Advertisement

Tribology Letters

, 67:117 | Cite as

Temperature-Dependent Friction of Gemini Hydrogels

  • Eric O. McGhee
  • Juan Manuel Urueña
  • Angela A. Pitenis
  • W. Gregory SawyerEmail author
Original Paper
  • 197 Downloads

Abstract

Discussion and hypotheses regarding the dominant dissipation mechanisms in Gemini hydrogel sliding have often implicated viscous dissipation through shear rate and mesh size—essentially, if the dissipation is simply a result of viscous shear through a single mesh dimension at the surface, increasing viscosity, increasing sliding speed and decreasing mesh size will all increase the frictional shear. Based on the measurements of gel shrinking coupled with increasing viscosity with decreasing temperature, the expectation is that the friction will increase dramatically with decreasing temperature. Potential frictional dissipation mechanisms in hydrogel sliding were investigated by measuring friction coefficients over a range of temperature from − 20 °C (253 K) to + 20 °C (293 K). The gels were run in the Gemini configuration and were made from 7.5 wt% polyacrylamide (PAAm) formulations swollen in water. After casting, the hydrogel solvent (water) was exchanged with a 40:60 dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)–water solution by volume, which permitted experiments to be conducted below the freezing point of water alone (0 °C). The hydrogels were found to shrink as the temperature decreased, and measurements suggest that the mesh size changed from roughly ξ = 16 nm at + 20 °C to ξ = 10 nm at − 20 °C. The viscosity of the 40:60 DMSO–water solution was measured on a parallel plate rheometer over the range in temperature and found to increase from η = 1 mPa-s at + 20 °C to η = 12 mPa-s at − 20 °C. Experiments were conducted with 2-mm-radius spherical probes on flat sheets under reciprocating contact at a normal load of 2 mN, sliding speeds of either V = 10 µm/s or V = 1 mm/s and over a temperature range of − 20 °C to + 20 °C, at 5 °C increments. The entire system was allowed to equilibrate at each temperature, and the friction coefficients and associated uncertainties are reported. The friction behavior at V = 10 µm/s increased in proportion to the changes in viscosity and mesh size following the models, and had friction coefficients of µ = 0.01 at + 20 °C that increased to µ = 0.16 at − 20 °C. The high-speed sliding experiments at V = 1 mm/s were in the soft elastohydrodynamic lubrication regime, and the friction coefficient increased in proportion to the ratio of the viscosity changes, µ = 0.01 at + 20 °C to µ = 0.09 at − 20 °C. In the high-speed experiments, there was a dramatic shift in behavior from low to high friction around T = − 3 °C (270 K). Following the hypotheses of thermally activated friction, plots of the natural log of normalized friction (ln(µ/µo)) versus 1/RT were analyzed for both data sets and give activation energies of Ea = 16 ± 2 kJ/mol at V = 1 mm/s and Ea = 20 ± 2.5 kJ/mol at V = 10 µm/s. These activation energies are within the range of the activation energy of the viscosity for the DMSO–water solution, Ea = 15.9 ± 0.3 kJ/mol. Overall, these experiments clearly demonstrate that Gemini hydrogel friction increases with decreasing temperature and suggest that both viscosity and mesh size contribute to friction under direct contact sliding.

Keywords

Hydrogels Temperature dependence Biotribology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was graciously supported by a research grant from Alcon Research LLC. The authors would like to thank Anton Paar for supporting the Soft Matter Engineering Center Rheology Laboratory at the University of Florida and for helpful discussions. The authors also would like to thank Profs. Tommy Angelini, Fyl Pincus, Martin Müser and their groups for many helpful discussions.

References

  1. 1.
    Dunn, A.C., Sawyer, W.G., Angelini, T.E.: Gemini interfaces in aqueous lubrication with hydrogels. Tribol. Lett. 54, 59–66 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-014-0308-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reale, E.R., Dunn, A.C.: Poroelasticity-driven lubrication in hydrogel interfaces. Soft Matter 13, 428–435 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SM02111E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pitenis, A.A., Urueña, J.M., Schulze, K.D., Nixon, R.M., Dunn, A.C., Krick, B.A., Sawyer, W.G., Angelini, T.E.: Polymer fluctuation lubrication in hydrogel gemini interfaces. Soft Matter 10, 8955–8962 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4SM01728E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pitenis, A.A., Urueña, J.M., Nixon, R.M., Bhattacharjee, T., Krick, B.A., Dunn, A.C., Angelini, T.E., Sawyer, W.G.: Lubricity from entangled polymer networks on hydrogels. J. Tribol. 138, 042102 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032889 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pitenis, A.A., Urueña, J.M., Cooper, A.C., Angelini, T.E., Sawyer, W.G.: Superlubricity in gemini hydrogels. J. Tribol. 138, 042103 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032890 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McGhee, E.O., Pitenis, A.A., Urueña, J.M., Schulze, K.D., McGhee, A.J., O’Bryan, C.S., Bhattacharjee, T., Angelini, T.E., Sawyer, W.G.: In situ measurements of contact dynamics in speed-dependent hydrogel friction. Biotribology 13, 23–29 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2017.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Urueña, J.M., Pitenis, A.A., Nixon, R.M., Schulze, K.D., Angelini, T.E., Sawyer, W.G.: Mesh size control of polymer fluctuation lubrication in gemini hydrogels. Biotribology 1–2, 24–29 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2015.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dunn, A.C., Urueña, J.M., Huo, Y., Perry, S.S., Angelini, T.E., Sawyer, W.G.: Lubricity of surface hydrogel layers. Tribol. Lett. 49, 371–378 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-012-0076-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Beer, S., Kutnyanszky, E., Schön, P.M., Vancso, G.J., Müser, M.H.: Solvent-induced immiscibility of polymer brushes eliminates dissipation channels. Nat. Commun. 5, 3781 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4781 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shoaib, T., Heintz, J., Lopez-Berganza, J.A., Muro-Barrios, R., Egner, S.A., Espinosa-Marzal, R.M.: Stick-slip friction reveals hydrogel lubrication mechanisms. Langmuir 34, 756–765 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shoaib, T., Espinosa-Marzal, R.M.: Insight into the viscous and adhesive contributions to hydrogel friction. Tribol. Lett. 66, 96 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-018-1045-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beer, S., Müser, M.H., de Beer, S., Müser, M.H.: Alternative dissipation mechanisms and the effect of the solvent in friction between polymer brushes on rough surfaces. Soft Matter 9, 7234 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3sm50491c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gong, J.P.: Friction and lubrication of hydrogels -its richness and complexity. Soft Matter 2, 544 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1039/b603209p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu, Y., Wei, Q., Cai, M., Zhou, F.: Interfacial friction control. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2, 1400392 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201400392 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pitenis, A.A., Sawyer, W.G.: Lubricity of high water content aqueous gels. Tribol. Lett. 66, 113 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-018-1063-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Urueña, J.M., Hart, S.M., Hood, D.L., McGhee, E.O., Niemi, S.R., Schulze, K.D., Levings, P.P., Sawyer, W.G., Pitenis, A.A.: Considerations for biotribometers: cells, gels, and tissues. Tribol. Lett. 66, 141 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-018-1094-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doi, M., Edwards, F.S.: The Theory of Polymer Dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1986)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hamrock, B.J., Dowson, D.: Elastohydrodynamic lubrication of elliptical contacts for materials of low elastic modulus I—fully flooded conjunction. J. Lubr. Technol. 100, 236 (1978).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3453152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hamrock, B.J., Schmid, S.S.R., Jacobson, B.O.: Fundamentals of Fluid Film Lubrication. Marcel Dekker, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De Gennes, P.G.: Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1979)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kestin, J., Sokolov, M., Wakeham, W.A.: Viscosity of liquid water in the range −8°C to 150°C. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 7, 941–948 (1978).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmitz, T.L., Action, J.E., Ziegert, J.C., Sawyer, W.G.: The difficulty of measuring low friction: uncertainty analysis for friction coefficient measurements. J. Tribol. 127, 673 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1843853 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Burris, D.L., Sawyer, W.G.: Addressing practical challenges of low friction coefficient measurements. Tribol. Lett. 35, 17–23 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-009-9438-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schulze, K.D., Hart, S.M., Marshall, S.L., O’Bryan, C.S., Urueña, J.M., Pitenis, A.A., Sawyer, W.G., Angelini, T.E.: Polymer osmotic pressure in hydrogel contact mechanics. Biotribology 11, 3–7 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2017.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Urueña, J.M., McGhee, E.O., Angelini, T.E., Dowson, D., Sawyer, W.G., Pitenis, A.A.: Normal load scaling of friction in gemini hydrogels. Biotribology 13, 30–35 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2018.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Murat Ozmen, M., Okay, O.: Formation of macroporous poly(acrylamide) hydrogels in DMSO/water mixture: transition from cryogelation to phase separation copolymerization. React. Funct. Polym. 68, 1467–1475 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2008.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Canal, T., Peppas, N.A.: Correlation between mesh size and equilibrium degree of swelling of polymeric networks. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 23, 1183–1193 (1989).  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820231007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kagata, G., Gong, J.P., Osada, Y.: Friction of gels. 6. Effects of sliding velocity and viscoelastic responses of the network. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 4596–4601 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp012380w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vorvolakos, K., Chaudhury, M.K.: The effects of molecular weight and temperature on the kinetic friction of silicone rubbers. Langmuir 19, 6778–6787 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1021/la027061q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mandal, J., Simic, R., Spencer, N.D.: Impact of dispersity and hydrogen bonding on the lubricity of poly(acrylamide) brushes. Adv. Mater. Interfaces (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201900321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhao, X., Hamilton, M., Sawyer, W.G., Perry, S.S.: Thermally activated friction. Tribol. Lett. 27, 113–117 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-007-9220-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McCook, N.L., Burris, D.L., Dickrell, P.L., Sawyer, W.G.: Cryogenic friction behavior of PTFE based solid lubricant composites. Tribol. Lett. 20, 109–113 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-005-8300-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hamilton, M.A., Alvarez, L.A., Mauntler, N.A., Argibay, N., Colbert, R., Burris, D.L., Muratore, C., Voevodin, A.A., Perry, S.S., Sawyer, W.G.: A possible link between macroscopic wear and temperature dependent friction behaviors of MoS2 coatings. Tribol. Lett. 32, 91–98 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-008-9366-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringHerbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Materials DepartmentUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations