuki, G.S. Pandey and A. Nambota (eds), The Effect of Enlargement of Domestic Animal Pasture on the Wildlife in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia, 22nd March 1995, 136–138Google Scholar
  40. Turkson, P.K. and Boadu, D.Q., 1992. Epidemiology of bovine brucellosis in the coastal savanna zone of Ghana. Acta Tropica, 52, 39–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. B. Muma
    • 1
    • 2
  • K. L. Samui
    • 1
  • V. M. Siamudaala
    • 3
  • J. Oloya
    • 2
    • 4
  • G. Matope
    • 5
  • M. K. Omer
    • 6
  • M. Munyeme
    • 1
  • C. Mubita
    • 1
  • E. Skjerve
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Disease ControlUniversity of ZambiaLusakaZambia
  2. 2.Department of Food Safety and Infection BiologyNorwegian School of Veterinary ScienceOsloNorway
  3. 3.Zambia Wildlife AuthorityChilangaZambia
  4. 4.Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineMakerere UniversityKampalaUganda
  5. 5.Department of Paraclinical Veterinary Studies, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of ZimbabweHarareZimbabwe
  6. 6.Norwegian Meat Research CenterOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations