Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 103–111

Prospective analysis for community participation in trypanosomosis control in The Gambia

Original Article


The shift towards community participation in the eradication of trypanosomosis calls for investigation the underlying incentive structure for individuals in the community to cooperate in the provision of various control methods. Survey data were used to assess patterns of the community’s demand for insecticide pour-ons and trypanocidal drugs and factors affecting individual} demand in The Gambia. The results show that insecticide pour-on is strongly preferred. Similarly, farmers revealed a preference for community-based provision scheme. Factors affecting an individual farmer’s decision to invest in either pour-on or trypanocidal drugs were highlighted. While there are many factors associated with farmer’s decisions to invest in trypanosomosis control methods and to participate in collective actions, the results indicate that farmers} are ready to anticipate complete privatization of veterinary services through community-based schemes.


Demand Trypanosomosis Control Livestock Community Participation The Gambia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adesina, A.A. and Baidu-Forson, J., 1995. Farmers’ perceptions and adoption of new agricultural technology: evidence from analysis in Burkina Faso and Guinea, West Africa. Agricultural Economics, 13, 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adesina, A.A. and Zinnah, M.M., 1993. Technology characteristics, farmer perceptions and adoption decisions: a Tobit model application in Sierra Leone. Agricultural Economics, 9, 297–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agyemang, K., Dwinger, R.H., Little, D.A. and Rowlands, G.J., 1997. Village N’Dama Cattle Production in West Africa: Six Years of Research in The Gambia, (International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya, and International Trypanotolerance Centre, Banjul, The Gambia)Google Scholar
  4. Bauer, B. and Snow, W.F., 1999. Sustainable integrated disease management (IDM) for the control of African animal trypanosomosis: Experiences in West Africa, (Policy paper, Programme Against African Trypanosomosis (PAAT) website
  5. Bishop, R.C. and Heberlein, T.A., 1979. Measuring values of extra market goods: are indirect measures biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 926–930Google Scholar
  6. Blanc, F., Gouteux, J.P., Cuisance, D., Pounekrozou, E., Le Masson, A., N′dokoue, F., Mainguet, M., D′Amico, F. and Le Gall, F. 1991. La lutte par piégeage contre Glossina fuscipes pour la protection de l′élevage en RCA. III. Vulgarisation en milieu Mbororo. Révue d’Elevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux, 44, 301–307Google Scholar
  7. Brightwell, B., Dransfield, B., Maudlin, I., Stevenson, P. and Shaw, A. 2001. Reality vs. rhetoric—a survey and evaluation of tsetse control in East Africa. Agriculture and Human Values, 18, 219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carson, R.T., Groves, T. and Machina, M.J., 1999. Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions, Plenary Address European Association of Resource and Environmental Economists, Oslo, Norway, June 1999Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, E., 1971. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice, 11, 17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Groves, T., 1973. Incentives in teams. Econometrica, 41, 617–631Google Scholar
  11. Groves, T. and Ledyard, J., 1987. Incentive Compatibility since 1972. In: T. Groves and R. Radner (eds), Essays in Honor of Leonid Hurwicz. (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis)Google Scholar
  12. Kamuanga, M., Sigué, H., Bauer, B., Swallow, B.M. and d’Ieteren, G., 2001. Farmers’ perceptions of the impacts of tsetse and trypanosomosis control on livestock production: evidence from southern Burkina Faso. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 33(2), 141–153Google Scholar
  13. Kamuanga, M., Somda, J., Snow, W. F. and Mugalla, C.I., 2004. Socio-economic analysis of tsetse control experiments in the central river division of the Gambia: Impacts and farmers’ perceptions. Pakistan Journal of Social Science, 2, 162–170Google Scholar
  14. Koma, L.M., 2003. Can private veterinarians survive in Uganda? In: D.K. Leonard (ed.), Africa’s Changing Markets for Health and Veterinary Services: The New Institutional Issues, (University of California Press, University of California International and Area studies Digital Collection, Edited Volume #5, 2003, article 6)Google Scholar
  15. Laughland, A.S., Musser, W.N. and Musser, L.M., 1994. An experiment in contingent valuation and social desirability. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 23(1), 29–36Google Scholar
  16. Leonard, D.K., 1993. Structural reform of the veterinary profession in Africa and the new institutional economics. Development and Change, 24, 227–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ly, C., 2003. Veterinary professionals in Senegal: allocation of priorities and working behavior. In: D.K. Leonard (ed.), Africa’s Changing Markets for Health and Veterinary Services: The New Institutional Issues. (University of California Press, University of California International and Area studies Digital Collection, Edited Volume #5, 2003, article 7)Google Scholar
  18. Mattioli, R.C., Jaitner, J., Clifford, D.J., Pandey, V.S. and Verhulst, A., 1998. Trypanosome infections and tick infestations: susceptibility in N’Dama, Gobra zebu and Gobra multi, N’Dama crossbred cattle exposed to natural challenge and maintained under high and low surveillance of trypanosome infections. Acta Tropica, 71, 57–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. McCarthy, N., McDermott, J. and Coleman, P., 2003. Animal Health and The Role of Communities: An Example of Trypanosomosis Control Options in Uganda, (EPTD Discussion Paper No. 103; International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC)Google Scholar
  20. McDermott, J. and Coleman, P.G., 2001. Comparing apples and oranges: model-based assessment of different tsetse-transmitted trypanosomosis control strategies. International Journal for Parasitology, 31(5–6), 603–609Google Scholar
  21. McDonald, J.F. and Moffitt, R.A., 1980. The use of Tobit analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 62, 318–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T., 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Methods, (Resources for the Future, Washington DC)Google Scholar
  23. Mugalla, C.I., 2000. Household Decision Making Under Different Levels of Trypanosomosis Risk: An Investigation of Factors Affecting Disease Control, Labor Participation, and Household Income Decisions in Rural Household of the Gambia, (PhD thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural sociology, Pennsylvania State University, Pittsburgh, USA)Google Scholar
  24. Niewijk, R.K., 2003. Misleading quantification/the contingent valuation of the environment quality. The Cato Review of Business & Government, (Cato Institute, Scholar
  25. Savadogo, K., Reardon, T. and Pietola, K., 1998. Adoption of improved land use technologies to increase food security in Burkina Faso: relating animal traction, productivity, and non-farm income. Agricultural Systems, 58(3), 441–464Google Scholar
  26. Snow, W.F. and Rawlings, P., 1999. Methods for the rapid appraisal of African animal trypanosomosis in the Gambia. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 42(2), 67–86Google Scholar
  27. Swallow, B.M. and Woudyalew, M., 1994. Evaluating willingness to contribute to a local public good: application of the contingent valuation to tsetse control in Ethiopia. Ecological Economics, 11, 153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tobin, J., 1958. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26, 24–36Google Scholar
  29. Uphoff, N., 1996. Learning from Gal Oya: Possibility for Participatory Development and Post Newtonian Social Science. (Intermediate Technology Publications, London)Google Scholar
  30. Varian, H.R., 1992. Microeconomic Analysis, 3rd edn, (W.W.Norton, New York)Google Scholar
  31. White, K.J., 1993. SHAZAM User’s Reference Manual Version 7.0, (McGraw-Hill, Canada)Google Scholar
  32. Whitehead, J.C., 2000. A Practitioner’s Primer on Contingent Valuation, (Department of Economics, East Carolina University)Google Scholar
  33. Williamson, O.E., 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, (Free Press, New York)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Trypanotolerance Centre, Banjul, The Gambia, and Department of Agricultural and Environmental EconomicsKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.International Livestock Research InstituteBobo DioulassoBurkina Faso
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural and Environmental EconomicsKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations